Perry, William R

AbstractAimMinimally invasive transanal platforms are now the standard of care for select low‐risk rectal tumours. However, existing platforms come with persistent technical challenges. The da Vinci SP Surgical System™ offers a new alternative designed to work effectively in narrow spaces. This technology has the potential to enhance the feasibility and proximal extent of complex transanal resections. This study aimed to describe the morbidity and technical success in patients undergoing single‐port robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (SPR‐TAMIS). Secondary outcomes include rates of local recurrence.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent SPR‐TAMIS at our institution between February 2019 and December 2023.ResultsThe study included 31 patients (19 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 61 ± 13.3 years. The average tumour distance from the anal verge was 10 cm. Thirty patients completed SPR‐TAMIS, with one patient requiring conversion to robotic sigmoidectomy due to location in the mid‐sigmoid colon. The mean operating time was 106 ± 42 min. Twenty‐eight out of 30 patients underwent full‐thickness excision and all but two were successfully closed. All specimens were resected intact, and margins were negative in 93.5% of cases. The average tumour size was 13 ± 34 cm2, with 13 lesions classified as adenomas and 16 as adenocarcinomas. All patients who did not undergo associated procedures were discharged on the day of surgery. Two patients experienced 30‐day morbidity. At a mean follow‐up of 18 months (± 13), no local or systemic recurrences were identified.ConclusionSPR‐TAMIS for excision of low‐risk rectal tumours is associated with high rates of technical success and low 30‐day morbidity. Further research is needed to compare SPR‐TAMIS with other techniques to determine potential advantages over current transanal platforms.

Objective: To compare robotic-assisted proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (R-IPAA) outcomes and laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA within a specialized robotic surgery center, using matching techniques to minimize potential confounding factors. Background: Minimally invasive approaches, particularly laparoscopy, have improved outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing IPAA. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential technical advantages, but its definitive superiority over laparoscopy in this context remains under debate. Methods: This retrospective, “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology”–compliant study analyzed 234 consecutive patients undergoing IPAA (117 robotic and 117 laparoscopic). Data encompassed patient demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. We employed various matching techniques to address potential bias. Primary endpoints focused on 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations, with secondary endpoints including hospital stay, blood loss, and stoma closure rates. Results: R-IPAA demonstrated a lower conversion rate to open surgery ( P = 0.02), a shorter hospital stay ( P = 0.04), and reduced blood loss ( P = 0.0003) compared with laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA. While overall 30-day morbidity rates were similar ( P = 0.4), matched analyses suggested a trend towards fewer reoperations and 3-month IPAA-associated complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure in the robotic group. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In a high-volume robotic surgery center, R-IPAA reduced the risk of conversion to open surgery while reducing intraoperative blood loss and providing shorter lengths of stay with equivalent perioperative outcomes. Promising trends to reduce 30-day reoperations and surgical complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure were observed after a matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Narrative operative reports may omit or obscure data from an operation. OBJECTIVE: To develop a synoptic operative report for rectal prolapse that includes core descriptors as developed by an international consensus of expert pelvic floor surgeons. DESIGN: Descriptors for patients undergoing rectal prolapse surgery were generated through review. Members of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium were recruited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process using a 9-point Likert scale. Descriptors that achieved 70% agreement were kept from the first round, and descriptors scoring 40% to 70% agreement were recirculated in subsequent rounds. A final list of operative descriptors was determined at a consensus meeting, with a final consensus meeting more than 70% agreement. SETTINGS: This survey was administered to members of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium. PATIENTS: No patient data are included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptors meeting greater than 70% agreement were selected. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six surgeons representing colorectal surgeons, urogynecologists, and urologists distributed throughout North America (56%), Latin America (4%), Western Europe (29%), Asia (4%), and Africa (1%) participated in the first round of Delphi voting. After 2 additional rounds and a final consensus meeting, 16 of 30 descriptors met 70% consensus. Descriptors that met consensus were surgery type, posterior dissection, ventral dissection, mesh used, type of mesh used, mesh location, sutures used, suture type, pouch of Douglas and peritoneum reclosed, length of rectum imbricated, length of bowel resected, levatoroplasty, simultaneous vaginal procedure, simultaneous gynecologic procedure, simultaneous enterocele repair, and simultaneous urinary incontinence procedure. LIMITATIONS: The survey represents the views of members of the Delphi panel and may not represent the viewpoints of all surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi survey establishes international consensus descriptors for intraoperative variables that have been used to produce a synoptic operative report. This will help establish defined operative reporting to improve clinical communication, quality measures, and clinical research. See Video Abstract. DESARROLLO DE UN PROTOCOLO OPERATORIO SINÓPTICO DERIVADO DE CONSENSO PARA EL PROLAPSO RECTAL: UN INFORME DEL CONSORCIO DE TRASTORNOS DEL PISO PÉLVICO ANTECEDENTES: Los protocolos operativos narrativos frecuentemente pueden omitir u oscurecer datos de un procedimiento. OBJETIVO: Nuestro objetivo es desarrollar un protocolo operatorio sinóptico para el prolapso rectal que incluya descriptores básicos desarrollados por un consenso internacional de cirujanos expertos en piso pélvico. DISEÑO: Los descriptores para pacientes sometidos a cirugía de prolapso rectal se generaron mediante revisión. Se reclutó a miembros del Consorcio de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico para participar en un proceso Delphi de 3 rondas utilizando una escala Likert de 9 puntos. Los descriptores que lograron un 70% de acuerdo se mantuvieron en la primera ronda, los descriptores que obtuvieron un 40-70% de acuerdo se recircularon en rondas posteriores. Se determinó una lista final de descriptores operativos en una reunión de consenso, con una reunión de consenso final de más del 70% de acuerdo. ESCENARIO: Esta fue una encuesta administrada a miembros del Consorcio de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Se seleccionaron los descriptores que cumplieron más del 70% de acuerdo. RESULTADOS: Ciento setenta y seis cirujanos en representación de cirujanos colorrectales, uroginecólogos y urólogos distribuidos en América del Norte (56%), América Latina (4%), Europa Occidental (29%), Asia (4%) y África (1%) participaron en la primera ronda de votación Delphi. Después de dos rondas adicionales y una reunión de consenso final, 16 de 30 descriptores alcanzaron un 70% de consenso. Los descriptores que alcanzaron consenso fueron: tipo de cirugía, disección posterior, disección ventral, malla utilizada, tipo de malla utilizada, ubicación de la malla, suturas utilizadas, tipo de sutura, cierre del fondo de saco de Douglas y peritoneo, longitud del recto superpuesto, longitud del intestino resecado, plastía de los elevadores , procedimiento vaginal simultáneo, procedimiento ginecológico simultáneo, reparación simultánea de enterocele y procedimiento simultáneo de incontinencia urinaria. LIMITACIONES: La encuesta representa las opiniones de los miembros del panel Delphi y puede no representar los puntos de vista de todos los cirujanos. CONCLUSIONES/DISCUSIÓN: Esta encuesta Delphi establece descriptores de consenso internacional para las variables intraoperatorias que se han utilizado para producir un protocolo operatorio sinóptico. Esto ayudará a establecer protocolos operativos definidos para mejorar la comunicación clínica, las medidas de calidad y la investigación clínica. (Traducción—Dr. Felipe Bellolio)

BACKGROUND: Primary tumors of the ischiorectal fossa are rare and comprise a wide array of pathologies with varying malignant potential. Because of the low prevalence, there is a paucity of data in the literature. This article presents a case series on the management of ischiorectal fossa tumors. OBJECTIVE: To present experience from 30 years of managing ischiorectal fossa tumors. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center analysis. SETTINGS: A quaternary referral academic health care center. PATIENTS: All patients treated for ischiorectal fossa tumors were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent surgical management of their disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease recurrence and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (53% women) were identified with a median follow-up of 23 months. Twenty-one patients (62%) were diagnosed with benign and 13 (38%) with malignant tumors. All underwent surgical resection. The median tumor size was 8.4 cm. R0 resection was obtained in 28 patients. Twelve patients (35%) developed recurrence (9 after R0 resection) after a median time of 6.5 months. There were no surgical-related mortalities. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to the study include its retrospective nature, single-center experience, and small patient sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Ischiorectal fossa tumors are primarily benign; however, they are associated with high recurrence rates even in the setting of an R0 resection. Treatment should be approached in a multidisciplinary manner, preferably in centers with experience treating these tumors. Close posttreatment surveillance is imperative. See Video Abstract. TUMORES DE LA FOSA ISQUIORRECTAL: EXPERIENCIA DE 30 AÑOS EN UNA SOLA INSTITUCIÓN ANTECEDENTES: Los tumores primarios de la fosa isquiorrectal son raros y comprenden una amplia gama de patologías con potencial maligno variable. Debido a la baja prevalencia, hay escasez de datos en la literatura. Este artículo presenta una serie de casos sobre el tratamiento de los tumores de la fosa isquiorrectal. OBJETIVO: Presentar una experiencia de 30 años en el manejo de tumores de la fosa isquiorrectal. DISEÑO: Análisis retrospectivo de un solo centro. AJUSTES: Un centro de atención médica académico de referencia cuaternaria. PACIENTES: Todos los pacientes tratados por tumores de la fosa isquiorrectal. INTERVENCIONES: Todos los pacientes se sometieron a tratamiento quirúrgico de su enfermedad. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Recurrencia de la enfermedad y supervivencia general. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 34 pacientes (53% mujeres) con una mediana de seguimiento de 23 meses. Veintiún pacientes (62%) fueron diagnosticados con tumores benignos y 13 (38%) con tumores malignos. Todos fueron sometidos a resección quirúrgica. El tamaño medio del tumor fue de 8,4 cm. La resección R0 se obtuvo en 28 pacientes. Doce (35%) desarrollaron recurrencia (nueve después de la resección R0) con una mediana de tiempo de 6,5 meses. No hubo mortalidades relacionadas con la cirugía. LIMITACIONES: Las limitaciones del estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva, experiencia en un solo centro y tamaño pequeño de la muestra de pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: Los tumores de la fosa isquiorrectal son principalmente benignos, sin embargo, se asocian con altas tasas de recurrencia incluso en el contexto de una resección R0. El tratamiento debe abordarse de forma multidisciplinaria y preferentemente en centros con experiencia en el tratamiento de estos tumores. Vigilancia cercana posterior al tratamiento es imperativa. (Traducción—Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez)

Importance Obesity adds complexity to the decision of surgical approach for pelvic organ prolapse; data regarding perioperative complications are needed. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate associations of body mass index (BMI) and surgical approach (vaginal vs laparoscopic) on perioperative complications. Study Design Patients who underwent prolapse surgery were identified via the Current Procedural Terminology codes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database 2007–2018. Thirty-day major complications were compared across BMI to identify an inflection point, to create a dichotomous BMI variable. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between BMI and complications. An interaction term was introduced to evaluate for effect modification by operative approach. Results A total of 26,940 patients were identified (25,933 BMI < 40, 1,007 BMI ≥ 40). The proportion of patients experiencing a major complication was higher in the BMI ≥ 40 group (2.0 vs 1.1%, P = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, the odds of a major complication was 1.8 times higher for women with a BMI ≥ 40 (95% confidence interval, 1.1–2.9, P = 0.04). There was a significant interaction between operative approach and BMI; therefore, further analyses were restricted to either vaginal or laparoscopic operative approaches. Among women who underwent vaginal prolapse repair, there was no difference in the odds of a major complication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.4; 0.8–2.4; P = 0.06). Among women who underwent laparoscopic repair, those with a BMI ≥ 40 were 6 times more likely to have a major complication (adjusted odds ratio, 6.0; 2.5–14.6; P < 0.001). Conclusions Body mass index ≥ 40 was associated with an increased odds of a 30-day major complication. This association was greatest in women who underwent a laparoscopic prolapse repair.

Abstract Background:Presacral tumors are a rare entity typically treated with an open surgical approach. A limited number of minimally invasive resections have been described. Aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic resection of presacral tumors. Methods: This was a retrospective single system analysis, conducted at a quaternary referral academic healthcare system, and included all patients who underwent a robotic excision of a presacral tumor between 2015 and 2023. Outcomes of interest were operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, length of stay, margin status, and recurrence rates. Results: Sixteen patients (11 females, 5 males) were included. Median age of the cohort was 51 years (range 25-69). Median operative time was 197 minutes (range 98-802). Median estimated blood loss was 40 ml, ranging from 0 to 1800 ml, with one patient experiencing conversion to open surgery after uncontrolled hemorrhage. Urinary retention was the only post-operative complication that occurred in 3 patients (19%) and was solved within 30 days in all cases. Median length of stay was one day (range 1-6). Median follow-up was 6.7 months (range 1-110). All tumors were excised with appropriate margins, but one benign and one malignant tumor recurred (12.5%). Ten tumors were classified as congenital (one was malignant), two were mesenchymal (both malignant), and five were miscellaneous (one malignant). Conclusions:Robotic resection of select presacral pathology is feasible and safe. Further studies must be conducted to determine complication rates, outcomes, and long-term safety profiles.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive angiomyxoma is a very rare mesenchymal tumor most commonly found in the pelvic and perineal regions. Although many are estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor positive, the pathogenesis is unknown. Due to its rarity, there is a paucity of literature relating to this pathology. This article presents a case series on the management of aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. OBJECTIVE: To present a 35-year experience managing aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective single-system analysis. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a quaternary referral academic health care system. PATIENTS: All patients treated for aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent surgical or medical management of their disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were disease recurrence and mortality. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (94% women) were identified with a median follow-up of 65 months. Thirty patients (94%) underwent operative resection and 2 patients were treated solely with medical management. Fifteen achieved an R0 resection (negative microscopic margins) at the index operation, of which 4 (27%) experienced tumor recurrence. There were no mortalities. No risk factors for disease recurrence were identified. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to our study include its nonrandomized retrospective nature, single health care system experience, and small patient sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive angiomyxoma is a rare, slow-growing tumor with locally invasive features and a high potential for recurrence even after resection with negative margins. Imaging modalities such as CT or MRI should be obtained to aid in diagnosis and surgical planning. Workup should be paired with preoperative biopsy and testing for hormone receptor status, which can increase diagnostic accuracy and guide medical treatment. Close posttreatment surveillance is imperative to detect recurrence. See Video Abstract. ANGIOMIXOMA AGRESIVO DE PELVIS: EXPERIENCIA DE 35 AÑOS ANTECEDENTES: El angiomixoma agresivo es un tumor mesenquimal muy raro que se encuentra más comúnmente en las regiones pélvica y perineal. Aunque muchos son positivos para los receptores hormonales como el estrógeno y la progesterona, la patogénesis es aún desconocida. Debido a su rareza, existe escasa literatura relacionada con esta patología. Este artículo presenta una serie de casos sobre el tratamiento del angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. OBJETIVO: Presentar una experiencia de 35 años en el manejo del angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. DISEÑO: Este fue un análisis retrospectivo de sistema único. AJUSTES: Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un sistema de salud académico de referencia de nivel cuaternario. PACIENTES: Todos los pacientes tratados por angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. INTERVENCIONES: Todos los pacientes se sometieron a tratamiento quirúrgico y/o médico de su enfermedad. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Los resultados primarios fueron la recurrencia de la enfermedad y la mortalidad. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron factores de riesgo de recurrencia. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 32 pacientes (94% mujeres) con una mediana de seguimiento de 65 meses. Treinta (94%) fueron sometidos a resección quirúrgica y dos fueron tratados únicamente con tratamiento médico. Quince lograron una resección R0 (márgenes microscópicos negativos) en la operación inicial, de los cuales cuatro (27%) experimentaron recurrencia tumoral. No hubo mortalidades. No se identificaron factores de riesgo para la recurrencia de la enfermedad. LIMITACIONES: Las limitaciones de nuestro estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva no aleatoria, la experiencia de un solo sistema de atención médica y el tamaño pequeño de la muestra de pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: El angiomixoma agresivo es un tumor raro, de crecimiento lento, con características localmente invasivas y un alto potencial de recurrencia incluso después de una resección con márgenes negativos. Se deben obtener modalidades de imágenes como CT y/o MRI para la ayuda diagnóstica y la planificación quirúrgica. El estudio debe combinarse con una biopsia preoperatoria y pruebas del estado de los receptores hormonales, que pueden aumentar la precisión del diagnóstico y guiar el tratamiento médico. Es imperativa una estrecha vigilancia posterior al tratamiento para detectar recurrencia. (Traducción—Dr Osvaldo Gauto)