Howard, Brian M

Background Multiple randomized trials could not establish the noninferiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone without preceding intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or superiority of IVT followed by EVT in anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion stroke. The role of prior IVT in posterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion remains controversial. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective study, patients with stroke with large‐vessel occlusion in the posterior circulation who received EVT alone or with IVT were selected from the stroke thrombectomy and aneurysm registry between 2013 and 2022. Effects of IVT followed by thrombectomy on favorable functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale≤3 at 90 days) and safety were investigated using multivariable logistic and linear regression models. Results Of the 588 included patients, 67% (n = 394) were treated with EVT alone and 29% (n = 170) with EVT after IVT, and 4% (n = 24) have missing values on this variable. Controlling for multiple confounding factors, IVT was not associated with a higher likelihood of favorable functional outcome at 90 days (odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.52–2.09; P = 0.901). Thrombectomy alone did not show any safety advantages compared with those receiving IVT. Conclusion Similar functional outcomes and complication rates were seen in patients with posterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion treated with EVT alone versus EVT after IVT. Further prospective studies are required to determine the utility of IVT in posterior circulation stroke, especially in patients being directly admitted to thrombectomy centers.

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients often require multiple passes during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to open the vessel. Yet, at times, even numerous passes are unsuccessful. This study aims to investigate the impact of the number of passes on the outcomes of patients who underwent failed MT. Methods: We used Data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) from 2013 to August 2023. Patients who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 with unsuccessful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≤ 2a) were included. Primary outcome was 90- day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. Secondary outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Outcomes were compared among patients who received ≤ 2, 3, 4, and ≥ 5 MT passes. Results: 736 patients met inclusion criteria. 90-day mRS 0-2 was found to decrease with number of passes (Figure 1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that 3 passes (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.23 -0.96, P-value: 0.04), 4 passes (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.19 -1.03, P-value: 0.07), and ≥ 5 passes (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08 -0.50, P-value: <0.001) were associated with lower odds of mRS 0-2 compared to ≤ 2 passes. However, there were no significant differences between groups in ICH, sICH, or 90-day mortality. Conclusion: The number of passes affects functional outcomes among stroke patients who underwent failed MT.

Introduction: Despite comparable outcomes for different frontline techniques in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), there are sparse data regarding if and when to switch techniques if the first pass is unsuccessful. We aimed to investigate the impact of converting from one MT technique to another on the second MT attempt for AIS among patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using data from the large multicenter international Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR). Data from 29 stroke centers for 10,229 AIS patients treated with MT for LVO between January 2010 and December 2022 was investigated. The primary outcome measure was successful recanalization defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score of 2b or higher. 90-day modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-2, mortality and symptomatic hemorrhage were used as secondary outcomes. Clinical and technical outcomes after the second MT attempt were compared between those with or without technique conversion. Results: Among 10,229 AIS patients, 1,797 AIS patients with LVO failed first pass recanalization and were included in this retrospective analysis. 927 patients were female (52%) and median (interquartile range) age was 72 (61-81) years. Converting to alternative techniques following a first failed attempt was more likely to be associated with successful recanalization at the second attempt (adjusted odds ratio 2.30, 95% CI: 1.37-3.86, P = 0.002) and 90-day good clinical outcome (adjusted odds ratio 2.10, 95% CI: 1.15-3.85, P = 0.02) after multivariate adjustment. Conclusions: This study demonstrates better clinical and technical outcomes with conversion of MT technique for the second attempt in AIS patients with LVO who failed first pass recanalization.

Introduction: The benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are not well established. Methods: This study included patients from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 occlusions with unsuccessful MT (mTICI score ≤ 2a). Patients who received IVT prior to MT were compared to those who received MT alone. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed using age, sex, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS), admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), occluded vessel, ASPECTS score, mTICI score, and symptom onset to groin puncture time. The primary outcome was favorable 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2). Results: Of 610 patients with unsuccessful MT, 219 were matched in each group. Median ages were 70 [IQR: 61 - 80] and 73 [IQR: 62 - 81] in the IVT + MT and MT alone groups, respectively. In the IVT + MT group. Final TICI scores of 0, 1, and 2a were achieved in 92 (42.0%), 33 (15.1%), and 94 (42.9%) patients, respectively, compared to 76 (34.7%), 29 (13.2%), and 114 (52.1%) in the MT alone group. The IVT + MT group showed a significantly. higher 90-day mRS of 0-2 (aOR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.53-4.32) and mRS of 0-3 (aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.12). There were no significant differences between the groups in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, or 90-day mortality rates. Conclusions: IVT is associated with improved functional outcomes in patients with unsuccessful MT. Ensuring that IVT is provided to all eligible stroke patients should remain a priority.

Introduction: Up to 50% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who undergo successful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) fail to achieve favorable outcomes (futile recanalization). In this study we aim to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict futile recanalization (FR) in AIS patients who undergo MT. Methods: We used data from an ongoing large, multicenter database from 2013 to 2023. We included AIS patients treated with MT for ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion with successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score ≥ 2C) and procedure durations under 60 minutes. FR was defined as successful recanalization with 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6. The dataset was divided into 75% for training and 25% for external validation. Using the Caret Package in R, multiple models were tested, and their performances were evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating. Both baseline and pre-interventional characteristics were incorporated into the model. The selected model was then externally validated on a 25% validation dataset. Results: Among 2,546 qualified patients, FR occurred in 1,342 (52.7%). In univariate analysis, baseline characteristics were significantly different between FR and non-FR groups. The M5P model demonstrated the highest performance (AUC: 0.833; 95% CI: 0.7989-0.852; PPV: 0.8101) in comparison to other tested models such as logistic regression (AUC: 0.74), RF (AUC: 0.78), J48 (AUC: 0.78), SVM (AUC: 0.79), and GB (AUC: 0.79). The external validation of the model showed satisfactory results (AUC: 75.25; 95% CI: 70-80; PPV: 76.87). Conclusion: Utilizing clinical, pre-procedural, and imaging parameters, the M5P model can efficiently predict F) in AIS patients before attempting MT. This tool can assist neurointerventionalists in adequately choosing their MT candidates.

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aims to analyze the outcomes and factors associated with decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) in AIS patients who underwent MT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from an ongoing, multicenter database to investigate AIS patients who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion. We compared clinical and procedural variables between patients who underwent DHC and those who did not. Propensity score (PS) matching between the two groups was conducted using age, sex, admission NIHSS, occluded vessel, ASPECTS, time from symptoms onset to arterial puncture, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Results: Among the 3,135 MT patients who met our inclusion criteria, 113 underwent DHC. A 1:3 propensity matching yielded a well-matched cohort of 113 in the DHC group versus 339 in the non-DHC group. The DHC group had a significantly higher rate of successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2C) (175 [51.6%] versus 36 [31.9%], P < 0.001) and a longer procedure duration, with a median of 30 minutes (IQR: 17-54) compared to 44 minutes (IQR: 25-78) in the non-DHC group (P = <0.001). Further comparison of patients with low ASPECTS (≤ 5) who underwent DHC (n = 36) with those who did not (n = 99) showed no significant difference in successful recanalization rates (15 [41.7%] versus 43 [43.4%], P > 0.90). However, procedure duration was significantly longer in the DHC group with a median of 29 minutes (IQR: 13-52), compared to 39 minutes (IQR: 27-86) in the non-DHC group (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Successful recanalization can help in preventing DHC in AIS patients with high ASPECTS, but not those with low ASPECTS. Procedure duration is independently related to DHC following MT, especially in low ASPECTS patients.

Introduction: While balloon guide catheters (BGCs) enhance safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions, their impact on distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of BGC vs non-BGC in DMVO thrombectomy. Methods: This retrospective study focused on DMVO cases defined as occlusions in M2-M4 middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery. Baseline characteristics and technical and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups, with subgroup analysis in first-line thrombectomy techniques, including ADAPT, stent retriever, and Solumbra. First pass effect (FPE) was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥ 2C after the first pass. Results: A total of 1,508 patients were included, of whom 231 (15.3%) were in the BGC group and 1,277 (84.7%) were in the Non-BGC group. The BGC group was associated with a lower mTICI score ≥ 2C (overall: 43.2% vs. 52.7%, p = 0.01; ADAPT: 42.2% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.01; Solumbra: 32.4% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.005), longer puncture to intracranial access time (overall: 15 vs. 8 min, p < 0.001; ADAPT: 17 vs. 8 min, p < 0.001; Solumbra: 12 vs. 8 min, p = 0.02), and longer puncture to recanalization time (overall: 97 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001; ADAPT: 100 vs. 28 min, p < 0.001; Solumbra: 78 vs. 46 min, p < 0.001; Stent retriever: 95 vs. 45 min, p < 0.001 ). The BGC group also had a lower FPE rate (17.4% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.03) in the Solumbra subgroup. In terms of clinical outcomes, the BGC group had a lower rate of distal embolization (overall: 8.8% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.02), but there were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes between the two groups in first-line thrombectomy techniques. Conclusions: Our findings showed that the use of BGC in DMVO had a lower mTICI score, reduced FPE rates, decreased distal embolization, and longer procedure times. Figure 1: Figure 2: