Jack, Clifford R.

AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies have reported that age modifies the distribution and burden of tau (and, to a lesser extent, amyloid) pathology in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here we present preliminary baseline amyloid and tau PET results from the Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS), a multi‐site longitudinal study of sporadic early‐onset AD.Method135 patients meeting clinical criteria for MCI or probable AD and 50 cognitively normal controls (all age<65 at enrollment) were enrolled at 12 US centers between August 2018 and December 2019 (Table 1). 18F‐Florbetaben amyloid‐PET (FBB) was used to assign patients to EOAD (amyloid‐positive) or EOnonAD (amyloid‐negative) subgroups based on visual rating and semi‐quantification. 130 patients and all controls had 18F‐Flortaucipir tau‐PET (FTP). Regional Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVR) for FBB (whole cerebellum reference) and FTP (inferior cerebellar gray reference) were extracted using co‐registered 3T‐MRI.Result98 patients (72.6%) were amyloid PET‐positive (EOAD) and 37 (27.4%) were amyloid PET‐negative (EOnonAD). Compared to EOAD, EOnonAD patients had higher MMSE, MOCA and CDR sum‐of‐boxes (CDR‐SB) and were more frequently male (Table 1). Patients with EOAD showed elevated FBB and FTP SUVR in temporoparietal and frontal cortex compared to CN and EOnonAD (Figures 1‐2). In EOAD, MMSE, MOCA and CDR‐SB were significantly correlated with FTP SUVR (Figure 3), while no significant correlations were found with FBB SUVR. EOnonAD patients showed variable FTP binding ranging from negative to mildly elevated binding in anterior temporal and frontal cortex and underlying white matter. Two EOnonAD cases showed intense FTP binding comparable to typical EOAD cases, despite visually and quantitatively negative FBB scans.ConclusionPatients with clinically mild, sporadic EOAD typically show an extensive distribution and burden of tau pathology in the setting of positive amyloid PET. Global clinical measures correlate with tau but not amyloid PET. Over 25% of patients meeting clinical criteria for early‐onset MCI/probable AD have negative amyloid PET, suggesting alternative etiologies for cognitive decline. These findings will inform future design of drug trials in this important and under‐studied population.

AbstractBackgroundGiven that a proportion of mild cognitive impaired (MCI) individuals are amyloid negative and have cerebrovascular disease (CVD), there is a need for biomarkers that can complement AD biomarkers (amyloid and neurodegeneration) for the prediction of future cognitive decline in MCI. The aim of our study was to determine the utility of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) as a CVD marker for prediction of future cognitive decline in individuals with MCI in conjunction with amyloidosis and neurodegeneration.MethodWe identified 132 MCI individuals ≥60 years old (55 % were amyloid positive and 59 % were male) from the population based sample of Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) who had structural MRI, DTI, amyloid PET, and at least one clinical follow‐up after the imaging at the time of their clinical visit as MCI. All imaging scans were acquired and processed using in house developed protocols and pipelines. We used fractional anisotropy in the genu of corpus callosum (FAGCC), as a CVD marker, education/occupation score as a resilience variable, and global cognitive z‐score as the cognitive outcome. Using mixed effect models for cognitive decline, we evaluated three models to test the prognostic ability of (i) DTI marker alone, (ii) DTI marker and amyloid PET, (iii) DTI marker, amyloid PET, and neurodegeneration (cortical thickness). The final parsimonious models included the significant interactions of potential predictors with time, main effects nested within those interactions, and other significant main effects. Since the adjustment for conventional CVD measures like WMH was important to determine the utility DTI over traditional measures, we further assessed the value of FAGCC in conjunction with white matter hyper intensity (WMH).ResultWe found: i) FAGCC was associated with cognitive decline after adjusting for amyloid PET neurodegeneration (Figure 1 and Table 1) and ii) FAGCC was associated with cognitive decline even after controlling for WMH and WMH was no longer significant after accounting for FAGCC (Table 2).ConclusionDTI has significant utility for prediction of cognitive decline in MCI from population‐based samples and will provide complementary information to AD biomarkers.

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies suggest that lifestyle changes (physical exercise, Mediterranean diet adherence, cognitive stimulation, vascular risk management) may protect against cognitive decline and reduce AD pathophysiology. The U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER) is a 2‐year randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether lifestyle interventions can protect cognitive function in older adults (60‐79 years) who are at increased risk for cognitive impairment and dementia. The POINTER Imaging ancillary study will assess effects of the POINTER lifestyle interventions on neuroimaging biomarkers of AD and cerebrovascular pathophysiology, and whether baseline neuroimaging measures predict cognitive responses to the interventions.MethodThe POINTER Imaging ancillary study aims to enroll 1250 participants from the five U.S. POINTER sites. Ancillary study participants will undergo PET imaging (Baseline, Month 24) to measure Aβ ([18F]Florbetaben) and tau ([18F]MK‐6240) burden, and MRI (Baseline, Months 12 & 24) to measure brain morphometry, white matter (WM) hyperintensities and microstructure, and cerebral blood flow. U.S. POINTER provides standardized cognitive, clinical, genetic (e.g. APOE), and lifestyle activity assessments, and demographics for integration with neuroimaging data.ResultThe study design and methods for the POINTER Imaging ancillary study will be presented. The study will examine whether: (1) neuroimaging biomarkers at baseline (Aβ, tau, hippocampal volume, WM hyperintensities) predict intervention‐related cognitive changes and (2) biomarker outcomes are differentially modified by participation in lifestyle interventions. It will also examine changes in exploratory biomarkers (tensor‐based morphometry, microstructural integrity, microbleeds, cerebral blood flow).ConclusionThe POINTER Imaging study aims to address gaps in our understanding of how a variety of lifestyle practices (diet, exercise, cognitive stimulation and vascular risk management) influence brain health. In particular, the study will determine whether imaging measurements of AD and cerebrovascular pathophysiology are amenable to improvement with the POINTER lifestyle interventions. It also aims to determine pathological profiles of individuals who benefit most from such interventions.

AbstractBackgroundThe critical‐period theory of menopausal hormone therapy (mHT) suggests that if menopausal hormone therapy begins shortly after menopause, it may have beneficial effects on brain structure and cognitive health. We investigated white matter integrity with diffusion tensor MRI (DTI) 3 years after the end of mHT trial in recently menopausal women who were randomized shortly after menopause.MethodParticipants of this study were enrolled in the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (aged 42–56 years; 5–36 months past menopause). Participants received the following treatments: 0.45 mg/d oral conjugated equine estrogen (oCEE, n=19); 50 μg/d transdermal 17β‐estradiol (tE2, n=22); or placebo (n=33) for 4 years. Oral progesterone (200 mg/d) was given to hormone therapy groups for 12 days each month. DTI was performed 3 years after the end of 4 years of hormone therapy (n=75), which corresponded to 7 years after randomization. Voxel‐based analysis was performed on DTI to evaluate fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) differences between treatment groups (uncorrected p<0.001).ResultVoxel based analysis showed higher FA, a measure of white matter integrity, in the superior corona radiata, anterior limb of the internal capsule and splenium of the corpus callosum of participants treated with oCEE compared to placebo (p <0.001, Figure 1A). Furthermore, higher FA was observed in the superior corona radiata, anterior limb of internal capsule and thalamus in participants treated with tE2 compared to placebo (p <0.001, Figure 1B). There were no differences in FA findings between oCEE and tE2 groups, and no MD differences between treatments groups.ConclusionA relatively higher FA in a variety of white matter regions in the oCEE and tE2 groups compared to placebo suggest that mHT may have long‐term protective effects on white matter integrity. Previously, we had shown that women in the tE2 group preserved their dorsolateral prefrontal cortex volumes better than the placebo group over 7 years. Our findings suggest that the tracts that connect the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the thalamus such as the superior corona radiata and the anterior limb of internal capsule may particularly benefit from mHT.

AbstractBackgroundCharacterization of the changes that occur throughout the transition from asymptomatic to symptomatic for those with familial frontotemporal dementia is essential for planning future disease‐modifying trials.MethodWe identified four related microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT) N279K mutation carriers who have phenoconverted from the asymptomatic to the symptomatic state. Key features were as follows: Case 1 (female) initial exam age 36, onset age 44, current age 49; Case 2 (male) initial exam age 39, onset age 43, current age 48; Case 3 (female) initial exam age 41, onset age 47, current age 53; Case 4 (male) initial exam age 36, onset age 37, current age 46. MRI and neuropsychological data were analyzed.ResultStructural MRI was analyzed using Tensor Based Morphometry Symmetric Diffeomorphic Image Normalization (TBM‐SyN) methodology to quantify lobar volumes, which was then analyzed using a Mixed Effects Model to determine the annual change in lobar volumes. The phenoconverters had a greater estimated annual rate of cortical atrophy in temporal (p <0.001), frontal (p <0.01) and parietal (p <0.05) lobes compared to non‐carriers, with the rate of annual change in symptomatic individuals double that of asymptomatic individuals. Annual change in the parietal and occipital lobes was also analyzed and found to be similar to healthy controls of a similar age. Raw scores on neuropsychological measures were converted to z‐scores for analysis. Category fluency, letter fluency, and Trails A and B were all impaired (z‐score <‐1.5) following phenoconversion, but performance on these and other measures was variable across these four in the late asymptomatic state.ConclusionFor each of the four phenoconverters, structural MRI changes preceded symptom onset, whereas neuropsychological performance was more variable and occurred in closer proximity to the time of phenoconversion. Decrements in verbal fluency and cognitive flexibility were observed earlier than other cognitive domains. These findings suggest that changes in frontal and temporal volume on MRI precede symptom onset, with regional brain volumes most consistently tracking the evolution from the asymptomatic to symptomatic state in N279K MAPT mutation carriers. Supported by: AG063911, AG045390, NS092089, AG016976, AG016574, AG062677.

AbstractBackgroundPractice effects can obscure interpretation of longitudinal cognitive performance. Reliable change indices (RCIs) provide data for determining a significant change, typically for a single repeat assessment, but multiple follow‐up visits are common clinically and in research cohorts. Further, regression‐based or linear mixed effects models improve prediction of future cognitive decline and have higher correlations with neuroimaging biomarkers than RCI approaches. We present norms for change for the Auditory Verbal Learning Tests (AVLT) with conditional normative z‐scores for up to 7 repeat assessments, and demonstrate application of this method to individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodNormative Sample: Robust conditional norms were derived from 1001 adults ages 50‐90 from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) who completed the AVLT across 4‐8 visits approximately 15 months apart and remained cognitively unimpaired (CU) across all available visits. Linear mixed effects models were used to compute a conditional normative z‐score for AVLT 30‐minute recall and sum of trials. Models included adjustment for baseline performance, number of prior test exposures, demographic factors (age, sex, education), and interactions (baseline*time; sex*time). Test Sample: We used a preclinical AD sample with positive amyloid and tau imaging (n= 27 CU A+T+; Jack et al. 2017) expected to have a higher rate of intra‐individual cognitive decline relative to CU A‐T‐ individuals (n = 268) to compare mean performances of conditional normative z‐scores to typical age‐corrected Mayo’s Older Americans Normative Studies (MOANS) norms. Participants had at least 1 and up to 4 follow‐up visits, with their most recent AT data used for classification.ResultAVLT performance based on typical norms did not differ across A+T+ and A‐T‐ groups. Specifically, across 2‐4 follow‐up visits, the typical norms mean z‐score was similar across groups (p=0.945; see Table 1). However, the conditional norms mean z‐score that accounts for practice effects and typical trajectories of AVLT performance was lower in the A+T+ relative to the A‐T‐ group for 30‐minute recall (p=0.055) and sum of trials (p=0.060).ConclusionConditional normative methods that account for practice effects are more sensitive to preclinical AD than typical norms, and show promise for identifying transitional cognitive decline.

AbstractBackgroundThe numeric clinical staging scheme described by the NIA‐AA workgroup proposes evidence of subtle decline on longitudinal cognitive testing as one option to define transitional cognitive decline for individuals in the Alzheimer’s continuum. Few studies have compared longitudinal and cross‐sectional definitions of subtle objective cognitive impairment (sOBJ). The study aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of cross‐sectional sOBJ and longitudinal objective cognitive decline (ΔOBJ) for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) based on Cogstate One Card Learning (OCL) performance.MethodWe included Mayo Clinic Study of Aging cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants who were A+T+ by amyloid and tau PET assessment (n=32) and A‐T‐ (n=211); all had at least two follow‐up visits. sOBJ was defined as performance ≤ ‐1SD on OCL accuracy using age‐corrected normative data. ΔOBJ was measured using two different methods: (1) within subjects’ standard deviation (WSD) using a ≤ ‐1 z‐score for change to define decline based on Cogstate’s normative change data, and (2) extracted subject‐specific slopes from a linear mixed effects model (LME) which can be interpreted as approximate annual change; decline was defined as slope < 10%ile among a reference sample of CU participants aged 50‐65 at baseline (N=732).ResultssOBJ and ΔOBJ‐WSD both showed low sensitivity in detection of A+T+ (9.4% and 12.5%, respectively). Total AUC values did not differ significantly (p=.31) across sOBJ (AUC = .64, CI = .53‐.75) and ΔOBJ‐WSD (AUC = .53, CI = .42‐.65) methods. Sensitivity of the ΔOBJ‐LME method to predict A+T+ was improved (37.5%) when using a conventional cutoff of <10%ile slope and was further improved (56%) when using an optimal derived cutoff equivalent to <17%ile slope within the reference group. Like the sOBJ method, the ΔOBJ‐LME method differentiated groups better than chance (AUC = .69, CI = .58‐.80). Despite increased sensitivity, total AUC values were not significantly different across sOBJ and ΔOBJ‐LME methods (p=.34). However, total AUC of ΔOBJ‐LME was significantly better than ΔOBJ‐WSD (p=.03).ConclusionsΔOBJ may be more sensitive to preclinical AD than sOBJ and may serve as a helpful method for identifying at risk CU individuals if advanced statistical methods are used for defining change.

AbstractBackgroundWe report a group of individuals presenting with a progressive dementia syndrome characterized by predominant dysfunction in core executive functions and positive biomarkers for Alzheimer’s pathophysiology.MethodIn this retrospective review, we report on 55 participants with a clinically defined progressive dysexecutive syndrome with 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography (FDG) and AD biomarker positivity. A subset of these individuals enrolled in our ADRC were compared to other phenotypic variants of AD.ResultSixty‐two percent were female with a mean of 15.2 years of education. Mean age of symptom onset was 53.8 while mean age at diagnosis was 57.2 years. Multi‐domain cognitive impairment was evident in neuropsychological testing with executive dysfunction most consistently and severely affected. The frontal and/or parietal regions demonstrate clear hypometabolism on positron emission tomography in all cases. Genetic testing for autosomal dominant genes was negative in all 8 participants tested and at least one APOE ε4 allele was present in 14/26. EEG was abnormal in 14/17 cases. CSF and neuroimaging biomarkers (PIB‐PET and Tau‐PET) were consistent with Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology, although CSF p‐tau was normal in 24% of cases. In two participants that came to autopsy, the hippocampus was relatively spared compared to frontal and parietal cortex. Participants presenting with a progressive dysexecutive syndrome and evidence of AD pathology are labeled dAD. Comparing FDG in dAD relative to other AD phenotypes revealed unique areas of relatively greater hypometabolism in parieto‐frontal cortex and relative sparing of medial temporal (vs typical AD), visual (vs PCA), and left temporal (vs lvPPA) (Figure 1). Controlling for age did not alter patterns of regional differences. This demonstrates regional variability related to clinical phenotype not accountable by variation in age, duration, stage, or severity (Figure 2).ConclusionA progressive dysexecutive syndrome should be recognized as a distinct clinical phenotype. This clinical presentation can be due to Alzheimer’s disease but is not specific for any single etiology (non‐AD cases of progressive dysexecutive syndrome will be discussed). Prominent impairment of executive task performance, young‐age of onset, normal CSF p‐tau, and relative preservation of the hippocampus were commonly encountered in this case series of dAD.

AbstractBackgroundThe NIA‐AA Research Framework for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) includes consideration of two clinical schemes for staging AD: (1) traditional cognitively unimpaired (CU) to MCI to dementia and (2) a new numeric staging (1‐6) for individuals who are on the Alzheimer’s continuum.MethodThe Mayo Clinic Study of Aging is a population‐based longitudinal study of aging and cognitive impairment in Olmsted County, Minnesota. We analyzed CU persons who had completed three consecutive clinical visits and calculated measures for cross‐sectional categories: objective cognitive impairment and function and measures for change including subjective cognitive impairment (SCD), objective cognitive change (ΔOBJ), and new onset of neurobehavioral symptoms (NBS). We calculated the frequencies for Stage 2 by varying the cutoffs for each of the measures above and assessed stability of this stage over 15 months.ResultThe frequency of Stage 2 varied from 5‐48% depending upon the age of the participants and the cutoff scores used. Membership in Stage 2 required abnormal SCD, ΔOBJ, or ΔNBS and having only ΔOBJ abnormal was the primary reason for inclusion in Stage 2 (45‐62%) followed by 10‐21% having only SCD abnormal. The stability of Stage 2 over 15 months ranged from 31‐65% with 5‐13% progressing to Stage 3 or higher and 22‐43% percent reverting to Stage 1.ConclusionStage 2 was characterized as a transitional period between CU and MCI and could be operationalized with a variety of measures. The staging scheme performed well considering the variables evaluated and cutoff scores employed.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter changes and Alzheimer’s disease pathology frequently co‐exist in the population. Recently we empirically derived subtypes of incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and found that there was significant heterogeneity not only in cognitive impairment profiles but also gray matter atrophy suggesting that multiple etiologies may contribute to cognitive impairment in these subtypes. The aim of this study was to examine differences in white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume in these same MCI subtypes and investigate amyloid deposition in a smaller subset.MethodWe analyzed data from 188 participants with incident MCI enrolled in the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) identified as having one of four MCI subtypes: subtle cognitive impairment (SCI), amnestic, dysnomic, and dysexecutive. All participants completed 3T imaging at the time of the MCI diagnosis. Using WMH volume scaled by TIV and PIB SUVR, we compared each MCI subtype to 344 cognitively impaired (CU) participants (mean age 78; 46% women) and each other.ResultThe amnestic (n = 83; mean age 80; 43% women), dysnomic (n = 30; mean age 84; 47% women) and dysexecutive subtypes (n = 49; mean age 83; 35% women) had significantly higher WMH volumes compared to CU (p < .02) while the SCI subtype (n = 26; mean age 80; 23% women) did not differ from CU (p = .76). Amongst the MCI subtypes, the amnestic (p = .04) and dysexecutive subtypes (p = .01) had significantly higher WMH volumes than the SCI subtype [Figure 1]. In a smaller subset of individuals who also completed PiB‐PET (17/26 SCI; 39/83 amnestic; 10/30 dysnomic, 28/49 dysexecutive), we found evidence for higher amyloid load in all MCI subgroups except the SCI group (p<0.05) in comparison to CU.ConclusionWe found significantly elevated levels of WMH and amyloid burden in amnestic, dysnomic, and dysexecutive subtypes of incident MCI supporting the notion that both vascular changes and amyloid contribute to the development of clinical symptoms. Surprisingly, WMH and amyloid positivity were not high in SCI suggesting that the pathophysiology in this group needs further investigation.