Back to Authors

Collins, Jessica A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0659-3762

Mayo Clinic

Massachusetts General Hospital

Citations 4

Neurodegeneration in the Longitudinal Evaluation of Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS) sample: Results from the MRI core
Collins, Jessica A. , Ezzo, Rania , Borowski, Bret, Bourakova, Viktoriya, Eloyan, Ani , Aisen, Paul , Fagan, Anne M. , Gatsonis, Constantine , Kramer, Joel H. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Apostolova, Liana G. , Dickerson, Brad C., Vemuri, Prashanthi , Iaccarino, Leonardo , Joie, Renaud La , Lesman‐Segev, Orit H. , Foroud, Tatiana , Jack, Clifford R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Saykin, Andrew J. , Toga, Arthur W. , Day, Gregory S. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Wolk, David A. , Wingo, Thomas S , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 7, 2020 | Volume: 16 | Issue: S5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.046338 Get It

AbstractBackgroundApproximately 5% of the 5.6 million (∼280,000) Americans with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) develop symptoms at age 65 or younger and are classified as having early‐onset AD (EOAD). Although EOAD and late‐onset AD (LOAD) share the same pathologic substrate, there are notable differences in their clinical and biological phenotypes. The Longitudinal Early‐onset AD study (LEADS) is a multi‐site, observational clinical and biomarker study of EOAD. In the present study we utilized the currently available LEADS imaging data to explore the spatial extent and magnitude of neurodegeneration EOADMethod95 amyloid positive patients with EOAD, 37 amyloid negative cognitively impaired patients (EOnonAD) , and 55 cognitively unimpaired controls (CNs) were included in the analysis. The magnitude of cortical thinning in the EOAD and EOnonAD groups was estimated using whole‐brain GLMs compared to the CN group. In addition, w‐scores were derived for each EOAD patient for these ROIs: average cortical thickness, hippocampal volume, AD‐signature cortical thickness (typically used in LOAD), and precuneus cortical thickness controlling for age, sex, and acquisition site. The utility of each ROI to differentiate EOAD patients from CNs was assessed by calculating the percentage of patients falling below a W‐threshold of ‐1.5.ResultIn EOAD, a distributed pattern of cortical thinning was observed in lateral temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex (p<.01), and was most prominent in the precuneus (Cohen’s d’ = 1.5). In the EOnonAD group, cortical thinning was observed but was highly variable across individuals. The w‐score analysis in the EOAD group yielded the following results: Mean Cortical thickness: Mean = ‐3.34, SD = 2.97, Classification = 72%.; Hippocampal volume: Mean = ‐2.96, SD = 2.39, Classification = 74%; AD Signature: Mean = ‐4.63, SD = 3.07, Classification = 80%; Precuneus: Mean = ‐5.98, SD = 4.1, Classification = 90%.ConclusionOur results are consistent with previous findings demonstrating cortical thinning in lateral parietal, precuneus, and lateral temporal lobes in EOAD with relatively less involvement of the medial temporal lobes. Our results also suggest that the precuneus may be especially vulnerable to neurodegeneration in patients with EOAD and may serve as a useful biomarker for patient classification.
Increased white matter MRI T1 hypointensity volume in young‐onset Alzheimer’s disease patients is not accounted for by age or cardiovascular risk factors
Flaherty, Ryn , Ezzo, Rania , Collins, Jessica A. , Krivensky, Samantha, Eckbo, Ryan, Borowski, Bret, Bourakova, Viktoriya, Eloyan, Ani , Aisen, Paul, Fagan, Anne M. , Gatsonis, Constantine , Kramer, Joel H. , Toga, Arthur W. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Apostolova, Liana G. , Dickerson, Brad C., Vemuri, Prashanthi , Iaccarino, Leonardo , Joie, Renaud La , Lesman‐Segev, Orit H. , Foroud, Tatiana , Jack, Clifford R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Saykin, Andrew J. , Day, Gregory S. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Wolk, David A. , Wingo, Thomas S , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 7, 2020 | Volume: 16 | Issue: S4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.045577 Get It

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter (WM) hypointensity volume in T1 MRI correlates strongly with T2 hyperintensities and both are typically associated with advancing age and vascular brain injury (VBI). Recent research has suggested that Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) neuropathologic changes (ADNC) also increases WM hypointensity volume. Sporadic early onset AD (EOAD) patients provide a unique model to examine the relationship between ADNC biomarkers and WM hypointensity volume in the absence of advanced age, cardiovascular injury, or autosomal dominant genetic mutations.MethodIncluded in the analysis were sporadic EOAD patients (n = 75) and cognitively normal controls (n = 39) from the Longitudinal Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS) for whom full demographic and health information were available. WM hypointensity volume in T1 MRI was segmented by Freesurfer and corrected for total white matter volume. Multiple‐factor ANOVA models with logarithmic transformations were used to determine the effects of age, cohort, and presence of cardiovascular conditions on WM hypointensity volume. Further multiple‐factor ANOVA models assessed whether the addition of covariates improved the model fit.ResultIn a reproduction of prior research, WM hypointensity volume was correlated with age for controls (p < 0.05), but not for EOAD patients. We additionally found an effect of cohort, such that EOAD patients had a higher mean WM hypointensity volume than controls when accounting for age (p < 0.05). No difference in the presence or number of cardiovascular conditions was found between groups. Additionally, no correlation was found between WM hypointensity volume and the presence or number of cardiovascular conditions. Including cardiovascular condition as a covariate failed to improve the model fit, even when accounting for interaction effects.ConclusionThese results support the hypothesis that patients with ADNC have higher WM hypointensity volume beyond what would be expected based on aging or cardiovascular risk factors. Further research is needed to assess the co‐localization of WM hypointensities with cortical degradation, amyloid pathology, and tau pathology.
Amyloid and tau PET in sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease: Preliminary results from LEADS
Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Collins, Jessica A. , Aisen, Paul , Borowski, Bret, Eloyan, Ani , Fagan, Anne M. , Gatsonis, Constantine , Kramer, Joel H. , Graff-Radford, N. R., Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Dickerson, Brad C., Apostolova, Liana G. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Iaccarino, Leonardo , Joie, Renaud La , Lesman‐Segev, Orit H. , Provost, Karine , Foroud, Tatiana , Jack, Clifford R. , Saykin, Andrew J. , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Day, Gregory S. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Wolk, David A. , Wingo, Thomas S , Koeppe, Robert A. , Carrillo, María C.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 7, 2020 | Volume: 16 | Issue: S4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.041613 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies have reported that age modifies the distribution and burden of tau (and, to a lesser extent, amyloid) pathology in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here we present preliminary baseline amyloid and tau PET results from the Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS), a multi‐site longitudinal study of sporadic early‐onset AD.Method135 patients meeting clinical criteria for MCI or probable AD and 50 cognitively normal controls (all age<65 at enrollment) were enrolled at 12 US centers between August 2018 and December 2019 (Table 1). 18F‐Florbetaben amyloid‐PET (FBB) was used to assign patients to EOAD (amyloid‐positive) or EOnonAD (amyloid‐negative) subgroups based on visual rating and semi‐quantification. 130 patients and all controls had 18F‐Flortaucipir tau‐PET (FTP). Regional Standardized Uptake Value Ratios (SUVR) for FBB (whole cerebellum reference) and FTP (inferior cerebellar gray reference) were extracted using co‐registered 3T‐MRI.Result98 patients (72.6%) were amyloid PET‐positive (EOAD) and 37 (27.4%) were amyloid PET‐negative (EOnonAD). Compared to EOAD, EOnonAD patients had higher MMSE, MOCA and CDR sum‐of‐boxes (CDR‐SB) and were more frequently male (Table 1). Patients with EOAD showed elevated FBB and FTP SUVR in temporoparietal and frontal cortex compared to CN and EOnonAD (Figures 1‐2). In EOAD, MMSE, MOCA and CDR‐SB were significantly correlated with FTP SUVR (Figure 3), while no significant correlations were found with FBB SUVR. EOnonAD patients showed variable FTP binding ranging from negative to mildly elevated binding in anterior temporal and frontal cortex and underlying white matter. Two EOnonAD cases showed intense FTP binding comparable to typical EOAD cases, despite visually and quantitatively negative FBB scans.ConclusionPatients with clinically mild, sporadic EOAD typically show an extensive distribution and burden of tau pathology in the setting of positive amyloid PET. Global clinical measures correlate with tau but not amyloid PET. Over 25% of patients meeting clinical criteria for early‐onset MCI/probable AD have negative amyloid PET, suggesting alternative etiologies for cognitive decline. These findings will inform future design of drug trials in this important and under‐studied population.