Sauer, William H

AbstractIntroductionPulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an innovative therapy for cardiac arrhythmias. Drawing parallels with PFA's application in solid tumors, calcium chloride (CaCl2) as an adjuvant therapy, known as calcium electroporation, may amplify PFA's apoptotic effects. We propose that PFA in the atrium could enhance calcium uptake through PFA‐created pores, thereby increasing ablation efficacy even at reduced power levels by exploiting PFA's permeabilization effects.MethodsWe conducted in vivo ablations on the atria of seven pigs using low PFA power (250 V, 20 μs for 50 pulses at 200 ms intervals). Post‐PFA, we randomly administered an infusion of either 200 mg/2 ml CaCl2 (calcium group) or saline (control) directly to the ablation site via the catheter tip. We evaluated reduction in electrogram voltage amplitude, electrocardiography (ECG) parameters, ablation lesion parameters, and histology after PFA.ResultsNineteen lesions from control and calcium groups were examined. Control lesions showed no voltage decrease post‐PFA, whereas calcium‐treated lesions exhibited a significant voltage reduction. Gross pathology indicated marked differences in maximum lesion surface diameter, depth, and volume between the lesion groups. Histologically, calcium group lesions were characterized by a more severe acute PFA response with contraction band necrosis, myocytolysis and nuclear pyknosis in adjacent myocardium, in addition to microhemorrhages.ConclusionInfusing calcium chloride locally after PFA markedly improves the immediate efficacy of electroporation in porcine atria. This study suggests that calcium electroporation could bolster PFA outcomes without higher energy levels, potentially diminishing associated risks. These preliminary findings warrant further research into the long‐term efficacy and potential clinical application of calcium electroporation in PFA.

AbstractIntroductionEsophageal injury is a well‐known complication associated with catheter ablation. Though novel methods to mitigate esophageal injury have been developed, few studies have evaluated temperature gradients with catheter ablation across the posterior wall of the left atrium, interstitium, and esophagus.MethodsTo investigate temperature gradients across the tissue, we developed a porcine heart–esophageal model to perform ex vivo catheter ablation on the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA), with juxtaposed interstitial tissue and esophagus. Circulating saline (5 L/min) was used to mimic blood flow along the LA and alteration of ionic content to modulate impedance. Thermistors along the region of interest were used to analyze temperature gradients. Varying time and power, radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesions were applied with an externally irrigated ablation catheter. Ablation strategies were divided into standard approaches (SAs, 10–15 g, 25–35 W, 30 s) or high‐power short duration (HPSD, 10–15 g, 40–50 W, 10 s). Temperature gradients, time to the maximum measured temperature, and the relationship between measured temperature as a function of distance from the site of ablation was analyzed.ResultsIn total, five experiments were conducted each utilizing new porcine posterior LA wall‐esophageal specimens for RF ablation (n = 60 lesions each for SA and HPSD). For both SA and HPSD, maximum temperature rise from baseline was markedly higher at the anterior wall (AW) of the esophagus compared to the esophageal lumen (SA: 4.29°C vs. 0.41°C, p < .0001 and HPSD: 3.13°C vs. 0.28°C, p < .0001). Across ablation strategies, the average temperature rise at the AW of the esophagus was significantly higher with SA relative to HPSD ablation (4.29°C vs. 3.13°C, p = .01). From the start of ablation, the average time to reach a maximum temperature as measured at the AW of the esophagus with SA was 36.49 ± 12.12 s, compared to 16.57 ± 4.54 s with HPSD ablation, p < .0001. Fit to a linear scale, a 0.37°C drop in temperature was seen for every 1 cm increase in distance from the site of ablation and thermistor location at the AW of the esophagus.ConclusionBoth SA and HPSD ablation strategies resulted in markedly higher temperatures measured at the AW of the esophagus compared to the esophageal lumen, raising concern about the value of clinical intraluminal temperature monitoring. The temperature rise at the AW was lower with HPSD. A significant time delay was seen to reach the maximum measured temperature and a modest increase in distance between the site of ablation and thermistor location impacted the accuracy of monitored temperatures.