Back to Authors

Kubaski, Francyne

0000-0002-9330-0154

Mayo Clinic

Department of Genetics UFRGS, Medical Genetics Service, HCPA, DASA and Casa dos Raros, Porto Alegre 91501970, Brazil.

Citations 6

Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Newborn Screening Laboratories
Basheeruddin, Khaja, Burlina, Alberto , Chen, Hsiao-Jan, Dizikes, George J. , Dorley, M. Christine , Giugliani, Roberto , Hietala, Amy, Kao, Shu‐Min, Klug, Tracy, Kubaski, Francyne , Liao, Hsuan-Chieh , Martin, Monica, Manning, Adrienne, Orsini, Joseph J. , Peng, Yin , Ranieri, Enzo , Rohrwasser, Andreas , Szabo‐Fresnais, Nicolas, Turgeon, Coleman , Wang, Liyun , Matern, Dietrich , Burlina, Alberto , Chien, Yin-Hsiu , Dorley, Christine , Giugliani, Roberto , Kubaski, Francyne , Turgeon, Coleman T, Matern, Dietrich , Gelb, Michael H. , Hong, Xinying , Khaledi, Hamid , Vaz, F

International Journal of Neonatal Screening | November 28, 2022 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 62

10.3390/ijns8040062 Get It

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is the most universal platform currently available for the analysis of enzymatic activities and biomarkers in dried blood spots (DBS) for applications in newborn screening (NBS). Among the MS/MS applications in NBS, the most common is flow-injection analysis (FIA-) MS/MS, where the sample is introduced as a bolus injection into the mass spectrometer without the prior fractionation of analytes. Liquid chromatography combined with MS/MS (LC-MS/MS) has been employed for second-tier tests to reduce the false-positive rate associated with several nonspecific screening markers, beginning two decades ago. More recently, LC-MS/MS has been applied to primary screening for new conditions for which FIA-MS/MS or other methods, including genomic screening, are not yet adequate. In addition to providing a list of the currently used LC-MS/MS-based assays for NBS, the authors share their experience regarding the maintenance requirements of LC-MS/MS vs. FIA-MS/MS systems. The consensus is that the maintenance of LC-MS/MS and FIA-MS/MS instrumentation is similar, and LC-MS/MS has the advantage of allowing for a larger number of diseases to be screened for in a multiplex, cost-effective fashion with a high throughput and an adequate turnaround time.
Therapeutic Options for Mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter Disease)
Kubaski, Francyne , Poswar, Fabiano de Oliveira , Corte, Amauri Dalla , Giugliani, Roberto , Giugliani, Roberto , de Oliveira Poswar, Fabiano , Kubaski, Francyne , Vairo, Filippo Pinto e , Baldo, Guilherme

Current Pharmaceutical Design | August 3, 2020 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 40 | Pages: 5100-5109

10.2174/1381612826666200724161504 Get It

Background:Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome, or MPS II) is an X-linked lysosomal disorder caused by the deficiency of iduronate-2-sulfatase, which leads to the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in a variety of tissues, resulting in a multisystemic disease that can also impair the central nervous system (CNS).Objective:This review focuses on providing the latest information and expert opinion about the therapies available and under development for MPS II.Methods:We have comprehensively revised the latest studies about hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), enzyme replacement therapy (ERT - intravenous, intrathecal, intracerebroventricular, and intravenous with fusion proteins), small molecules, gene therapy/genome editing, and supportive management.Results and Discussion:Intravenous ERT is a well-established specific therapy, which ameliorates the somatic features but not the CNS manifestations. Intrathecal or intracerebroventricular ERT and intravenous ERT with fusion proteins, presently under development, seem to be able to reduce the levels of GAGs in the CNS and have the potential of reducing the impact of the neurological burden of the disease. Gene therapy and/or genome editing have shown promising results in preclinical studies, bringing hope for a “one-time therapy” soon. Results with HSCT in MPS II are controversial, and small molecules could potentially address some disease manifestations. In addition to the specific therapeutic options, supportive care plays a major role in the management of these patients.Conclusion:At this time, the treatment of individuals with MPS II is mainly based on intravenous ERT, whereas HSCT can be a potential alternative in specific cases. In the coming years, several new therapy options that target the neurological phenotype of MPS II should be available.
Precision Medicine for Lysosomal Disorders
Vairo, Filippo Pinto e , Málaga, Diana Rojas , Kubaski, Francyne , Souza, Carolina Fischinger Moura de , Poswar, Fabiano de Oliveira , Vairo, Filippo , de Oliveira Poswar, Fabiano , Kubaski, Francyne , Baldo, Guilherme , Giugliani, Roberto

Biomolecules | July 27, 2020 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1110

10.3390/biom10081110 Get It

Precision medicine (PM) is an emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that accounts for the individual variability in the genes, environment, and lifestyle of each person. Lysosomal diseases (LDs) are a group of genetic metabolic disorders that include approximately 70 monogenic conditions caused by a defect in lysosomal function. LDs may result from primary lysosomal enzyme deficiencies or impairments in membrane-associated proteins, lysosomal enzyme activators, or modifiers that affect lysosomal function. LDs are heterogeneous disorders, and the phenotype of the affected individual depends on the type of substrate and where it accumulates, which may be impacted by the type of genetic change and residual enzymatic activity. LDs are individually rare, with a combined incidence of approximately 1:4000 individuals. Specific therapies are already available for several LDs, and many more are in development. Early identification may enable disease course prediction and a specific intervention, which is very important for clinical outcome. Driven by advances in omics technology, PM aims to provide the most appropriate management for each patient based on the disease susceptibility or treatment response predictions for specific subgroups. In this review, we focused on the emerging diagnostic technologies that may help to optimize the management of each LD patient and the therapeutic options available, as well as in clinical developments that enable customized approaches to be selected for each subject, according to the principles of PM.
Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I
Kubaski, Francyne , Poswar, Fabiano de Oliveira , Michelin‐Tirelli, Kristiane , Matte, Úrsula da Silveira , Barth, Anneliese Lopes, Baldo, Guilherme , Vairo, Filippo Pinto e , de Oliveira Poswar, Fabiano , Baldo, Guilherme , Vairo, Filippo , Kubaski, Francyne , Horovitz, Dafne Dain Gandelman , Giugliani, Roberto

Diagnostics | March 17, 2020 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 161

10.3390/diagnostics10030161 Get It

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is caused by the deficiency of α-l-iduronidase, leading to the storage of dermatan and heparan sulfate. There is a broad phenotypical spectrum with the presence or absence of neurological impairment. The classical form is known as Hurler syndrome, the intermediate form as Hurler–Scheie, and the most attenuated form is known as Scheie syndrome. Phenotype seems to be largely influenced by genotype. Patients usually develop several somatic symptoms such as abdominal hernias, extensive dermal melanocytosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis odontoid dysplasia, arthropathy, coxa valga and genu valgum, coarse facial features, respiratory and cardiac impairment. The diagnosis is based on the quantification of α-l-iduronidase coupled with glycosaminoglycan analysis and gene sequencing. Guidelines for treatment recommend hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for young Hurler patients (usually at less than 30 months of age). Intravenous enzyme replacement is approved and is the standard of care for attenuated—Hurler–Scheie and Scheie—forms (without cognitive impairment) and for the late-diagnosed severe—Hurler—cases. Intrathecal enzyme replacement therapy is under evaluation, but it seems to be safe and effective. Other therapeutic approaches such as gene therapy, gene editing, stop codon read through, and therapy with small molecules are under development. Newborn screening is now allowing the early identification of MPS I patients, who can then be treated within their first days of life, potentially leading to a dramatic change in the disease’s progression. Supportive care is very important to improve quality of life and might include several surgeries throughout the life course.