Metzger, Otto

PURPOSE Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for advanced breast cancer. In the adjuvant setting, the potential value of adding palbociclib to endocrine therapy for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer has not been confirmed. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the prospective, randomized, phase III PALLAS trial, patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive 2 years of palbociclib (125 mg orally once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) with adjuvant endocrine therapy or adjuvant endocrine therapy alone (for at least 5 years). The primary end point of the study was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); secondary end points were invasive breast cancer–free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, locoregional cancer-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Among 5,796 patients enrolled at 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide over 3 years, 5,761 were included in the intention-to-treat population. At the final protocol-defined analysis, at a median follow-up of 31 months, iDFS events occurred in 253 of 2,884 (8.8%) patients who received palbociclib plus endocrine therapy and in 263 of 2,877 (9.1%) patients who received endocrine therapy alone, with similar results between the two treatment groups (iDFS at 4 years: 84.2% v 84.5%; hazard ratio, 0.96; CI, 0.81 to 1.14; P = .65). No significant differences were observed for secondary time-to-event end points, and subgroup analyses did not show any differences by subgroup. There were no new safety signals for palbociclib in this trial. CONCLUSION At this final analysis of the PALLAS trial, the addition of adjuvant palbociclib to standard endocrine therapy did not improve outcomes over endocrine therapy alone in patients with early hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.

Abstract Background: In HER2-positive breast cancer patients, timing from the end of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab (T)-based therapy to diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer is the key factor in determining the optimal first-line treatment. There is currently lack of clear evidence to support the possible prognostic role of this interval and 12 months has been mostly empirically used. The present analysis aimed to investigate patterns of relapse, first-line choice and survival outcomes of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who relapsed after adjuvant T-based therapy depending on T-free interval (TFI, i.e. timing from end of adjuvant T to diagnosis of distant metastases). Methods: In ALTTO, HER2-positive early breast cancer patients were randomized to 1 year of either T alone, lapatinib (L) alone, their sequence (T–>L) or their combination (T+L). This exploratory analysis included only pts in the T or T+L arms who experienced a distant disease-free survival (DDFS) event. Two cohorts of patients were defined depending on TFI: group A (TFI of <12 months) and group B (>12 months). Baseline characteristics, patterns of relapse, first-line choice and overall survival (OS) were compared. OS was defined as time between date of DDFS event to death; age at diagnosis, tumor size and hormone receptor status were the variables included in the final multivariate models. Results: Out of 8,381 patients included in ALTTO, 404 patients in the T and T+L arms developed a DDFS event, of whom 201 occurred <12 months (group A) and 203 >12 months (group B) after the end of adjuvant T. Patients in group A were older (p=0.013), had larger tumors (p=0.004) and more frequently hormone receptor-negative disease (p<0.001). No significant difference in patterns of first DDFS event was observed (p=0.073); however, a numerically higher number of patients in group A compared to group B developed brain metastasis (26% vs. 15%). First-line anti-HER2 therapy was received by 57% of the patients. Choice of first-line anti-HER2 therapy was different between the two groups (p=0.022): the majority of patients received T in both groups (61% vs. 65% in groups A and B, respectively), while more patients in group A received L (25% vs. 11%) and less received pertuzumab (8% vs. 17%). OS survival was significantly shorter in group A compared to group B: median OS was 18.4 and 29.3 months in groups A and B, respectively (adjusted HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.54-0.89; p=0.004). Similar results were observed after the exclusion of patients treated with first-line pertuzumab-based therapy (n=29): median OS was 18.2 and 26.8 months in groups A and B, respectively (adjusted HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51-0.86; p=0.002). Better outcomes in terms of OS for patients in group B was observed across all analyzed subgroups with no interaction according to hormone receptor status (p=0.814) nor type of adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment (p=0.233): hormone receptor-positive (adjusted HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.99), hormone receptor-negative (adjusted HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.48-0.98), T+L arm (adjusted HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38-0.80) and T arm (adjusted HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.55-1.17). Conclusions: In the ALTTO trial, HER2-positive early breast cancer patients who experienced shorter TFI (i.e. <12 months vs. >12 months) following adjuvant T-based therapy had inferior OS after the diagnosis of distant recurrence. Given its prognostic value, TFI can help to individualize clinical recommendations and to design future trials in the metastatic setting for patients relapsing after prior exposure to anti-HER2 therapy for early disease. Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Dominique Agbor-Tarh, Otto Metzger-Filho, Noam Ponde, Francesca Poggio, Florentine Hilbers, Larissa A Korde, Saranya Chumsri, Olena Werner, Lucia Del Mastro, Rafael Caparica, Volker Moebus, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Martine Piccart, Evandro de Azambuja. Prognostic role of distant disease-free interval from completion of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: Analysis from the ALTTO (BIG 2-06) trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-04.

Abstract Background: Pre-clinical data and results from early phase clinical trials point to synergistic antitumor activity and potential efficacy of palbociclib when given in combination with anti-HER2 therapy (tx). The aim of PATINA is to determine the effect of adding palbociclib to anti-HER2 and ET maintenance after induction tx in the 1st line setting for HR+/HER2+ MBC. Trial Design: The PATINA trial (AFT-38/NCT02947685) is a pivotal, open-label, international, phase III study. Following 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy (taxane or vinorelbine) with anti-HER2 tx for MBC participants will be randomized 1:1 to standard anti-HER2 tx (trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab) in combination with ET with or without palbociclib until disease progression. ET options are either an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Premenopausal patients (pts) must receive ovarian suppression. The trial is open to men or women with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2+ MBC provided they are without evidence of disease progression by local assessment after induction tx. Total planned accrual is 496 pts. Primary objective is to demonstrate that the combination of palbociclib with anti-HER2 tx plus ET is superior to anti-HER2 tx plus ET alone in prolonging progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary objectives are measures of tumor control, overall survival, safety and Quality of Life. The main translational science objective is to compare PFS estimates according to PIK3CA mutation status. The study has a 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.667 in favor of the palbociclib arm. All pts approached to participate in PATINA will be asked to share remaining biospecimens and clinical data with the Mastering Breast Cancer Initiative. This initiative was created in order to understand the natural history of MBC and how it envolves over time with the aim to develop new treatments for this patient population. Recruitment has started in 07/2017 and is planned for approximately 22 months in 140 sites in Australia, Germany, Italy, France, New Zealand, Spain, and the US. 69 pts have been recruited so far. The study is sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials (AFT) and financially supported by Pfizer Citation Format: Metzger O, Mandrekar S, Loibl S, Mundhenke C, Seiler S, Valagussa P, Lim E, Tripathy D, Winer EP, Huang C, Carey L, Francis P, Miller K, Goetz MP, Prat A, Loi S, Krop I, Gianni L, Delalogue S, Vaz-Luis I, Dockter T, Lanzillotti J, Ciruelos E, DeMichele AM. PATINA: A randomized, open label, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib + anti-HER2 therapy + endocrine therapy (ET) vs. anti-HER2 therapy + ET after induction treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-07.

Abstract Learning Objectives Discuss methods for improving the efficiency of global clinical trials. Explain the need for national regulatory authorities and collaborative cancer groups to initiate efforts to quicken the activation process in their countries. Describe the activation process of phase III studies and its complex and heterogeneous regulation across different geographic and economic regions. Purpose. This study measured the time taken for setting up the different facets of Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization (ALTTO), an international phase III study being conducted in 44 participating countries. Methods. Time to regulatory authority (RA) approval, time to ethics committee/institutional review board (EC/IRB) approval, time from study approval by EC/IRB to first randomized patient, and time from first to last randomized patient were prospectively collected in the ALTTO study. Analyses were conducted by grouping countries into either geographic regions or economic classes as per the World Bank's criteria. Results. South America had a significantly longer time to RA approval (median: 236 days, range: 21–257 days) than Europe (median: 52 days, range: 0–151 days), North America (median: 26 days, range: 22–30 days), and Asia-Pacific (median: 62 days, range: 37–75 days). Upper-middle economies had longer times to RA approval (median: 123 days, range: 21–257 days) than high-income (median: 47 days, range: 0–112 days) and lower-middle income economies (median: 57 days, range: 37–62 days). No significant difference was observed for time to EC/IRB approval across the studied regions (median: 59 days, range 0–174 days). Overall, the median time from EC/IRB approval to first recruited patient was 169 days (range: 26–412 days). Conclusion. This study highlights the long time intervals required to activate a global phase III trial. Collaborative research groups, pharmaceutical industry sponsors, and regulatory authorities should analyze the current system and enter into dialogue for optimizing local policies. This would enable faster access of patients to innovative therapies and enhance the efficiency of clinical research.