Shamoun, Fadi Elias

Summary: Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) increases cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, but remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Several trials support low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in PAD treatment, although this has yet to be widely adopted in clinical practice. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent ankle-brachial index testing (ABI) from 1996 – 2020 at Mayo Clinic. We included patients with PAD defined by abnormal ABI (<1.0 or >/=1.4). Primary outcomes evaluated were myocardial infarcts (MI), ischemic strokes (IS), critical limb ischemia (CLI)/amputation, bleeding events and all-cause mortality. DOAC and warfarin use were each compared to no anticoagulant use for the outcomes using univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Results: 22,162 patients had abnormal ABI readings; 1,266 were on warfarin and 269 were on DOAC for any indication. Both the DOAC and warfarin groups showed significant a decrease in all-cause mortality. The DOAC group showed superior mortality outcomes with HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.40–0.63], p-value <0.001 compared to warfarin with HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.81–0.96], p-value <0.004. There appeared to be a similar trend for MI and CLI/amputation however this was not statistically significant. IS was similar with only warfarin being statistically significant. The DOAC group had improved bleeding outcomes compared to the warfarin group, HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.24–0.85), p-value 0.007. Notably, the addition of ASA for both AC groups resulted in significant HR >1. Conclusions: Our study shows that anticoagulation use, particularly DOACs, is associated with decreased all-cause mortality in patients with PAD. There appears to be a favorable trend for DOACs in MI, IS and CLI/amputation. Lastly, DOACs were found to have superior outcomes with bleeding events.

Summary: Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) impacts 3–12% of patients worldwide and is characterized by endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory pathways which are also common to venous thromboembolism (VTE), but there is a paucity of evidence regarding VTE risk in PAD patients. We investigated whether PAD is an independent risk factor for VTE. Patients and methods: We reviewed medical records of patients undergoing ABI studies at Mayo Clinic from 01/1996-02/2020. We classified patients by ABI (low [<1.0], normal [1.0–1.4], or elevated [>1.4]), as well as by specific low ABI subgroup: severely reduced (ABI: 0.00–0.39), moderately reduced (0.40–0.69), mildly reduced (0.70–0.90), and borderline reduced (0.91–0.99). The primary outcome was incident VTE event (acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) after ABI measurement. Multivariable Cox proportional regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) after adjusting for age, sex, active smoking, cancer, previous VTE, thrombophilia, anticoagulation, and revascularization. Results: 39,834 unique patients (mean age 66.3±14.3 years, median follow-up 34 months) were identified. 2,305 VTE events occurred in patients without PAD (13.0%), 2,218 in low ABI patients (13.0%), and 751 in elevated ABI patients (14.8%). After risk factor adjustment, VTE risk was modestly increased for PAD overall (HR: 1.12, 95% CI [1.06, 1.18]), including low ABI (HR: 1.11, 95% CI [1.04, 1.18]) and elevated ABI groups (HR: 1.15, 95% CI [1.04, 1.26]), compared to patients without PAD. The greatest VTE risk was in severely low ABI patients (HR: 1.46, 95% CI [1.31, 1.64]). Conclusions: In a large longitudinal cohort, we present strong clinical evidence of PAD, with low and elevated ABI, as an independent VTE risk factor, with the highest risk seen in patients with severely low ABI. Continued research is required to further investigate this relationship and its intersection with functional performance status to optimize VTE risk reduction or anticoagulation strategies in the PAD population.