Fatunde, Olubadewa

Summary: Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) increases cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, but remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Several trials support low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in PAD treatment, although this has yet to be widely adopted in clinical practice. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent ankle-brachial index testing (ABI) from 1996 – 2020 at Mayo Clinic. We included patients with PAD defined by abnormal ABI (<1.0 or >/=1.4). Primary outcomes evaluated were myocardial infarcts (MI), ischemic strokes (IS), critical limb ischemia (CLI)/amputation, bleeding events and all-cause mortality. DOAC and warfarin use were each compared to no anticoagulant use for the outcomes using univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Results: 22,162 patients had abnormal ABI readings; 1,266 were on warfarin and 269 were on DOAC for any indication. Both the DOAC and warfarin groups showed significant a decrease in all-cause mortality. The DOAC group showed superior mortality outcomes with HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.40–0.63], p-value <0.001 compared to warfarin with HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.81–0.96], p-value <0.004. There appeared to be a similar trend for MI and CLI/amputation however this was not statistically significant. IS was similar with only warfarin being statistically significant. The DOAC group had improved bleeding outcomes compared to the warfarin group, HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.24–0.85), p-value 0.007. Notably, the addition of ASA for both AC groups resulted in significant HR >1. Conclusions: Our study shows that anticoagulation use, particularly DOACs, is associated with decreased all-cause mortality in patients with PAD. There appears to be a favorable trend for DOACs in MI, IS and CLI/amputation. Lastly, DOACs were found to have superior outcomes with bleeding events.

AbstractBackgroundThe real‐world data on the safety profile of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation among elderly patients is not well‐established. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes among those aged 18–64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT.MethodUsing the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into non‐elderly (18–64 years old) and elderly age groups (≥65 years old). We then analyzed the in‐hospital procedural outcome and 30‐day readmission between these two groups.ResultsOur study included 2075 (49.1%) non‐elderly patients and 2153 (50.9%) elderly patients who underwent VT ablation. Post‐procedurally, elderly patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (≥7 days; 35.5% vs. 29.3%, p < .01), non‐home discharge (13.4% vs. 6.0%, p < .01), 30‐day readmission (17.0% vs. 11.4%, p < .01), and early mortality (5.5% vs. 2.4%, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the procedural complications between two groups, namely vascular complications, hemopericardium/cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, and systemic embolization. Through multivariable analysis, the elderly group was associated with higher odds of early mortality (OR: 7.50; CI 1.86–30.31, p = .01), non‐home discharge (OR: 2.41; CI: 1.93–3.00, p < .01) and 30‐day readmission (OR: 1.58; CI 1.32–1.89, p < .01).ConclusionElderly patients have worse in‐hospital outcome, early mortality, non‐home discharge, and 30‐day readmission following catheter ablation for VT. There was no significant difference between elderly and non‐elderly groups in the procedural complications.

Abstract Recent advances in treatment have transformed the management of cancer. Despite these advances, cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death in cancer survivors. Cardio-oncology has recently evolved as a subspecialty to prevent, diagnose, and manage cardiovascular side effects of antineoplastic therapy. An emphasis on optimal management of comorbidities and close attention to drug interactions are important in cardio-oncologic care. With interdisciplinary collaboration among oncologists, cardiologists, and pharmacists, there is potential to prevent and reduce drug-related toxicities of treatments. The cytochrome P450 (CYP450) family of enzymes and the P-glycoprotein (P-g) transporter play a crucial role in drug metabolism and drug resistance. Here we discuss the role of CYP450 and P-g in drug interactions in the field of cardio-oncology, provide an overview of the cardiotoxicity of a spectrum of cancer agents, highlight the role of precision medicine, and encourage a multidisciplinary treatment approach for patients with cancer.