Yost, Kathleen J.

ImportanceThere is a lack of reliable, patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) instruments to address the multidimensional nature of patient-centered outcomes for patients undergoing parotidectomy. The Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index is a new 35-item validated patient-reported outcome instrument specific to recovery after parotidectomy.ObjectiveTo establish and validate a comprehensive English-language patient-reported QOL instrument specific to parotidectomy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis survey study was conducted in 2 phases: first, in a single-institution cohort (October 12, 2021, to March 7, 2022), and second, as an anonymous web-based survey enrolled via printed promotional brochures and social media platforms (March 13 to July 31, 2023). Inclusion criteria were age at least 18 years and parotidectomy within the last year. For test-retest reliability, a subset of phase II participants volunteered to answer the survey a second time within 2 weeks. Data were analyzed from March 8, 2022, to November 3, 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresItem rankings from phase I participants were used to narrow the original 61-item survey down to 45 items in the phase II survey. To assess construct validity, an exploratory factor analysis was performed. Cronbach α and pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure internal consistency, reliability, and redundancy. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients.ResultsPhase I enrolled 38 individuals, of whom 30 completed the survey (15 women [60%]; 21 participants [84%] aged >40 years). Phase II enrolled 342 participants, of whom 317 completed the survey (305 women [89%]; 284 participants [83%] aged >40 years). A total of 42 items across 7 domains were selected based on exploratory factor analysis. After Cronbach α and pairwise correlation analysis, 33 items across 6 multi-item domains and 2 standalone items were incorporated into the final QOL instrument. Cronbach αs for each of the final 6 domains were at least 0.77, suggesting excellent internal validity. Pairwise correlations did not show strong correlations (ie, none ≥0.80), suggesting minimal redundancy between domains. Younger age was significantly associated with a lower global score. Participants with malignant tumors scored lower on 4 of the 6 multi-item domains. Test-retest reliability coefficients for the domains ranged from 0.82 to 0.93, indicating very good reproducibility over a 2-week interval.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest the Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index demonstrated excellent internal validity and test-retest reliability. With further external validation, this instrument may provide opportunity for quality improvement in clinical practice and has potential as a key patient-reported outcome in future parotidectomy clinical trials.

To address the limitations of existing instruments, the authors developed the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index. The Index captures the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma (VS) on daily life across eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. Initially developed in English, this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery presents translations of the VSQOL Index to Simplified Chinese, Spanish, Japanese, Arabic, French, and Norwegian. These translations aim to improve access to VS quality of life (QOL) research globally with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The goal is to comprehensively evaluate the impact of VS diagnosis and management on well-being and QOL by offering the VSQOL Index in patients’ native, or first-learned, languages. The English version and these translations may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without written permission from the authors. Investigators interested in translating the VSQOL Index to other languages should contact the corresponding author for translation methodology instructions.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Norwegian using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of vestibular schwannoma QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to French using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Simplified Chinese using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Arabic using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Spanish using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Japanese using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

PURPOSE Emoji are digital images or icons used to express an idea or emotion in electronic communication. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of two patient-reported scales that incorporate emoji. METHODS The Emoji Response Scale developed for this study has two parts: the Emoji-Ordinal and Emoji-Mood scales. A pilot study was designed to validate the ordinal nature of the Emoji-Ordinal Scale. Twenty patients were shown all possible pairs of five emoji and asked to select the most positive from each pair. The psychometric ordering was assessed using Coombs unfolding and Thurstone scaling. A separate pilot study was designed to determine which emoji to include in the Emoji-Mood Scale. Ten common feelings experienced by patients with cancer were chosen by the study team. Patients and providers were asked to select the one emoji that best represented each feeling from the selection. The most commonly selected emotions and representative emoji were chosen for the Emoji-Mood Scale. In a randomized study of 294 patients, Spearman correlations, Wilcoxon tests, and Bland-Altman analyses determined the construct validity of the scales compared with Linear Analog Scale Assessments (LASA) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. RESULTS Ninety-five percent of patients selected the same ordering among the ordinal emoji, and Thurstone scaling confirmed the ordinal nature of the response scale. The construct validity of the scales was high with correlations between the Emoji-Ordinal Scale and the LASA scale of 0.70 for emotional well-being, 0.72 for physical well-being, 0.74 for overall quality of life, and –0.81 for fatigue. Emoji-Mood Scale ratings were strongly related to PROMIS global mental, global physical, fatigue, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and social activity scales ( P < .0001). CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that scales incorporating emoji are valid for collecting patient-reported outcomes.

Background: Financial toxicity (FT), or the negative impact of medical expenses experienced by patients, is a known adverse effect of cancer treatment that result in worse health outcomes for patients. However, there is limited literature investigating FT in lymphoma with even less data on predictors such as age, gender, and socioeconomic factors. As lymphoma treatment options expand, it is vital to understand the impact of these treatments on patients' financial well-being. We investigate FT through patient reported outcomes from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO), a large multi-institution prospective cohort study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed NHL were enrolled into the LEO cohort from 2015-2020. Clinical, pathology and treatment data were abstracted from medical records, and participants were offered self-administered surveys at enrollment and selected follow-up time points. Participants were included if they completed at least four of six survey questions on FT adapted from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) within the first year after diagnosis. Questions focused on either material hardship (unable to cover costs; file for bankruptcy; borrow money; work extra job or hours) or psychological stress (worried about paying large medical bills). We evaluated FT as answering positively to any question (any vs none). Associations with FT were evaluated using chi-squared tests. All analyses were performed using R (v4.2.2). Results: 3202 patients completed at least four survey questions relating to FT. Mean age at diagnosis was 62 years (18-94), 56% were male, and majority identified as white (90%). Characteristics associated with FT are reported (p&lt;0.001). FT was more likely in younger patients: 18-25 years (64%, 30/47), 26-44 years (73%, 299/313), and 45-64 years (58%, 799/1375) as compared to those 65-79 years (36%, 459/1272) and ≥80 years (35%, 69/195). FT was highest in patients without a high school diploma (54%, 45/84), followed by patients with a high school diploma (52%, 209/402), and an associate's degree (57%, 358/627). It was lowest in patients with a bachelor's (45%, 224/296) or post-graduate degree (39.6%, 216/545). Higher FT was seen in those receiving disability income (65%, 47/72); whereas less FT was seen in retired patients (36%, 299/828). FT rates inversely correlated with income: 65% for income &lt; $21,000 (184/283), 61% for $21,000- $39,999 (224/370) and 60% for $40,000-$65,999 (293/491). Lower FT noted for income range of $66,000-$106,000 (47%, 323/681) or &gt; $106,000 (37%, 324/872). Patients separated from a partner (82.9%, 19/23) had the highest FT, followed by patients living with a partner (64%, 48/75), divorced (56%, 103/184), and never married (53.4%, 79/148). Patients who were married (47%, 793/1672) or widowed (41%, 60/146) reported the lowest FT. Higher FT was reported in DLBCL (55%, 631/1146), MCL (55%, 172/315), and TCL (53%, 119/226) when compared to FL (44%, 327/746), MZL (44%, 137/316), and other NHL (44%, 200/453). This is likely related to treatment as more FT was seen in patients who received an anthracycline and/or alkylator containing therapy (54%, 1066/1963) versus non-systemic (43%, 120/278) and observation (35%, 168/483). In multivariable analyses, FT strongly correlated with age at diagnosis, household income, and treatment type. The odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for the most significant category within each variable are as follows: age per 1 year (0.96, [0.95-0.97]), income &gt; $106,000 vs &lt; $21,000 (0.28, [0.21-0.38]), and observation vs anthracycline and/or alkylator (0.56, [0.44-0.71]). Conclusion: Nearly 50% of patients with lymphoma experience FT, seen as material hardship and psychological stress, within the first year of diagnosis. Patients with a younger age (18-44), less education, and lower household income reported higher levels of FT; whereas those who were retired or married/widowed reported lower FT. Lymphoma subtypes that require more anthracycline and/or alkylator containing therapy imposed higher FT. Understanding these risk factors can help clinicians identify patients who may benefit from additional resources during lymphoma management.