Plimack, Elizabeth R.

TPS2618 Background: MEDI-573 is an investigational dual-targeting human antibody that neutralizes IGF-I/-II ligands and inhibits IGF‑1R and insulin receptor-A (IR-A) signaling pathways. By sparing IR-B and its hybrid receptors, MEDI-573 may achieve antitumor activity without perturbing glucose homeostasis. Objectives of this phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study are to evaluate safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), optimal biologically effective dose, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of MEDI-573 in adult patients with solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, Karnofsky status ≥60, and adequate organ function were treated with escalating doses of MEDI-573 IV once weekly (0.5 to 15 mg/kg) or every 3 weeks (30 or 45 mg/kg q3w) using a 3+3 design. Three patients per dose level were evaluated for safety. A biomarker-rich dose-expansion arm tested weekly 5 or 15 mg/kg MEDI‑573 in patients with advanced bladder cancer. Results: Preliminary data are presented for 43 patients (25 M, 18 F), median age 64 years. No dose-limiting toxicities or serious toxicity patterns occurred at any dose level. Drug-related adverse events occurring in ≥10% of patients were fatigue (28%), decreased appetite (23%), nausea (16%), diarrhea (14%), and anemia (12%); the majority were ≤ grade 2. Perturbations in insulin and growth hormone were not observed. Clinically significant changes in serum glucose were rare. The MTD was not reached after completely enrolling patients through the highest dose, 45 mg/kg IV q3w. Serum exposure of MEDI-573 increased with increasing dose. Full suppression of IGF‑I/-II was achieved with weekly and q3w dosing. No neutralizing antibodies against MEDI‑573 were detected. Of 43 patients, 8 (19%) had stable disease ≥12 weeks. The longest exposure was 21 months in a patient with well-differentiated liposarcoma. Conclusions: MEDI-573 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile at all doses tested. No dose-limiting toxicity or serious toxicities, including those related to glucose homeostasis, were detected. These preliminary results support further clinical development.

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Bladder Cancer focuses on the clinical presentation and workup of suspected bladder cancer, treatment of non–muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer, and treatment of metastatic urothelial bladder cancer because important updates have recently been made to these sections. Some important updates include recommendations for optimal treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the event of a bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage and details about biomarker testing for advanced or metastatic disease. The systemic therapy recommendations for second-line or subsequent therapies have also been revised. Treatment and management of muscle-invasive, nonmetastatic disease is covered in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer available at NCCN.org . Additional topics covered in the complete version include treatment of nonurothelial histologies and recommendations for nonbladder urinary tract cancers such as upper tract urothelial carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma of the prostate, and primary carcinoma of the urethra.

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for the clinical management of patients with clear cell and non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel discussions for the 2020 update to the guidelines regarding initial management and first-line systemic therapy options for patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations regarding diagnosis, risk stratification and workup, treatment options for localized disease, and management of recurrent and advanced disease for clinicians who treat patients with prostate cancer. The portions of the guidelines included herein focus on the roles of germline and somatic genetic testing, risk stratification with nomograms and tumor multigene molecular testing, androgen deprivation therapy, secondary hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in patients with prostate cancer.

560 Background: Level I evidence exists demonstrating the efficacy of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (EVE) in decreasing tumor volume of syndromic angiomyolipomas (AMLs) among patients with Tuberous Sclerosis. No prospective data are available regarding the effect of mTOR inhibition on growth kinetics in patients with sporadic AMLs. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional, prospective, phase 2 trial with an optimal two-stage Simon design in patients presenting with > 3cm sporadic AMLs who were candidates for surgical or percutaneous intervention. Response was defined as ≥25% volumetric reduction of the AML. Planned enrollment was 43 patients to test the null hypothesis at a 5% level of significance with 80% power. Baseline, 4- and 6-month volumetric analysis was performed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Patients received EVE 10mg for four 28-day cycles, at which point EVE was discontinued in those with < 25% volumetric reduction. Those with ≥ 25% volumetric reduction received two additional cycles of EVE. Dose reductions and interruptions were allowed to 5 mg QOD. Conservative stopping rules were established for toxicity, given the benign nature of AMLs. Results: The early stopping rules for both efficacy and toxicity were invoked. We enrolled 20 patients (median age = 68) from 5 centers with 21 sporadic AMLs. 11/20 (55%) patients completed 4 cycles of EVE, while 7/20 (35%) completed 6 cycles. Median days on treatment was 88 (2 cycles). 4/20 (20%) patients were withdrawn due to toxicity, while 8/20 (40%) withdrew due to personal preference. Dose reductions were required in 6/20 (30%) patients, and 5/20 (25%) patients had grade 3 toxicities which resolved upon discontinuation or dose reduction of EVE. At 4-month MRI, 10/16 (62.5%) patients had a ≥25% reduction in volume (mean = 54.1% decrease). At 6-month MRI, 8/12 (66.6%) patients had a ≥25% reduction in volume (mean = 51.5% decrease). Conclusions: EVE was effective in reducing tumor volume in patients with sporadic AMLs but was associated with a high rate of treatment termination due to patient preference or prespecified AEs. Neoadjuvant EVE may be useful in potentiating surgical resection of large or anatomically complex AMLs. Clinical trial information: NCT02539459.

Abstract Purpose: This phase I, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of MEDI-573 in adults with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy exists. Experimental Design: Patients received MEDI-573 in 1 of 5 cohorts (0.5, 1.5, 5, 10, or 15 mg/kg) dosed weekly or 1 of 2 cohorts (30 or 45 mg/kg) dosed every 3 weeks. Primary end points included the MEDI-573 safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and optimal biologic dose (OBD). Secondary end points included MEDI-573 pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity. Results: In total, 43 patients (20 with urothelial cancer) received MEDI-573. No dose-limiting toxicities were identified, and only 1 patient experienced hyperglycemia related to treatment. Elevations in levels of insulin and/or growth hormone were not observed. Adverse events observed in &gt;10% of patients included fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, and anemia. PK evaluation demonstrated that levels of MEDI-573 increased with dose at all dose levels tested. At doses &gt;5 mg/kg, circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGFII were fully suppressed. Of 39 patients evaluable for response, none experienced partial or complete response and 13 had stable disease as best response. Conclusions: The MTD of MEDI-573 was not reached. The OBD was 5 mg/kg weekly or 30 or 45 mg/kg every 3 weeks. MEDI-573 showed preliminary antitumor activity in a heavily pretreated population and had a favorable tolerability profile, with no notable perturbations in metabolic homeostasis. Clin Cancer Res; 20(18); 4747–57. ©2014 AACR.