Haluska, Paul

Abstract Ovarian cancer mortality ranks highest among all gynecologic cancers with growth factor pathways playing an integral role in tumorigenesis, metastatic dissemination, and therapeutic resistance. The HER and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) are both overexpressed and/or aberrantly activated in subsets of ovarian tumors. While agents targeting either the HER or VEGF pathways alone have been investigated, the impact of these agents have not led to overall survival benefit in ovarian cancer. We tested the hypothesis that cotargeting HER and VEGFR would maximize antitumor efficacy at tolerable doses. To this end, ovarian cancer xenografts grown intraperitoneally in athymic nude mice were tested in response to AC480 (pan-HER inhibitor, “HERi”), cediranib (pan-VEGFR inhibitor “VEGFRi”), or BMS-690514 (combined HER/VEGFR inhibitor “EVRi”). EVRi was superior to both HERi and VEGFRi in terms of tumor growth, final tumor weight, and progression-free survival. Correlative tumor studies employing phosphoproteomic antibody arrays revealed distinct agent-specific alterations, with EVRi inducing the greatest overall effect on growth factor signaling. These data suggest that simultaneous inhibition of HER and VEGFR may benefit select subsets of ovarian cancer tumors. To this end, we derived a novel HER/VEGF signature that correlated with poor overall survival in high-grade, late stage, serous ovarian cancer patient tumors. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(12); 2909–16. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract New approaches to drug development are critically needed to lessen the time, cost, and resources necessary to identify and optimize active agents. Strategies to accelerate drug development include testing drugs earlier in the disease process, such as the neoadjuvant setting. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued guidance designed to accelerate drug approval through the use of neoadjuvant studies in which the surrogate short-term endpoint, pathologic response, can be used to identify active agents and shorten the time to approval of both efficacious drugs and biomarkers identifying patients most likely to respond. However, this approach has unique challenges. In particular, issues of patient safety are paramount, given the exposure of potentially curable patients to investigational agents with limited safety experience. Key components to safe drug development in the neoadjuvant setting include defining a study population at sufficiently poor prognosis with standard therapy to justify exposure to investigational agents, defining the extent and adequacy of safety data from phase I, detecting potentially harmful interactions between investigational and standard therapies, improving study designs, such as adaptive strategies, that limit patient exposure to ineffective agents, and intensifying safety monitoring in the course of the trial. The I-SPY2 trial is an example of a phase II neoadjuvant trial of novel agents for breast cancer in which these issues have been addressed, both in the design and conduct of the trial. These adaptations of phase II design enable acceleration of drug development by reducing time and cost to screen novel therapies for activity without compromising safety. Clin Cancer Res; 19(11); 2817–23. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract Background: The five year survival rate for women with ovarian cancer (OC) is less than 40%. Crucial to improving the outcomes for ovarian cancer patients is the development of accurate pre-clinical models of human epithelial OC, which can be used to unravel the mechanisms underlying its evolution and behaviour. Methods: We have generated a novel xenograft model of human high-grade serous OC (HG-SOC) in order to enable preclinical molecular and drug response assessment of individual HG-SOC: this includes a comparison of standard OC xeno-transplantion approaches (intra-peritoneal, subcutaneous and sub renal capsular), with the novel use of the rodent ovarian bursa, the orthotopic site. Utilising the rodent bursa may better replicate the relevant microenvironment and increase the success of EOC xeno-transplantion. Other aspects designed to optimize the model include the use of NOD-SCID-IL-2rg recipient mice, systemic estrogen supplementation and transplantation of fresh human HG-SOC fragments which have had no prior in vitro culture. Histological, functional and molecular analysis of the novel xenograft cohort (at baseline and following xenotransplantation) includes histological review; documentation of in vitro Homologous Recombination (HR) DNA repair and drug response capabilities (using novel α-irradiation and explant drug assays); classification according to molecular subtype (Tothill classfier); documentation of NHEJ pathway status, BRCA1/2 status and other DNA repair gene status. In vivo drug treatment studies are being performed, with the choice of treatment targeted to the specific molecular characteristics of the HG-SOC in question. Results: Fourteen consecutive chemotherapy naive potentially HG-SOC samples have been collected. Corresponding clinical data has been collected. Data concerning DNA repair capability and response to DNA damaging agents will be presented, including IHC for markers of DNA damage (γH2AX), DNA repair (RAD51) and apoptosis (capsase 3 cleavage). HG-SOC in this cohort have been classified according to Tothilll (Tothill et al 2008). Eight appropriate HG-SOC have been transplanted and 5 of the first 6 have successfully xenografted, with phenotyping of xenografts underway. In vivo analysis of response to cisplatin treatment and other relevant therapeutics will be presented. Conclusions: A novel xenograft model has been developed of human HG-SOC, which includes comparative characterization of important prognostic features both in the baseline panel of fresh human HG-SOC and in subsequent xenografts. This clinically, functionally and molecularly annotated consecutive xenograft cohort of HG-SOC will provide outstanding utility for the development of improved therapeutic approaches. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3276. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3276

Abstract Despite advances in chemotherapeutic options over the last four decades, ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecologic malignancy with a cure rate that is essentially unchanged. A major barrier is lack of treatment-naïve, clinically- relevant in vivo models of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To target this problem, we have developed low-passage in vivo models of EOC derived from patient primary debulking procedures at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). Tumors were obtained from consented patients with suspected ovarian cancer, minced and injected into severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice intraperitoneally for model establishment. To the date, we have heterotransplanted 129 EOC or ovarian malignant mixed mullerian (MMMT) tumors. The most common histologic subtype is serous (70.5%), followed by endometrioid (12.4%), clear cell (6.9%), and others (9.9%). The tumors were injected intraperitoneally into severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice and the average time to moribund (TTM) was 174 +/− 83 days. In general, tumors grew faster with serial passages, TTM for epithelial tumors was 87 +/− 15 days and 19.5 +/− 3 days for MMMT. De novo ascites developed in 17 models and 24 models developed bowel metastasis, two clinically-relevant complications in late-stage ovarian cancer patients. Tumorgrafts were histologically similar to their source patient tumors and were positive for expression epithelial markers (pan-cytokeratin). The engraftment rate was 72.4% (n=87) after ≤ 6 months of lead-time, which is the average time to tumorgraft harvest. Passage of well-established tumorgrafts in SCID mice was successful in 88.6 % (n= 70) of all mice but only 56% (n=16) of athymic nude mice, consistent with prior studies demonstrating improved engraftment rates in more immunodeficient mice. Molecular characterization of tumorgrafts by array comparative genomic hybridization revealed similar gains and losses between the patient, early-passage, and later-passage tumorgraft tissues, indicating the tumorgrafts were genetically similar to their primary tumor. Analysis of tumorgrafts using the Affymetrix Human Plus 2.0 arrays revealed a predominance of previously described molecular subtypes C3, C4, and C5. Current investigations with both standard chemotherapy and novel targeted therapies are ongoing. Taken together, these models are as diverse as the patient population from which they are derived, produce clinically-relevant complications of EOC, maintain genetic fidelity in SCID mice, and are useful preclinical models for testing and development of novel therapeutics for ovarian cancer. High rates of engraftment are feasible. These tumorgrafts may help define predictors of response and eventually, lead to better treatments for patients. This work is funded by the Mayo Ovarian SPORE (CA136393) and the Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3274. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3274

Abstract Background: In estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is associated with resistance to tamoxifen (Tam). Endoxifen is the most abundant active metabolite of Tam, resulting in part from cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) metabolism. While Tam has been extensively used to model proliferative ER/HER2 cross-talk, there are no published data regarding endoxifen's effect on ER/HER2 nongenomic nor ER genomic signaling. Methods: Using ER+ cells (MCF7) and ER+/HER2+ cells (MCF7-HER2, BT474) we compared the effects of Tam and endoxifen on proliferation using crystal violet assays, Erk1/2 phosphorylation by western blotting, and E2-stimulated ER-regulated gene expression of amphiregulin (AREG), c-Myc (MYC) and progesterone receptor (PGR) by real-time RT-PCR assays. To examine the anti-proliferative affects of endoxifen compared to Tam in vivo we performed E2-stimulated MCF7-HER2 xenograft studies in athymic nude mice. Endoxifen doses of 25 (low) and 75 mg/kg (high) were used based on our prior pharmacokinetic studies showing achievable steady state levels of 100 nM and 1 uM, respectively. Z-Endoxifen HCl was synthesized by NCI. Results: Endoxifen, unlike Tam, potently inhibits growth in both ER+ and ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines at concentrations observed in human CYP2D6 intermediate and extensive metabolizers (>40 nM). Tam (10-1000 nM) stimulates phosphorylation of Erk1/2 in stark contrast to endoxifen at similar doses. Endoxifen (100-1000 nM) significantly decreases E2-stimulated transcription of ER-regulated genes in MCF7-HER2 cells; AREG 2-3 fold, MYC 1-2 fold, and PGR 2-4 fold. Conversely, Tam (10-1000 nM) maintains or stimulates transcription; AREG 2-3 fold, MYC 0.5-2.5 fold, and PGR 0-3 fold. After 7 weeks of treatment of MCF7-HER2 xenografts, both high (p=0.001) and low dose endoxifen (p=0.01) resulted in greater antitumor activity than Tam, with high dose superior to low dose endoxifen (p=0.024). MCF7-HER2 xenografts that progressed on Tam to 200% growth at 7 weeks were randomized to either continued Tam or endoxifen. Four weeks after randomization endoxifen was superior to Tam (p<0.0001) with tumor size decreased by ≥ 20%. No significant toxicity was observed.Conclusions: We have demonstrated in both ER+ and ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines that in contrast to Tam, endoxifen potently inhibits growth (both in vitro and in vivo), does not activate Erk1/2 signaling, and inhibits E2-stimulated transcription of ER-regulated genes. Endoxifen exhibited potent antitumor activity in MCF7-HER2 xenografts refractory to Tam. These data support the ongoing NCI sponsored phase I studies of Z-endoxifen at Mayo Clinic and NCI. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2283. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2283

Abstract Background: ABT-888 is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase1 (PARP1) and PARP2, two highly conserved enzymes implicated in DNA repair, maintenance of genomic stability, and regulation of transcription. Topotecan (TPT) is a water soluble camptothecin derivative with antitumor activity against ovarian tumors. The combination of ABT-888 with TPT is under investigation in phase I trials because PARP inhibition sensitizes tumors cells to TPT in vitro and in vivo. In those trials, the pharmacokinetics of TPT and ABT-888 are being studied to determine if ABT-888 levels are sufficient to modulate PARP activity and to investigate the potential interaction between TPT and ABT-888. Methods: Advanced cancer patients with ECOG performance scores 0-2, adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function were treated with ABT-888 on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 every 28 days. Topotecan was administered on days 2, 9 and 16 every 28 days. DLTs were defined as grade 4 neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 anemia or ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities despite maximal supportive care. ABT-888 and Toptoecan pharmacokinetics were characterized in all patients. Analysis of urinary recovery is ongoing. Results: In this ongoing Phase I trial, 13 female patients with ovarian (n=12) or breast (n=1) cancer have been enrolled to date and pharmacokinetic data is available for 12 of those patients. ABT-888/TPT dose levels are: Level 1- 10 mg/ 2 mg/m2, Level 2- 20 mg/2 mg/m2, Level 3- 10 mg/3 mg/m2, and Level 4- 20 mg/3 mg/m2. The combination of ABT-888 with topotecan has been tolerable, with no dose limiting toxicity, and dose escalation continues at dose level 5. Topotecan t1/2 and clearance values were 3.0 ± 0.5 hrs and 9.50 ± 1.51 L/hr/m2 when administered alone, and were not affected by administration with ABT-888. When administered alone, ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC0-∞ values after the 10 mg dose were 8.2 ± 2.4 hrs, 432 ± 217 nM, and 2568 ± 1300 nM*hr, respectively. ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC values after the 20 mg dose were 5.7 ± 3.1 hrs, 600 ± 165 nM, and 3870± 934 respectively. When administered with TPT, ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC values after the 10 mg dose were 7.2 ± 2.1 hrs, 412 ± 283 nM, and 2705± 1089 nM*hr are: nM*hr respectively. ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax and AUC values after the 20 mg dose combined with TPT were 5.8 ± 2.2 hrs, 664 ± 97.6 nM, and 4283± 936 nM*hr respectively. Conclusions: Plasma clearance of TPT and ABT-888 does not appear to be altered when they are administered together. The effect of co-administration of these agents on renal clearance is presently under investigation and those results will be presented. This work was supported by NIH grants R25 GM75148-04, U01CA069912-16S and MM01-RR00585. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1301. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1301

Abstract Purpose: To improve the significance of insulin-like growth factor–binding protein 5 (IGFBP-5) as a prognostic and potentially predictive marker in patients with breast cancer. Experimental Design: Increased IGFBP-5 expression was identified in MCF-7 cells resistant (MCF-7R4) to the IGF-1R/insulin receptor (InsR) inhibitor BMS-536924 and its role examined by targeted knockdown and overexpression in multiple experimental models. Protein expression of IGFBP-5 was measured by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 76 patients with breast cancer to examine correlative associations with invasive tumor fraction and outcome. The use of a combined IGFBP-5/IGFBP-4 (BPR) expression ratio was applied to predict anti-IGF-1R/InsR response in a panel of breast cancer lines and outcome in multiple breast tumor cohorts. Results: IGFBP-5 knockdown decreased BMS-536924 resistance in MCF-7R4 cells, whereas IGFBP-5 overexpression in MCF-7 cells conferred resistance. When compared with pathologically normal reduction mammoplasty tissue, IGFBP-5 expression levels were upregulated in both invasive and histologically normal adjacent breast cancer tissue. In both univariate and multivariate modeling, metastasis-free survival, recurrence free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were significantly associated with high IGFBP-5 expression. Prognostic power of IGFBP-5 was further increased with the addition of IGFBP-4 where tumors were ranked based upon IGFBP-5/IGFBP-4 expression ratio (BPR). Multiple breast cancer cohorts confirm that BPR (high vs. low) was a strong predictor of RFS and OS. Conclusion: IGFBP-5 expression is a marker of poor outcome in patients with breast cancer. An IGFBP-5/IGFBP-4 expression ratio may serve as a surrogate biomarker of IGF pathway activation and predict sensitivity to anti-IGF-1R targeting. Clin Cancer Res; 18(6); 1808–17. ©2012 AACR.