Hickling, Susannah V

AbstractBackground and purposeProton therapy is a key modality used in the treatment of ocular melanoma. Traditionally ocular sites are treated using a dedicated eyeline with a passively scattered proton beam and a brass aperture. This work aims to design and characterize a beam‐collimating aperture to treat ocular targets with a gantry‐based spot scanning proton beam.MethodsA plastic aperture system that slides into the gantry nozzle of a spot scanning proton beam was designed and constructed. It consists of an intermediate scraper layer to attenuate stray protons and a 3D‐printed patient‐specific aperture positioned 5.7 cm from the surface of the eye. The aperture system was modeled in TOPAS and Monte Carlo simulations were validated with film measurements. Two different spot configurations were investigated for treatment planning and characterized based on lateral penumbra, central axis (CAX) dose and relative efficiency. Alignment and leakage were investigated through experimental film measurements. Range was verified using a multi‐layer ionization chamber. Reference dose measurements were made with a PinPoint 3D ion chamber. Neutron dose was evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations.ResultsAperture alignment with radiation isocenter was determined to be within 0.31 mm at a gantry angle of 0°. A single‐spot configuration with a 10 mm diameter aperture yielded film‐measured lateral penumbras of 1 mm to 1.25 mm, depending on depth in the spread‐out Bragg peak. TOPAS simulations found that a single spot configuration results in a flat dose distribution for a 10 mm diameter aperture and provides a CAX dose of less than 106% for apertures less than 14 mm in diameter. For larger targets, adding four corner spots to fill in the dose distribution is beneficial. Trade‐offs between lateral penumbra, CAX dose and relative efficiency were characterized for different spot configurations and can be used for future clinical decision‐making. The aperture was experimentally determined to not affect proton beam range, and no concerning leakage radiation or neutron dose was identified. Reference dose measurements with a PinPoint ion chamber were within 2.1% of Monte Carlo calculated doses.ConclusionThe aperture system developed in this work provides a method of treating ocular sites on a gantry‐based spot scanning proton system. Additional work to develop compatible gaze tracking and gating infrastructure is ongoing.

AbstractPurposeThe Leksell Gamma Knife Icon unit (IU) was introduced recently as an upgrade to the Perfexion unit (PU) at our Gamma Knife practice. In the current study, we sought mainly to characterize dosimetry and targeting accuracy of the IU treatment deliveries using both invasive frame and frameless treatment workflows.MethodsRelative output factors were measured by delivering single‐shot 4, 8 and 16 mm radiation profiles in the manufacturer's acrylonitrile butadiene styrene spherical phantom in coronal and sagittal planes using EBT3 film. Resultant dosimetry was compared with the manufacturer's dose calculation and derived output factors were compared with the manufacturer's published value. Geometric consistency of stereotactic coordinates based on cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) versus the traditional conventional CT‐based method was characterized using a rigid phantom containing nine fiducial indicators over four separate trials. End‐to‐end (E2E) testing using EBT3 film was designed to evaluate both dosimetric and geometric accuracy for hypothetical framed and frameless workflows.ResultsRelative output factors as measured by the manufacturer were independently confirmed using EBT3 film measurements to within 2%. The mean 3D radial discrepancy in stereotactic space between CBCT and CT‐based definition over the sampled locations in our rigid geometry phantom was demonstrated to be between 0.40 mm and 0.56 mm over the set of trials, larger than prior reported values. E2E performed in 2D demonstrates sub‐mm (and typically < 0.5 mm) accuracy for framed and frameless workflows; geometric accuracy of framed treatments using CBCT‐defined stereotactic coordinates was shown to be slightly improved in comparison with those defined using conventional CT. Furthermore, in phantom, frameless workflows exhibited better accuracy than framed workflows for fractionated treatments, despite large magnitudes of introduced interfraction setup error. Accuracy of dosimetric delivery was confirmed in terms of qualitative comparisons of dose profiles and in terms of 2D gamma pass rates based on 1%/1 mm criteria.ConclusionThe IU was commissioned for clinical use of frameless and framed treatment protocols. The present study outlines an extensive E2E methodology for confirmation of dosimetric and geometric treatment accuracy.

AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study was to provide guidance in developing and implementing a process for the accurate delivery of free breathing respiratory amplitude‐gated treatments.MethodsA phase‐based 4DCT scan is acquired at time of simulation and motion is evaluated to determine the exhale phases that minimize respiratory motion to an acceptable level. A phase subset average CT is then generated for treatment planning and a tracking structure is contoured to indicate the location of the target or a suitable surrogate over the planning phases. Prior to treatment delivery, a 4DCBCT is acquired and a phase subset average is created to coincide with the planning phases for an initial match to the planning CT. Fluoroscopic imaging is then used to set amplitude gate thresholds corresponding to when the target or surrogate is in the tracking structure. The final imaging prior to treatment is an amplitude‐gated CBCT to verify both the amplitude gate thresholds and patient positioning. An amplitude‐gated treatment is then delivered. This technique was commissioned using an in‐house lung motion phantom and film measurements of a simple two‐field 3D plan.ResultsThe accuracy of 4DCBCT motion and target position measurements were validated relative to 4DCT imaging. End to end testing showed strong agreement between planned and film measured dose distributions. Robustness to interuser variability and changes in respiratory motion were demonstrated through film measurements.ConclusionsThe developed workflow utilizes 4DCBCT, respiratory‐correlated fluoroscopy, and gated CBCT imaging in an efficient and sequential process to ensure the accurate delivery of free breathing respiratory‐gated treatments.