Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice

BackgroundQuantitative Doppler echocardiography and proximal flow convergence methods are validated techniques for quantifying mitral regurgitation. However, the clinical interpretation of the values calculated is hindered by the absence of calibration of ranges of severity in large numbers of patients.Methods and ResultsIn 180 consecutive patients (men, 62%; mean age±SD, 66±11 years), the results of Doppler quantification of isolated mitral regurgitation were calibrated by use of left ventricular angiographic grading performed within 3 months in routine practice and without intervening events. The thresholds of the quantitative variables corresponding to the angiographic grades were identified by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity and minimizing their difference. The mitral regurgitation grade by angiography was 2.7±1.3. The mean value and correlation with angiographic grades for effective regurgitant orifice were 43±37 mm andr=.79 (P<.0001); for regurgitant volume, 62±45 mL andr=.80 (P<.0001); and for regurgitant fraction, 45±17% andr=.78 (P<.0001). Despite some overlap, differences between mitral regurgitation grades were all significant (allP<.05). The thresholds for severe mitral regurgitation (grade 4) were 60 mL, 50%, and 40 mm2for regurgitant volume, regurgitant fraction, and orifice, respectively.ConclusionsIn routine practice in large numbers of patients in a clinical laboratory, Doppler echocardiographic quantification of mitral regurgitation shows highly significant correlation with qualitative angiographic grades. Despite an expected overlap between classes, the calibration by angiography of grading ranges for the quantitative variables provides a framework for their interpretation and allows the definition in clinical practice of thresholds for severe mitral regurgitation.

BackgroundIndications for surgical correction of aortic regurgitation have been established mostly in men and have not been validated in women. The outcome of this surgical correction in women is unknown.Methods and ResultsBaseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 51 women and 198 men undergoing surgery for isolated aortic regurgitation between 1980 and 1989. Compared with men, women had surgery rarely for severe left ventricular enlargement (systolic diameter ≥55 mm in 11% versus 27%,P=.031; diastolic diameter ≥80 mm in 0% versus 16%,P<.0001) and more often for class III to IV symptoms (59% versus 32%,P<.0001). Operative mortalities were similar in women and men (3.9% and 4.5%, respectively). Among operative survivors, 10-year survival was worse for women than for men (39±9% versus 72±4%,P=.0002) and, in contrast with men, was worse than expected for women (P<.0001). Independent predictors of late survival were different for men (age and ejection fraction) and women (age and concomitant coronary bypass grafting). By multivariate analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of worse late survival (adjusted relative risk, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.11).ConclusionsThe generalization to women of the unadjusted left ventricular diameter surgical criteria established in men results in irrelevant criteria almost never reached in women, who often undergo surgery after developing severe symptoms. After surgery, women exhibit an excess late mortality, suggesting that surgical correction of aortic regurgitation should be considered at an earlier stage in women.

Background In patients with mitral regurgitation, surgical intervention produces immediate improvement in symptoms, but the long-term incidence and significance of postoperative congestive heart failure are unknown. Methods and Results The long-term outcome of 576 operative survivors of surgical correction of pure mitral regurgitation performed between 1980 and 1989 was analyzed. Survival was 77±2% and 56±3% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Cumulative incidence of congestive heart failure was 23±2%, 33±3%, and 37±3% at 5, 10, and 14 years, respectively. Survival after the first episode of congestive heart failure was dismal, 44±4% at 5 years. Cause of congestive heart failure was left ventricular dysfunction in two thirds of the patients and valvular dysfunction in the other third. With multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of postoperative heart failure were preoperative ejection fraction ( P =.0001), coronary artery disease ( P =.0017), and New York Heart Association functional class ( P =.012), with borderline value for atrial fibrillation ( P =.10). The performance of valve repair was independently predictive of a lower incidence of the combined end point of death and heart failure ( P =.001), compared with valve replacement. Conclusions Congestive heart failure frequently occurs late after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation and portends dismal prognosis. This complication is due most often to left ventricular dysfunction; its main determinant is decreased left ventricular function preoperatively. These data should lead to earlier indication of surgical correction of mitral regurgitation, before left ventricular dysfunction occurs.

BackgroundIn patients with mitral valve prolapse, spontaneous changes of the effective regurgitant orifice during systole are not well documented. Such changes can now be analyzed by use of the proximal isovelocity surface area method, but the changes raise concern about the reliability of this method for assessing overall severity of regurgitation in these patients.Methods and ResultsIn a prospective study of 42 patients with mitral valve prolapse, the effective mitral regurgitant orifice was calculated at four phases of systole (early, mid, mid-late, and late) as the ratio of regurgitant flow to regurgitant velocity by use of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. Throughout systole, the effective regurgitant orifice increased significantly, from 32±27 mm2in early systole to 41±27 in midsystole, 55±30 in mid-late systole, and 107±66 mm2during late systole (P<.0001). Phasic regurgitant volume increased from early to mid-late systole but decreased in late systole. For quantitation of the overall effective regurgitant orifice, four approaches using the proximal isovelocity surface area were compared with simultaneously performed quantitative Doppler echocardiography (54±30 mm2) and quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography (51±29 mm2). All correlations were good (r>.95), but overestimation was considerable when the largest flow convergence was used (70±39 mm2; bothP<.0001), significant when the simple mean of the four phases was used (59±36 mm2;P=.005 andP=.0007, respectively), mild when a weighted mean of the four phases was used (55±33 mm2;P=.41 andP=.01, respectively), and no overestimation was observed when the effective regurgitant orifice calculated at maximum regurgitant velocity was used (54±30 mm2;P=.29 andP=.17, respectively).ConclusionsPhasic changes of mitral regurgitation are observed in patients with mitral valve prolapse. The effective regurgitant orifice increases throughout systole. Regurgitant volume also increases initially but tends to decrease in late systole. These changes can lead to overestimation of the overall degree of regurgitation, but properly timed measurements made by use of the proximal isovelocity surface area method allow an accurate estimation of the overall effective regurgitant orifice.

BackgroundMitral valve repair has been suggested as providing a better postoperative outcome than valve replacement for mitral regurgitation, but this impression has been obscured by differences in baseline characteristics and has not been confirmed in multivariate analyses.Methods and ResultsThe outcomes in 195 patients with valve repair and 214 with replacement for organic mitral regurgitation were compared using multivariate analysis. All patients had preoperative echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function. Before surgery, patients with valve repair were less symptomatic than those with replacement (42% in New York Heart Association functional class I or II versus 24%, respectively;P=.001), had less atrial fibrillation (41% versus 53%;P=.017), and had a better ejection fraction (63±9% versus 60±12%,P=.016). After valve repair, compared with valve replacement, overall survival at 10 years was 68±6% versus 52±4% (P=.0004), overall operative mortality was 2.6% versus 10.3% (P=.002), operative mortality in patients under age 75 was 1.3% versus 5.7% (P=.036), and late survival (in operative survivors) at 10 years was 69±6% versus 58±5% (P=.018). Late survival after valve repair was not different from expected survival. After surgery, ejection fraction decreased significantly in both groups but was higher after valve repair (P=.001). Multivariate analysis indicated an independent beneficial effect of valve repair on overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.39;P=.00001), operative mortality (odds ratio, 0.27;P=.026), late survival (hazard ratio, 0.44;P=.001), and postoperative ejection fraction (P=.001).ConclusionsValve repair significantly improves postoperative outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation and should be the preferred mode of surgical correction. The low operative mortality is an incentive for early surgery before ventricular dysfunction occurs.

BACKGROUND Left ventricular dysfunction is a frequent cause of death after successful surgical repair of mitral regurgitation. The role of preoperative echocardiographic left ventricular variables in the prediction of postoperative survival and thus their clinical implications remain uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS The survival of 409 patients operated on between 1980 and 1989 for pure, isolated, organic mitral regurgitation and with a preoperative echocardiogram (within 6 months of operation) was analyzed. The overall survival was 75% at 5 years (90% of expected), 58% at 10 years (88% of expected), and 44% at 12 years (73% of expected). Operative mortality was 6.6% and markedly improved from 1980 to 1984 (10.7%) to 1985 to 1989 (3.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that age (P = .0003), date of operation (P = .003), and functional class (P = .016) but not left ventricular function were predictors of operative mortality. In the most recent period (1985 to 1989), operative mortality was 12.3% in patients age 75 years or older and 1.1% in patients younger than 75 years. Late survival was analyzed in the operative survivors. Multivariate analysis showed that the most powerful predictor was echocardiographic ejection fraction (EF) (P = .0004), followed by age (P = .0031), creatinine level (P = .0062), systolic blood pressure (P = .0164), and presence of coronary artery disease (P = .0237). The late survival at 10 years was 32 +/- 12% for patients with EF < 50%, 53 +/- 9% for EF 50% to 60%, and 72 +/- 4% for EF > or = 60%. The hazard ratio compared with EF > or = 60% was 2.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.65 to 4.72) for EF < 50% and 1.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 2.95) for EF 50% to 60%. Echocardiographic EF remained the best predictor of late survival, even when combined with left ventricular angiographic variables. The survival of patients with EF > or = 60% was 100% of expected at 10 years but was better in patients in class I or II than in those in class III or IV (82 +/- 6% versus 59 +/- 6%, respectively, at 10 years; P = .0021). The preoperative predictors of operative and late mortality remained significant independent of the type of surgical correction performed in combined multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS In organic mitral regurgitation, (1) operative mortality has markedly decreased recently, being at a low 1.1% in patients younger than 75 years, and is predicted by age and symptoms and not by left ventricular function, and (2) left ventricular EF measured by echocardiography is the most powerful predictor of late survival. These results suggest that surgical treatment should be considered early, even in the absence of severe symptoms, in patients with severe mitral regurgitation, before left ventricular dysfunction occurs.

Background —Myocardial infarction (MI) can directly cause ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), which has been touted as an indicator of poor prognosis in acute and early phases after MI. However, in the chronic post-MI phase, prognostic implications of IMR presence and degree are poorly defined. Methods and Results —We analyzed 303 patients with previous (>16 days) Q-wave MI by ECG who underwent transthoracic echocardiography: 194 with IMR quantitatively assessed in routine practice and 109 without IMR matched for baseline age (71±11 versus 70±9 years, P =0.20), sex, and ejection fraction (EF, 33±14% versus 34±11%, P =0.14). In IMR patients, regurgitant volume (RVol) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) area were 36±24 mL/beat and 21±12 mm 2 , respectively. After 5 years, total mortality and cardiac mortality for patients with IMR (62±5% and 50±6%, respectively) were higher than for those without IMR (39±6% and 30±5%, respectively) (both P <0.001). In multivariate analysis, independently of all baseline characteristics, particularly age and EF, the adjusted relative risks of total and cardiac mortality associated with the presence of IMR (1.88, P =0.003 and 1.83, P =0.014, respectively) and quantified degree of IMR defined by RVol ≥30 mL (2.05, P =0.002 and 2.01, P =0.009) and by ERO ≥20 mm 2 (2.23, P =0.003 and 2.38, P =0.004) were high. Conclusions —In the chronic phase after MI, IMR presence is associated with excess mortality independently of baseline characteristics and degree of ventricular dysfunction. The mortality risk is related directly to the degree of IMR as defined by ERO and RVol. Therefore, IMR detection and quantification provide major information for risk stratification and clinical decision making in the chronic post-MI phase.

Background —Surgical correction of mitral regurgitation in patients with no or mild symptoms remains controversial, particularly because the impact of preoperative symptoms on postoperative outcome is unknown. Methods and Results —The long-term outcome of 478 patients with organic mitral regurgitation (199 in NYHA functional class I/II and 279 in class III/IV before surgery) operated on between 1984 and 1991 was analyzed. In patients in NYHA class I/II before surgery compared with those in class III/IV, postoperative long-term survival was higher (at 10 years, 76±5% versus 48±4%, P <0.0001), with lower operative mortality (0.5% versus 5.4%, P =0.003) and better late survival ( P <0.0001). Comparison of observed and expected survival showed identical curves in patients in class I/II before surgery ( P =0.18), whereas excess mortality was observed in patients in class III/IV before surgery ( P <0.0001). Excess mortality associated with severe symptoms was also confirmed in all subgroups (all P <0.003) and in multivariate analysis ( P =0.0036; adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.81 [1.21 to 2.70]). Conclusions —In patients with organic mitral regurgitation, preoperative functional class III/IV symptoms are associated with excess short- and long-term postoperative mortality independently of all baseline characteristics. These data should lead to consideration of surgical correction of severe organic mitral regurgitation when no or minimal symptoms are present in patients at low operative risk, especially if repair is feasible.

Background —The outcome of aortic regurgitation conservatively followed in clinical practice is poorly defined. Methods and Results —Long-term outcome of 246 patients with severe or moderately severe aortic regurgitation diagnosed by color Doppler echocardiography was analyzed. With conservative management, mortality rate was higher than expected (at 10 years, 34±5%, P <0.001) and morbidity was high (10-year rates of 47±6% for heart failure and 62±4% for aortic valve surgery). At 10 years, 75±3% of patients had died or had surgery and 83±3% had had cardiovascular events. In multivariate analysis, predictors of survival were age ( P <0.001), functional class ( P <0.001), comorbidity index ( P =0.033), atrial fibrillation ( P =0.002), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter corrected for body surface area ( P =0.025). Ejection fraction was also an independent predictor of overall survival, including postoperative follow-up of surgically treated patients ( P <0.001). High risk during conservative treatment, with mortality rate in excess of that expected, was noted among patients with severe, even transient, symptoms (24.6% yearly, P <0.001) but also in those with mild (class II) symptoms (6.3% yearly, P =0.02) and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <55% (5.8% yearly, P =0.03) or with end-systolic diameter normalized to body surface area ≥25 mm/m 2 (7.8% yearly, P =0.004). Surgery performed during follow-up was independently associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.54; P =0.048). Conclusions —Patients diagnosed with severe aortic regurgitation in clinical practice incur excess mortality and high morbidity, underscoring the serious prognosis of the disease. Surgery, which reduces cardiac mortality rates, should be considered promptly in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND Quantitation of valvular regurgitation remains a challenge. The accuracy of quantitative Doppler is controversial, and its ability to measure regurgitant volume is unknown; therefore, it is not widely used. METHODS AND RESULTS In 120 patients (20 without regurgitation, 19 with aortic regurgitation, and 81 with mitral regurgitation), the stroke volume through the mitral annulus and left ventricular outflow tract were measured using pulsed-wave Doppler concurrently with left ventricular stroke volume calculated using left ventricular volumes measured by two-dimensional echocardiography Simpson's biapical method. Regurgitant volume and fraction were thus computed using Doppler or ventricular methods. In normal patients there were good correlations between Doppler and left ventricular measurements of stroke volume. Doppler regurgitant volume and fraction were 4.4 +/- 4.4 mL and 5.3 +/- 4.5%, respectively. In patients with aortic regurgitation, there were good correlations between Doppler and left ventricular measurements of stroke volume, regurgitant volume, and regurgitant fraction (r = 0.97, r = 0.95, and r = 0.93, respectively; p < 0.0001). In patients with mitral regurgitation, despite good correlations between Doppler and ventricular methods for stroke volume, regurgitant volume, and regurgitant fraction (r = 0.94, r = 0.93, and r = 0.94, respectively; p < 0.001), these variables were overestimated by Doppler. However, in the last 54 patients compared with the first 27, overestimation decreased significantly for regurgitant volume (5 +/- 10 mL versus 18 +/- 27 mL, p < 0.05) and regurgitant fraction (3.3 +/- 6.7% versus 6.2 +/- 6.8%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Quantitative Doppler can be performed in large numbers of patients in a clinical laboratory. Its potential limitation was identified as overestimation of mitral regurgitation, which is overcome with increased experience. Its achieved accuracy in mitral and aortic regurgitation allows measurement not only of regurgitant fraction but most importantly of regurgitant volume.