Klodas, Elizabeth

Introduction: Up to 20% of outpatients receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) experience treatment reluctance on the basis of side effects, leaving a large population at increased risk of CVD. We hypothesized that a practical food-based approach can be utilized to lower LDL-C in statin reluctant patients and that the lipid response can be predicted based upon CYP7A1-rs3808607 (CYP7A1) and APOE genetic isoforms. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, free-living cross-over study composed of 2 phases of 4 wk each, separated by a 4 wk washout. Participants (n=54) received an assortment of individually packaged, shelf stable snacks along with printed instructions to ingest 2 servings of the foods per day as a substitute for similar items they were eating already. No other dietary or behavior adjustments were requested. Treatment products supplied at least 1800 mg alpha-linoleic acid (ALA), 5 g of fiber and 1g of phytosterols per serving. Control products were calorie-matched like items drawn from the general grocery marketplace. Lipid parameters were measured and averaged over 2 d at baseline and at 4 wk of each phase. Ingestion of study foods was confirmed by C18:3n3 serum level assessment. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and APOE isoform were assessed by Taqman genotyping assay. Results: As compared to control, LDL-C decreased 8.8% in the treatment arm (p<0.0001, range -37.6% to +20.5%) and total cholesterol fell 5.1% (p<0.004). No significant change was seen in HDL-C, TG or fasting glucose levels. LDL-C was reduced by diet in CYP7A1 T/T homozygotes (-0.3924+0.1271mmol/l, p = 0.0033) and APOE4 carriers ( -0.3808+0.098 mmol/l, p = 0.0003). Conclusions: Significant LDL-C reductions can be affected through a simple food intervention supplying high levels of phytosterols, fiber and ALA. CYP7A1 and APOE isoforms influence the variability in LDL-C response and can help identify individual patients especially appropriate for a food-based LDL-C lowering approach. Given the large number of patients unable/unwilling to take statins, our findings have significant impact for management of this challenging population.

BackgroundIndications for surgical correction of aortic regurgitation have been established mostly in men and have not been validated in women. The outcome of this surgical correction in women is unknown.Methods and ResultsBaseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 51 women and 198 men undergoing surgery for isolated aortic regurgitation between 1980 and 1989. Compared with men, women had surgery rarely for severe left ventricular enlargement (systolic diameter ≥55 mm in 11% versus 27%,P=.031; diastolic diameter ≥80 mm in 0% versus 16%,P<.0001) and more often for class III to IV symptoms (59% versus 32%,P<.0001). Operative mortalities were similar in women and men (3.9% and 4.5%, respectively). Among operative survivors, 10-year survival was worse for women than for men (39±9% versus 72±4%,P=.0002) and, in contrast with men, was worse than expected for women (P<.0001). Independent predictors of late survival were different for men (age and ejection fraction) and women (age and concomitant coronary bypass grafting). By multivariate analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of worse late survival (adjusted relative risk, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.11).ConclusionsThe generalization to women of the unadjusted left ventricular diameter surgical criteria established in men results in irrelevant criteria almost never reached in women, who often undergo surgery after developing severe symptoms. After surgery, women exhibit an excess late mortality, suggesting that surgical correction of aortic regurgitation should be considered at an earlier stage in women.