Arruda-Olson, Adelaide M

Background Symptomatic limitations in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may occur because of diastolic dysfunction with resultant elevated left ventricular filling pressures, cardiac output limitation to exercise, pulmonary hypertension (PH), valvular abnormalities, and/or arrhythmias. In this study, the authors aimed to describe invasive cardiac hemodynamics in a cohort of patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Methods and Results Patients presenting to a comprehensive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy center with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were identified (n=542) and those who underwent invasive hemodynamic catheterization (n=47) were included in the study. Of these, 10 were excluded due to postmyectomy status or incomplete hemodynamic data. The mean age was 56±18 years, 16 (43%) were women, and ejection fraction was preserved (≥50%) in 32 (91%) patients. The most common indication for catheterization was dyspnea (48%) followed by suspected PH (13%), and preheart transplant evaluation (10%). Elevated left ventricular filling pressures at rest or exercise were present in 32 (86%) patients. PH was present in 30 (81%) patients, with 6 (20%) also having right‐sided heart failure. Cardiac index was available in 25 (86%) patients with elevated resting filling pressures. Of these, 19 (76%) had reduced cardiac index and all 6 with right‐sided heart failure had reduced cardiac index. Resting hemodynamics were normal in 8 of 37 (22%) patients, with 5 during exercise; 3 of 5 (60%) patients had exercise‐induced elevation in left ventricular filling pressures. Conclusions In patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy undergoing invasive hemodynamic cardiac catheterization, 86% had elevated left ventricular filling pressures at rest or with exercise, 81% had PH, and 20% of those with PH had concomitant right‐sided heart failure.

AbstractBackgroundA subset of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Practice guidelines endorse use of a risk calculator, which requires entry of left atrial (LA) diameter. However, American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines recommend the use of LA volume index (LAVI) for routine quantification of LA size. The aims of this study were to (a) develop a model to estimate LA diameter from LAVI and (b) evaluate whether substitution of measured LA diameter by estimated LA diameter derived from LAVI reclassifies HCM‐SCD risk.MethodsThe study cohort was comprised of 500 randomly selected HCM patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). LA diameter and LAVI were measured offline using digital clips from TTE. Linear regression models were developed to estimate LA diameter from LAVI. A European Society of Cardiology endorsed equation estimated SCD risk, which was measured using LA diameter and estimated LA diameter derived from LAVI.ResultsThe mean LAVI was 48.5 ± 18.8 mL/m2. The derived LA diameter was 45.1 mm (SD: 5.5 mm), similar to the measured LA diameter (45.1 mm, SD: 7.1 mm). Median SCD risk at 5 years estimated by measured LA diameter was 2.22% (interquartile range (IQR): 1.39, 3.56), while median risk calculated by estimated LA diameter was 2.18% (IQR: 1.44, 3.52). 476/500 (95%) patients maintained the same risk classification regardless of whether the measured or estimated LA diameter was used.ConclusionsSubstitution of measured LA diameter by estimated LA diameter in the HCM‐SCD calculator did not reclassify risk.