Thornburg, Danielle

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare delivery has become an important area of research due to the rapid progression of technology, which has allowed the growth of many processes historically reliant upon human input. AI has become particularly important in plastic surgery in a variety of settings. This article highlights current applications of AI in plastic surgery and discusses future implications. We further detail ethical issues that may arise in the implementation of AI in plastic surgery. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of all electronically available publications in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases as of February 5, 2020. All returned publications regarding the application of AI in plastic surgery were considered for inclusion. Results: Of the 89 novel articles returned, 14 satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles procured from the references of those of the database search and those pertaining to historical and ethical implications were summarized when relevant. Conclusions: Numerous applications of AI exist in plastic surgery. Big data, machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and facial recognition are examples of AI-based technology that plastic surgeons may utilize to advance their surgical practice. Like any evolving technology, however, the use of AI in healthcare raises important ethical issues, including patient autonomy and informed consent, confidentiality, and appropriate data use. Such considerations are significant, as high ethical standards are key to appropriate and longstanding implementation of AI.

Introduction: Pectus excavatum is a common congenital anomaly in the pediatric population. During the postoperative period, pain control is one of the top priorities. As a result, multiple techniques for pain control have been developed, including thoracic epidural analgesia, multimodal analgesia (MM), and elastomeric pain pump (EPP) placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pain control using EPP as an adjunct to MM after the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Methods: We identified all pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE from June 2017 to July 2018. MM was employed in all patients; some patients additionally received subpleural EPP as adjuncts to postoperative analgesia. We reviewed pain scores, length of stay, opioid use, and complications. Results: During the study period, a total of 62 patients were included. The study cohort was divided into 15 patients undergoing MM alone versus 47 patients undergoing subpleural EPP placement plus MM (EPP + MM). Median pain scores were lower in the EPP + MM group (2.9 versus 4.2, P < .05). There was a significant reduction of total inpatient opioid use in the EPP + MM group (357.6 mg versus 466.9 mg, P = .03). There was no difference in median length of stay or complications. We found no significant difference between subpleural versus subcutaneous placement of the infusion catheters. Conclusion: The use of subpleural EPP as an adjunct to MM is an effective way to reduce pain and opioid use after MIRPE without increased risk of complications. Type of Study: Retrospective study with comparison group.