McMahon, Lisa

Objective: The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature-reported outcomes of CRYO compared to standard of care without CRYO (non-CRYO) after PEx repair. Summary Background Data: Surgical repair of pectus excavatum (PEx) via the Nuss or Ravitch procedures is associated with substantial postoperative pain. Intercostal nerve cryoablation (CRYO) performed during the primary surgical repair has been adopted as a non-opioid modality for pain management. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and using additional online approaches to identify comparative studies of patients undergoing the Nuss or Ravitch procedure for PEx repair with CRYO versus non-CRYO between years 2014-24. Meta-analysis was performed to quantitatively evaluate primary outcomes of hospital length of stay (LOS) and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were hospital costs and complications, summarized qualitatively. Results: Of 178 studies, 32 comparative studies encompassing 13,103 patients were included; 28% (n=3,620) received CRYO. Random effects meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly shortened LOS by 1.8 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.12, -1.42) and a significant reduction in inpatient and outpatient opioid consumption with CRYO by 186 morphine mg equivalents (MME) (95% CI: -262.26, -109.08) and 147 MME (95% CI: -255.72, -38.26), respectively. Complications with CRYO were either decreased or similar between groups and resolved over time. Hospital costs were similar. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests CRYO during PEx repair is associated with a significantly shorter hospital LOS, as well as decreased opioid consumption both in the hospital and after discharge. Complications were infrequent and time-limited.

Introduction: Cryoablation of intercostal nerves is performed for pain control after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Cryoablation affects both sensory and motor neurons, resulting in temporary anesthesia to the chest wall and loss of intercostal motor function. The study objective is to determine the effect of cryoablation on incentive spirometry (IS) volumes, as a measure of pulmonary function, after MIRPE. Materials and Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE was performed. All patients received a multimodal regimen (MMR) of analgesics postoperatively. Three groups were compared—cryoablation (CRYO), elastomeric pain pump (EPP), and MMR alone. The primary outcomes were postoperative IS volumes and IS volumes as a ratio of preoperative forced vital capacity (FVC). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid use, length of stay (LOS), and infectious complications. Results: MIRPE was performed in 115 patients: 50 CRYO, 50 EPP, and 15 MMR alone. Groups were similar for demographics and pectus excavatum severity. Postoperative spirometry measurements were similar across groups: IS (CRYO 750 mL [500,961] versus EPP 750 mL [590,1019] versus MMR 696 mL [500,1037], P = .77); IS/FVC (CRYO 0.19 [0.14,0.26] versus EPP 0.20 [0.16,0.26] versus MMR 0.16 [0.15,0.24], P = .69). Although pain scores were also similar across groups, CRYO patients used less opioid ( P < .05) and had shorter LOS ( P < .05). Postoperative pneumonia was rare and similar across groups ( P = 1.00). Conclusion: Intercostal nerve cryoablation during MIRPE does not adversely affect postoperative IS volumes or increase pneumonia rate, despite the temporary loss of motor innervation to intercostal muscles. Cryoablation provides effective pain control with less opioid use.

Introduction: Pectus excavatum is a common congenital anomaly in the pediatric population. During the postoperative period, pain control is one of the top priorities. As a result, multiple techniques for pain control have been developed, including thoracic epidural analgesia, multimodal analgesia (MM), and elastomeric pain pump (EPP) placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pain control using EPP as an adjunct to MM after the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Methods: We identified all pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE from June 2017 to July 2018. MM was employed in all patients; some patients additionally received subpleural EPP as adjuncts to postoperative analgesia. We reviewed pain scores, length of stay, opioid use, and complications. Results: During the study period, a total of 62 patients were included. The study cohort was divided into 15 patients undergoing MM alone versus 47 patients undergoing subpleural EPP placement plus MM (EPP + MM). Median pain scores were lower in the EPP + MM group (2.9 versus 4.2, P < .05). There was a significant reduction of total inpatient opioid use in the EPP + MM group (357.6 mg versus 466.9 mg, P = .03). There was no difference in median length of stay or complications. We found no significant difference between subpleural versus subcutaneous placement of the infusion catheters. Conclusion: The use of subpleural EPP as an adjunct to MM is an effective way to reduce pain and opioid use after MIRPE without increased risk of complications. Type of Study: Retrospective study with comparison group.

Abstract Introduction: Cryoanalgesia has been applied to minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). After implementation of cryoanalgesia at our institution, we had several cases of delayed postoperative pneumothorax. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the complications and efficacy of cryoanalgesia in MIRPE. Materials and Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE from June 2017 to July 2018. Multimodal (MM) analgesia was used in all patients. In addition, most patients received either cryoanalgesia or elastomeric pain pumps (EPPs) as adjuncts to postoperative analgesia. Primary outcome was clinically significant late pneumothorax. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, pain scores, opiate use, and bar displacement requiring reoperation. Results: A total of 101 patients undergoing MIRPE were included: 45 had cryoanalgesia + MM, 45 EPP + MM, and 11 MM alone. Postoperative tube thoracostomy was placed in 5 patients with cryoanalgesia (4 pneumothorax; 1 effusion), 1 patient with EPP (1 pneumothorax), and none in MM alone ( P = .25). Pain scores at discharge were similar in all groups. Cryoanalgesia patients received less overall inpatient opioids than other groups ( P < .05). No patient required reoperation for bar displacement. Conclusion: Cryoanalgesia is an effective therapy for pain control in MIRPE. Because thermal injury can occur on the lung and chest wall with cryoanalgesia, we implemented techniques to limit and prevent this injury. Cryoanalgesia offers a safe alternative for postoperative analgesia with significant reduction in inpatient opioid requirement. Larger prospective studies are required to assess the long-term impact and complications of cryoanalgesia.