Parrado, Raphael H.

Background: Open hand fractures are one of the most common injuries in the pediatric population. These injuries are at higher risk of infection, especially in cases of frank contamination. Several studies on adult hand fractures are available in the literature; however, pediatric open hand fractures have yet to be extensively studied. This study aimed to define pediatric open hand fracture’s demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns. Methods: Using the Protected Health Information database, pediatric patients (<18 y old) with the diagnosis of open hand fracture from June 2016 to June 2018 were extracted. Demographic, treatment, and follow-up data were collected. Clinical outcomes included readmission and postoperative infection rates. Results: There were a total of 4516 patients who met the inclusion criteria; the median age was 7 years (interquartile range: 3 to 11); 60% males; 60% white. Displaced fractures occurred in 74% of patients, with the right hand (52%) and middle finger (27%) predominance. The most common mechanism of injury was a crushing injury in-between objects (56%). Associated nerve injury occurred in 78 patients (4%) and vascular injury in 43 patients (2%). Open reduction and internal fixation were performed in 30% of patients. Cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics (73%), followed by aminopenicillins (7%). Nine patients had complications related to surgical intervention (0.2%), and postoperative infection occurred in 44 patients (1%). Conclusions: Pediatric open hand fractures most often occur during childhood and more frequently in males. These fractures tend to be more distal and displaced; reduction and fixation are required in one-third of the cases. Despite the absence of treatment guidelines and variability, this injury exhibits low complication rates. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective study.

Introduction: Pectus excavatum is a common congenital anomaly in the pediatric population. During the postoperative period, pain control is one of the top priorities. As a result, multiple techniques for pain control have been developed, including thoracic epidural analgesia, multimodal analgesia (MM), and elastomeric pain pump (EPP) placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pain control using EPP as an adjunct to MM after the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Methods: We identified all pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE from June 2017 to July 2018. MM was employed in all patients; some patients additionally received subpleural EPP as adjuncts to postoperative analgesia. We reviewed pain scores, length of stay, opioid use, and complications. Results: During the study period, a total of 62 patients were included. The study cohort was divided into 15 patients undergoing MM alone versus 47 patients undergoing subpleural EPP placement plus MM (EPP + MM). Median pain scores were lower in the EPP + MM group (2.9 versus 4.2, P < .05). There was a significant reduction of total inpatient opioid use in the EPP + MM group (357.6 mg versus 466.9 mg, P = .03). There was no difference in median length of stay or complications. We found no significant difference between subpleural versus subcutaneous placement of the infusion catheters. Conclusion: The use of subpleural EPP as an adjunct to MM is an effective way to reduce pain and opioid use after MIRPE without increased risk of complications. Type of Study: Retrospective study with comparison group.

Abstract Introduction: Cryoanalgesia has been applied to minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). After implementation of cryoanalgesia at our institution, we had several cases of delayed postoperative pneumothorax. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the complications and efficacy of cryoanalgesia in MIRPE. Materials and Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE from June 2017 to July 2018. Multimodal (MM) analgesia was used in all patients. In addition, most patients received either cryoanalgesia or elastomeric pain pumps (EPPs) as adjuncts to postoperative analgesia. Primary outcome was clinically significant late pneumothorax. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, pain scores, opiate use, and bar displacement requiring reoperation. Results: A total of 101 patients undergoing MIRPE were included: 45 had cryoanalgesia + MM, 45 EPP + MM, and 11 MM alone. Postoperative tube thoracostomy was placed in 5 patients with cryoanalgesia (4 pneumothorax; 1 effusion), 1 patient with EPP (1 pneumothorax), and none in MM alone ( P = .25). Pain scores at discharge were similar in all groups. Cryoanalgesia patients received less overall inpatient opioids than other groups ( P < .05). No patient required reoperation for bar displacement. Conclusion: Cryoanalgesia is an effective therapy for pain control in MIRPE. Because thermal injury can occur on the lung and chest wall with cryoanalgesia, we implemented techniques to limit and prevent this injury. Cryoanalgesia offers a safe alternative for postoperative analgesia with significant reduction in inpatient opioid requirement. Larger prospective studies are required to assess the long-term impact and complications of cryoanalgesia.