Back to Authors

Nakano, Toshimichi

0000-0001-5033-4509

Mayo Clinic

8University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan.

Citations 2

Improved Survival and Prognostication in Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases: An Update of the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment
Sperduto, Paul W. , Marqueen, Kathryn E. , Chang, Enoch , Li, Jing , Davies, Michael A. , Ebner, Daniel K. , Breen, William G. , Lamba, Nayan , Shih, Helen A. , Mahal, Amandeep R. , Rahman, Rifaquat , Ankrah, Nii, Boggs, Drexell H. , Lewis, Calvin D. , Hyer, Daniel E. , Johri, Fasila, Soliman, Hany , Masucci, Laura , Chiang, Veronica , Phuong, Christina , Dajani, Salah, Wan, Zihan, Niedzwiecki, Donna , Vaios, Eugene , Pasetsky, Jared , Wang, Tony J. C. , Kotecha, Rupesh , Ross, Richard B. , Rusthoven, Chad G. , Nakano, Toshimichi , Tawbi, Hussein A. , Edwards, Donna , Kim, Michelle M , Rahman, Rifaquat , Boggs, Drexell H , Lewis, Calvin , Hyer, Daniel , Buatti, John M , Aneja, Sanjay , Chiang, Veronica , Phuong, Christina , Braunstein, Steve , Sachdev, Sean , Niedzwiecki, Donna , Vaios, Eugene , Pasetsky, Jared , Wang, Tony J C , Kotecha, Rupesh , Ross, Richard B , Rusthoven, Chad G , Nakano, Toshimichi , Tawbi, Hussein , Mehta, Minesh P , Shih, Helen A , Kim, Michelle M. , Buatti, John M. , Roberge, David , Braunstein, Steve , Kirkpatrick, John P. , Kütük, Tuğçe , Mehta, Minesh P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 17, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 1910-1919

10.1200/jco-24-01351 Get It

PURPOSE Survival for patients with melanoma has recently improved. The propensity of melanoma to metastasize to the brain remains a common and serious feature of this disease. The purposes of this study were to evaluate prognostic factors for patients with newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) in a large cohort treated with modern multimodal therapies, compare those results with those in prior eras, and update the Melanoma Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). METHODS Univariable and multivariable (MVA) analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival were performed on 1,796 patients with newly diagnosed MBM treated between January 01, 2015, and December 31, 2021, using a multi-institutional retrospective database. Multiple imputation was used to address missingness of potential predictors. Significant variables in combined MVA were used to update the Melanoma GPA. Comparisons were made with legacy cohorts. RESULTS Median survivals for cohorts A (1985-2007, n = 481), B (2006-2015, n = 823), and C (2015-2021, n = 1,796) were 6.7, 9.8, and 16.6 months and median follow-up times were 40.1, 43.6, and 48.8 months, respectively. In combined MVA, significant prognostic factors for survival were higher Karnofsky Performance Status, fewer MBMs, absence of extracranial metastases, lower serum lactate dehydrogenase, and no immunotherapy before MBM. These factors were incorporated into the updated Melanoma GPA. The combined median and 3-year survivals for patients with GPA 0-1, 1.5-2, and 2.5-4.0 were 5.4, 13.2, and 43.2 months and 12.4%, 28.8%, and 51.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION Prognostic factors have changed and survival has improved for patients with MBM but varies widely by GPA. The updated Melanoma GPA calculator (BrainMetGPA), available free online, can be used to estimate survival, individualize treatment, stratify clinical trials, guide surveillance, and augment clinical trial eligibility. Multidisciplinary treatment is essential. Trials are needed to elucidate the optimal sequencing of various therapeutic modalities.
Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient
Sperduto, Paul W. , Mesko, Shane , Li, Jing , Cagney, Daniel , Aizer, Ayal A. , Lin, Nancy U. , Nesbit, Eric , Chan, Jason W., Braunstein, Steve , Breen, Will, Brown, Paul D. , Shi, Diana D. , Soliman, Hany , Sahgal, Arjun , Shanley, Ryan , Sperduto, William , Everett, Ashlyn S. , Boggs, Drexell H. , Masucci, Laura , Plichta, Kristin A. , Buatti, John M. , Jain, Supriya , Gaspar, Laurie E., Wu, Cheng–Chia , Wang, Tony J. C. , Bryant, John , Chuong, Michael D. , An, Yi , Chiang, Veronica , Nakano, Toshimichi , Aizer, Ayal , Chan, Jason , Braunstein, Steve , Breen, Will , Brown, Paul D , Shi, Diana , Shih, Helen A , Shanley, Ryan , Lou, Emil , Everett, Ashlyn , Boggs, Drexell H , Buatti, John M , Jain, Supriya , Wang, Tony J C , Chuong, Michael , An, Yi , Chiang, Veronica , Nakano, Toshimichi , Mehta, Minesh P , Lin, Nancy U , Kruser, Tim J. , Lee, Jessica , Kirkpatrick, John P. , Shih, Helen A. , Lou, Emil , Roberge, David , Remick, Jill S. , Aoyama, Hidefumi , Mehta, Minesh P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 15, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 32 | Pages: 3773-3784

10.1200/jco.20.01255 Get It

PURPOSE Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility. METHODS A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively. RESULTS Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation ( P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non–small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).