Breen, Will

Abstract Background The current treatment of glioblastoma involves resection followed by radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide. Rapid early progression (REP) of tumor in the surgery-to-radiotherapy interval (SRI) has been described using categorical or semi-quantitative assessments and is associated with inferior clinical outcomes. This study seeks to establish and validate a quantitative definition for REP and examine how REP could inform future therapy. Methods Volumes of tumor and resection cavity at 3 time points—preoperative, postoperative and RT-planning (pre-RT)—were contoured among patients who had undergone standard of care. A minimal, but clinically appreciable, threshold for defining REP based on change in tumor volume was established, validated, and subsequently used to assess actionable predictors of REP and its prognostic value. Results An increase of >2 cc in volume or a new satellite tumor between the post-operative to planning MRI was found to be a sensitive, pragmatic, and statistically significant cutoff for REP (P = .002). Actionable predictors such as SRI of 6 weeks and a > 5 cc residual immediate post-operative tumor volume were found to be statistically significant predictors of REP. REP was also found to be a statistically significant prognostic indicator for overall survival (P = .002) and progression-free survival. Conclusion These findings support that an increase in tumor volume between post-operative and pre-RT MRI of >2 cc is the ideal working definition of REP in this clinical setting. Furthermore, REP could serve as a prognostic ­biomarker to track treatment response. Additionally, 2 actionable predictors of REP, post-op residual tumor volume and SRI, are identified.

Abstract Background Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas are infiltrative tumors with limited treatment options at recurrence. Early studies suggest IDH inhibition has therapeutic activity. We evaluated clinical outcomes associated with IDH-1 inhibitor ivosidenib in recurrent IDH-1-mutant gliomas and molecular predictors of response. Methods We retrospectively analyzed adults treated with ivosidenib from January 2021 to August 2025 with predominantly recurrent, pretreated CNS WHO grade 2-4 astrocytoma IDH-mutant or grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted. Prior anticancer treatments, toxicities, enhancement status at ivosidenib initiation, and genomic alterations were collected. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary analyses evaluated associations between PFS, genomic complexity, and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion. Results Ninety-two adults, median age 43, were included: 61 astrocytomas and 31 oligodendrogliomas, mostly grade 2. Before ivosidenib, 69 had surgery, 64 chemotherapy, and 64 radiation. Median time from diagnosis to ivosidenib was 4.8 years, with median of two prior progressions. Median treatment duration was 5.8 months. Median PFS was 15.2, 4.6, and 2.1 months for astrocytoma grades 2-4, 14.0 and 6.9 months for oligodendroglioma grades 2-3. Increasing genomic complexity was associated with shorter PFS in univariate analysis. Patients without CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion had median PFS of 19.2 months. Two patients with homozygous deletion had median PFS of 0.6 months. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis of predominantly recurrent IDH-1-mutant glioma, ivosidenib was associated with longer PFS in lower-grade, non-enhancing tumors that received little or no prior anticancer treatment and less complex genomic profiles. These findings support a context-dependent benefit of IDH inhibition in recurrent disease.

BackgroundPatients with high‐risk prostate cancer (HRPC) have multiple accepted treatment options. Because there is no overall survival benefit of one option over another, appropriate treatment must consider patient life expectancy, quality of life, and cost.MethodsThe authors compared quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost effectiveness among treatment options for HRPC using a Markov model with three treatment arms: (1) external‐beam radiotherapy (EBRT) delivered with 20 fractions, (2) EBRT with 23 fractions followed by low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy boost, or (3) radical prostatectomy alone. An exploratory analysis considered a simultaneous integrated boost according to the FLAME trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01168479).ResultsTreatment strategies were compared using the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER). EBRT with LDR brachytherapy boost was a cost‐effective strategy (ICER, $20,929 per QALY gained). These results were most sensitive to variations in the biochemical failure rate. However, the results still demonstrated cost effectiveness for the brachytherapy boost paradigm, regardless of any tested parameter ranges. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that EBRT with LDR brachytherapy was favored in 52% of 100,000 Monte Carlo iterations. In an exploratory analysis, EBRT with a simultaneous integrated boost was also a cost‐effective strategy, resulting in an ICER of $62,607 per QALY gained; however, it was not cost effective compared with EBRT plus LDR brachytherapy boost.ConclusionsEBRT with LDR brachytherapy boost may be a cost‐effective treatment strategy compared with EBRT alone and radical prostatectomy for HRPC, demonstrating high‐value care. The current analysis suggests that a reduction in biochemical failure alone can result in cost‐effective care, despite no change in overall survival.

PURPOSE Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility. METHODS A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively. RESULTS Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation ( P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non–small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).