Chahal, Choudhary Anwar A

Despite advances in cardiovascular care and improved outcomes, fragmented healthcare systems, nonequitable access to health care, and nonuniform and unbiased collection and access to healthcare data have exacerbated disparities in healthcare provision and further delayed the technological-enabled implementation of precision medicine. Precision medicine relies on a foundation of accurate and valid omics and phenomics that can be harnessed at scale from electronic health records. Big data approaches in noncardiovascular healthcare domains have helped improve efficiency and expedite the development of novel therapeutics; therefore, applying such an approach to cardiovascular precision medicine is an opportunity to further advance the field. Several endeavors, including the American Heart Association Precision Medicine platform and public-private partnerships (such as BigData@Heart in Europe), as well as cloud-based platforms, such as Terra used for the National Institutes of Health All of Us, are attempting to temporally and ontologically harmonize data. This state-of-the-art review summarizes best practices used in cardiovascular genomic and precision medicine and provides recommendations for systems’ requirements that could enhance and accelerate the integration of these platforms.

Abstract Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a clinical diagnosis characterized by the presence of left ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction unexplained by abnormal loading conditions or coronary artery disease. However, a broad range of phenotypic manifestations, encompassing isolated scar, DCM with preserved ejection fraction, and overt DCM, should be regarded as a diagnostic classification representing a broad spectrum of underlying aetiologies, including both inherited and acquired heart muscle disorders. A multimodal non-invasive imaging approach is essential for accurate morpho-functional assessment of cardiac chambers and is key to establish the cardiac phenotype and to rule out an underlying ischaemic aetiology. Furthermore, advanced imaging techniques enable deep cardiovascular phenotyping and non-invasive tissue characterization. The aim of this review is to propose a systematic approach to the diagnosis of DCM, emphasizing the importance of genetics and clinical findings for a precise and practical clinical approach. Also, we strive to qualify the role of cardiac imaging in the diagnosis of DCM, particularly on the relevance of novel techniques and clinical utility of actionable parameters to improve current diagnostic schemes and risk stratification algorithms. We further elaborate on the role of cardiac imaging to deliver optimal guidance to aetiology-based therapeutic approaches, verification of treatment response and disease progression monitoring.

Abstract Aims In light of recent advances in imaging techniques, molecular understanding and therapeutic options in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), we performed a systematic review of current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCM in order to identify consensus and discrepant areas in the clinical practice guidelines. Methods and results We systematically reviewed the English language guidelines and recommendations for the management of HCM in adults. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for guidelines published in the last 10 years. Following a systematic search, three guidelines on the diagnosis and management of HCM were identified, all of which were robustly developed (AGREE rigour of development score ≥50%). These guidelines were authored by the major European (European Society of Cardiology; 2023), American (American Heart Association /American College of Cardiology/American Medical Society for Sports Medicine /Heart Rhythm Society/Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society/Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; 2024), and Japanese [Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)/Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS); 2018] cardiovascular societies. There was broad consensus on echocardiographic recommendations, the medical and invasive management of HCM, the application of genetic testing and family screening, and exercise and reproductive recommendations in HCM. There were areas of variability in the definition and diagnostic criteria for HCM, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging recommendations, and assessment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk and prevention strategies. Due to the JCS/JHFS guidelines being older, there are no recommendations on the use of cardiac myosin ATPase inhibitors. Conclusion Contemporary guidelines for HCM achieve consensus across a broad range of criteria and recommendations concerning diagnosis and management. However, variations in the approach towards risk assessment for SCD exist between the guidelines. There are also more subtle differences concerning diagnostic criteria and the utility of late gadolinium enhancement for risk stratification, which will likely evolve as the evidence-base broadens.

Background Hyperlipidemia is a major cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, but there are limited data on its mortality trends in CVD over time. We assessed annual hyperlipidemia‐related CVD mortality trends in the United States, including the COVID‐19 pandemic's impact. Methods and Results Mortality data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention repository between 1999 and 2020 among patients ≥15 years old, using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision ( ICD‐10 ) codes for hyperlipidemia (E78.0–E78.5) and CVD (I00–I99). Age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 1 000 000 population were standardized to the 2000 US population. Log‐linear regression models were used to evaluate mortality shifts. Average annual percentage change from 1999 to 2019 was used to project 2020 AAMRs, estimating pandemic‐attributed excess deaths. From 1999 to 2020, 483 155 hyperlipidemia‐related CVD deaths occurred. Despite a general CVD mortality decline, hyperlipidemia‐related CVD AAMRs rose from 36.33 in 1999 to 99.77 in 2019. Ischemic heart diseases (AAMR 49.39) were the leading cause, whereas hypertension had the highest mortality increase (average annual percentage change +10.23%). Mortality rates were higher in men (AAMR 104.87) and non‐Hispanic (AAMR 82.49), and rural populations (AAMR 89.98). Highest mortality was observed in Black populations (AAMR 84.35), those ≥75 years old (AAMR 646.45), and Western US regions (AAMR 96.88). During the first pandemic year, deaths exceeded projections by 10.55%, with notable increases among ages 35 to 75 (14.23%), Hispanic (17.96%), Black (14.82%), and urban (11.68%) groups. Conclusions Hyperlipidemia‐related CVD mortality has risen over the past 2 decades, further heightened by the COVID‐19 pandemic, with higher impact on men, Black Americans, the older population, and rural residents. Further study is needed to understand contributing factors and mitigate disparities.

Precision medicine, which among other aspects includes an individual's genomic data in diagnosis and management, has become the standard‐of‐care for Mendelian cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, early identification and management of asymptomatic patients with potentially lethal and manageable Mendelian CVD through screening, which is the promise of precision health, remains an unsolved challenge. The reduced costs of genomic sequencing have enabled the creation of biobanks containing in‐depth genetic and health information, which have facilitated the understanding of genetic variation, penetrance, and expressivity, moving us closer to the genotype‐first screening of asymptomatic individuals for Mendelian CVD. This approach could transform health care by diagnostic refinement and facilitating prevention or therapeutic interventions. Yet, potential benefits must be weighed against the potential risks, which include evolving variant pathogenicity assertion or identification of variants with low disease penetrance; costly, stressful, and inappropriate diagnostic evaluations; negative psychological impact; disqualification for employment or of competitive sports; and denial of insurance. Furthermore, the natural history of Mendelian CVD is often unpredictable, making identification of those who will benefit from preventive measures a priority. Currently, there is insufficient evidence that population‐based genetic screening for Mendelian CVD can reduce adverse outcomes at a reasonable cost to an extent that outweighs the harms of true‐positive and false‐positive results. Besides technical, clinical, and financial burdens, ethical and legal aspects pose unprecedented challenges. This review highlights key developments in the field of genotype‐first approaches to Mendelian CVD and summarizes challenges with potential solutions that can pave the way for implementing this approach for clinical care.