Tande, Aaron J.

Abstract Background Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) is a life-threatening spinal infection with considerable clinical burden. Although increasing literature has described its features and associated treatment failure, large-scale cohorts with long-term follow-up remain limited. Herein, we evaluated a large cohort of patients with NVO to characterize the clinical manifestations, management, and long-term outcomes, and to further explore factors associated with treatment failure.Table 1.Baseline characteristics of patients with native vertebral osteomyelitisTable 2.Treatment, failure rates, and mortality in patients with native vertebral osteomyelitis Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with NVO across Mayo Clinic sites between 1999 and 2024. Data on demographics, clinical manifestations, antimicrobial therapy, and surgical intervention were collected. Cumulative incidence of treatment failure was estimated as a function of follow-up accounting for the competing risk of death. Independent predictors of treatment failure were evaluated in a multivariable Cox regression model with time-dependent covariates.Table 3.Multivariable predictors of treatment failure in patients with native vertebral osteomyelitisFigure 1.Cumulative incidence of death and treatment failure following diagnosis of native vertebral osteomyelitis(A) Short-term (12-month) cumulative incidence of death and treatment failure (magnified view of the first year from panel B).(B) Long-term (up to 7 years) cumulative incidence of death (dotted orange line) and treatment failure (solid blue line). Results Among 1,255 patients included (median age 67 years; 66% male), lumbosacral involvement was most common (65%), with multilevel vertebral involvement ( >2 levels) in 21%. Epidural abscesses were present in 43%, paravertebral abscesses in 42%, and psoas abscesses in 20%. Pathogens were identified in 77%, most commonly S. aureus (50%; MSSA 37%, MRSA 13%), followed by Streptococcus species (22%), and Gram-negative bacilli (11%) (Table 1). The median total antibiotic duration was 59 days (IQR, 42–132). Surgical intervention was performed in 13% after a median of 2 days (IQR, 1-5). Treatment failure occurred in 162 patients during a median follow-up of 2.8 years (6-month and 5-year cumulative incidence were 11% and 14%, respectively), with the median time to failure of 3.1 months. Cumulative mortality was 12% at 6 months and 33% at 5 years (Table 2, Figure 1). Diabetes (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.16–3.12), multilevel vertebral involvement (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22–2.51), and MRSA infection (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.06–4.18) were independently associated with increased risk of treatment failure (Table 3). Conclusion This 25-year study highlights the persistent burden of treatment failure in NVO and associated risk factors, underscoring the importance of early recognition of high-risk features to optimize outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Native joint septic arthritis (NJSA) is a serious musculoskeletal infection requiring timely surgical intervention to prevent long-term morbidity. Although current guidelines recommend early surgical debridement, supporting data, particularly on long-term outcomes, remain scarce. Given this, we evaluated the association between surgical timing and 1-year clinical outcomes using the Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) framework, applied for the first time in NJSA.Table 1.Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) ordinal scaleTable 2.Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with NJSA who underwent surgery across Mayo Clinic campuses between 2012 and 2021. Clinical outcomes at one year were assessed using a 9-level DOOR scale, incorporating survival, treatment failure (relapse, reinfection, readmission, or significant surgical events), and joint recovery (full vs qualified) (Table 1). Time to surgery from hospital admission was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as categories: < 1, 1–2, or ≥3 days.Table 3.Associations between duration and outcomesFigure 1.Association Between Time to Surgery and DOOR Scores in Native Joint Septic Arthritis.A) Distribution of Modified DOOR Scores by Surgical Timing. B) Modeled Probability of DOOR Scores by Time to Surgery. Results Among 268 patients (median age 62 years, 61% male), 30% underwent surgery < 1 day from admission, 47% within 1–2 days, and 24% at ≥3 days. At 1 year, 57% achieved full recovery without unfavorable events (DOOR score 1), while treatment failure occurred in 34% (Table 2). In unadjusted analyses, longer surgical delay was significantly associated with higher DOOR scores (per IQR increase [from 0 to 2 days], OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0–2.1; p = 0.026) and with increased 1-year mortality (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.6; p = 0.019) and treatment failure (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.0; p = 0.007). Similar results were obtained when delay was used as a categorical 3-level variable, with the highest risk observed in patients undergoing surgery after ≥3 days. After adjusting for age and Charlson index, only the association between surgical delay and treatment failure remained statistically significant (HR: 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; p=0.016) (Table 3, Figure 1). Conclusion Delayed surgical intervention for management of NJSA was independently associated with higher risk of treatment failure at 1 year. These findings reinforce current guideline recommendations for timely operative management and further underscore the potential of the DOOR framework to capture clinically meaningful, multidimensional outcomes in NJSA. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Study Design. Modified Delphi consensus process Objective. To establish a standardized, consensus-driven definition for postoperative spine infection (PSI) for research, diagnosis, and management. Summary of Background Data. Postoperative infection is a devastating and common complication following spine surgery. Rates of PSI in the literature range from 0% to over 20% depending on surgical indication and invasiveness. Despite the implications of PSI, there is no universally accepted diagnostic standard or consensus definition for infection following spine surgery, hindering research and treatment of this challenging clinical condition. Methods. A multispecialty workgroup convened by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) conducted a systematic literature review. Using data from the systematic review, an expert panel completed a modified Delphi process to achieve consensus. The panel included nine fellowship-trained, board-certified physicians with expertise in infectious diseases, orthopaedic and neurologic spine surgery, and musculoskeletal radiology. Iterative rounds focused on criterion selection, importance ranking, categorical grouping, and final constellation development for PSI diagnosis. Consensus was defined as a 2/3 majority, with a target of 100%. Results. The workgroup achieved 100% consensus on a new PSI definition, which incorporates six clinical domains: wound features, microbiology, imaging, inflammatory biomarkers, intraoperative findings, and histology. A single microbiological stand-alone criterion—identification of a phenotypically indistinguishable organism from two or more deep operative site specimens—was established as pathognomonic for postoperative spine infection. Additional primary and secondary supporting criteria were defined, with specific combinations required to classify cases as definite or probable PSI. Final definitions were ratified by the boards of MSIS and the European Bone & Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) Conclusion. This consensus-based definition provides a standardized framework for diagnosing postoperative spine infection, facilitating research and clinical management. The criteria balance sensitivity and specificity across diverse clinical scenarios and represent the first multispecialty, society-endorsed definition for PSI.

Background The rising number of spinal surgeries has been paralleled by an increase in postoperative spine infections (PSIs), now identified as the third most common surgical complication. The absence of a standardized PSI definition complicates clinical management and research. This meta-epidemiological study was conducted to establish clear diagnostic criteria to aid clinicians and researchers in consistently identifying and reporting PSIs. Methods In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE on March 14, 2024, by a medical librarian. Studies were considered eligible if they reported clear diagnostic definitions of PSI in at least ten adult patients. The primary objective was to review existing PSI diagnostic criteria and classify them into thematic clusters. We developed standardized diagnostic combinations based on 13 predefined criteria sourced from clinical practice guidelines and previous research (see Table 1). Results From an initial pool of 1,466 studies, 101 were included. The vast majority were retrospective (91/101, 92.1%), with most studies (77/101, 76.2%) utilizing established criteria, such as those from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) or the CDC. Seven studies combined these predefined criteria with additional detailed descriptions. Among studies using independent definitions, clinical signs and symptoms were the most commonly reported criteria (13/24, 54.2). The criteria were grouped into clinical, microbiological, and radiological categories, with most studies employing clinical criteria either alone or alongside microbiological or imaging findings (Figure 1). Conclusion These findings highlight the urgent need for a standardized definition of PSI that integrates clinical, microbiological, and radiological elements. Implementing such a unified diagnostic framework could enhance accuracy, address limitations related to hardware complications, wound drainage interpretation, and imaging ambiguities, and improve current surveillance practices. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Abstract Background Although recent guidance recommends early surgical debridement for native joint septic arthritis (NJSA), supporting data, particularly on long-term outcomes, remains scarce. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with NJSA who underwent surgery across Mayo Clinic campuses between 2012 and 2021. Clinical outcomes at 1 year were assessed using a 9-level Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) scale, incorporating survival, treatment failure (relapse, reinfection, readmission, or significant surgical events), and joint recovery. Time to surgery from hospital admission was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as categories: < 1, 1–2, or ≥3 days. Results Among 268 patients, 30% underwent surgery <1 day from admission, 47% in 1–2 days, and 24% in ≥3 days. At 1 year, 57% achieved full recovery without unfavorable events (DOOR score 1), while treatment failure occurred in 34%. In unadjusted analyses, longer surgical delay was significantly associated with higher (worse) DOOR scores (per IQR increase [from 0 to 2 days], OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0–2.1; P = .026), increased 1-year mortality (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.6; P = .019) and treatment failure (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.0; P = .007). Even after adjusting for age and Charlson comorbidity index, the association between surgical delay and treatment failure remained significant (HR: 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; P = .016). Conclusions The finding that delayed surgical intervention is associated with an increased risk of treatment failure reinforces current expert recommendations for timely surgical management in NJSA.

Abstract Background We investigated the relationship between cumulative, historical antibiotic therapy and the presence of ceftriaxone-resistant (CRO-R) Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (BSI) from urinary sources. Methods Adult patients established with primary care at Mayo Clinic with a first episode of monomicrobial Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, or Proteus mirabilis BSI from a urinary source from May 2019 to May 2023 were included. Antibiotic therapy over the year prior to BSI was quantified as days of therapy (DOT), cumulative modified Antibiotic Spectrum Index (mASI), and cumulative Days of Antibiotic Spectrum Coverage (DASC) using prescription data. Patients with CRO-R urinary pathogens prior to antibiotic therapy assessment were excluded. Results In total, 721 adults had monomicrobial gram-negative BSI, including 70 patients (9.7%) with a CRO-R pathogen and 651 patients (90.3%) with a ceftriaxone-susceptible (CRO-S) pathogen. In the 12 months prior to BSI, levels of antibiotic DOT, mASI, and DASC were significantly greater among patients with CRO-R BSI than CRO-S BSI (P < .001). The median time from blood culture collection to appropriate antibiotic therapy was significantly longer in the CRO-R group (24 hours, interquartile range [IQR] 16–48) than the CRO-S group (1 hour, IQR 0–2) (P < .001). Increasing cumulative antibiotic therapy prior to BSI, as quantified by the mASI, was significantly associated with increased risk of 1-year CDI after BSI (P = .027). Conclusions Patients with first episode CRO-R Enterobacterales BSI had significantly greater prior antibiotic exposure than patients with CRO-S BSI and experienced significant delay of appropriate therapy. Routine quantitation and reporting of prior antibiotic therapy may improve empiric prescribing.

ABSTRACT Background Facet Joint Septic Arthritis (FJSA) is an infection of the spinal facet joints, for which previously described imaging findings are non‐specific. We present MRI findings of 20 patients who underwent facet biopsy for possible FJSA. Materials and Methods An internal database was reviewed for cases who underwent image‐guided spinal facet biopsy for possible infection and had pre‐biopsy contrast‐enhanced MRI. Cases were categorized as biopsy FJSA positive or negative and MRI was reviewed for synovitis, bone marrow enhancement, epidural phlegmon/abscess, and paraspinal muscle enhancement. The MRI findings were considered extensive if the involvement of the posterior paraspinal muscles spanned at least two vertebral bodies in the craniocaudal direction and at least half the length of the muscles in the anterior‐posterior direction. Results Twenty patients were included. Nine patients were FJSA positive, all of whom had synovitis, bone marrow enhancement of the facet joints, and epidural phlegmon. No patients had epidural abscess, but five patients had a paraspinal abscess. All nine patients demonstrated extensive paraspinal muscular enhancement. Eleven biopsy cases that were negative for FSJA were included. Their MRI findings demonstrated all with synovitis, six with bone marrow enhancement of the facet joints, six with epidural phlegmon, none with epidural abscess, and none with paraspinal abscess. Only one FJSA negative case had extensive paraspinal muscle enhancement. Conclusion The MRI appearance of FJSA has rarely been described in the literature; however, the diagnosis has a significant clinical impact. Facet enhancement with florid posterior paraspinal muscle enhancement should raise suspicion for FSJA.

Abstract We examined the effect of preoperative antibiotic exposure and duration on synovial fluid samples from patients with native joint septic arthritis of the hip/knee. While exposure before diagnostic arthrocentesis did not affect fluid parameters, increased duration was associated with a decreased total nucleated cell count, underscoring the complex antibiotic effects on synovial fluid parameters.

Abstract Background The first-line management strategy for acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) after DAIR is proposed to improve outcomes, yet its efficacy remains under scrutiny. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in patients with acute PJI of the hip or knee who were treated with DAIR in centers from Europe and the United States. We analyzed the effect of SAT using a Cox model landmarked at 12 weeks. The primary covariate of interest was SAT, which was analyzed as a time-varying covariate. Patients who experienced treatment failure or were lost to follow-up within 12 weeks were excluded from the analysis. Results The study included 510 patients with 66 treatment failures with a median follow-up of 801 days. We did not find a statistically significant association between SAT and treatment failure (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, .79–2.39; P = .27). Subgroup analyses for joint, country cohort, and type of infection (early or late acute) did not show benefit for SAT. Secondary analysis of country cohorts showed a trend toward benefit for the US cohort (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, .11–1.15; P = .09), which also had the highest risk of treatment failure. Conclusions The utility of routine SAT as a strategy for enhancing DAIR's success in acute PJI remains uncertain. Our results suggest that SAT's benefits might be restricted to specific groups of patients, underscoring the need for randomized controlled trials. Identifying patients most likely to benefit from SAT should be a priority in future studies.