Back to Authors

Domchek, Susan M

0000-0002-5914-7272

Mayo Clinic

Abramson Cancer Center

Citations 14

Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Susceptibility Genes Predispose to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Huang, Huaizhi , Couch, Ronan E. , Karam, Rachid , Boddicker, Nicholas , Polley, Eric C. , Na, Jie , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Yao, Song , Trentham‐Dietz, Amy , Bodelón, Clara , Hodge, James M. , Patel, Alpa V. , Haiman, Christopher A. , John, Esther M. , Vachon, Celine M. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Goldgar, David E. , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Dolinsky, Jill S. , Pesaran, Tina , Hu, Chunling , Boddicker, Nicholas J , Polley, Eric C , Na, Jie , Ambrosone, Christine B , Yao, Song , Trentham-Dietz, Amy , Eliassen, A Heather , Penney, Kathryn , Brantley, Kristen D , Bodelon, Clara , Teras, Lauren R , Hodge, James M , Patel, Alpa V , Haiman, Christopher A , John, Esther M , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Lacey, James V. , O'Brien, Katie M , Sandler, Dale P , Weinberg, Clarice R , Palmer, Julie R , Bertrand, Kimberly A , Vachon, Celine M. , Olson, Janet E , Ruddy, Kathryn J , Anton-Culver, Hoda , Ziogas, Argyrios , Goldgar, David E , Nathanson, Katherine L , Domchek, Susan M , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Kraft, Peter , Dolinsky, Jill S , Pesaran, Tina , Richardson, Marcy E , Yadav, Siddhartha , Couch, Fergus J. , Karam, Rachid , Huang, Huaizhi , Couch, Ronan , Hu, Chunling , Eliassen, A. Heather , Brantley, Kristen D. , Teras, Lauren R. , O’Brien, Katie M. , Sandler, Dale P. , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Palmer, Julie R. , Bertrand, Kimberly A. , Olson, Janet E. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Ziogas, Argyrios , Domchek, Susan M. , Kraft, Peter , Yadav, Siddhartha , Couch, Fergus J.

Clinical Cancer Research | November 8, 2024 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 130-138

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1884 Get It

Abstract Purpose: To determine the relationship between germline pathogenic variants (PV) in cancer predisposition genes and the risk of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Experimental Design: Germline PV frequencies in breast cancer predisposition genes (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D) were compared between DCIS cases and unaffected controls and between DCIS and invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC) cases from a clinical testing cohort (n = 9,887), a population-based cohort (n = 3,876), and the UK Biobank (n = 2,421). The risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) for DCIS cases with PV was estimated in the population-based cohort. Results: Germline PV were observed in 6.5% and 4.6% of women with DCIS in the clinical testing and population-based cohorts, respectively. BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 PV frequencies were significantly lower among women with DCIS than those with IDC (clinical cohort: 2.8% vs. 5.7%; population-based cohort: 1.7% vs. 3.7%), whereas the PV frequencies for ATM and CHEK2 were similar. ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 PV were significantly associated with an increased risk of DCIS (OR > 2.0), but only BRCA2 PV were associated with high risk (OR > 4) in both cohorts. The cumulative incidence of CBC among carriers of PV in high-penetrance genes with DCIS was 23% over 15 years. Conclusions: The enrichment of PV in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 among women with DCIS suggests that multigene panel testing may be appropriate for women with DCIS. Elevated risks of CBC in carriers of PV in high-penetrance genes with DCIS confirmed the utility of testing for surgical decision-making.
Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Integrating Monogenic, Polygenic, and Epidemiologic Risk
Kalia, Sarah S. , Boddicker, Nicholas , Yadav, Siddhartha , Huang, Hongyan , Na, Jie , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Yao, Song , Haiman, Christopher A. , Chen, Fei , John, Esther M. , Kurian, Allison W. , Guo, Boya , Lindström, Sara , Auer, Paul L. , Taylor, Jack A. , Hodge, James M. , Lori, Adriana , Bodelón, Clara , Vachon, Celine M. , Goldgar, David E. , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Boddicker, Nicholas J , Hu, Chunling , Ambrosone, Christine B , Yao, Song , Haiman, Christopher A , Chen, Fei , John, Esther M , Kurian, Allison W , Guo, Boya , Lindstrom, Sara , Auer, Paul , Lacey, James V. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Sandler, Dale P , O'Brien, Katie M , Taylor, Jack A , Teras, Lauren R , Hodge, James M , Lori, Adriana , Bodelon, Clara , Trentham-Dietz, Amy , Burnside, Elizabeth S , Vachon, Celine M. , Winham, Stacey J , Goldgar, David E , Domchek, Susan M , Nathanson, Katherine L , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Couch, Fergus J. , Kraft, Peter , Yadav, Siddhartha , Na, Jie , Hu, Chunling , Sandler, Dale P. , O’Brien, Katie M. , Teras, Lauren R. , Trentham‐Dietz, Amy , Burnside, Elizabeth S. , Winham, Stacey J. , Domchek, Susan M. , Couch, Fergus J. , Kraft, Peter

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | September 11, 2024 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1490-1499

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0594 Get It

Abstract Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive, and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited. Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case–control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium. Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population. Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification. Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts.
Development of an Electronic Health Record–Based Clinical Decision Support Tool for Patients With Lynch Syndrome
Lau‐Min, Kelsey S. , Bleznuck, Joseph, Wollack, Colin, McKenna, Danielle , Long, Jessica M. , Hubert, Anna P. , Johnson, Mariah, Rochester, Shavon E., Constantino, Gillain , Dudzik, Christina , Doucette, Abigail , Wangensteen, Kirk J. , Landgraf, Jeffrey, Chen, Jessica , Nathanson, Katherine L. , McKenna, Danielle B , Wangensteen, Kirk J , Domchek, Susan M , Nathanson, Katherine L , Katona, Bryson W , Domchek, Susan M.

JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics | August 28, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/cci.23.00024 Get It

PURPOSE To develop an electronic health record (EHR)–based clinical decision support (CDS) tool to promote guideline-recommended cancer risk management among patients with Lynch syndrome (LS), an inherited cancer syndrome that confers an increased risk of colorectal and other cancer types. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the baseline prevalence and predictors of guideline-recommended colonic surveillance and annual genetics program visits among patients with LS. Multivariable log-binomial regressions estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) of cancer risk management adherence by baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. These analyses provided rationale for the development of an EHR-based CDS tool to support patients and clinicians with LS-related endoscopic surveillance and annual genetics program visits. The CDS leverages an EHR platform linking discrete genetic data to LS Genomic Indicators, in turn driving downstream clinician- and patient-facing CDS. RESULTS Among 323 patients with LS, cross-sectional adherence to colonic surveillance and annual genetics program visits was 69.3% and 55.4%, respectively. Patients with recent electronic patient portal use were more likely to be adherent to colonic surveillance (PR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.52). Patients more recently diagnosed with LS were more likely to be adherent to annual genetics program visits (PR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.76 for 2-4 years; PR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.75 for ≥4 compared with <2 years). Our EHR-based CDS tool is now active for 421 patients with LS throughout our health system. CONCLUSION We have successfully developed an EHR-based CDS tool to promote guideline-recommended cancer risk management among patients with LS.
ENIGMA CHEK2 gether Project: A Comprehensive Study Identifies Functionally Impaired CHEK2 Germline Missense Variants Associated with Increased Breast Cancer Risk
Stolařová, Lenka , Kleiblová, Petra , Šťastná, Barbora , Janatová, Markéta , Soukupová, Jana , Achatz, Maria Isabel , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Apostolou, Paraskevi , Arun, Banu , Auer, Paul L. , Bertelsen, Birgitte , Japan, Biobank, Kamatani, Yoichiro, Morisaki, Takayuki , Nagai, Akiko , Muto, Kaori , Murakami, Yoshinori , Furukawa, Yoichi , Yamanashi, Yuji , Nakamura, Yusuke , Momozawa, Yukihide , Ohnishi, Yozo, Kubo, Michiaki , Higashiue, Shinichi , Kobayashi, Shuzo , Minami, Shiro, Yamaguhci, Hiroki, Arai, Hajime , Yamaji, Ken , Asai, Satoshi , Fujioka, Tomoaki, Obara, Wataru , Mori, Seijiro, Murayama, Shigeo , Miki, Yoshio , Masumoto, Akihide, Yamada, Akira , Nishizawa, Yasuko, Higashiyama, Masahiko, Kutsumi, Hiromu, Koretsune, Yukihiro , Blok, Marinus J. , Brunet, Joan , Calvello, Mariarosaria , Chen, Fei , Cortesi, Laura , Crujeiras-González, Ana , Černá, Marta , Hovhannisyan, Milena, Jelínková, Sandra , Nehasil, Petr , Macháčková, Eva , Krutilkova, Vera, Tavandzis, Spiros , Cerna, Leona, Chvojka, Štěpán, Koudová, Monika , Puchmajerová, Alena, Novotný, Jan , Veselá, Kamila , Hrušková, Lucie , Michalovska, Renata, Schwetzova, Denisa, Vlčková, Zdeňka, Černá, Monika, Hejnalová, Markéta, Jedlickova, Nikol, Šubrt, Ivan , Zavoral, Tomas, Kosařová, Marcela, Vacínová, Gabriela, Janíková, Mária , Kratochvílová, Romana , Curtisová, Václava , Vrtěl, Radek , Scheinost, Ondřej, Duskova, Petra, Putter, Robin De , Efremidis, Anna , Engel, Christoph , Evans, D. Gareth , Feliubadaló, Lídia , Fuentes-Ríos, Olivia , Gómez, E. , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Hodge, James M. , Huang, Hongyan , Ishak, Nur Diana Binte , Iwasaki, Yusuke , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Li, Na , Lindström, Sara , Lori, Adriana , Martinez, Elana, Martins, Alexandra , McInerny, Simone , Montagna, Marco , Mori, Luigi , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Patel, Alpa V. , Poppe, Bruce , Rosseel, Toon , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Santos, Elizabeth Santana Dos , Vachon, Celine M. , Volk, Alexander E. , Weber‐Lassalle, Nana , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Zethoven, Magnus, Zhang, Ze Wen, Vega, Ana , Rossing, Maria , Valle, Jesús Del , Nicolo, Arcangela De , Hahnen, Eric , Ngeow, Joanne , Kleibl, Zdeněk , Chen, Chen , Zemankova, Petra , Stastna, Barbora , Janatova, Marketa , Soukupova, Jana , Achatz, M I , Ambrosone, Christine B , Apostolou, Paraskevi , Arun, Banu , Auer, Paul , Barnard, Mollie , Bertelsen, Birgitte , Blok, Marinus J , Boddicker, Nicholas J , Brunet, Joan , Burnside, Elizabeth S , Calvello, Mariarosaria , Campbell, Ian G , Chan, Sock Hoai , Chen, Fei , Chiang, Jian Bang , Coppa, Anna , Cortesi, Laura , Crujeiras-González, Ana , De Leeneer, Kim , de Putter, Robin , DePersia, Allison , Devereux, Lisa , Domchek, Susan M , Efremidis, Anna , Engel, Christoph , Ernst, Corinna , Evans, D Gareth , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Fostira, Florentia , Fuentes-Ríos, Olivia , Gómez-García, Encarna B , González, Sara , Haiman, Christopher A , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Hauke, Jan , Hodge, James M , Hu, Chunling , Huang, Hongyan , Ishak, Nur Diana Binte , Iwasaki, Yusuke , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Kraft, Peter , Lacey, James V. , Lazaro, Conxi , Li, Na , Lim, Weng Khong , Lindstrom, Sara , Lori, Adriana , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Martins, Alexandra , Matsuda, Koichi , Matullo, Giuseppe , McInerny, Simone , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Mori, Luigi , Nathanson, Katherine L , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, H , Olson, Janet E , Palmer, Julie R , Pasini, Barbara , Patel, Alpa V , Piane, Maria , Poppe, Bruce , Radice, Paolo , Renieri, Alessandra , Resta, Nicoletta , Richardson, Marcy E , Rosseel, Toon , Ruddy, Kathryn J , Santamariña, Marta , Dos Santos, Elizabeth Santana , Teras, Lauren R , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Trentham-Dietz, Amy , Vachon, Celine M. , Volk, Alexander E , Weber-Lassalle, Nana , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Wiesmuller, Lisa , Winham, Stacey J , Yadav, Siddhartha , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Yao, Song , Zampiga, Valentina , Zethoven, Magnus , Zhang, Ze Wen , Zima, Tomas , Spurdle, Amanda B , Vega, Ana , Rossing, Maria , Del Valle, Jesús , De Nicolo, Arcangela , Hahnen, Eric , Claes, Kathleen B M , Ngeow, Joanne , Momozawa, Yukihide , James, Paul , Couch, Fergus J. , Macurek, Libor , Kleibl, Zdenek , Chen, C , Japan, Biobank, Kamatani, Yoichiro, Mushiroda, Taisei , Tanaka, Toshihiro , Yamaguhci, Hiroki, Okazaki, Yasushi , Takahashi, Yasuo , Nagayama, Satoshi , Yoshiyama, Takashi , Boddicker, Nicholas , Burnside, Elizabeth S. , Campbell, Ian , Borecká, Marianna , Foretová, Lenka , Havránek, Ondřej , Vočka, Michal , Michalovska, Renata, Schwetzova, Denisa, Jedlickova, Nikol, Zavoral, Tomáš, Duskova, Petra, Stránecký, Viktor , Leeneer, Kim De , Domchek, Susan M. , González, Sara , Hauke, Jan , Hu, Chunling , Kraft, Peter , Lázaro, Conxi , Matullo, Giuseppe , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Olson, Janet E. , Palmer, Julie R. , Pasini, Barbara , Radice, Paolo , Renieri, Alessandra , Santamariña, Marta , Teras, Lauren R. , Trentham‐Dietz, Amy , Wiesmüller, Lisa , Winham, Stacey J. , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Yao, Song , Zampiga, Valentina , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Claes, Kathleen , James, Paul A. , Couch, Fergus J.

Clinical Cancer Research | July 14, 2023 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 3037-3050

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0212 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Germline pathogenic variants in CHEK2 confer moderately elevated breast cancer risk (odds ratio, OR ∼ 2.5), qualifying carriers for enhanced breast cancer screening. Besides pathogenic variants, dozens of missense CHEK2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) have been identified, hampering the clinical utility of germline genetic testing (GGT). Experimental Design: We collected 460 CHEK2 missense VUS identified by the ENIGMA consortium in 15 countries. Their functional characterization was performed using CHEK2-complementation assays quantifying KAP1 phosphorylation and CHK2 autophosphorylation in human RPE1–CHEK2-knockout cells. Concordant results in both functional assays were used to categorize CHEK2 VUS from 12 ENIGMA case–control datasets, including 73,048 female patients with breast cancer and 88,658 ethnicity-matched controls. Results: A total of 430/460 VUS were successfully analyzed, of which 340 (79.1%) were concordant in both functional assays and categorized as functionally impaired (N = 102), functionally intermediate (N = 12), or functionally wild-type (WT)–like (N = 226). We then examined their association with breast cancer risk in the case–control analysis. The OR and 95% CI (confidence intervals) for carriers of functionally impaired, intermediate, and WT-like variants were 2.83 (95% CI, 2.35–3.41), 1.57 (95% CI, 1.41–1.75), and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.08–1.31), respectively. The meta-analysis of population-specific datasets showed similar results. Conclusions: We determined the functional consequences for the majority of CHEK2 missense VUS found in patients with breast cancer (3,660/4,436; 82.5%). Carriers of functionally impaired missense variants accounted for 0.5% of patients with breast cancer and were associated with a moderate risk similar to that of truncating CHEK2 variants. In contrast, 2.2% of all patients with breast cancer carried functionally wild-type/intermediate missense variants with no clinically relevant breast cancer risk in heterozygous carriers.
Functional and Clinical Characterization of Variants of Uncertain Significance Identifies a Hotspot for Inactivating Missense Variants in RAD51C
Nagaraj, Anil Belur , Shimelis, Hermela , Montalban, Gemma , Lee, Kun Y. , Huang, Huaizhi , Lumby, Carolyn A. , Na, Jie , Susswein, Lisa R. , Marshall, Megan L. , Hiraki, Susan , LaDuca, Holly , Yussuf, Amal , Pesaran, Tina , Haiman, Christopher A. , Lindström, Sara , Vachon, Celine M. , Ong, Irene M. , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Mer, Georges , Yadav, Siddhartha , Hruska, Kathleen S. , Dolinsky, Jill S. , Weroha, S. John , Simard, Jacques , Pang, Yuan‐Ping , Chen, Chen , Hu, Chunling , Nagaraj, Anil Belur , Shimelis, Hermela , Montalban, Gemma , Lee, Kun Y , Huang, Huaizhi , Lumby, Carolyn A , Na, Jie , Susswein, Lisa R , Roberts, Maegan E , Marshall, Megan L , Hiraki, Susan , LaDuca, Holly , Chao, Elizabeth , Yussuf, Amal , Pesaran, Tina , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Haiman, Christopher A , Kraft, Peter , Lindstrom, Sara , Palmer, Julie R , Teras, Lauren R , Vachon, Celine M. , Yao, Song , Ong, Irene M , Nathanson, Katherine L , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Boddicker, Nicholas J , Gnanaolivu, Rohan , Polley, Eric C , Mer, Georges , Cui, Gaofeng , Karam, Rachid , Richardson, Marcy E , Domchek, Susan M , Yadav, Siddhartha , Hruska, Kathleen S , Dolinsky, Jill S , Weroha, S John , Hart, Steven N , Simard, Jacques , Masson, Jean Yves , Pang, Yuan-Ping , Couch, Fergus J. , Chen, C , Hu, Chunling , Roberts, Maegan E. , Kraft, Peter , Palmer, Julie R. , Teras, Lauren R. , Yao, Song , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Boddicker, Nicholas , Gnanaolivu, Rohan , Polley, Eric C. , Cui, Gaofeng , Karam, Rachid , Domchek, Susan M. , Hart, Steven N. , Masson, Jean‐Yves , Couch, Fergus J.

Cancer Research | May 30, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2557-2571

10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-2319 Get It

Abstract Pathogenic protein-truncating variants of RAD51C, which plays an integral role in promoting DNA damage repair, increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. A large number of RAD51C missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) have been identified, but the effects of the majority of these variants on RAD51C function and cancer predisposition have not been established. Here, analysis of 173 missense variants by a homology-directed repair (HDR) assay in reconstituted RAD51C−/− cells identified 30 nonfunctional (deleterious) variants, including 18 in a hotspot within the ATP-binding region. The deleterious variants conferred sensitivity to cisplatin and olaparib and disrupted formation of RAD51C/XRCC3 and RAD51B/RAD51C/RAD51D/XRCC2 complexes. Computational analysis indicated the deleterious variant effects were consistent with structural effects on ATP-binding to RAD51C. A subset of the variants displayed similar effects on RAD51C activity in reconstituted human RAD51C-depleted cancer cells. Case–control association studies of deleterious variants in women with breast and ovarian cancer and noncancer controls showed associations with moderate breast cancer risk [OR, 3.92; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.18–7.59] and high ovarian cancer risk (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 7.71–30.36), similar to protein-truncating variants. This functional data supports the clinical classification of inactivating RAD51C missense variants as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, which may improve the clinical management of variant carriers. Significance: Functional analysis of the impact of a large number of missense variants on RAD51C function provides insight into RAD51C activity and information for classification of the cancer relevance of RAD51C variants.
Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk Among Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in ATM , BRCA1 , BRCA2 ,
Yadav, Siddhartha , Boddicker, Nicholas , Na, Jie , Polley, Eric C. , Hart, Steven N. , Larson, Nicole L. , Holtegaard, Susan, Huang, Huaizhi , Dunn, Carolyn, Patel, Alpa V. , Martínez, Elena, Haiman, Christopher A. , Chen, Fei , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , John, Esther M. , Kurian, Allison W. , Taylor, Jack A. , Zirpoli, Gary , Goldgar, David E. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Chen, Chen , Lumby, Carolyn A. , Boddicker, Nicholas J , Hu, Chunling , Hart, Steven N , Gnanaolivu, Rohan D., Larson, Nicole , Dunn, Carolyn A, Teras, Lauren R , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Haiman, Christopher A , Chen, Fei , Ruddy, Kathryn J , John, Esther M , Kurian, Allison W , Sandler, Dale P , O'Brien, Katie M , Taylor, Jack A , Anton-Culver, Hoda , Ziogas, Argyrios , Zirpoli, Gary , Goldgar, David E , Palmer, Julie R , Domchek, Susan M , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Nathanson, Katherine L , Kraft, Peter , Couch, Fergus J. , Chen, C , Yadav, Siddhartha , Polley, Eric C , Na, Jie , Huang, Huaizhi , Lumby, Carolyn A , Hu, Chunling , Gnanaolivu, Rohan , Teras, Lauren R. , Lacey, James V. , Olson, Janet E. , Sandler, Dale P. , O’Brien, Katie M. , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Ziogas, Argyrios , Palmer, Julie R. , Domchek, Susan M. , Kraft, Peter , Couch, Fergus J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 9, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1703-1713

10.1200/jco.22.01239 Get It

PURPOSE To estimate the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among women with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. METHODS The study population included 15,104 prospectively followed women within the CARRIERS study treated with ipsilateral surgery for invasive breast cancer. The risk of CBC was estimated for PV carriers in each gene compared with women without PVs in a multivariate proportional hazard regression analysis accounting for the competing risk of death and adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. The primary analyses focused on the overall cohort and on women from the general population. Secondary analyses examined associations by race/ethnicity, age at primary breast cancer diagnosis, menopausal status, and tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status. RESULTS Germline BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2 PV carriers with breast cancer were at significantly elevated risk (hazard ratio > 1.9) of CBC, whereas only the PALB2 PV carriers with ER-negative breast cancer had elevated risks (hazard ratio, 2.9). By contrast, ATM PV carriers did not have significantly increased CBC risks. African American PV carriers had similarly elevated risks of CBC as non-Hispanic White PV carriers. Among premenopausal women, the 10-year cumulative incidence of CBC was estimated to be 33% for BRCA1, 27% for BRCA2, and 13% for CHEK2 PV carriers with breast cancer and 35% for PALB2 PV carriers with ER-negative breast cancer. The 10-year cumulative incidence of CBC among postmenopausal PV carriers was 12% for BRCA1, 9% for BRCA2, and 4% for CHEK2. CONCLUSION Women diagnosed with breast cancer and known to carry germline PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, or PALB2 are at substantially increased risk of CBC and may benefit from enhanced surveillance and risk reduction strategies.
NBN Pathogenic Germline Variants are Associated with Pan-Cancer Susceptibility and In Vitro DNA Damage Response Defects
Belhadj, Sami , Khurram, Aliya , Bandlamudi, Chaitanya , Palou-Márquez, Guillermo , Steinsnyder, Zoe , Wildman, Temima , Catchings, Amanda , Kemel, Yelena , Mukherjee, Semanti , Fesko, Benjamin , Mehine, Miika , Dandiker, Sita , Izhar, Aalin , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Brower, Jamie , Walsh, Michael F. , Topka, Sabine , Offit, Kenneth , Ravichandran, Vignesh , Steinsnyder, Zoe , Wildman, Temima , Catchings, Amanda , Kemel, Yelena , Mukherjee, Semanti , Fesko, Benjamin , Arora, Kanika , Mehine, Miika , Dandiker, Sita , Izhar, Aalin , Petrini, John , Domchek, Susan M , Nathanson, Katherine L , Brower, Jamie , Couch, Fergus J. , Stadler, Zsofia , Robson, Mark , Walsh, Michael , Joseph, Vijai , Berger, Michael , Supek, Fran , Karam, Rachid , Topka, Sabine , Offit, Kenneth , Ravichandran, Vignesh , Domchek, Susan M. , Couch, Fergus J. , Robson, Mark E. , Vijai, Joseph , Karam, Rachid

Clinical Cancer Research | November 8, 2022 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 422-431

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1703 Get It

Abstract Purpose: To explore the role of NBN as a pan-cancer susceptibility gene. Experimental Design: Matched germline and somatic DNA samples from 34,046 patients were sequenced using Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets and presumed pathogenic germline variants (PGV) identified. Allele-specific and gene-centered analysis of enrichment was conducted and a validation cohort of 26,407 pan-cancer patients was analyzed. Functional studies utilized cellular models with analysis of protein expression, MRN complex formation/localization, and viability assessment following treatment with γ-irradiation. Results: We identified 83 carriers of 32 NBN PGVs (0.25% of the studied series), 40% of which (33/83) carried the Slavic founder p.K219fs. The frequency of PGVs varied across cancer types. Patients harboring NBN PGVs demonstrated increased loss of the wild-type allele in their tumors [OR = 2.7; confidence interval (CI): 1.4–5.5; P = 0.0024; pan-cancer], including lung and pancreatic tumors compared with breast and colorectal cancers. p.K219fs was enriched across all tumor types (OR = 2.22; CI: 1.3–3.6; P = 0.0018). Gene-centered analysis revealed enrichment of PGVs in cases compared with controls in the European population (OR = 1.9; CI: 1.3–2.7; P = 0.0004), a finding confirmed in the replication cohort (OR = 1.8; CI: 1.2–2.6; P = 0.003). Two novel truncating variants, p.L19* and p.N71fs, produced a 45 kDa fragment generated by alternative translation initiation that maintained binding to MRE11. Cells expressing these fragments showed higher sensitivity to γ-irradiation and lower levels of radiation-induced KAP1 phosphorylation. Conclusions: Burden analyses, biallelic inactivation, and functional evidence support the role of NBN as contributing to a broad cancer spectrum. Further studies in large pan-cancer series and the assessment of epistatic and environmental interactions are warranted to further define these associations.
Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay
Susswein, Lisa R. , Roberts, Maegan E. , Yang, Hana , Marshall, Megan L. , Hiraki, Susan , Berkofsky‐Fessler, Windy, Gupta, Sounak , Shen, Wei , Dunn, Carolyn, Huang, Huaizhi , Yadav, Siddhartha , Hruska, Kathleen S. , Chen, Chen , Lumby, Carolyn A. , Hu, Chunling , Hiraki, Susan , Gupta, Sounak , Shen, Wei , Dunn, Carolyn A, Na, Jie , Domchek, Susan M , Yadav, Siddhartha , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Hart, Steven N , Couch, Fergus J. , Chen, C , Huang, Huaizhi , Lumby, Carolyn A , Roberts, Maegan E , Hu, Chunling , Na, Jie , Domchek, Susan M. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Polley, Eric C. , Hart, Steven N. , Couch, Fergus J.

Clinical Cancer Research | June 23, 2022 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 3742-3751

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0203 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes by hereditary cancer testing poses great challenges for the clinical management of variant carriers. The ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology) variant classification framework, which incorporates multiple sources of evidence, has the potential to establish the clinical relevance of many VUS. We sought to classify the clinical relevance of 133 single-nucleotide substitution variants encoding missense variants in the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of BRCA2 by incorporating results from a validated functional assay into an ACMG/AMP-variant classification model from a hereditary cancer–testing laboratory. Experimental Design: The 133 selected VUS were evaluated using a validated homology-directed double-strand DNA break repair (HDR) functional assay. Results were combined with clinical and genetic data from variant carriers in a rules-based variant classification model for BRCA2. Results: Of 133 missense variants, 44 were designated as non-functional and 89 were designated as functional in the HDR assay. When combined with genetic and clinical information from a single diagnostic laboratory in an ACMG/AMP-variant classification framework, 66 variants previously classified by the diagnostic laboratory were correctly classified, and 62 of 67 VUS (92.5%) were reclassified as likely pathogenic (n = 22) or likely benign (n = 40). In total, 44 variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic, 84 as benign/likely benign, and 5 remained as VUS. Conclusions: Incorporation of HDR functional analysis into an ACMG/AMP framework model substantially improves BRCA2 VUS re-classification and provides an important tool for determining the clinical relevance of individual BRCA2 VUS.
Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes Among Women With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast
Yadav, Siddhartha , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Goldgar, David E. , Kraft, Peter , Gnanaolivu, Rohan D., Na, Jie , Huang, Hongyan, Boddicker, Nicholas , Larson, Nicole, Gao, Chi , Weinberg, Clarice, Vachon, Celine M. , Taylor, Jack A. , Patel, Alpa, Olson, Janet E., Lindstrom, Sara, Lacey, James V., Kurian, Allison W. , John, Esther M. , Haiman, Christopher, Auer, Paul W., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Chao, Elizabeth, Yussuf, Amal , Pesaran, Tina , Dolinsky, Jill S. , LaDuca, Holly , Hu, Chunling , Nathanson, Katherine L , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Goldgar, David E , Kraft, Peter , Na, Jie , Boddicker, Nicholas J , Gao, Chi , Yao, Song , Vachon, Celine M. , Trentham-Dietz, Amy , Taylor, Jack A , Sandler, Dale P , Palmer, Julie R , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Kurian, Allison W , John, Esther M , Bernstein, Leslie , Ambrosone, Christine B , Karam, Rachid , Yussuf, Amal , Pesaran, Tina , Dolinsky, Jill S , Hart, Steven N , LaDuca, Holly , Polley, Eric C , Domchek, Susan M , Couch, Fergus J. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Gnanaolivu, Rohan D., Huang, Hongyan, Larson, Nicole, Weinberg, Clarice, Patel, Alpa, Olson, Janet E., Lindstrom, Sara, Lacey, James V., Haiman, Christopher, Auer, Paul W., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Chao, Elizabeth

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 21, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 35 | Pages: 3918-3926

10.1200/jco.21.00640 Get It

PURPOSETo determine the contribution of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in hereditary cancer testing panel genes to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast.MATERIALS AND METHODSThe study included 2,999 women with ILC from a population-based cohort and 3,796 women with ILC undergoing clinical multigene panel testing (clinical cohort). Frequencies of germline PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were compared between women with ILC and unaffected female controls and between women with ILC and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC).RESULTSThe frequency of PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes among women with ILC was 6.5% in the clinical cohort and 5.2% in the population-based cohort. In case-control analysis, CDH1 and BRCA2 PVs were associated with high risks of ILC (odds ratio [OR] > 4) and CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2 PVs were associated with moderate (OR = 2-4) risks. BRCA1 PVs and CHEK2 p.Ile157Thr were not associated with clinically relevant risks (OR < 2) of ILC. Compared with IDC, CDH1 PVs were > 10-fold enriched, whereas PVs in BRCA1 were substantially reduced in ILC.CONCLUSIONThe study establishes that PVs in ATM, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, and PALB2 are associated with an increased risk of ILC, whereas BRCA1 PVs are not. The similar overall PV frequencies for ILC and IDC suggest that cancer histology should not influence the decision to proceed with genetic testing. Similar to IDC, multigene panel testing may be appropriate for women with ILC, but CDH1 should be specifically discussed because of low prevalence and gastric cancer risk.
Breast and Prostate Cancer Risks for MaleBRCA1andBRCA2Pathogenic Variant Carriers Using Polygenic Risk Scores
Barnes, Daniel R. , Silvestri, Valentina , Leslie, Goska , McGuffog, Lesley, Yang, Xin , Adlard, Julian , Agnarsson, Bjarni A. , Ahmed, Munaza, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Arason, Aðalgeir , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Barrowdale, Daniel , Belotti, Muriel, Berthet, Pascaline, Boonen, Susanne E. , Borg, Åke , Brady, Angela F., Brewer, Carole, Brunet, Joan , Bucalo, Agostino, Caldés, Trinidad , Cassingham, Hayley , Christensen, Lise Lotte , Cini, Giulia , Claes, Kathleen , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Cortesi, Laura , Damante, Giuseppe , Darder, Esther , Davidson, Rosemarie, Leeneer, Kim De , Putter, Robin De , Valle, Jesús Del , Ding, Yuan Chun , Donaldson, Alan , Eason, Jacqueline , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Engel, Christoph , Evans, D. Gareth , Feliubadaló, Lídia , Frone, Megan N. , Frost, Debra, Gehrig, Andrea, Giraud, Sophie , Glendon, Gord , Goldgar, David E. , Greene, Mark H. , Gregory, Helen , Groß, Eva, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Hanson, Helen , Horváth, Judit , Investigators, KConFab, Investigators, HEBON, Izatt, Louise , James, Paul A. , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Jensen, Uffe Birk , Johannsson, Oskar T., John, Esther M. , Kramer, Gero , Kroeldrup, Lone , Kruse, Torben A. , Lautrup, Charlotte Kvist , López‐Fernández, Adrià , Mai, Phuong L, Manoukian, Siranoush , Mátrai, Zoltán , Matricardi, Laura , Mebirouk, Noura, Meindl, Alfons , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Morrison, Patrick J. , Muranen, Taru , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Niederacher, Dieter , Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Peissel, Bernard , Peterlongo, Paolo , Petersen, Annabeth Høgh , Pinto, Pedro, Porteous, Mary, Pottinger, Caroline , Pujana, Miquel Angel, Ramser, Juliane, Rantala, Johanna, Rogers, Mark T., Rønlund, Karina, Abajo, A.M. SÁnchez De, Shah, Payal D. , Sharif, Saba , Side, Lucy, Stadler, Zsofia, Steele, Linda , Sutter, Christian , Tan, Yen Y. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Teulé, Àlex , Thull, Darcy L. , Trainer, Alison H., Tripathi, Vishakha , Valentini, Virginia , Viel, Alessandra , Walker, Lisa, Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Whaite, Anna , Offit, Kenneth, Thomassen, Mads , Schmutzler, Rita K., Simard, Jacques , Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Pujana, Miguel Ángel , Dennis, Joe , Yang, Xin , Adlard, Julian , Agnarsson, Bjarni A , Andrulis, Irene L , Arason, Adalgeir , Arnold, Norbert , Auber, Bernd , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardottir, Rosa B , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benitez, Javier , Boonen, Susanne E , Bozsik, Aniko , Brennan, Paul , Brunet, Joan , Bucalo, Agostino , Caligo, Maria A , Campbell, Ian G , Cassingham, Hayley , Cini, Giulia , Claes, Kathleen B M , Coppa, Anna , Cortesi, Laura , Darder, Esther , de la Hoya, Miguel , de Putter, Robin , Del Valle, Jesús , Domchek, Susan M , Donaldson, Alan , Eason, Jacqueline , Engel, Christoph , Fostira, Florentia , Frone, Megan , Glendon, Gord , Godwin, Andrew K. , Greene, Mark H , Hahnen, Eric , Hanson, Helen , Izatt, Louise , Izquierdo, Angel , James, Paul , John, Esther M , Kroeldrup, Lone , Kruse, Torben A , Lazaro, Conxi , Lesueur, Fabienne , Matrai, Zoltan , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Morrison, Patrick J , Muranen, Taru A , Nathanson, Katherine L , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, H , Nguyen-Dumont, Tu , Niederacher, Dieter , Palli, Domenico , Parsons, Michael T , Perez-Segura, Pedro , Peterlongo, Paolo , Pinto, Pedro , Pottinger, Caroline , Radice, Paolo , Robson, Mark , Rump, Andreas , Sharif, Saba , Steele, Linda , Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique , Teixeira, Manuel R , Thull, Darcy L , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Tommasi, Stefania , Toss, Angela , Tripathi, Vishakha , Valentini, Virginia , van Asperen, Christi J , Venturelli, Marta , Viel, Alessandra , Joseph, Vijai , Whaite, Anna , Simard, Jacques , Easton, Doug , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Ottini, Laura , Barnes, Daniel R , Leslie, Goska , Pujana, Miquel Angel , Eeles, Rosalind A , Evans, D Gareth , Matricardi, Laura , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Silvestri, Valentina , De Leeneer, Kim , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Manoukian, Siranoush , Arnold, Norbert , Auber, Bernd , Balmañà, Judith , Barwell, Julian , Benı́tez, Javier , Bozsik, Anikó , Brady, Angela F., Buys, Saundra S. , Caligo, Maria A. , Campbell, Ian , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Cook, Jackie A , Hoya, Miguel de la , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , Gallagher, David James , Hentschel, Julia , Investigators, KConFab, Investigators, HEBON, Izquierdo, Á. , Lázaro, Conxi , Lesueur, Fabienne , Mai, Phuong L, Maxwell, Kara N. , Meindl, Alfons , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nguyen‐Dumont, Tú , Palli, Domenico , Parsons, Michael T. , Radice, Paolo , Robson, Mark E. , Rump, Andreas , Singer, Christian F. , Stoppa‐Lyonnet, Dominique , Asperen, Christi J. van , Vijai, Joseph , Zanna, Ines , Couch, Fergus J. , Ottini, Laura

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 26, 2021 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 109-122

10.1093/jnci/djab147 Get It

AbstractBackgroundRecent population-based female breast cancer and prostate cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been developed. We assessed the associations of these PRS with breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.Methods483 BRCA1 and 1318 BRCA2 European ancestry male carriers were available from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). A 147-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) prostate cancer PRS (PRSPC) and a 313-SNP breast cancer PRS were evaluated. There were 3 versions of the breast cancer PRS, optimized to predict overall (PRSBC), estrogen receptor (ER)–negative (PRSER-), or ER-positive (PRSER+) breast cancer risk.ResultsPRSER+ yielded the strongest association with breast cancer risk. The odds ratios (ORs) per PRSER+ standard deviation estimates were 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] =1.07 to 1.83) for BRCA1 and 1.33 (95% CI = 1.16 to 1.52) for BRCA2 carriers. PRSPC was associated with prostate cancer risk for BRCA1 (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.28 to 2.33) and BRCA2 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.91) carriers. The estimated breast cancer odds ratios were larger after adjusting for female relative breast cancer family history. By age 85 years, for BRCA2 carriers, the breast cancer risk varied from 7.7% to 18.4% and prostate cancer risk from 34.1% to 87.6% between the 5th and 95th percentiles of the PRS distributions.ConclusionsPopulation-based prostate and female breast cancer PRS are associated with a wide range of absolute breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. These findings warrant further investigation aimed at providing personalized cancer risks for male carriers and informing clinical management.