Zekeridou, Anastasia

AbstractDefining the CSF cytokine/chemokine and injury biomarker signature of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) autoimmunity can inform immunopathogenesis. CSF GFAP‐IgG‐positive samples (N = 98) were tested for 17 cytokines/chemokines, neurofilament light chain (NfL), and GFAP (ELLA, Bio‐Techne). Controls included non‐inflammatory (N = 42), AQP4‐IgG‐positive (N = 83), CNS infections (N = 13), and neurosarcoidosis (N = 32). IL5, IL6, IL10, IL8/CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, BAFF, GM‐CSF, IFN‐gamma, and TNF‐alpha concentrations were higher compared to non‐inflammatory controls (P < 0.01). GFAP concentrations were similar to those of AQP4‐IgG‐positive patients; NfL was higher (P < 0.001) and correlated with MRI changes and outcomes. CSF cytokine/chemokine findings in GFAP autoimmunity correlate with histopathology; GFAP and NfL hold promise as disease biomarkers.

Background Data regarding long-term recovery from autoimmune encephalitis (AE) remain limited. Methods This retrospective observational study investigated outcomes in 182 patients who met the 2016 criteria for definite AE. Recovery data were available in 172 patients. Follow-up data at ≥24 months post-attack were available for 119. Recovery trajectory, residual symptoms, outcome predictors and causes of post-AE death were assessed. Results Of 172 patients, 138 (80%) achieved good recovery (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2) with a median recovery time of 4 months (95% CI: 2 to 6 months). Recovery varied by associated neural antibody, with the best recovery observed in leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (97% good recovery, median recovery time 0 (0 to 2) months). Paraneoplastic AE (p=0.007), severe attacks (eg, mRS ≥4 at attack, p=0.007) and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis (p=0.005) were associated with a lower likelihood of good recovery, while seizure presentation (p=0.026) was associated with better recovery. Despite good recovery, several residual symptoms persisted ≥24 months post-AE, including cognitive deficits (53%), seizures (26%), depression (23%), sleep disorders (25%), brainstem/cerebellar symptoms (13%), other movement disorders (14%) and autonomic symptoms (12%). Predictors of long-term sequelae included disabling cognitive deficit at onset and delayed immunotherapy for post AE-dementia, and medial temporal atrophy as well as escalation to cyclophosphamide therapy for both drug-resistant epilepsy and chronic depression. Of 182 patients, 20 (11%) died; the most common cause of death was progression of AE (6/20 (30%)). Conclusion While the majority of patients achieved functional independence after AE, several residual symptoms persisted. Several clinical and paraclinical features were associated with long-term sequelae.

AbstractObjectiveWe describe neurologic phenotype, clinical associations, and outcomes in autoimmune brainstem encephalitis.MethodsMedical records of neural‐IgG positive autoimmune brainstem encephalitis patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic (January 1, 2006–December 31, 2022) were reviewed.ResultsNinety‐eight patients (57 male) were included. Median age of symptom onset was 51 years (range, 8 months‐85 years). Frequent presenting features were ≥1: diplopia (80%), ataxia (78%), dysarthria (68%), vestibulocochlear symptoms (67%), dysphagia (61%), nausea/vomiting (42%), and facial weakness (32%). Altered mental status (11%) was uncommon. Neural antibodies detected were as follows: KLHL‐11 (26 patients), GAD65 (high titer, 12), ANNA‐1 (anti‐Hu, 8), ANNA‐2 (anti‐Ri, 8), Ma2 (7), IgLON‐5 (6), AQP4 (6), MOG (4), glycine receptor (4), GQ1B (4), PCA‐1 (anti‐Yo, 4), DPPX (2), neurochondrin (2), neurofilament (2), NMDA‐R (2), AGNA‐1 (SOX‐1, 1), ANNA‐3 (DACH1, 1), amphiphysin (1), CRMP‐5 (1), ITPR‐1 (1), PCA‐Tr (DNER, 1), and PDE10A (1). Cancer was identified in 55 patients: germ cell (23 patients; 3 extra‐testicular), ductal breast adenocarcinoma (8), small cell carcinoma (6, lung 4), adenocarcinomas (6), neuroendocrine carcinoma (3), hematologic (2), squamous cell (2), and other (7). Median modified Ranking score (mRS) at last follow‐up was 3 (range, 0–6). Factors associated with poor outcome included abnormal brain MRI, bulbar symptoms, and elevated CSF IgG index. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed faster progression to wheelchair in patients who were immunotherapy refractory and with elevated CSF IgG index. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune brainstem encephalitis (definite and probable) are proposed.InterpretationAutoimmune brainstem encephalitis is a distinct clinical subphenotype of autoimmune encephalitis. Abnormal brain MRI, bulbar symptoms, and elevated CSF‐IgG index associate with poor outcome.

AbstractObjectiveTo describe the phenotypes, oncological associations, biomarker profiles, and outcomes across different age groups in patients with ANNA1 (anti‐Hu) autoimmunity.MethodsA retrospective review of patients with ANNA1‐IgG in serum/CSF between January 1, 2001, and December 31,2019 was performed. Patients were classified into three groups based on the age of symptom onset. Phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP‐Seq) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) measurements were done in patient sera/CSF with archived samples.ResultsOf 122 patients, 81 (66%), 20 (16%), and 21 (17%) patients belonged to older adults, young adults, and pediatric groups, respectively. Lung cancer and neuromuscular presentations were more common in older adults (p < 0.001), while limbic encephalitis and neuroblastoma were more common in pediatric patients (p < 0.005). Most young adults (75%) did not have cancer identified. Proportions of patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy were 20%, 30%, and 52% among older adults, young adults, and pediatric groups, respectively. PhIP‐Seq demonstrated significant enrichment for ELAVL4 peptides especially for amino acids 240–289, in the majority of samples evaluated (36/67, 54%). ZIC and SOX2 peptides were significantly enriched in those with central nervous system presentations. Serum NfL levels were elevated in patients with cancer and those with poor long‐term outcomes.InterpretationYoung adults with ANNA1 autoimmunity phenotypically resembled older adults but rarely had an underlying cancer. Pediatric patients frequently presented with limbic encephalitis and neuroblastoma and often responded favorably to immunotherapy. Distinct antigenic signatures may underlie differences in clinical presentations. Serum NfL levels may be a biomarker of poor long‐term outcomes in ANNA1 autoimmunity.

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dried blood spot (DBS) compared with conventional serum Aquaporin‐4‐IgG (AQP4‐IgG) testing.MethodsProspective multicenter diagnostic study was conducted between April 2018 and October 2023 across medical centers in the United States, Uganda, and the Republic of Guinea. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients and controls collected blood on filter paper cards along with concurrent serum samples. These samples underwent analysis using flow cytometric live‐cell‐based assays (CBA) and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine AQP4 serostatus. The accuracy of AQP4‐IgG detection between DBS and serum (gold standard) was compared.ResultsAmong 150 participants (47 cases, 103 controls), there was a strong correlation between DBS and serum samples (Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.82). The AUC was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92–0.99). AQP4‐IgG detection through DBS showed 87.0% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.74–0.95) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 0.96–1.00) using CBA, and 65.2% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.43–0.84) and 95.2% specificity (95% CI: 0.76–0.99) using ELISA. Serum ELISA demonstrated 69.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.47–0.87) and 98.4% specificity (95% CI: 0.91–0.99). The stability of DBS in detecting AQP4‐IgG persisted over 24 months for most cases.InterpretationThe DBS represents a viable alternative for detecting AQP4‐IgG in resource‐limited settings to diagnose NMOSD, offering high sensitivity and specificity comparable to serum testing. Moreover, DBS has low shipping costs, is easy to administer, and is suitable for point‐of‐care testing.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytokine/chemokine profile of central nervous system (CNS) neurosarcoidosis (NS), and its utility in differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication.MethodsIn this case–control study, we validated 17 cytokines/chemokines (interleukin [IL]‐1‐beta, IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐6, IL‐10, IL‐12p70, IL‐13, IL‐17A, BAFF, IL‐8/CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, GM‐CSF, interferon‐gamma, and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]‐alpha) in a multiplexed automated immunoassay system (ELLA; Bio‐Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and assessed them in CSF and serum of symptomatic patients with probable or definite CNS NS (01/2011–02/2023) with gadolinium enhancement and/or CSF pleocytosis. Patients with multiple sclerosis, primary CNS lymphoma, aquaporin‐4 immunoglobulin G positivity, non‐inflammatory disorders, and healthy individuals were used as controls.ResultsA total of 32 NS patients (59% women; median age, 59 years [19–81]) were included; concurrent sera were available in 12. CSF controls consisted of 26 multiple sclerosis, 8 primary CNS lymphoma, 84 aquaporin‐4 immunoglobulin G positive, and 34 patients with non‐inflammatory disorders. Gadolinium enhancement was present in 31 of 32 NS patients, and CSF pleocytosis in 27 of 32 (84%). CSF IL‐2, IL‐6, IL‐10, IL‐13, BAFF, IL‐8/CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, GM‐CSF, interferon‐gamma, and TNF‐alpha levels were significantly higher in NS patients compared with non‐inflammatory controls (p ≤ 0.02); elevations were more common in CSF than serum. Concurrent elevation of IL‐6, CXCL9, CXCL10, GM‐CSF, interferon‐gamma, and TNF‐alpha was present in 18 of 32 NS patients, but only in 1 control. Elevated IL‐6, IL‐10, IL‐13, CXCL9, CXL10, GM‐CSF, and TNF‐alpha associated with measures of disease activity.InterpretationNS CSF cytokine/chemokine profiles suggest T cell (mainly T helper cell type 1), macrophage, and B‐cell involvement. These signatures aid in NS diagnosis, indicate disease activity, and suggest therapeutic avenues. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:704–714

ObjectivesTo report an autoimmune paraneoplastic encephalitis characterized by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody targeting synaptic protein calmodulin kinase‐like vesicle‐associated (CAMKV).MethodsSerum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples harboring unclassified antibodies on murine brain‐based indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) were screened by human protein microarray. In 5 patients with identical cerebral IFA staining, CAMKV was identified as top‐ranking candidate antigen. Western blots, confocal microscopy, immune‐absorption, and mass spectrometry were performed to substantiate CAMKV specificity. Recombinant CAMKV‐specific assays (cell‐based [fixed and live] and Western blot) provided additional confirmation.ResultsOf 5 CAMKV‐IgG positive patients, 3 were women (median symptom‐onset age was 59 years; range, 53–74). Encephalitis‐onset was subacute (4) or acute (1) and manifested with: altered mental status (all), seizures (4), hyperkinetic movements (4), psychiatric features (3), memory loss (2), and insomnia (2). Paraclinical testing revealed CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis (all 4 tested), electrographic seizures (3 of 4 tested), and striking MRI abnormalities in all (mesial temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [all patients], caudate head T2 hyperintensities [3], and cortical diffusion weighted hyperintensities [2]). None had post‐gadolinium enhancement. Cancers were uterine adenocarcinoma (3 patients: poorly differentiated or neuroendocrine‐differentiated in 2, both demonstrated CAMKV immunoreactivity), bladder urothelial carcinoma (1), and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (1). Two patients developed encephalitis following immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy (atezolizumab [1], pembrolizumab [1]). All treated patients (4) demonstrated an initial response to immunotherapy (corticosteroids [4], IVIG [2]), though 3 died from cancer.InterpretationCAMKV‐IgG is a biomarker of immunotherapy‐responsive paraneoplastic encephalitis with temporal and extratemporal features and uterine cancer as a prominent oncologic association. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:21–33