Back to Authors

Accurso, Erin C

0000-0002-5521-6381

Mayo Clinic

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Citations 4

Psychotropic medication use in treatment‐seeking youth with eating disorders
Gorrell, Sasha , Lebow, Jocelyn , Kinasz, Kathryn , Goldschmidt, Andrea B. , Accurso, Erin C. , Accurso, Erin C , Goldschmidt, Andrea B , Lebow, Jocelyn , Mitchell, James E., Grange, Daniel Le

European Eating Disorders Review | September 27, 2020 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 739-749

10.1002/erv.2788 Get It

AbstractObjectivePsychotropic medication use in youth with eating disorders (EDs) is poorly understood despite high co‐occurrence of psychiatric disorders. This study examined characteristics associated with medication use in treatment‐seeking youth with EDs.MethodYouth up to age 18 reported on medication use when presenting to an academic medical center outpatient ED service in the United States. Data presented were collected between 1998–2015.ResultsThe sample (N = 604) was predominantly female (90.6%) with a mean age of 15.3 years (SD = 2.3). Approximately one‐third (30%, n = 173) were taking psychotropic medications (40%, n = 70, were taking multiple medications). Antidepressant use was most common (26%, n = 152), followed by atypical antipsychotics (8%, n = 43). Adjusting for co‐occurring psychiatric disorders, non‐Hispanic Whites who had received prior treatment (psychotherapy, hospitalization) were significantly more likely to be using medication. Longer illness duration and prior treatment were associated with greater antidepressant use. For atypical antipsychotics, prior hospitalization was associated with greater use.ConclusionsFindings confirm moderate psychotropic medication use among young patients with EDs despite a lack of clarity regarding optimally effective pharmacologic interventions in this population. Pharmacological trials examining the efficacy of medications for young patients with EDs are warranted to inform future prescribing practice.
Parents know best: Caregiver perspectives on eating disorder recovery
Accurso, Erin C. , Sim, Leslie , Muhlheim, Lauren, Lebow, Jocelyn , Accurso, Erin C , Lebow, Jocelyn

International Journal of Eating Disorders | November 19, 2019 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1252-1260

10.1002/eat.23200 Get It

Abstract Objective This study used mixed methods to evaluate caregiver perspectives on recovery from an eating disorder. Method Caregivers ( N = 387) completed an online survey about their child's weight history, treatment history, illness trajectory, and recovery. Results Children were predominantly females with adolescent onset anorexia nervosa and currently 18.4 years old on average. Qualitative analysis of caregivers' open‐ended definitions of recovery revealed seven distinct recovery domains, including (a) weight (45%); (b) body image, eating disorder cognitions, and related emotions (54%); (c) eating behavior (71%); (d) independence and responsibility in eating disorder management (28%); (e) physical health (21%); (f) psychological well‐being (31%); and (g) life worth living (27%). Most (72%) reported that their child had achieved partial or full recovery at some point in their lifetime. Only 20% reported that their child had ever achieved full recovery, but 93% of those had sustained recovery over time (i.e., no relapses since achieving recovery). Physical recovery occurred on average 2.7 years after eating disorder onset, followed shortly by social and emotional recovery (2.9 years), and finally behavioral (3.4 years) and cognitive (3.9 years) recovery, which occurred at weights 6–7 pounds higher than those at which physical recovery was achieved. Discussion Findings suggest that caregivers hold a multifaceted view of recovery that includes not only weight restoration and symptom reduction, but also full engagement in social and occupational activities, establishment of a meaningful life, cognitive flexibility, and emotional well‐being. These data support clinical observations that physical and behavioral recovery precede cognitive recovery.
Weight gain trajectories during outpatient family‐based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa
Lebow, Jocelyn , Sim, Leslie , Goldschmidt, Andrea B. , Grange, Daniel Le , Accurso, Erin C. , Goldschmidt, Andrea B , Le Grange, Daniel , Accurso, Erin C , Lebow, Jocelyn , Crosby, Ross D.

International Journal of Eating Disorders | December 22, 2018 | Volume: 52 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 88-94

10.1002/eat.23000 Get It

AbstractObjectiveGiven that weight gain patterns in adolescents receiving outpatient Family‐Based Treatment (FBT) have not been characterized, the purpose of this study was to examine trajectories of weight gain in a group of adolescent patients with a restrictive eating disorder [e.g., anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN] receiving FBT. This study also examined the association of patient characteristics with weight gain trajectories, including age, diagnosis, weight suppression, presenting BMI‐for‐age percentile, and eating pathology.MethodLatent growth mixture modeling was used to identify distinct weight trajectories, as defined by change in BMI‐for‐age percentile, for 153 adolescents with AN or atypical AN, receiving FBT.ResultsThere were five distinct weight gain trajectory profiles for adolescents receiving FBT for a restrictive eating disorder. Younger age and greater weight suppression were associated with more rapid weight gain trajectories. A pattern of slow and consistent weight gain was associated with older age and less eating pathology.DiscussionThere was considerable variability in weight gain trajectories in youth receiving outpatient FBT for a restrictive eating disorder. This suggests that patients' presenting information can be used to inform expectations regarding weight gain trajectories.
Is there clinical consensus in defining weight restoration for adolescents with anorexia nervosa?
Lebow, Jocelyn , Sim, Leslie , Accurso, Erin C. , Sim, Leslie A , Accurso, Erin C , Lebow, Jocelyn

Eating Disorders | October 31, 2017 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 270-277

10.1080/10640266.2017.1388664 Get It