Mandrekar, Sumithra J.

AbstractIntroductionStructured data capture requires defined languages such as minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE). This pilot assessed the feasibility of capturing 5 mCODE categories (stage, disease status, performance status (PS), intent of therapy and intent to change therapy).MethodsA tool (SmartPhrase) using existing and custom structured data elements was Built to capture 4 data categories (disease status, PS, intent of therapy and intent to change therapy) typically documented as free‐text within notes. Existing functionality for stage was supported by the Build. Participant survey data, presence of data (per encounter), and time in chart were collected prior to go‐live and repeat timepoints. The anticipated outcome was capture of >50% sustained over time without undue burden.ResultsPre‐intervention (5‐weeks before go‐live), participants had 1390 encounters (1207 patients). The median percent capture across all participants was 32% for stage; no structured data was available for other categories pre‐intervention. During a 6‐month pilot with 14 participants across three sites, 4995 encounters (3071 patients) occurred. The median percent capture across all participants and all post‐intervention months increased to 64% for stage and 81%–82% for the other data categories post‐intervention. No increase in participant time in chart was noted. Participants reported that data were meaningful to capture.ConclusionsStructured data can be captured (1) in real‐time, (2) sustained over time without (3) undue provider burden using note‐based tools. Our system is expanding the pilot, with integration of these data into clinical decision support, practice dashboards and potential for clinical trial matching.

Abstract A041202 (NCT01886872) is a phase 3 study comparing bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) with ibrutinib and the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) in previously untreated older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The initial results showed that ibrutinib-containing regimens had superior progression-free survival (PFS) and rituximab did not add additional benefits. Here we present an updated analysis. With a median follow-up of 55 months, the median PFS was 44 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 38-54) for BR and not yet reached in either ibrutinib-containing arm. The 48-month PFS estimates were 47%, 76%, and 76% for BR, ibrutinib, and IR, respectively. The benefit of ibrutinib regimens over chemoimmunotherapy was consistent across subgroups of patients defined by TP53 abnormalities, del(11q), complex karyotype, and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV). No significant interaction effects were observed between the treatment arm and del(11q), the complex karyotype, or IGHV. However, a greater difference in PFS was observed among the patients with TP53 abnormalities. There was no difference in the overall survival. Notable adverse events with ibrutinib included atrial fibrillation (afib) and hypertension. Afib was observed in 11 patients (pts) on BR (3%) and 67 pts on ibrutinib (18%). All-grade hypertension was observed in 95 pts on BR (27%) and 263 pts on ibrutinib (55%). These data show that ibrutinib regimens prolong PFS compared with BR for older patients with treatment-naïve CLL. These benefits were observed across subgroups, including high-risk groups. Strikingly, within the ibrutinib arms, there was no inferior PFS for patients with abnormalities in TP53, the highest risk feature observed in CLL. These data continue to demonstrate the efficacy of ibrutinib in treatment-naïve CLL.

Importance Patient withdrawal of consent from a cancer clinical trial is defined as a patient’s volitional cessation of participation in all matters related to a trial. It can undermine the trial’s purpose, make the original sample size and power calculations irrelevant, introduce bias between trial arms, and prolong the time to trial completion. Objective To report rates of and baseline factors associated with withdrawal of consent among patients in cancer clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants This multisite observational cohort study was conducted through the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Patient withdrawal was defined as a patient’s voluntary termination of consent to participate anytime during trial conduct. Baseline patient- and trial-based factors were investigated for their associations with patient withdrawal within the first 2 years using logistic regression models. All patients who participated in cancer therapeutic clinical trials conducted within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology from 2013 through 2019 were included. The data lock date was January 23, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures The percentage of patients who withdrew consent in 2 years and factors associated with withdrawal of consent. Results A total of 11 993 patients (median age, 62 years; 67% female) from 58 trials were included. Within 2 years, 1060 patients (9%) withdrew from their respective trials. Two-year rates of withdrawal were 5.7%, 7.6%, 8.5%, 7.8%, 8.4%, 9.5%, and 9.8% for each of the respective years from 2013 through 2019. In multivariable analyses, Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.30-2.15; P < .001), randomized design with placebo (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.38-1.94; P < .001), and patient age 75 years and older (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.12-1.72; P = .003) were associated with higher likelihood of withdrawal by 2 years. Use of radiation was associated with patient retention (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, rates of withdrawal of consent were less than 10% and appeared consistent over time. Factors that are associated with withdrawal of consent should be considered when designing trials and should be further studied to learn how they can be favorably modified.

TPS11584 Background: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive sarcoma subtype with frequent metastatic relapse. Advanced uLMS is treated with gemcitabine/docetaxel or anthracycline-based regimens. After failure of initial chemotherapy, remaining options provide limited benefit (trabectedin: objective response rate (ORR) 11%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) 4.0 months (mo); pazopanib: ORR 11%, mPFS 3.0 mo; dacarbazine: ORR 9%, mPFS 1.5 mo). 18-23% of uLMS harbor deleterious alterations in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair genes. HR-deficient cancers are unable to effectively repair double-stranded DNA breaks and may be sensitive to poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-based strategies. In preclinical studies, the combination of temozolomide (T), an alkylating agent, and olaparib (O), a PARP inhibitor, markedly suppressed proliferation of uLMS models. Among 22 uLMS patients with median 3 prior lines, O+T demonstrated mPFS 6.9 mo and ORR 27% (Ingham M. et al. ASCO 2021: #11506). In correlative analysis, alterations in HR genes including PALB2 and RAD51B or absence of RAD51 foci formation by a functional assay were observed in patients with prolonged PFS (Bose S. et al. ASCO 2022: #11509). Based on these results, we designed a randomized phase 2/3 study to further evaluate O+T in advanced, pretreated uLMS. Methods: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A092104 is a randomized, open-label phase 2/3 clinical trial of O+T versus investigator’s choice in advanced uLMS. Eligible patients have ECOG performance status ≤2, progression on ≥ 2 prior treatment lines and measurable disease. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive T 75 mg/m2 orally daily + O 200 mg orally twice daily on days 1-7 in 21-day cycles (Arm 1) or investigator’s choice of trabectedin 1.5 mg/m2 over 24 hours every 21 days or pazopanib 400-600 mg orally daily (Arm 2). For phase 2, the primary endpoint is PFS. The design evaluates for an improvement in PFS from 4 mo to 8 mo, requires 70 patients, and yields 90% power and 1-sided alpha 0.10. If phase 2 is positive, phase 3 will enroll. For phase 3, the primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). The design evaluates for an improvement in OS from 13 mo to 23 mo, requires 165 patients (including 70 from phase 2) and yields 90% power with 1-sided alpha 0.025. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, safety and patient-reported outcomes. Archival tissue will be collected and evaluated with a RAD51 foci formation assay. Genomic sequencing results will be obtained where available. The study opened to accrual in 1/2023. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT05633381 .

7520 Background: With goal of simplifying clinical trials in lymphomas, we reported that bone marrow biopsies are irrelevant for response assessment in most patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL) on trials (Rutherford JCO 2023). We then investigated impact of imaging frequency in FL clinical trials. We hypothesized that progression free survival (PFS) would not be different when imaging is performed less frequently than required by trials. Methods: We identified all trials through Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology that enrolled untreated pts with FL from 2008-2016. We considered 2 imaging schedules: protocol specified (control) vs relaxed (X) in which response assessments at every other required time point were omitted. For each trial, we estimated PFS using Kaplan Meier methods for the 2 schedules then determined difference in PFS between schedules as % change from control schedule in 2 year (yr) PFS rate. We performed simulation studies to approximate impact of less frequent imaging on PFS estimation using 50901 (low-intermediate risk FL) and 50904 (intermediate-high risk FL, control arm). We assumed exponential distribution for PFS, where rate parameter was calculated based on observed median PFS with uniform censoring distribution. Protocols for 50901 and 50904 mandated imaging every 4 months (mos) for 2 yrs then every 6 mos (S0). We ran 1000 iterations of 100 observations using 3 tumor assessment follow up schedules: every 6 mos for 2 yrs then yearly (S1), every 8 mos for 2 yrs then yearly (S2), or yearly (S3) for simulated progression times. We calculated deviation of PFS using simulated schedules from truth (S0). Results: Across 5 FL trials, median percent change of schedule X from control schedule in estimated 2yr PFS was 2.1% (0.0-30.8%) and in estimated 4yr PFS was 0.9% (-8.6-25.7%). Disparate result in 50901 is due to small shift in events with low number of pts at risk for progression. Simulation study results by trial were: for 50901, true median PFS 1.9 yrs and average median PFS for S1, S2, and S3 of 2.05, 2.11, and 2.21 yrs; for 50904 (control arm), true median PFS 4.1 yrs and average median PFS for S1, S2, and S3 of 4.16, 4.12, and 4.05 yrs. Conclusions: Our findings support decreased frequency of imaging studies in FL clinical trials, which would improve resource use and decrease pt burden. We plan a larger analysis to confirm results. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT00553501 , NCT01145495 , NCT01190449 , NCT01286272 , NCT01829568 .[Table: see text]

TPS5634 Background: The prognosis for women with recurrent or persistent EC after progressing on first-line chemotherapy is poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of 12 months, highlighting the need for more efficacious therapies for this population. Immune checkpoint inhibitors either as monotherapy or when combined with kinase inhibitors have recently demonstrated encouraging response rates in pts with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and MS-stable (MSS)/MMR-proficient (MMRp) EC, respectively. Atezo is a humanized monoclonal anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor that has demonstrated monotherapy antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile in relapsed recurrent EC. Atezo has shown compelling clinical efficacy for pts with certain solid tumors (e.g., urothelial, NSCLC, triple negative breast cancer) as monotherapy and as part of combinatorial therapy. The AFT-50 EndoMAP trial is a platform trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Atezo in combination with biomarker-defined targeted agents in pts with recurrent or persistent EC. Recognizing pts may have either progressed through or received a checkpoint inhibitor in a prior line of therapy, a non atezo cohort will also be open to enrollment. Methods: This is a phase IB/II non-randomized, multicenter, multicohort, biomarker-driven platform study consisting of two cohorts: A (atezo containing) and B (non atezo). Eligible pts have recurrent or persistent EC and have received no more than 2 prior lines of therapy. FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) NGS assay will be used for genomic tumor profiling. In cohort A, pts may be eligible for one of the following doublets: Atezo+ipatasertib (PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT1-altered cancers), Atezo+talazoparib (tumors with genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) ≥16%), Atezo+Trastuzumab emtansine (ERBB2/HER2 mutated and/or amplified tumors), Atezo+Tiragolumab (MSI-H and/or TMB>10 mut/MB), and Atezo+bevacizumab (biomarker unmatched). Pts will receive Atezo in addition to the targeted agent (at the study approved dosing schedule) until progression, unacceptable toxicity, pt or physician decision to withdraw from the study, death, or study termination. Pts in cohort B, will be eligible for inavolisib (PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT1-altered cancers) + letrozole. Each cohort will enroll ~20 pts; however, the exact size of the cohort may be adjusted. The primary endpoint for Cohort A is confirmed overall response rate (ORR) for each cohort, and for Cohort B is progression free survival at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate, duration of response, OS, safety and tolerability, 6-month PFS (cohort A). As a platform study, additional arms may be added, as supported by evolving understanding of EC and molecular targets. EndoMAP is actively enrolling at 17 sites in the US with a target of 25 sites nationwide. Clinical trial information: NCT04486352 .