Mahipal, Amit

Abstract Background Optimal treatment following first-line immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains uncertain. This study evaluated futibatinib, a pan-FGFR inhibitor, combined with pembrolizumab in previously treated patients with FGF19-expressing HCC. Methods Eligible patients were ≥18 years old with advanced HCC, prior systemic therapy, Child-Pugh A-B7 liver function, ECOG 0–2, and FGF19 overexpression. Patients received futibatinib 20 mg orally daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life, and safety. Results Between August 2021 and March 2024, 14 patients enrolled and 13 were evaluable. Median age was 72 years (range, 60–87), 53.8% were male, 92.3% had Child-Pugh A liver function, and all had received prior immunotherapy. Median progression-free survival was 15 weeks (95% CI, 9.0–NE), with a PFS6 rate of 23.1% (95% CI, 8.6–62.3%). ORR was 0% (95% CI, 0–24.7%), while stable disease was observed in 53.9% of patients. Median OS was 55.7 weeks (95% CI, 47.3–NE). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 69.2% of patients, and grade ≥4 adverse events in 15.4%. One grade 5 event (acute-on-chronic kidney injury) was deemed unrelated to treatment. Common adverse events included hyperphosphatemia, fatigue, diarrhea, elevated transaminases, dry eye, nail changes, rash, and oral mucositis. Conclusions Futibatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile but did not meet efficacy thresholds supporting further study in FGF19-expressing HCC. Effective post-immunotherapy treatment strategies remain an unmet need.

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B) and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (D + T) are approved first-line systemic therapy options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with no head-to-head comparison. In this propensity-matched analysis, we compared the survival of patients with advanced HCC who received either A + B or D + T therapy. Methods: Patients with advanced HCC who received A + B or D + T treatment in the first-line setting were identified using the TriNetX platform, a health research network that provides access to electronic health record data from 112 healthcare organizations. Propensity-score-matched (PSM) analysis was conducted, and the median overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: We identified 2819 patients with HCC who were treated with A + B or D + T: 2031 patients received A + B and 788 received D + T. Compared to patients in the A + B cohort, those who received D + T were more likely to be older (median age: 68.4 vs. 66.9 years), have lower platelet counts (186.8 vs. 201.3), higher prevalence of hypoalbuminemia with levels < 2.7 g/dL (35.2% vs. 28.4%), higher prevalence of bilirubin levels between 2.0 and 2.9 mg/dL (28.8% vs. 23.8%), and decreased INR with levels between 0.0 and 1.6 (92.1% vs. 86.3%). After PSM, 1536 patients were included in the survival analyses, with all variables adequately matched. There was no significant difference in the median OS between those receiving A + B or D + T [16.3 vs. 22.5 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.0]. Higher rates of immune-mediated colitis were noted in the D + T group. Conclusions: Similar survival rates were observed among patients with advanced HCC who received A + B and D + T in the first-line setting. Our study suggests that both A + B and D + T are valid treatment options, and that therapy can be tailored based on comorbidities, adverse effects, and patient preferences.

PURPOSE Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR, MSI-H) in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) is observed in 1%-5% of tumors. MSI-H across solid tumors has demonstrated durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) regardless of the anatomic location. Here, we describe clinical outcomes and surgical conversion of MSI-H BTC treated with ICIs. Patients and Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of BTC patients with dMMR/MSI-H between 2017 and 2024 at Mayo Clinic, University of Michigan, and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center. Outcomes of interest were surgical resection rate, rate of pathologic response, 2-year overall survival (OS; time from initiation of treatment to death/last follow-up), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD; time from initiation of treatment to cessation because of any cause). Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS Thirty patients with MSI-H BTC were identified: 19 with cholangiocarcinoma, three with gallbladder cancer, and 8 with BTC undefined. The median age at diagnosis was 61.5 years (range, 26-86). Twenty-six (86.7%) patients had advanced stage at diagnosis. Twenty-seven patients (90%) received first-line systemic therapy, and 13 (48.1%) continued onto second line. Six patients (23.1%) were restaged to resectable from advanced disease after ICI therapy and underwent resection; all remained recurrence-free at last follow-up. Of these six patients, 3 (50%) achieved a pathologic complete response. Among those receiving first-line therapy, the median TTD was 9.9 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 14.5 months) and the 2-year OS was 73% (95% CI, 56% to 94%). CONCLUSION ICI therapy in patients with MSI-H BTC demonstrated durable response and downstaged some BTC to a resectable stage. dMMR/MSI-H should be performed up-front to guide treatment decisions.

Abstract Background The incidence of gastroesophageal cancer diagnosed at ages younger than 50 years is increasing. Assessment of the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of these cancers is limited currently. Methods This analysis used Tempus’ clinicogenomic database to compare patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 vs 50 years and older who completed tumor molecular profiling between December 2017 and July 2024. The spectrum of biomarkers, somatic alterations, and germline alterations were compared between those diagnosed with gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 years and those aged 50 years and older, and a multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with longer survival. Results Among 5863 gastroesophageal cancer patients, 785 had gastroesophageal cancer diagnosed at ages younger than 50 years. There were more females (35% vs 25%, P &lt; .001) and fewer White patients (69% vs 80%, P &lt; .001) with gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 years. Fewer tumors of patients with gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 years had high tumor mutational burden (3.2% vs 10.2%, P &lt; .001) or high microsatellite instability (1.7% vs 5.1%, P &lt; .001), but there was no difference in PD-L1 positivity (49% vs 51%, P = .3). Higher incidence of somatic CDH1 mutations was seen in those with gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 years (16.1% vs 6.6%, q &lt; 0.001) with lower incidence of TP53 (65.6% vs 74.1%), CDKN2A (12.5% vs 19.8%), and KRAS (11.7% vs 18.3%, P &lt; .001 for all) alterations. The most statistically significant germline difference was higher incidence of CDH1 (2.2% vs 0.3%, q = 0.001) and TP53 (0.6% vs 0%, q = 0.039) alterations among those with gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 years. Median survival for patients with metastatic disease was longer for gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 years (11 vs 8.5 months, P = .002), and gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 years, ERBB2 amplification, and high microsatellite instability were associated with superior survival. Conclusions Unique molecular and germline profiles were seen in patients with gastroesophageal cancer at ages younger than 50 years, which may suggest differences in causal factors yet undiscovered.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have advanced the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet their association with cancer risk remains subject of ongoing research. Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a well-established risk factor for pancreatic cancer, yet the impact of GLP-1 RA therapy in this high-risk population is unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and pancreatic cancer incidence among patients with CP, and among those with CP and T2DM. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from TriNetX, a healthcare database of over 150 million patients in the United States. In the first analysis, adult patients with pre-existing CP were identified and stratified by use of a GLP-1 RA (semaglutide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, and albiglutide). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between GLP1-RA users and non-users, matching for age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and pancreatic cysts. Five-year incidence of pancreatic cancer was compared between GLP-1 RA users and non-users in the matched cohort between 2015 and 2025. We then restricted the cohort to patients with CP and T2DM and repeated this analysis. Results: We identified 89,596 patients with CP, including 3183 GLP-1 RA users and 86,413 non-users. After PSM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower 5-year incidence of pancreatic cancer (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30–0.80, p < 0.005). Similarly, amongst patients with CP and T2DM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower 5-year incidence of pancreatic cancer (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31–0.91, p < 0.05). Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of pancreatic cancer in all patients with CP, as well as the subpopulation with both CP and T2DM. Given the elevated cancer risk in CP, these findings suggest a potential beneficial effect of GLP-1RA use in this high-risk population. Prospective studies will be important to further analyze and confirm this potential benefit.

PURPOSE Limited treatment options exist for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Recently, several clinical trials provided preliminary evidence for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a new target for patients with HER2-expressing BTC. We conducted a systematic review and pooled analysis of the safety and efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in patients with advanced BTCs. METHODS A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to identify phase I, II, or III clinical trials published between January 2019 and March 2024 that evaluated anti-HER2 therapy in locally advanced or metastatic BTC. Participant data included in the analysis were from trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of various anti-HER2 agents. The primary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points included incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), rate of treatment discontinuation, and death. RESULTS The analysis included 368 patients from eight publications diagnosed with advanced BTC. Patients were treated with several anti-HER2 agents including zanidatamab, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, tucatinib plus trastuzumab, trastuzumab deruxtecan, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, trastuzumab-pkrb plus chemotherapy, and neratinib. The pooled ORR and DCR were 34% (95% CI, 24 to 44) and 64% (95% CI, 51 to 77), respectively. The pooled weighted PFS and median overall survival were 4.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. The pooled duration of response for the reporting trials was 5.0 months. In the study cohort, 82.6% of patients experienced any adverse event and 32.1% experienced a grade 3-4 adverse event. Only 5.7% of the patients discontinued treatment secondary to TRAEs. CONCLUSION In patients with HER2-expressing BTCs, anti-HER2 therapies are viable options, particularly in the second-line setting.

Abstract Background Impact of BRAF V600E mutations (BRAFV600E), a poor prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer, is lacking in non-CRC gastrointestinal (GI) cancers including pancreatic (PDAC), gastric/gastroesophageal (GEA), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Due to tumor-agnostic approvals for patients with BRAFV600E, understanding the frequency and impact of BRAF alterations across non-CRC GI cancers is essential for clinical decision-making. Methods Patients with PDAC, GEA, HCC, or CCA who had cell-free DNA detected on Guardant360 (Guardant Health) from 2020 to 2023 were queried. Prevalence of characterized BRAF genomic alterations (GA) was calculated; GAs were grouped by class (Class I/II/III). The Chi-squared test assessed differences between cancer types. A subset of patients had outcomes analysis using GuardantINFORM, a real-world clinicogenomic database, to derive real-world overall survival (rwOS). Results Of 32 480 included patients, BRAF GAs were identified in 4.4%; 19% were BRAFV600E (0.81% prevalence overall). CCA had the highest rate of BRAF GAs and BRAFV600E (P &lt; .01); HCC and GEA had the highest rates of BRAF class II/III alterations. There were no significant differences in rwOS by alteration class or cancer type; numeric differences were observed by alteration class. Few patients were treated with BRAF inhibitors (2.2%). Prevalence of co-occurring alterations was unique by cancer type. Conclusions Frequency of BRAF GAs, including BRAFV600E, in non-CRC GI cancers detected by liquid biopsy is similar to tissue-based rates and can be reliably used to assess BRAF status. BRAF GAs have mixed prognostic implications on survival for patients with non-CRC GI malignancies that warrant further exploration.

Background: Rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC), defined as disease diagnosed at <50 years of age, are increasing. The incidence and spectrum of somatic and pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in this population are not well understood. Methods: This cross-sectional study leveraged Tempus’ clinicogenomic database, including de-identified records of patients diagnosed with CRC between 2000–2022, to analyze and compare eoCRC and average-onset colorectal cancer (aoCRC, disease diagnosed ≥50 years of age) patients. The frequency and spectrum of somatic mutations and PGVs in patients with eoCRC and aoCRC were evaluated and compared. Results: Among 11,006 participants in this study, 57% were male, 76% were white, and 80% had stage 4 disease. Within the total cohort, 2379 had eoCRC and 8627 had aoCRC. Among patients with eoCRC, 4.2% had a tumor with high microsatellite instability and/or deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) and 6.8% with aoCRC had an MSI-H/dMMR tumor (p < 0.001). The most frequent somatic mutations involved TP53, APC, and KRAS, with the most significant difference in BRAF, which was more frequently mutated in aoCRC (9.8% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.0001). In total, 1413 (59.4%) eoCRC and 4898 (56.8%) aoCRC patients had matched normal specimen (blood or saliva) sequencing and a PGV was identified in 6.9% of eoCRC and 5.0% of aoCRC patients. Conclusions: Somatic and germline mutation profiles were similar for eoCRC and aoCRC patients and may not adequately explain differences in tumor behavior and age of disease onset.

PURPOSE SWOG S1815 was a randomized, open label phase III trial, evaluating gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and cisplatin (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BTC, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), were randomly assigned 2:1 to either GAP (gemcitabine 800 mg/m 2 , cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 , and nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) or GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle). RESULTS Among 452 randomly assigned participants, 441 were eligible and analyzable, 67% with ICC, 16% with GBC, and 17% with ECC. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between GAP versus GC. Median OS with GAP was 14.0 months (95% CI, 12.4 to 16.1) and 13.6 months with GC (95% CI, 9.7 to 16.6); hazard ratio (HR), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.14); P = .41. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between groups with median PFS for GAP being 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5) versus 6.3 months for GC (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.2); HR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.12); P = .32. In exploratory subset analyses, the OS and PFS benefits of GAP versus GC treatment were greater in locally advanced disease compared with metastatic disease, although not statistically significant (interaction P = .14 for OS and P = .17 for PFS). Moreover, GAP versus GC showed greater improvement in PFS among participants with GBC than those with ICC or ECC (interaction P = .01), but not OS (interaction P = .28). CONCLUSION The addition of a taxane in the GAP regimen to the standard gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen did not improve OS in newly diagnosed BTC. More toxicity was encountered with GAP versus GC.

Abstract Background Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the first-line setting, although was only evaluated in patients with Child-Pugh (CP) A liver function in the IMbrave150 trial. We sought to determine the outcomes of these patients based on CP score and ALBI grade in the US population. Methods This multicenter cohort study included patients with HCC who received atezolizumab with bevacizumab as first-line systemic therapy between March 2018 and November 2023. Overall survival (OS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression method. Results Among 322 patients, 226, 86, and 10 patients had CP-A, CP-B, and CP-C liver function, respectively. Median age was 66.5 years, 78.6% were male, and 82.6% were White. Median OS (mOS) was 21.6 months for those with CP-A, 9.1 months for those with CP-B7, and 4.7 months for those with CP-B8-C12 (P &lt; .0001). Among patients with CP-A, those with ALBI grade 1 had an mOS of 34.9 months versus 14.2 months in those with grade 2. In multivariate analyses, CP score, ALBI grade, hepatitis B, performance status, and macrovascular invasion were significantly associated with survival. Conclusions CP score is an important prognostic tool for patients with HCC receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, and this regimen remains a viable option for patients with CP-B7 with no additional safety concern, although the benefit is significantly less than those with CP-A. ALBI score has independent predictive value in patients with CP-A liver function.