Mehravar, Sepideh

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B) and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (D + T) are approved first-line systemic therapy options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with no head-to-head comparison. In this propensity-matched analysis, we compared the survival of patients with advanced HCC who received either A + B or D + T therapy. Methods: Patients with advanced HCC who received A + B or D + T treatment in the first-line setting were identified using the TriNetX platform, a health research network that provides access to electronic health record data from 112 healthcare organizations. Propensity-score-matched (PSM) analysis was conducted, and the median overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: We identified 2819 patients with HCC who were treated with A + B or D + T: 2031 patients received A + B and 788 received D + T. Compared to patients in the A + B cohort, those who received D + T were more likely to be older (median age: 68.4 vs. 66.9 years), have lower platelet counts (186.8 vs. 201.3), higher prevalence of hypoalbuminemia with levels < 2.7 g/dL (35.2% vs. 28.4%), higher prevalence of bilirubin levels between 2.0 and 2.9 mg/dL (28.8% vs. 23.8%), and decreased INR with levels between 0.0 and 1.6 (92.1% vs. 86.3%). After PSM, 1536 patients were included in the survival analyses, with all variables adequately matched. There was no significant difference in the median OS between those receiving A + B or D + T [16.3 vs. 22.5 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.0]. Higher rates of immune-mediated colitis were noted in the D + T group. Conclusions: Similar survival rates were observed among patients with advanced HCC who received A + B and D + T in the first-line setting. Our study suggests that both A + B and D + T are valid treatment options, and that therapy can be tailored based on comorbidities, adverse effects, and patient preferences.

4123 Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is the most commonly utilized first-line therapy for advanced HCC. However, the optimal choice for second-line treatment remains uncertain, particularly between different tyrosine kinase inhibitors including lenvatinib and cabozantinib. This study aims to compare survival outcomes of patients with metastatic HCC who received either lenvatinib or cabozantinib as second-line therapy following frontline treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX database, a large-scale platform providing access to deidentified electronic medical records from over 130 million patients across 94 healthcare organizations in the United States. The study included patients diagnosed with metastatic HCC (ICD-10 codes: C22, C22.8) who were aged 18 years or older, diagnosed between January 2019 and October 2024, and had received first-line chemotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The cohort was divided into two groups: one receiving lenvatinib and the other cabozantinib as second-line therapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), compared between the two treatment groups using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to balance baseline demographics and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank tests, and hazard ratios (HR) were employed to assess differences in OS. Results: Between January 2019 and October 2024, a total of 552 patients met the study criteria, including 397 patients who received Lenvatinib and 155 patients who received cabozantinib as second-line therapy. Median age was similar in two groups (65.2 vs 65.9 yrs). There were no differences between the two groups with respect to gender, albumin or bilirubin levels. Lenvatinib group had lower proportions of white patients (44.1% vs 55.3%). After PSM (matched on age, race, gender, albumin and bilirubin), the final analysis included 151 patients in each treatment group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated no statistically significant difference in OS between the two groups (median OS: 16.6 vs 10.9 months; HR: 0.809; 95%CI: 0.576-1.136; p=0.597). Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study found no significant difference in OS in pts with metastatic HCC treated with lenvatinib or cabozantinib as second-line therapy following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. These findings suggest that both agents may offer comparable survival benefits, highlighting the need for further prospective studies to refine second-line treatment strategies for advanced HCC.