Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios

348 Background: The proportion of females in medicine is increasing (approx. 50% in medical school/workforce), but disparities in female authorship in oncology research publications exist; female corresponding authorship reportedly ranges from 7.2-39.1% in oncology clinical trials (Ludmir et al 2019). This study aimed to describe and assess factors associated with female first and senior authorship in later phase systemic clinical trials in BTC and to identify any changes over time. Methods: Embase/Medline were used to identify final primary trial publications in BTC (2000-2020) (excluding phase I (PI) (expected to move to later phase), mixed tumour site trials, reviews, editorials and trial-in-progress publications). Gender was determined by inspection of names, google search and author communication. Chi-square tests and log regression were used to assess factors associated with female first and senior authorship, including changes over time (STATA16). Results: Of 501 publications, 163 met inclusion criteria; 80% single-arm PII and 15% and 5% randomised PII and PIII respectively; 73% enrolled ≤50 patients. Tumour primary sites were all BTC: 86%, cholangiocarcinoma: 8%, gallbladder cancer: 6%; 80% involved chemotherapy, 13% targeted therapy and 5% localised/systemic combinations; 65% were in first-line (1L) advanced setting, 17% post 1L, 13% advanced non-specified and 5% neo-adjuvant/adjuvant. Forty-eight percent received industry funding and 65% met primary end-point. Sixty-four percent were published post ABC-02 (Valle et al 2010). Publication impact factor (IF) was ≤5 in 50% and >20 in 12%. Median number of authors in all publications was 11. Geographic location of all first and senior authors were Asia (42%/42%), Europe (29%/29%), USA (24%/22%) and other (4%/6%), respectively. Median individual trial female author representation was 25%; there were no female authors in 12% of trials. Overall, female first and senior author representation was 21% and 11%, respectively. Median position of first female author was second. In publications with IF ≤20 and >20, there were 22% and 16% female first and 13% and 0% female senior authors, respectively. The phase of trial, journal IF, industry funding, or whether met primary end-point did not impact female first or senior author representation (all P>.05). There were more female senior authors associated with “other” geographic locations (40% in 10 trials) (P=.016) vs Asia (7%), Europe (8%) and USA (14%). There were no significant changes in female first or senior author representation over time (‘00-05: 21%/18%, ‘06-10: 27%/5%, ‘11-15: 15%/15%, ‘16-20: 22%/9%, P=.738, and P=.508 respectively). Conclusions: Female first and senior author representation in later phase systemic clinical trial publications in BTC is low and has not changed significantly over time. The underlying reasons for this imbalance need to be better understood and addressed.

Over the past 20 years, management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably, leading to increased overall survival and more patients eligible for third- or later-line therapy. Currently, two oral therapies are recommended in the third-line treatment of mCRC, regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil. Selecting the most appropriate treatment in the third-line setting poses different challenges compared with treatment selection at earlier stages. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand and differentiate between available treatment options and to communicate the benefits and challenges of these to patients. In this narrative review, practical information on regorafenib is provided to aid physicians in their decision-making and patient communications in daily practice. We discuss the importance of appropriate patient selection and adverse events management through close patient monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure patients stay on treatment for longer and receive as much benefit as possible. We also highlight key physician–patient communication points to facilitate shared decision-making.

Abstract Background: Chemotherapy in combination with targeted agents are standard-of-care options for patients for mCRC with response rates >50% in first line. In the second line setting, efficacy of chemotherapy and targeted agents are much lower with response rates of 5% for FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) + bevacizumab (anti-VEGF). New treatment options are urgently needed in particular for the 50 % of patients harboring a KRAS mutation. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a serine/threonine kinase, master regulator of the mitotic checkpoint and cell division. PLK1 is overexpressed in CRC and its overexpression is associated with poor prognostic. A genome wide RNAi screen identified PLK1 as a synthetic lethal target in KRAS mutant CRC cells, inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis upon inhibition. Onvansertib is an oral, highly selective PLK1 inhibitor that demonstrates single agent and synergistic activity with irinotecan in preclinical CRC models. Additionally, KRAS mutated vs wild-type cells showed higher sensitivity to onvansertib. PLK1 inhibition is a potential target in KRAS-mutated mCRC and onvansertib + FOLFIRI + bevacizumab may provide a new second-line treatment option. Trial design: The primary objective of this single-arm Phase 1b/2 study is to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab in the second line setting for KRAS-mutated mCRC patients. For the Phase 1b segment, a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design is used to determine the maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of onvansertib. As of January 24th 2020, enrollment in the second dose level is ongoing. Efficacy will be determined by objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1 (primary endpoint), progression-free survival and reduction in KRAS allelic burden in liquid biopsies (secondary endpoints). In the phase 2, based on a one-sided one sample log-rank test with 10% Type I error, there will be at least 90% power to detect an improvement in ORR from 5% to 20% with 26 patients. Exploratory endpoints include genomic studies of circulating tumor cells and ctDNA to evaluate altered pathways that correlate with patient response. Clinical trial identification NCT03829410. Citation Format: Afsaneh Barzi, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Errin Samuëlsz, Maya Ridinger, Mark Erlander, Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, Daniel H. Ahn. A phase 1b/2 study of onvansertib (PCM-075) in combination with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab for second line treatment of patients with KRAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT235.

Abstract Background: The inhibitory immune pathway, consisting of the receptor programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, plays a vital role in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. Therapies with monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 and its ligands are associated with remarkable response rates in various cancers. Imugene is proposing to develop an anti-PD-1 immunotherapy using a vaccine approach to treat patients with tumors that over-express PD-L1. The hypothesis is that a polyclonal-induced B-cell antibody response will be more effective or as effective with improved safety over current monoclonal antibody therapy. IMU-201, is a B-cell epitope (amino acids 92-110 from PD-1) linked to a promiscuous T cell epitope (amino acid residues 288-302 from measles virus fusion protein) via a 4-amino acid linker (G-P-S-L), combined in an aqueous phase vaccine to be emulsified in Montanide ISA 720 VG, to form the drug product. Study Design: IMU-201-101 is a 2-part open-label dose escalation/dose expansion study of IMU-201. Part 1 will dose escalate IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with Standard of Care (SOC) treatment to evaluate safety, tolerability and immunogenicity and assess the optimal biologic dose (OBD) of IMU-201. Part 2 will expand the number treated with IMU-201 at OBD in combination with SOC treatment. OBD is defined as the dose resulting in the best safety/tolerability and immunogenicity and will be determined after all dose cohorts have completed Day 29 of Part 1. A total of approximately 30 adult patients aged 18 years with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 will be enrolled in the study at sites in North America and Australia. In Part 1, three cohorts (25, 125 and 250 µg of IMU-201) of 3-6 participants per cohort are anticipated to establish the Optimum Biological Dose (OBD) of IMU-201 as monotherapy (mOBD). After establishing mOBD, combination dose escalation will combine IMU-201 with SOC treatment which may include ICI, chemotherapy or their combination, to establish combination OBD (cOBD). The starting dose for combination dose escalation will be one dose level below mOBD. The same dosing schedule of IMU-201, DLT criteria, and dose escalation rules will be used to establish mOBD and cOBD. In Part 2, the number of patients treated in combination with IMU-201 at cOBD will be expanded to 12 patients. Patients will receive IMU-201 at Baseline/Day 1, Day 15 and Day 29. Dosing with IMU-201 will continue at Day 64 (± 7 days) and every subsequent 63 days (± 7 days) until progressive disease or complete response. Therapy may continue beyond progression if the treating physician feels that the patient is deriving benefit. Primary Objectives: To evaluate the safety/tolerability and immunogenicity of IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with SOC treatment. To identify OBD of IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with SOC treatment. To evaluate changes in immunological, biochemical and additional radiological markers of tumor progression in patients treated with IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with SOC treatment. To evaluate changes in humoral and cellular immunogenicity data including PD-1 specific antibodies (IgG, IgM), vaccine-specific cytokine levels and regulatory and effector T and B cells. Citation Format: Pravin Kaumaya, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Tri Phan, Mark T. Marino, Nick Ede, Anthony Good. IMU-201-101 - an open-label, multi-center, dose escalation/expansion, phase 1 study of IMU-201 (PD1-Vaxx), a B-cell immunotherapy, in adults with non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT128.

Abstract Immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoints has become a common approach for many types of cancer but currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict and monitor treatment response. Immunohistochemical staining of PD-L1, which was initially developed as a companion diagnostic, is problematic due to tumor heterogeneity, variations in specimen preparation and multiple scoring schemes. There is, therefore, a critical need for a better biomarker to guide the use of immunotherapy to improve clinical outcomes. We previously reported that higher levels of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in CD8+ T cells were associated with increased response to PD-1 blockade therapy in patients with melanoma; high levels of Bim were also prognostic of poor survival in melanoma patients. In this study, we investigated the roles of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in patients receiving PD-1 blockade therapy (i.e. pembrolizumab) for small bowel adenocarcinoma as part of planned correlative analysis of the ACCRU clinical trial, NCT02949219. Patients with unresectable or metastatic biopsy-proven small bowel adenocarcinoma (excluding ampulla of Vater and appendix) who had at least one prior line of systemic chemotherapy were eligible for the trial. Pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered over 30 minutes intravenously every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or patient refusal. All patients underwent peripheral blood collection at baseline prior to initiation of treatment and then after 3 cycles of treatment. Levels of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in circulating T cells were quantified by flow cytometry using patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Data was analyzed via Cox proportional hazards model, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test, and Kaplan Meier curves using SAS 9.4. A total of 35 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Three patients had confirmed response (all partial responses) and 10 had stable disease as their best overall response. Seven patients had disease progression around the second blood draw. The median time from baseline to the second blood draw was 9 weeks. Lower levels of Bim in CD8+CD11ahi T cells at baseline on the percentage scale were associated with treatment response (median 54.5% vs. 79.5%; p=0.0087) and disease control (partial response plus stable disease; median 71.2% vs. 81.3%; p=0.0104) but higher levels led to worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio=1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.08; p=0.0051). In addition, positive changes in CX3CR1/granzyme B in CD8+CD11ahi T cells from baseline were associated with better overall survival (median 20.2 months vs. 3.7 months, p=0.0086). The levels of PD-1 and Ki-67 in CD8+CD11ahi T cells were not associated with treatment response or survival. In conclusion, Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B are biomarkers that associate with response and survival benefits respectively of PD-1 blockade therapy. This preliminary data calls for a larger-scale, prospective study to validate their predictive and prognostic utilities. Citation Format: Mojun Zhu, Henan Zhang, Nathan R. Foster, Haidong Dong, Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, Brandy L. Jaszewski, Patrick M. Boland, Michael J. Overman, Katrina Pedersen, Robert R. McWilliams, Academic and Community Cancer Research United (AACRU). Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in circulating CD8+ T cells are predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4467.