Back to Authors

Zeng, Shan

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-723X

Mayo Clinic

Central South University

Citations 2

Practical considerations in the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer
Antonuzzo, Lorenzo , Kuan, Feng‐Che , Macarulla, Teresa , Pietrantonio, Filippo , Xu, Rui‐Hua , Taniguchi, Hiroya , Winder, Thomas , Zeng, Shan , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Antonuzzo, Lorenzo , Pietrantonio, Filippo , Macarulla, Teresa , Loupakis, Fotios , Bachet, Jean‐Baptiste , Yuki, Satoshi

Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology | October 31, 2020 | Volume: 12 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/1758835920956862 Get It

Over the past 20 years, management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably, leading to increased overall survival and more patients eligible for third- or later-line therapy. Currently, two oral therapies are recommended in the third-line treatment of mCRC, regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil. Selecting the most appropriate treatment in the third-line setting poses different challenges compared with treatment selection at earlier stages. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand and differentiate between available treatment options and to communicate the benefits and challenges of these to patients. In this narrative review, practical information on regorafenib is provided to aid physicians in their decision-making and patient communications in daily practice. We discuss the importance of appropriate patient selection and adverse events management through close patient monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure patients stay on treatment for longer and receive as much benefit as possible. We also highlight key physician–patient communication points to facilitate shared decision-making.
The c-KIT mutation causing human mastocytosis is resistant to STI571 and other KIT kinase inhibitors; kinases with enzymatic site mutations show different inhibitor sensitivity profiles than wild-type kinases and those with regulatory-type mutations
Ma, Yongsheng , Zeng, Shan , Metcalfe, Dean D. , Akin, Cem , Dimitrijević, Saša, Butterfield, Joseph H. , McMahon, Gerald, Longley, B. Jack, Akin, Cem

Blood | July 27, 2002 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1741-1744

10.1182/blood.v99.5.1741 Get It

Mutations of c-KIT causing spontaneous activation of the KIT receptor kinase are associated with sporadic adult human mastocytosis (SAHM) and with human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We have classified KIT-activating mutations as either “enzymatic site” type (EST) mutations, affecting the structure of the catalytic portion of the kinase, or as “regulatory” type (RT) mutations, affecting regulation of an otherwise normal catalytic site. Using COS cells expressing wild-type or mutant KIT, 2 compounds, STI571 and SU9529, inhibited wild-type and RT mutant KIT at 0.1 to 1 μM but did not significantly inhibit the Asp816Val EST mutant associated with SAHM, even at 10 μM. Using 2 subclones of the HMC1 mast cell line, which both express KIT with an identical RT mutation but which differ in that one also expresses the Asp816Val EST mutation, both compounds inhibited the RT mutant KIT, thereby suppressing proliferation and producing apoptosis in the RT mutant-only cell line. Neither compound suppressed activation of Asp816Val EST mutant KIT, and neither produced apoptosis or significantly suppressed proliferation of the cell line expressing the Asp816Val mutation. These studies suggest that currently available KIT inhibitors may be useful in treating neoplastic cells expressing KIT activated by its natural ligand or by RT activating mutations such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors but that neither compound is likely to be effective against SAHM. Furthermore, these results help establish a general paradigm whereby classification of mutations affecting oncogenic enzymes as RT or EST may be useful in predicting tumor sensitivity or resistance to inhibitory drugs.