Kaumaya, Pravin T. P.

e21134 Background: Therapies with monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 and its ligands are associated with remarkable outcomes and have revolutionized cancer treatment (Honey 2017). However, patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may develop “a primary or secondary resistance” to therapy (Sharma, Hu-Lieskovan et al. 2017). Contrary to monoclonal antibodies, chimeric B-cell cancer vaccines have the advantage of producing polyclonal B-cell antibodies that can potentially induce memory B- and T-cell responses, while reducing immune evasion and suppression. The hypothesis is that a polyclonal induced B-cell antibody response will be more effective or as effective with improved safety over current monoclonal antibody therapy. IMU-201 (PD1-Vaxx) is being developed using an active immunization approach to treat cancers that overexpress PD-L1 by inducing the production of anti-PD-1 antibodies with a peptide epitope designed to stimulate polyclonal antibodies against PD-1 (Kaumaya et al. 2020). Methods: The IMPRINTER study is an ongoing open-label dose escalation study of IMU-201 as monotherapy (Phase 1) or in combination with atezolizumab (Phase 1b) for patients with PD-L1 expressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All patients enrolled in Phase 1 of the study must have previously received an immune checkpoint inhibitor and experienced disease progression. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IMU-201 and identify the optimal biological dose (OBD). The secondary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with atezolizumab. Humoral and cellular immunogenicity data will be evaluated, including IMU-201 and PD-1 specific antibodies (IgG, IgM), vaccine-specific cytokine levels, and regulatory and effector T and B cells. IMU-201 is administered by intramuscular (IM) injection on Day 1, Day 15, and Day 29. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment is completed after 29 days on treatment. Tumor progression is evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 at Day 43 then every 42 days until progression or withdrawal. Results: In Phase 1, four patients were enrolled into each of the three cohorts at 10 μg/dose, 50 μg/dose and 100 μg/dose IMU-201 with no DLTs observed. In the 10 μg/dose cohort, one patient achieved CR and one patient SD; in the 50 μg/dose cohort, four patients achieved SD; and in the 100 μg/dose cohort, one patient achieved PR and two patients achieved SD. Within the 100 μg/dose cohort, one patient experienced an immune related pneumonitis after two IMU-201 administrations and discontinued from study treatment. Conclusions: IMU-201 had no observed DLT and demonstrated preliminary signs of efficacy. The study will therefore move into Phase 1b with IMU-201 being assessed in combination with atezolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT04432207.

Abstract Background: The inhibitory immune pathway, consisting of the receptor programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, plays a vital role in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. Therapies with monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 and its ligands are associated with remarkable response rates in various cancers. Imugene is proposing to develop an anti-PD-1 immunotherapy using a vaccine approach to treat patients with tumors that over-express PD-L1. The hypothesis is that a polyclonal-induced B-cell antibody response will be more effective or as effective with improved safety over current monoclonal antibody therapy. IMU-201, is a B-cell epitope (amino acids 92-110 from PD-1) linked to a promiscuous T cell epitope (amino acid residues 288-302 from measles virus fusion protein) via a 4-amino acid linker (G-P-S-L), combined in an aqueous phase vaccine to be emulsified in Montanide ISA 720 VG, to form the drug product. Study Design: IMU-201-101 is a 2-part open-label dose escalation/dose expansion study of IMU-201. Part 1 will dose escalate IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with Standard of Care (SOC) treatment to evaluate safety, tolerability and immunogenicity and assess the optimal biologic dose (OBD) of IMU-201. Part 2 will expand the number treated with IMU-201 at OBD in combination with SOC treatment. OBD is defined as the dose resulting in the best safety/tolerability and immunogenicity and will be determined after all dose cohorts have completed Day 29 of Part 1. A total of approximately 30 adult patients aged 18 years with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 will be enrolled in the study at sites in North America and Australia. In Part 1, three cohorts (25, 125 and 250 µg of IMU-201) of 3-6 participants per cohort are anticipated to establish the Optimum Biological Dose (OBD) of IMU-201 as monotherapy (mOBD). After establishing mOBD, combination dose escalation will combine IMU-201 with SOC treatment which may include ICI, chemotherapy or their combination, to establish combination OBD (cOBD). The starting dose for combination dose escalation will be one dose level below mOBD. The same dosing schedule of IMU-201, DLT criteria, and dose escalation rules will be used to establish mOBD and cOBD. In Part 2, the number of patients treated in combination with IMU-201 at cOBD will be expanded to 12 patients. Patients will receive IMU-201 at Baseline/Day 1, Day 15 and Day 29. Dosing with IMU-201 will continue at Day 64 (± 7 days) and every subsequent 63 days (± 7 days) until progressive disease or complete response. Therapy may continue beyond progression if the treating physician feels that the patient is deriving benefit. Primary Objectives: To evaluate the safety/tolerability and immunogenicity of IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with SOC treatment. To identify OBD of IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with SOC treatment. To evaluate changes in immunological, biochemical and additional radiological markers of tumor progression in patients treated with IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with SOC treatment. To evaluate changes in humoral and cellular immunogenicity data including PD-1 specific antibodies (IgG, IgM), vaccine-specific cytokine levels and regulatory and effector T and B cells. Citation Format: Pravin Kaumaya, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Tri Phan, Mark T. Marino, Nick Ede, Anthony Good. IMU-201-101 - an open-label, multi-center, dose escalation/expansion, phase 1 study of IMU-201 (PD1-Vaxx), a B-cell immunotherapy, in adults with non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT128.

Abstract Background: HER-2 is a transmembrane receptor that is overexpressed in multiple epithelial tumors. We have previously shown that a first generation HER-2 B-cell peptide vaccine targeting epitopes (628-647) and (316-339) was safe and relatively active. We recently developed a novel B-cell epitope specific vaccine (HER-Vaxx) consisting of epitopes derived from the extracellular domain of HER-2 that correspond to amino acid sequences 597-626 (pertuzumab binding site) and 266-296 (trastuzumab binding site). Methods: This first-in-human Phase 1b study evaluated the safety, optimal immunologic/biologic dose (OID/OBD) and immunogenicity of HER-Vaxx. Using a 3+3 dose escalation design, 3 patients (pts) were treated at each dose level (DL). If <2 pts experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), we required an additional 3 pts to be entered at that DL for OID/OBD assessment (defined as the dose level inducing a strong immunogenic response for 5 out of 6 patients). We also required that at least 6 patients at each DL to receive 3 inoculations of the combination vaccines at 3-week intervals and that < 2 of the 6 pts experience DLT before dose escalation. DLs were 1.0 mg (DL1), 1.5 mg (DL2), 2.0 mg (DL3) and 2.5 mg (DL4) of each peptide. Each dose contained 0.025 mg of n-MDP. Results: 49 patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors and a median of 4 prior lines of chemotherapy received at least one inoculation of HER-vaxx. Common related toxicities include injection site reactions (56% grade 1/2 and 5% grade 3/4). There were no DLTs. The OID/OBD was found to be DL 2 (1.5 mg of each peptide vaccine).A total of 28 patients received ≥ 3 vaccinations including 2 with a partial response and 14 with stable disease. Of those, 6 patients received at least one 6-month boost. The vaccine generated sustained humoral response eliciting HER-2 specific antibodies in the majority of responding patients. Conclusion: We demonstrate that HER-Vaxx is well tolerated and able to generate sustained anti-HER-2 immune response. Given the promise, continuous development of the vaccine is ongoing at the suggested OBD in HER-2 overexpressing tumors. Citation Format: Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Lai Wei, Robert Wesolowski, Daniel Ahn, Christina Wu, Maryam Lustberg, Amir Mortazavi, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Jay Overholser, Pravin Kaumaya. A Phase Ib of a combination of two chimeric (Trastuzumab-like and Pertuzumab-like) HER-2 B cell peptide vaccine emulsified in ISA 720 and nor-MDP adjuvant in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT017.

Abstract Background: Therapeutic blockade of the signaling axis between PD-1 and its ligand programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) with monoclonal antibodies has shown remarkable clinical success in the treatment of cancer and demonstrated impressive activity across a broad set of cancer subtypes, even at advanced and metastatic stages of disease. Contrary to treatment with monoclonal antibodies, chimeric B-cell cancer vaccines have the advantage of producing a specific immune response that can potentially induce memory B & T cell responses, while reducing immune evasion and suppression. Methods: We have translated two HER-2 combination peptide vaccines (B-Vaxx) to the clinic in a Phase 1/2b trial to safely deliver curative and transformative cancer immunotherapies to advanced cancer patients. We have created and established the development of a novel B-cell peptide vaccine (Key-Vaxx) with high immunogenicity that binds to human PD-1 and produces tumor inhibition in vivo in an animal model of colon cancer. Here, we describe the transferable CT-26-HER2 neu tumor model in Balb/c was used to test for synergistic effects of anti-PD1 immunization therapy in combination with anti-HER2 immunization therapy to determine whether this combination could increase immunogenicity, enhance anti-tumor responses and provide synergistic benefit in inhibiting tumor growth. Results: We show robust HER-2 and PD-1 antibody responses in all vaccinated mice indicating that the combined vaccination is effective in reducing tumor growth in a Balb/c syngeneic model of colon carcinoma versus either the PD-1 vaccine or more importantly the positive control gold standard that is anti-mouse PD-1 monoclonal antibody. The vaccine combination was found to be safe and did not appear to exhibit toxicity or autoimmunity. Conclusion: Development of a novel PD-1 vaccine in combination with two Chimeric HER-2 peptide vaccine provides synergistic inhibition of tumor growth with no evidence of toxicity or autoimmunity. A clinical trial with the combination is under planning. Citation Format: Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Jay Overholser, Yuhong Yang, Manuel Penichet, Pravin Kaumaya. Development of a novel PD-1 vaccine and in combination with two Chimeric HER-2 peptide vaccine provides synergistic inhibition of tumor growth in a syngeneic Balb/c model challenged with CT26/HER-2 carcinoma cell line [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1453.

Abstract Purpose: This first-in-human phase I study (NCT 01417546) evaluated the safety profile, optimal immunologic/biological dose (OID/OBD), and immunogenicity of the combination of two peptide B-cell epitope vaccines engineered to represent the trastuzumab- and pertuzumab-binding sites. Although trastuzumab and pertuzumab have been approved for clinical use, patients often develop resistance to these therapies. We have advanced a new paradigm in immunotherapy that focuses on humoral responses based on conformational B-cell epitope vaccines. Patients and Methods: The vaccine is comprised of two chimeric HER-2 B-cell peptide vaccines incorporating a “promiscuous T-cell epitope.” Patients were immunized with the vaccine constructs emulsified with nor-muramyl-dipeptide adjuvant in a water-in-oil Montanide ISA 720VG vehicle. Eligible patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors received three inoculations every 3 weeks. Results: Forty-nine patients with a median of 4 prior lines of chemotherapy received at least 1 vaccination. Twenty-eight patients completed the 3 vaccination regimens. Six patients received 1 six-month boost after the regimen, and one patient received 7 six-month boosts. No serious adverse reactions or dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The vaccine was well tolerated with dose level 2 as the recommended phase II dose. The most common related toxicity in all patients was injection-site reactions (24%). Two patients had a partial response, 14 had stable disease, and 19 had progressive disease. Conclusions: The study vaccine is safe, exhibits antitumor activity, and shows preliminary indication that peptide vaccination may avoid therapeutic resistance and offer a promising alternative to monoclonal antibody therapies.