Weinstock‐Guttman, Bianca

Background: Rare genetic variants are emerging as important contributors to the heritability of multiple sclerosis (MS). Whether rare variants also contribute to pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is unknown. Objective: To test whether genes harboring rare variants associated with adult-onset MS risk ( PRF1, PRKRA, NLRP8 , and HDAC7 ) and 52 major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes are associated with POMS. Methods: We analyzed DNA samples from 330 POMS cases and 306 controls from the US Network of Pediatric MS Centers and Kaiser Permanente Northern California for which Illumina ExomeChip genotypes were available. Using the gene-based method “SKAT-O,” we tested the association between candidate genes and POMS risk. Results: After correction for multiple comparisons, one adult-onset MS gene ( PRF1, p = 2.70 × 10 −3 ) and two MHC genes ( BRD2, p = 5.89 × 10 −5 and AGER, p = 7.96 × 10 −5 ) were significantly associated with POMS. Results suggest these are independent of HLA-DRB1*1501. Conclusion: Findings support a role for rare coding variants in POMS susceptibility. In particular, rare minor alleles within PRF1 were more common among individuals with POMS compared to controls while the opposite was true for rare variants within significant MHC genes, BRD2 and AGER . These genes would not have been identified by common variant studies, emphasizing the merits of investigating rare genetic variation in complex diseases.

Objective: Cognitive involvement in pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) relative to adult MS is less defined. This study advances our understanding by measuring cognitive performances in pediatric MS, adult MS, and pediatric healthy controls. Methods: Consecutive relapsing pediatric MS participants from the United States Network of Pediatric MS Centers were compared with pediatric healthy controls and adults with relapsing MS. Participants were compared on two screening batteries: the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS and the Cogstate Brief Battery. Results were transformed to age-normative z scores. Results: The pediatric groups (MS vs. Healthy Controls) did not differ on either battery’s composite mean score or individual test scores ( ps > 0.32), nor in the proportions impaired on either battery, Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (26% vs. 24%, p = 0.83); Cogstate Brief Battery (26% vs. 32%, p = 0.41). The pediatric versus adult MS group even after controlling for differences in disease duration performed better on the Brief International Cognition Assessment for MS composite ( p = 0.03), Symbol Digit Modalities Test ( p = 0.02), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test ( p = 0.01), and Cogstate choice reaction time ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pediatric MS patients do not differ from healthy pediatric controls on cognitive screens but perform better than adults with MS.