Johnson, Casey P.

PurposeIn 2D SENSE‐accelerated 3D Cartesian acquisition, the net acceleration factor R is the product of the two individual accelerations, R = RY × RZ. Acceleration Apportionment tailors acceleration parameters (RY, RZ) to improve parallel imaging performance on a patient‐ and coil‐specific basis and is demonstrated in contrast‐enhanced MR angiography.MethodsA performance metric is defined based on coil sensitivity information which identifies the (RY, RZ) pair that optimally trades off image quality with scan time reduction on a patient‐specific basis. Acceleration Apportionment is evaluated using retrospective analysis of contrast‐enhanced MR angiography studies, and prospective studies in which optimally apportioned parameters are compared with standard acceleration parameters.ResultsThe retrospective studies show strong variability in optimal acceleration parameters between anatomic regions and between patients. Prospective application of apportionment to foot contrast‐enhanced MR angiography with an 8‐channel receiver array provides a 20% increase in net acceleration with improved contrast‐to‐noise ratio. Application to 16‐channel contrast‐enhanced MR angiography of the feet and calves suggests 10% acceleration increase to R > 13 and no contrast‐to‐noise ratio loss. The specific implementation allows the optimum (RY, RZ) pair to be determined within one minute.ConclusionOptimum 2D SENSE acceleration parameters can be automatically chosen on a per‐exam basis to allow improved performance without disrupting the clinical workflow. Magn Reson Med 71:672–680, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Time‐resolved three‐dimensional contrast‐enhanced MR angiography often relies on view sharing of peripheral k‐space data to enable acquisition of angiograms with both high spatial resolution and a rapid frame rate. It is typically assumed that k‐space will be fully sampled during passage of the contrast bolus arterial phase. However, this is not the case when view sharing is incomplete, for example, at the leading edge of an enhancing vessel or if acquisition time is limited as in fluoroscopic tracking for multistation bolus chase MR angiography. Incomplete view sharing will degrade image quality, for example, by reducing vessel signal and sharpness and increasing undersampling artifacts. In this work, the evolution of angiogram quality with view sharing is quantitatively assessed in phantom experiments and in vivo contrast‐enhanced MR angiography calf studies. It is demonstrated that there are multiple sets of sequence parameters that can yield a target image update time, but the choice of parameters can profoundly affect how image quality evolves with view sharing. A fundamental tradeoff between vessel signal and sharpness and its relationship to the sequence temporal footprint is investigated and discussed. Magn Reson Med 70:348–357, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.