Bakkum‐Gamez, Jamie N.

Abstract A problematic feature of many human cancers is a lack of understanding of mechanisms controlling organ-specific patterns of metastasis, despite recent progress in identifying many mutations and transcriptional programs shown to confer this potential. To address this gap, we developed a methodology that enables different aspects of the metastatic process to be comprehensively characterized at a clonal resolution. Our approach exploits the application of a computational pipeline to analyze and visualize clonal data obtained from transplant experiments in which a cellular DNA barcoding strategy is used to distinguish the separate clonal contributions of two or more competing cell populations. To illustrate the power of this methodology, we demonstrate its ability to discriminate the metastatic behavior in immunodeficient mice of a well-established human metastatic cancer cell line and its co-transplanted LRRC15 knockdown derivative. We also show how the use of machine learning to quantify clone-initiating cell (CIC) numbers and their subsequent metastatic progeny generated in different sites can reveal previously unknown relationships between different cellular genotypes and their initial sites of implantation with their subsequent respective dissemination patterns. These findings underscore the potential of such combined genomic and computational methodologies to identify new clonally-relevant drivers of site-specific patterns of metastasis.

Abstract Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a complex health condition associated with metabolic disturbances and infertility. Recent data suggest that the prevalence of PCOS is increasing among women globally, although the etiology of these trends is undefined. Consequently, preclinical models that better reflect the biology of PCOS are urgently needed to facilitate research that can lead to the discovery of prevention strategies or improved management. The existing animal models have several limitations as they do not reflect all the PCOS features metabolically and/or phenotypically. Therefore, there is no clear consensus on the use of appropriate animal model and selection of the most appropriate PCOS-inducing agent. To that end, we have established a Swiss albino mouse model of PCOS based on 3 weeks of daily treatment with letrozole (50 μg/day; intraperitoneal) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA, 6 mg/100 g body weight; subcutaneous) in 5-week-old female mice fed on normal or high-fat diet (HFD). Mice were regularly assessed for body weight, blood glucose, and estrous cycle. Three weeks after drug administration, mice were sacrificed and assessed for blood-based metabolic parameters as well as ovarian function. Our results indicate that DHEA combined with HFD produces changes mimicking those of clinical PCOS, including elevated serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone, dyslipidemia, poor ovarian microenvironment, and development of multiple ovarian cysts, recapitulating cardinal features of PCOS. In comparison, normal diet and/or letrozole produced fewer features of PCOS. The data from the experimental models presented here can improve our understanding of PCOS, a growing concern in women’s health.

Abstract Objectives: We hypothesize that a validated panel of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for HPV(+)CSCC will be similar to but distinct from a cohort of HPV(+)OPSCC. Methods: Patients were excluded for recurrent tumor, prior pelvic or head or neck cancer/neoplasia, chemotherapy < 1 year, prior therapeutic radiation to the target region, prior transplant, insufficient target tissue (<5mm), or if <18 yrs. MDMs identified from sequenced differentially methylated regions were selected from a panel validated for HPV(+)CSCC and evaluated on DNA from independent FFPE HPV(+)OPSCC, HPV(+)CSCC, normal oropharynx tonsil, and normal cervix tissue using methylation-specific PCR. White blood cells (WBCs) were used as a background control. Results: 34 HPV(+)OPSCC, 36 HPV(+)CSCC, 26 normal tonsil tissue, and 24 normal cervical tissue patients met criteria. The HPV(+)OPSCC cohort was older (57 vs 44 yrs, p=0.027), had more frequent alcohol exposure (85% vs 64%, p=0.02), but similar ACE-27 comorbidity scores (p=0.078) and tobacco use (p=0.066). Tumor stages were stage I (47% and 83%), stage II (44% and 11%) and stage III (9% and 6%) for HPV(+)OPSCC and HPV(+)CSCC, respectively. Twenty-one MDMs were evaluated and areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) are reported (Table 1). 95% confidence intervals excluded a non-diagnostic null hypothesis AUC of 0.5. 5/21 (24%) achieved an AUC ≥ 0.90, 15/21 (71%) achieved an AUC ≥ 0.8, and 19/21 (90%) exhibited better than chance classifications relative to control tonsil tissue (all p<0.001). Conclusion: MDMs have the potential to discriminate both HPV(+)OPSCC and HPV(+)CSCC from their normal tissue controls. 90% of the MDMs discovered for HPV(+)CSCC had better than chance discrimination in HPV(+)OPSCC suggesting a distinct signature between the two subtypes. Future discovery efforts specific to HPV(+)OPSCC is warranted. Methylated DNA Markers in HPV(+)OPSCC and HPV(+)CSCC CSCC AUC (95% CI) OPSCC AUC (95% CI) AUC CSCC vs AUC OPSCC Pvalue GRIN2D 0.72 (0.59-0.85) 0.91 (0.83-0.99) 0.019 EMX1 0.93 (0.86-0.99) 0.77 (0.65-0.89) 0.0191 VWC2 0.88 (0.79-0.97) 0.57 (0.42-0.72) 0.0001 ZNF610 0.99 (0.98-1) 0.89 (0.8-0.97) 0.0162 ZNF781.F 0.92 (0.86-0.99) 0.79 (0.67-0.91) 0.0585 TBX15 0.99 (0.96-1) 0.82 (0.72-0.93) 0.0025 TSPYL5 0.94 (0.87-1) 0.82 (0.72-0.93) 0.058 LOC645323 0.95 (0.89-1) 0.88 (0.8-0.97) 0.1952 ASCL1 0.98 (0.93-1) 0.86 (0.76-0.95) 0.0187 ABCB1 0.97 (0.93-1) 0.74 (0.61-0.86) 0.0001 ZNF69 0.89 (0.8-0.97) 0.95 (0.9-1) 0.2017 MAX.chr9 0.97 (0.92-1) 0.82 (0.72-0.93) 0.0113 ARHGAP12 0.91 (0.83-0.99) 0.9 (0.81-1) 0.9223 C1orf114 0.94 (0.86-1) 0.88 (0.8-0.97) 0.3366 MAX.chr6 0.99 (0.97-1) 0.86 (0.76-0.96) 0.0099 NEUROG3 0.95 (0.89-1) 0.7 (0.57-0.83) 0.0001 NID2 0.98 (0.95-1) 0.86 (0.77-0.95) 0.0207 TMEM200C 0.95 (0.89-1) 0.54 (0.39-0.69) 0.0001 TTYH1 0.99 (0.98-1) 0.82 (0.71-0.93) 0.0023 ZNF773 0.93 (0.86-1) 0.9 (0.82-0.98) 0.5696 ZNF781.R 1 (1-1) 0.92 (0.86-0.99) 0.0198 Citation Format: Kathryn M. Van Abel, David M. Routman, Daniel J. Ma, Karen A. Doering, Kelli N. Burger, Patrick H. Foote, William R. Taylor, Douglas W. Mahoney, Calise K. Berger, Xiaoming Cao, Sara S. Then, Alyssa M. Larish, Eric J. Moore, Joaquin G. Garcia, Rondell P. Graham, Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, John B. Kisiel. Comparison of methylated DNA markers between human papillomavirus mediated carcinoma in oropharynx and cervical cancer: A pilot study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3742.

e17610 Background: Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) associated with sporadic ovarian cancer (OC) are detected in plasma from patients with treatment naïve tumors, but not cancer-free controls. To assess potential benefits to patients at risk for hereditary OC, the aim of this study was to measure the performance of validated sporadic OC MDMs in OC and benign ovarian tissue (BOT), surgically obtained from germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) mutation carriers. Methods: BRCA1/2 carriers with OC and BRCA1/2 carriers who had undergone risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (SO) were identified at a comprehensive cancer center. BRCA1/2 carriers in both OC and BOT groups were balanced on age and year of surgery with non- BRCA carriers with sporadic OC or benign indications for SO. OC and BOT formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues were macrodissected following pathologist selection of representative sites; DNA was extracted, and bisulfite converted. 15 OC MDMs ( GDF6, IFFO1, MAX.chr1.147790358, MAX.chr6.10382190, MAX.chr11.14926602, C2CD4D, PDRM14, NCOR2, SKI, DSCR6, SIM2, PALLD, CDO1, GPRIN1, BCAT1) previously identified in sporadic OC were assayed by quantitative methylation specific PCR, normalized by β-actin, by blinded personnel. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were generated for each MDM to assess discrimination of OC from benign tissue and compared between BRCA1/2 and sporadic (non- BRCA) patients, using a z-test. Results: Among BRCA1/2 carriers, there were 48 OC ( BRCA-OC) and 48 BOT ( BRCA-BOT); among non- BRCA, we matched 48 OC (Sporadic-OC) and 48 BOT (non- BRCA-BOT). The median AUC for OC MDM discriminated between OC and BOT with AUCs in BRCA1/2 carriers was 0.87, (IQR, 0.83-0.93). Sporadic-OC vs non- BRCA-BOT median AUC was 0.88 (IQR, 0.83-0.92). AUCs were not significantly different for each MDM when stratified by BRCA or sporadic status. MDMs with an AUC of ≥0.9 in either group are shown (Table). Conclusions: OC MDMs identified and validated in sporadic OC are highly discriminant for OC from BOT in DNA extracted from tissues of people who carry a BRCA1/2 mutation. Testing the performance of these OC MDMs in plasma from BRCA1/2 carriers with and without OC may be of clinical value for high-risk patients and inform multi-cancer early detection testing strategies.[Table: see text]

Abstract Background Abnormal uterine bleeding requires the investigation of the endometrium. Histology is typically used but there remains room for the improvement and use of cytology. Methods Women presenting for clinically indicated office endometrial biopsy were prospectively enrolled. Tao endometrial brushing and office endometrial biopsy were performed, and surgical procedure if clinically indicated. Tao brush cytology specimens were blindly reviewed by up to three pathologists, consensus obtained, and scored as: benign, atypical (favor benign), suspicious, positive for malignancy, or non‐diagnostic. Cytology and histology were compared to surgical pathology to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values to detect AH (atypical hyperplasia) or EC (endometrial cancer). Results Clinical indications of 197 enrolled patients included postmenopausal bleeding (90, 45.7%), abnormal uterine bleeding (94, 47.7%), and abnormal endometrium on ultrasound without bleeding (13, 6.6%). Of the 197 patients, 185 (93.9%) had cytology score consensus and a total of 196 (99.5%) had consensus regarding cytology positivity. Surgical pathology diagnoses (N = 85) were 13 (15.3%) FIGO grade 1 or 2 EC, 3 (3.5%) AH, and 69 (81.2%) benign endometrium. Sensitivity and specificity to detect EC or AH were 93.7% and 100%, respectively, via endometrial biopsy; 87.5% and 63.8%, respectively, via endometrial cytology when scores of malignancy, suspicious, or atypical were considered positive. Conclusions In a high‐risk population, Tao brush endometrial cytology showed high sensitivity to detect AH and EC comparable to biopsy histology when considering scores of malignancy, suspicious, atypical, and non‐diagnostic. Revisiting the potential value of endometrial cytology in the contemporary era of endometrial diagnostic workup is warranted.

5526 Background: HR-HPV DNA testing, with or without cervical cytology, provides excellent sensitivity for detection of cervical cancer (CC) and its precursors; negative test results indicate that risk of disease is extremely low and enable women to undergo reduced screening with safety. However, management of women who screen positive remains challenging as many will prove to have self-limited HR-HPV infections. DNA methylation is an early event in carcinogenesis that could enhance CC screening specificity. Methods: For discovery, DNA from 70 FFPE CC (36 squamous, 34 adenocarcinoma) tissues that were reviewed microscopically, 18 fresh frozen benign cervicovaginal (BCV) tissues collected at the time of benign hysterectomy, and 18 buffy coats from cancer-free women underwent reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) to identify MDMs associated with CC. Candidate MDM selection was based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) discrimination, methylation fold change, and low background methylation among benign controls. Candidate MDMs were re-tested using methylation-specific PCR (MSP) to confirm performance. Blinded biological validation was performed using MSP on DNA extracted from independent FFPE CC (38 squamous, 43 adenocarcinoma) and BCV (40) tissues. The performance of CC MDMs was also tested in DNA extracted from cervical dysplasia (36 adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 32 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3, 11 CIN 1) FFPE tissues. Results: From RRBS discovery and technical validation via MSP, 30 candidate MDMs showed marked methylation fold changes (10 to >1000) across both CC histologies compared to BCV tissue from cancer-free women. Each of the 30 MDMs highly discriminated CC from BCV tissue with 9 MDMs having an AUC >0.90 (Table). CC MDMs also highly discriminated AIS from BCV but did not perform well in CIN 2/3 and CIN 1 (Table). Conclusions: Whole methylome sequencing, stringent filtering criteria, and biological validation have yielded outstanding candidate MDMs for CC that highly discriminate CC from BCV, notably with high specificity. Performance in cervical dysplasias varied with higher positivity rates in AIS than in CIN 2/3 and CIN 1. Translation to testing these novel MDMs in lower genital tract biospecimens and the addition of HR-HPV to the CC panel are warranted.[Table: see text]

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States and is the country’s fifth most common cause of cancer mortality in women. A major challenge in treating ovarian cancer is that most patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. These NCCN Guidelines discuss cancers originating in the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, as these are all managed in a similar manner. Most of the recommendations are based on data from patients with the most common subtypes─high-grade serous and grade 2/3 endometrioid. The NCCN Guidelines also include recommendations specifically for patients with less common ovarian cancers, which in the guidelines include the following: carcinosarcoma, clear cell carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, low-grade serous, grade 1 endometrioid, borderline epithelial, malignant sex cord-stromal, and malignant germ cell tumors. This manuscript focuses on certain aspects of primary treatment, including primary surgery, adjuvant therapy, and maintenance therapy options (including PARP inhibitors) after completion of first-line chemotherapy.