Cohn, Allen Lee

283 Background: Cancers of the esophagus, stomach, pancreas, gallbladder, liver, bile duct, colon and rectum will account for 17% of incident cancer diagnoses and 26% of cancer-related deaths in the US in 2019. We developed a methylation-based cfDNA early multi-cancer detection test that also can predict the tissue of origin (TOO) of these and other cancers types; performance of this test for gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers is reported here. Methods: The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA; NCT02889978) study is a prospective, multi-center, observational, case-control study with longitudinal follow-up, enrolling individuals with cancer ( > 20 cancers, all stages, newly diagnosed) and without cancer. Plasma cfDNA was subjected to a cross-validated targeted methylation (TM) sequencing assay. Methylation fragments were combined across targeted genomic regions and assigned a probability of cancer and a predicted TOO. GI cancer classes were upper GI (esophagus/stomach, n = 67), pancreas/gallbladder/extrahepatic bile duct (n = 95), liver/intrahepatic bile duct (n = 29), and colon/rectum (n = 121). Results: Detection across all GI cancers was 82% (95% CI 77-86) at a > 99% pre-set specificity. Overall predicted TOO accuracy was 92% (88-95) among the samples for which TOO was predicted (6/255 had indeterminate predicted TOO). The table shows performance by GI cancer type. Conclusions: Simultaneous detection at high specificity ( > 99%) of multiple cancer types, including GI cancers across stages at high sensitivity (82%), was shown using TM analysis of cfDNA. Accurate (92%) localization of cancers to specific regions of the GI tract was also achieved. Detection of multiple GI cancers from a single noninvasive blood test could be a practical method for detecting GI and other cancers, and may facilitate diagnostic work-ups. Clinical trial information: NCT02889978. [Table: see text]

5574 Background: A noninvasive cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based cancer detection assay offers the hope of a blood test that might reduce morbidity and mortality of cancers, particularly those without recommended screening tests (eg, some gynecologic cancers). CCGA (NCT02889978) is a prospective, multi-center, longitudinal, case-control study evaluating models for discriminating cancer versus non-cancer. Here, we report F/U of control participants (pts) who demonstrated a cancer-signal in CCGA. Methods: Clinically evaluable samples (N = 2508) from pts enrolled without a cancer diagnosis (dx; NC) and treatment-naive pts with newly diagnosed cancer (C) were divided into training (n = 1564; 580 NC, 984 C) and test (n = 944; 368 NC, 576 C) sets. Classification performance (cancer/non-cancer) was assessed via 3 prototype assays: whole-genome bisulfite (WGBS), whole-genome (WGS), and targeted (507 gene) sequencing. Notable outlier NC pts were identified with cancer-like scores in either ≥2 assay classification results or by the presence of known cancer drivers with ≥1 assay classification result suggesting cancer. All pts are currently in F/U in accordance with study protocol (to date: 80% with > 10 mo and 15% with > 22 mo F/U). Results: Among training and test sets, 8 ( < 1%) NC pts were identified with a cancer-like signal. To-date, 2 have been diagnosed with a gynecologic malignancy: 1 stage IIIc clear cell endometrial carcinoma and 1 stage IIIc ovarian cancer, 3 and 2 months (mo) post-enrollment [PE], respectively. Among C pts in the study, sensitivity (at 98% specificity; WGBS) in these cancer types was: uterine/endometrial: 11% (n = 27 train) and 22% (n = 9 test); ovarian: 82% (n = 17) and 71% (n = 7). In addition, a third NC pt was diagnosed with a stage IV lung cancer 15 mo PE. Conclusions: This cfDNA-based assay detected a cancer-like signal that anticipated a clinical presentation of cancer in undiagnosed pts as early as 15 months prior to the actual dx. High specificity ( > 99%) requires accounting for undiagnosed cancers in study design and analysis. Together, these data suggest that this prototype assay may have high performance detecting a variety of gynecological and other cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT02889978.

BACKGROUND Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits angiogenesis, growth, and proliferation, prolongs survival as monotherapy in patients with refractory colorectal cancer. This international, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter trial assessed the efficacy of regorafenib with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as a second‐line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed on first‐line oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine enrolled at 45 sites in the United States and Ireland. Patients, stratified by prior bevacizumab use, were randomized 2:1 to regorafenib or placebo. The treatment consisted of FOLFIRI on days 1 and 2 and days 15 and 16 with 160 mg of regorafenib or placebo on days 4 to 10 and days 18 to 24 of every 28‐day cycle. Crossover was not allowed. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Under the assumption of a 75% event rate, 180 patients were required for 135 events to achieve 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 with a 1‐sided α value of .1. RESULTS One hundred eighty‐one patients were randomized (120 to regorafenib‐FOLFIRI and 61 to placebo‐FOLFIRI) with a median age of 62 years. Among these, 117 (65%) received prior bevacizumab or aflibercept. PFS was longer with regorafenib‐FOLFIRI than placebo‐FOLFIRI (median, 6.1 vs 5.3 months; HR, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53‐1.01; log‐rank P = .056). The median overall survival was not longer (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71‐1.44). The response rate was higher with regorafenib‐FOLFIRI (34%; 95% CI, 25%‐44%) than placebo‐FOLFIRI (21%; 95% CI, 11%‐33%; P = .07). Grade 3/4 adverse events with a >5% absolute increase from regorafenib included diarrhea, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS The addition of regorafenib to FOLFIRI as second‐line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer only modestly prolonged PFS over FOLFIRI alone. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society .

668 Background: Ramucirumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody antagonist of VEGFR-2. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 2nd line FOLFIRI based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were improved with RAM therapy versus PBO in the RAISE trial. Recent work suggests mCRC primary tumor location is both prognostic and predictive; with improved OS and therapy-specific sensitivity observed in left (L)- vs right (R)-sided tumors. Given these findings, the RAISE trial data was subjected to post-hoc analysis to determine if sidedness influenced RAM efficacy. Methods: Primary tumor site was obtained. L-CRC was defined as the splenic flexure, descending and sigmoid colon, and rectum, while R-CRC included transverse, ascending colon and cecum. OS/PFS in L and R subgroups were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier method and unstratified log-rank test (treatments within subgroup), unstratified Cox proportional hazards model (estimate hazard ratio [HR] and 95% CI), and Wald test (treatment-by-subgroup interaction). Results: Tumor location was available for 1012/1072 (94%) patients, 699 L- and 313 R-CRC. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. RAM treatment enhanced L-CRC median OS by 2.5 mo (median 14.5 vs 12.0 mo) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.807 (0.675, 0.965), P = 0.019; compared to a 1.1 mo increase in median OS in R-CRC vs PBO (12.7 vs 11.6) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.971 (0.750, 1.258), P = 0.823; and, RAM enhanced L-CRC median PFS by 1.6 mo (6.0 vs 4.4 mo) and HR (95% CI) = 0.776 (0.664, 0.906), P = 0.001 compared to a 1.1 mo increase in median PFS R-CRC vs PBO (5.6 vs 4.5) with a HR (95% CI) = 0.855 (0.674, 1.084), P = 0.197. The treatment-by-subgroup interaction for both OS and PFS was not significant ( P = 0.276, 0.578, respectively). Conclusions: Despite L-CRC patients having longer OS/PFS and a seemingly stronger RAM treatment effect than R-CRC, the non-significant interaction test cannot verify sidedness as being predictive of RAM efficacy. The current study confirms ramucirumab benefits mCRC patients regardless primary tumor location. Clinical trial information: NCT01183780.

514 Background: Randomized trials and OCSs have demonstrated that BV treatment in 1st-line (1L), in 2L, and across multiple lines is associated with longer survival in patients (pts) with mCRC. This analysis was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of BV after 1st disease progression (PD) between male and female mCRC pts who received 1L BV-containing therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: ARIES is a large, prospective OCS that enrolled pts who received BV and chemotherapy (CT) for 1L mCRC. Post-PD effectiveness was assessed for men and women characterizing BV use by cumulative and dichotomous approaches. The primary analysis treated BV exposure as cumulative BV doses after 1st PD and post-progression overall survival (ppOS) as the time from 1st PD to death. A time-dependent Cox regression model was fitted to assess the effect of cumulative BV exposure on ppOS, while controlling for potential confounders. A dichotomous secondary analysis characterized BV exposure as receipt of CT + BV (BBP) or CT alone (No BBP) within 2 months after PD and ppOS as time from 1st PD + 2 months to death. Results: Among the 1,550 1L mCRC pts enrolled, 1,199 (532 women) had PD. In the primary analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) for ppOS decreased, on average, by 1.2% with each additional BV dose. When stratified by sex, the average risk reduction per BV dose over 15 doses was 1.8% in women and 0.7% in men. In the secondary analysis that included 331 women (BBP, 180; No BBP, 151) and 417 men (BBP, 245, No BBP, 172) who received BV ± CT within 2 months post-PD, the HRs for ppOS with BBP treatment were 0.46 (95% CI, 0.35–0.59) in women and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.41–0.67) in men. Statistical interaction tests for differences in the effectiveness of BV between men and women were negative for primary and secondary analyses (P of 0.58 and 0.77). Protocol-specified adverse events occurred in 17.8% of women and 10.2% of men in the BBP population; this difference was largely related to rates of hypertension (8.3% vs 2.4%, respectively). Conclusions: In ARIES, the effectiveness of BV after first PD was not statistically different between women and men with mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT00388206.

325 Background: TH-302 is a hypoxia-targeted drug with a hypoxia-triggered 2-nitroimidazole component designed to release the DNA alkylator, bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM), when reduced in severe hypoxia. A randomized Phase 2B study (NCT01144455) was conducted to assess the benefit of G+T to standard dose G as first-line therapy of PAC. Methods: An open-label multi-center study of two dose levels of TH-302 (240 mg/m2 or 340 mg/m2) in combination with G versus G alone (randomized 1:1:1). G (1,000 mg/m2) and T were administered IV over 30-60 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients on the G could crossover after progression and be randomized to a G+T arm. The primary efficacy endpoint was a comparison of PFS between the combination arms and G alone (80% power to detect 50% improvement in PFS with one-sided alpha of 10%). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: 214 pts were treated; 163 (76%) Stage IV and 51 (24%) Stage IIIB. Median age 65 (range 29-86); 126 M/88 F; 38% ECOG 0/62% ECOG 1. Receiving 6 or more cycles: 32% G; 45% G+T240; 55% G+T340. Median PFS was 3.6 mo in G vs 5.6 mo in G+T240 (p=0.06) and 6.0 mo in G+T340 (p=0.01). Median OS was 6.9 mo in G vs 8.7 in G+T240 (p=0.83) vs 9.2 mo in G+T340 (p=0.80). 6-mo OS was 57% in G vs 69% in G+T240 (p=0.12) and 73% in G+340 (p=0.04); 12-mo OS was 26% in G vs 37% in G+T240 (p=0.18) and 38% in G+340 (p=0.13). RECIST best response was 10% in G vs 17% in G+T240 and 26% in G+T340. 14 and 12 pts in G crossed over to T240 and T340, respectively. Median post crossover PFS was 1.8 mo in T240 vs 2.9 mo in T340 (p=0.13). Median post crossover OS was 2.6 mo in T240 vs 13.4 mo in T340 (p=0.01). AEs leading to discontinuation were: 16% G, 17% G+T240 and 12% G+T340. Rash (47% in G+T340) and stomatitis (42% in G+T340) were greater in combination, 3 pts Grd 3 rash. Grd 3/4 thrombocytopenia were 11% G, 39% G+T240 and 63% G+T340 and Grd 3/4 neutropenia were 31% G, 56% G+T240 and 60% G+T340. Conclusions: The combination of G plus TH-302 improved the PFS of G. Skin and mucosal toxicity and myelosuppression were the most common TH-302 related AEs with no increase in treatment discontinuation. A phase 3 study of TH-302 (340 mg/m2) in combination with G is planned with OS as the primary efficacy endpoint. Clinical trial information: NCT01144455.

702 Background: Median overall survival (OS) in mCRC has significantly improved over the past 20 yrs, but the observed range of OS in pts remains wide; a large percentage of pts have OS <1 yr or >4 yrs. ARIES was a prospective OCS conducted from 2006–2012 that evaluated outcomes in pts receiving BV + chemotherapy (CT) for mCRC in general clinical practice. The objective of this analysis is to examine clinical characteristics of pts with long vs short OS. Methods: This analysis included 1,417/1,550 first-line (1L) BV-treated mCRC pts who died or had complete follow-up on study. Long OS was defined as OS within the upper quartile of the analysis population (range 42–67 mos); short OS was defined as OS within the lower quartile (range 0.3–12 mos). Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Pt and disease characteristics and treatment patterns were described using summary statistics. Results: Pt and disease characteristics are shown in the Table. Median PFS was 22.3 mos (95% CI, 19.9–23.3) vs. 4.9 mos (95% CI, 4.6–5.4), in the long-OS vs. short-OS groups. More pts with long OS received any second-line (2L) therapy (71% vs. 46%), and were exposed to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan throughout the course of their disease (53% vs. 32%) compared with pts with short OS. KRAS/BRAF mutation status was not collected. Conclusions: Pts with long OS had better baseline performance status, primary tumors more likely to have been resected, and were more likely to have received 2L CT. Additional analyses of detailed treatment patterns and safety are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00388206. [Table: see text]

735 Background: In the phase III CORRECT study, regorafenib significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC. CONSIGN (NCT01538680) was a large phase IIIb study that included 2872 patients from 25 countries; it was designed to provide continued access to regorafenib for patients with mCRC who failed standard therapy and to further characterize the safety of regorafenib. In CONSIGN, adverse events (AEs) and PFS were consistent with those reported in phase III studies. We present a retrospective subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in CONSIGN in the USA. Methods: Patients with mCRC who progressed on standard therapies and had an ECOG PS 0─1 received regorafenib 160 mg QD for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. PFS (per investigator) was the only efficacy variable assessed. Results: A total of 364 patients in the USA were assigned to treatment (all evaluable for safety). The median age was 60 years; 38% and 62% had ECOG PS 0 and 1, respectively. KRAS mutation was present in 59%, KRAS wt in 38%; 74% had ≥ 3 prior regimens for metastatic disease. Median duration of treatment was 2.3 months (range: 0–30). Median PFS (95% CI) was 2.3 (2.0–2.6) months (2.1 months KRAS wt; 2.3 months KRAS mutant). NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 81% of patients and were considered drug-related in 53% (Table). Grade ≥ 3 hepatobiliary disorders occurred in 2%. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent laboratory toxicities included bilirubin (9%), AST (6%), and ALT (3%). Conclusions: In patients from the USA enrolled in CONSIGN, the safety profile of regorafenib was consistent with that of the overall population and the known safety profile of regorafenib in mCRC. Median PFS was in the range of that reported in phase III trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01538680. [Table: see text]