Greason, Kevin L.

The results of a meta-analysis are more than just the reported odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and P value. Of equal importance is the fine print of the study which should include assessment of risk of bias, certainty in evidence, and heterogeneity in the individual point estimates and confidence intervals. These areas all have influence on the quality of the data in the analysis. Reading and understanding the fine print is important.

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the safety of eliminating the pre‐discharge transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) on 30‐day outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundTTE is utilized before, during, and after TAVR. Post‐procedural, pre‐discharge TTE assists in assessment of prosthesis function and detection of clinically significant paravalvular leak (PVL) after TAVR.MethodsPatients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic from July 2018 to July 2019 were included in a prospective institutional registry. Patients undergoing TAVR prior to February 2019 received a pre‐discharge TTE, while those undergoing TAVR after February 2019 did not. Both cohorts were evaluated with TTE at 30 days post‐TAVR.ResultsA total of 330 consecutive patients were included. Of these, 160 patients (age 81.1 ± 7.6) had routine pre‐discharge TTE, while 170 patients (age 78.9 ± 7.5) were dismissed without routine pre‐discharge TTE. Mortality at 30 days was similar between the two groups (0% and 1.2%, respectively). One episode of PVL requiring intervention (0.6%) occurred in the pre‐discharge TTE group and none in the group without pre‐discharge TTE at 30‐day follow‐up. There was a similar incidence of total composite primary and secondary adverse events between the cohort receiving a pre‐discharge TTE and those without (28.1% vs. 25.3%, P = 0.56) at 30 days. The most common event was need for permanent pacemaker or ICD implantation in both groups (13.1% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.71).ConclusionsElimination of the pre‐discharge TTE is safe and associated with comparable 30‐day outcomes to routine pre‐discharge TTE. These findings have implication for TAVR practice cost‐efficiency and health care utilization.

Objectives We investigated haemodynamics and clinical outcomes according to type of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with constrictive pericarditis (CP). Background As the prevalence of CP with concomitant myocardial disease (mixed CP) grows, PH is more commonly seen in patients with CP. However, haemodynamic and outcome data according to the presence or absence of PH are limited. Methods 150 patients with surgically confirmed CP who underwent echocardiography and cardiac catheterisation within 7 days at two tertiary centres were divided into three groups: no-PH, isolated postcapillary PH (Ipc-PH) and combined postcapillary and precapillary PH (Cpc-PH). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Result In this retrospective cohort study, 110 (73.3%) had PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mm Hg). Cpc-PH, using defined cut-offs for pulmonary vascular resistance (>3 Wood units) or diastolic pulmonary gradient (≥7 mm Hg), was seen in 18 patients (12%). The Cpc-PH group had a higher prevalence of comorbidities (diabetes and atrial fibrillation) and concomitant myocardial disease as an aetiology of CP than other groups. Pulmonary vascular resistance had a significant direct correlation with medial E/e′ by Doppler echocardiography (r=0.404, p<0.001). Survival rate was significantly lower in the Cpc-PH than the no-PH (p=0.002) and Ipc-PH (p=0.024) groups. On multivariable analysis, age, New York Heart Association functional class IV, medial e′ velocity, Cpc-PH and Ipc-PH were independently associated with long-term mortality. Conclusion Combined postcapillary and precapillary PH develops in a subset of patients with CP and is associated with long-term mortality after pericardiectomy.

Background: Little is known about the relationship between Type A Acute Aortic Dissection (TAAAD) and pulse pressure (PP), defined as the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure. This study explores the association between PP and presentation, complications and outcomes of TAAAD patients. Methods: PP at hospital presentation was used to divide 1,960 non-iatrogenic TAAAD patients into quartiles: narrowed (≤39 mmHg; n=430), normal (40-56 mmHg; n=554), mildly elevated (57-75 mmHg; n=490) and markedly elevated (≥76 mmHg; n=486). Variables relating to index presentation and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. Results: TAAAD patients (patients) in the narrowed PP quartiles were more frequently older and Caucasian while patients with markedly elevated PPs tended to be male and have a history of hypertension. Patients who demonstrated abdominal vessel involvement more commonly demonstrated elevated PPs whereas patients with narrowed PPs were more likely to have periaortic hematoma and/or pericardial effusion. Narrowed PPs were also correlated with higher incidences of hypotension, cardiac tamponade and mortality. TAAAD patients who were managed with endovascular and hybrid procedures and those with renal failure tended to have elevated PPs. No difference in aortic regurgitation at presentation was noted between groups. Conclusions: TAAAD patients in the middle two PP quartiles had better in-hospital outcomes than patients in the outer quartiles. Patients with narrowed PPs experienced more cardiac complications, particularly cardiac tamponade, while those with elevated PPs were more likely to have abdominal aortic involvement. Presenting PP offers a clue to different manifestations of AAD that may facilitate initial triage and care.

Background: The debate for the optimal treatment of complicated Type B Acute Aortic Dissection (TBAAD) is primarily focused upon open surgical intervention versus thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The technique of fenestration with stenting has been proposed to resolve malperfusion. This study evaluated post-procedural outcomes of all three approaches for TBAAD. Methods: TBAAD patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection were stratified by management type: TEVAR, fenestration and stenting, and surgery. Results: Of the 552 patients with TBAAD, 231 (41.8%) underwent TEVAR, 214 (38.8%) standard open surgery, and 107 (19.4%) fenestration and stenting. TEVAR or fenestration and stenting were more likely to be performed in classic double barrel aortic dissection when compared to open surgery (73.2%, 76.6%, 52.8% respectively; p<0.001). Patients treated with open repair were less likely to have distal extension into the abdominal aorta than those with TEVAR or fenestration and stenting (47.7%, 62.7%, 86.4%, respectively; p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was similar between groups (11.7% TEVAR, 14.0% fenestration and stenting, 15.9% surgery). At five years, Kaplan-Meier post-discharge all-cause survival estimates were highest for TEVAR, followed by endovascular fenestration and finally open surgical intervention (85.2%, 78.3%, 67.2%, respectively; p=0.039). Conclusion: Patients treated by endovascular approaches, whether with flap fenestration or thoracic endovascular aortic repair, had lower five year mortality when compared to patients who required open repair in the setting of TBAAD. Either endovascular approach may be helpful in the treatment of TBAAD. Further research is needed to determine how much of the observed difference represents patient selection versus differential effects of treatment.

Objective: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), the development of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction adversely affects the natural history and is associated with poor outcomes following aortic valve replacement. However, the timing and possible reasons for transition from preserved to impaired LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with AS have not been described. The aim of this study was to describe the time course of development of LV dysfunction and associated conditions in patients with severe AS. Methods & Results: Between 1/1/2009 and 12/31/2012, 667 (19%) of 3528 patients with severe AS (aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2) identified from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN Echocardiographic Laboratory database; had LVEF ≤50%. Of those 667 patients, 263 (39%) had previous echocardiograms (median: 71.6 months, 25 IQR: 36.3, 75:118.2) before the development of severe AS, allowing an assessment of change in LVEF over time. Among these 263 patients, 8 (3%) had dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), 225 (86%) had ischemic heart disease (IHD), 5 (2%) had other significant valve disease, and 25 (10%) had no concomitant heart disease before the development of severe AS. The evolution of development of reduced LVEF at several time points is shown in the Figure. The initial LVEF was 34±12 % in DCM patients, 51±13% in IHD patients and 61±9 % in AS patients without other heart diseases (p<0.001, ANOVA). Patients with AS alone or AS+DCM/IHD showed a gradual decline in LVEF before AS became severe, and a more rapid decline in LVEF once the AVA reached ≤ 1 cm2. Conclusion: In patients with severe AS, a majority of the patients (86%) with reduced EF had ischemic heart disease. Although there was a gradual decline in LVEF before development of severe AS, the decline was more rapid after AS became severe in almost all patients regardless of associated cardiac condition. More frequent monitoring may be indicated in AS patients especially when AVA reaches 1cm2 and concomitant IHD.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at high surgical risk. We investigated the impact of TAVR on left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function using conventional echocardiography parameters. Methods and results: A total of 202 consecutive patients (age 80.6±8.0 years, aortic valve area 0.80±0.16cm 2 ) who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic between 2008 and 2013 were included in the study. LV ejection fraction (EF) and RV systolic function including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC) and, systolic excursion velocity (S’) were compared before (median 33.5 days) and after TAVR procedure (median 30 days). Patients who underwent pacemaker implantation after TAVR were excluded. LV EF significantly improved following TAVR (55.3±12.6% pre vs 58.5±11.1% post; p<0.05). In contrast, RV systolic function significantly decreased after TAVR (pre vs post; TAPSE: 18.8±6.3 mm vs 17.4±6.3 mm, FAC: 42.6±9.8% vs 37.3±8.2%; S’: 10.7±2.6 cm/s vs 10.2±2.6 cm/s; p<0.05 for all). Stratifying RV functional change by TAVR approach site, patients undergoing trans-femoral TAVR (n=100) showed RV deterioration only by FAC (see Table). In contrast, RV systolic dysfunction was more prominent in trans-apical approach group (n=87) with significant decline in all parameters of RV systolic function (see Table). Conclusion: TAVR is associated with early enhancement in LV systolic function. However, there is evidence of worsening RV function in a significant number of patients. Further studies are necessary to determine whether this deterioration in RV function is related to anatomic access site or to other factors, and to evaluate its prognostic significance.

Background Pericardiectomy for post-radiation constrictive pericarditis has been reported to generally have unfavorable outcomes. This study sought to evaluate surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing pericardiectomy for radiation-associated pericardial constriction. Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients (≥18years) who underwent pericardiectomy for a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis with a prior history of mediastinal irradiation from June 2002 to June 2019 was conducted. There were 100 patients (mean age 57.2±10.1 years, 49% females) who met the inclusion criteria. Records were reviewed to look at surgical approach, extent of resection, early mortality and late survival. Results The overall operative mortality was 10.1% (n=10). The rate of operative mortality decreased over the study period; however, the test of trend was not statistically significant (P=0.062). Hodgkin’s disease was the most common malignancy (64%) for which mediastinal radiation had been received. Only 27% patients had an isolated pericardiectomy, and concomitant pericardiectomy and valve surgery was performed in 46% patients. Radical resection was performed in 50% patients, whereas 47% patients underwent a subtotal resection. Prolonged ventilation (26%), atrial fibrillation (21%) and pleural effusion (16%) were the most common post-operative complications. The overall 1,5- and 10-years survival was 73.6%, 53.4% and 32.1% respectively. Increasing age (HR 1.044, 95%CI 1.017-1.073) appeared to have a significant negative effect on overall survival in the univariate model. Conclusion Pericardiectomy performed for radiation associated constrictive pericarditis has poor long-term outcomes. The early mortality, though high (~10%), has been showing a decreasing trend in the test of time.

Background The temporal incidence of high‐grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is uncertain. As a result, periprocedural monitoring and pacing strategies remain controversial. This study aimed to describe the temporal incidence of initial episode of HAVB stratified by pre‐ and post‐TAVR conduction and identify predictors of delayed events. Methods and Results Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR at a single center between February 2012 and June 2019 were retrospectively assessed for HAVB within 30 days. Patients with prior aortic valve replacement, permanent pacemaker (PPM), or conversion to surgical replacement were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of delayed HAVB (initial event >24 hours post‐TAVR). A total of 953 patients were included in this study. HAVB occurred in 153 (16.1%). After exclusion of those with prophylactic PPM placed post‐TAVR, the incidence of delayed HAVB was 33/882 (3.7%). Variables independently associated with delayed HAVB included baseline first‐degree atrioventricular block or right bundle‐branch block, self‐expanding valve, and new left bundle‐branch block. Forty patients had intraprocedural transient HAVB, including 16 who developed HAVB recurrence and 6 who had PPM implantation without recurrence. PPM was placed for HAVB in 130 (13.6%) (self‐expanding valve, 23.7% versus balloon‐expandable valve, 11.9%; P <0.001). Eight (0.8%) patients died by 30 days, including 1 unexplained without PPM present. Conclusions Delayed HAVB occurs with higher frequency in patients with baseline first‐degree atrioventricular block or right bundle‐branch block, new left bundle‐branch block, and self‐expanding valve. These findings provide insight into optimal monitoring and pacing strategies based on periprocedural ECG findings.