Greason, Kevin L.

Objectives: CABG and PCI are used for revascularization of multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD). However, limited information is available comparing the rates of in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (early MACCE), including early death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization, among patients with multiple arterial CABG (MultArt) vs PCI. Methods: We reviewed 12,615 MVCAD patients with isolated primary CABG or PCI from 1993 through 2009. CABG patients (n=6,667) were grouped by number of arterial grafts into left internal mammary artery/saphenous vein (LIMA/SV) (n=5,712) or MultArt (n=955); PCI patients (n=5,948) into balloon angioplasty (BA) (n=1,020), bare metal stent (BMS) (n=3,242), and drug-eluting stent (DES) (n=1,686). Results: Early MACCE rate was significantly greater for PCI than CABG (8.5% vs 4.1% [P<.001]) and lower for MultArt than LIMA/SV or PCI (1.5% vs 4.5% and 8.5%, respectively [P<.001]). Stroke and early death rates were higher in CABG vs PCI (2.2% vs 0.4% [P<.001], and 1.5% vs 1.0% [P=0.01], respectively), whereas MI and repeat revascularization were lower (0.5% vs 6.0% and 0.3% vs 2.2%, respectively [P<.001]). Stroke and early death were similar in MultArt and PCI and lower vs LIMA/SV (0.6% and 0.4% vs 2.6%, and 0.5% and 1.0% vs 1.7%, respectively [P<.001]); MI and repeat revascularization rates were similar in MultArt and LIMA/SV and lower vs PCI (0.4% and 0.6% vs 6.0%, and 0.3% and 0.3% vs 2.3%, respectively [P<.001]). In propensity score-matched analysis, CABG had significantly improved early MACCE rate compared with BA (4.7% vs 13.2% [P<.001]), BMS (4.3% vs 8.3% [P<.001]), and DES (2.9% vs 5.5% [P=.008]), and MultArt compared with PCI (1.8% vs 7.8% [P<.001]) fig. Conclusions: In MVCAD patients undergoing isolated primary revascularization, CABG conferred lower early MACCE rate vs PCI. Early MACCE rate was markedly decreased after MultArt compared with LIMA/SV, BA, BMS, and DES.

Introduction: We compared outcome of repeat CABG (RCABG) and PCI in patients with previous CABG. Hypothesis: RCABG may improve survival versus PCI. Methods: From 1993 through 2009, 3,058 patients underwent revascularization after previous CABG. RCABG patients (n=530) were grouped by the use of arterial grafts (n=396), or saphenous vein grafts (SVG; n=134). At previous CABG, 37% of RCABG patients received IMA graft. PCI patients (n=2,528) were grouped into balloon angioplasty (BA; n=491), bare metal stent (BMS; n=1,267), and drug-eluting stent (DES; n=769). PCI patients were further stratified by the treated target into native coronary artery (n=1,637), bypass grafts (n=674), or both (n=216). Propensity score analysis matched 287 patients. Results: RCABG had increased 30-day mortality compared with PCI (HR=3.92; 95% CI, 2.25-6.84; P <.001) in multivariable analysis, while in propensity matched analysis it did not ( P =.09). Overall survival, however, was greater for RCABG compared with PCI in multivariable analysis (HR=0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.83; P <.001), as well as in propensity matched analysis (10-year survival rates were 52% vs 37%, respectively [ P =.005]). Compared with RCABG, PCI involving bypass grafts had increased mortality (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78; P =.008), whereas PCI targeting only the native coronaries did not (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.85-1.47; P =.43); BMS patients had increased mortality (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.68; P =.013), but DES did not (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.77-2.12; P =.35). At RCABG, 318 patients (60%) received an IMA graft and late survival was similar to those receiving SVG; The use of IMA in previous CABG was associated with improved survival (HR=0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92; P <.001]. Conclusions: Long-term survival after previous CABG is improved with RCABG compared to PCI, especially when PCI involves bypass grafts. There is no difference in long-term survival between RCABG using arterial grafts vs SVG only if IMA is used in either previous or RCABG.

Introduction: Prior cardiac surgery can complicate the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAAD). This report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) examines this hypothesis. Methods: 352 of 2289 TAAAD patients (15.4%) enrolled in IRAD had cardiac surgery prior to dissection, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, 34.6%), aortic or mitral valve surgery (38.4%), aortic surgery (44.7%), and other cardiac surgery (18.1%). Results: Comparative differences in baseline demographics, clinical presentation, and management time are shown in Table 1. Patients with prior cardiac surgery were more likely to undergo CABG (p=0.006) or mitral valve replacement (p=0.001) at the time of dissection repair. Total cardiopulmonary bypass time was higher in patients with prior cardiac surgery (p<0.001); no difference was seen in cardiac arrest time (p=0.113) or cerebral ischemia time (p=0.286). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher for patients with prior cardiac surgery (33.5% vs. 24.0%, p70 (RR1.58, 95% CI 1.25-1.99), and medical management of acute dissection (RR 4.79, 95% CI 3.62-6.34). Kaplan-Meier analysis is shown in Figure 1. Conclusion: Prior cardiac surgery not only delays presentation and diagnosis of acute type A dissections, but is also an important adverse risk factor for early and late mortality.

Background: Stroke is one of the most dreaded complications of type A acute aortic dissection (TA-AAD). However, few data exist on its incidence and association with prognosis. Methods: We evaluated 2202 TA-AAD patients [pts, mean age 61.9 ± 14.4, 1487 (67.5%) male] from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) to determine the incidence and prognostic influence of stroke in TA-AAD. Results: Stroke was present at arrival in 132 (6.0%) TA-AAD pts. Stroke pts were older (65±12 vs. 62±15 yrs; p=.002) and more likely to have hypertension (86% vs. 71%; p=.001) or atherosclerosis (29% vs. 22%; p=.042). While chest pain at arrival was less common (70% vs. 82%; p<.001), stroke pts presented more often with syncope (44% vs. 15%; p<.001), shock (14% vs. 7%; p=.005) or pulse deficit (51% vs. 29%; p=<.001). Arch vessels involvement was more frequent among the stroke pts (68% vs. 37%; p<.001). Stroke pts were treated less frequently by surgery (74% vs. 85%; p<.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients presenting with stroke (median 17.9 versus 13.3 days, p<0.001). Stroke patients demonstrated more frequent in-hospital complications (Table) and higher mortality (adjusted OR 1.62, 95% CI .99-2.65, p=.055) Among hospital survivors, mortality at follow-up was similar in pts with and without stroke (adjusted HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.46-2.89, p=.761). Conclusions: Stroke occurred in greater than 1 of 20 pts with TA-AAD and was associated with increased morbidity and in-hospital, but not long-term mortality. Whether aggressive early intervention will reduce morbidity and improve mortality remains to be evaluated in future studies.

Objectives. The use of the left internal mammary artery (IMA) in revascularization of multivessel coronary artery disease has been shown to improve survival following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the incremental survival benefit of multiple arterial grafts is still debated. Methods. We reviewed outcome of 8,622 pt that had isolated primary CABG for multivessel disease from 1993 to 2009.Pt were stratified according to the number of arterial grafts; (1) single IMA plus saphenous vein (SV) IMA/SV group (n=7,435; 83% 3VD) and (2) multiple arterial (MultArt) group (n=1,187; 74% 3VD) Results. Early mortality rate was 0.8% (n=10) in the MultArt group and 2.1% (n=154) in the IMA/SV group (P=0.004). However, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.996) after adjusting for age, gender, chronic lung disease, renal failure, PVD, MI, EF, and number of diseased vessels. Late survival was significantly greater for the MultArt group compared to IMA/SV group (5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were 95%, 84% and 71% versus 85%, 61% and 35% p<0.001). MultArt subgroups with the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA)/SV (n=589) and BIMA only (n=271), had significantly improved 15-years survival (97%, 86%, 76% and 94%, 82%, 75% at 5-, 10- and 15-years, p<0.001), and BIMA/RA (n=147) and LIMA/RA (n=169), had significantly greater 10-years survival (95%, 84% and 93%, 78% at 5- and 10-years, p<0.001) compared to IMA/SV group. In multivariate analysis, use of multiple arterial grafts remained a strong independent predictor of survival (HR=0.78, 95% CI 0.66 - 0.93, p=0.006). Conclusion. Use of the right IMA or radial artery in addition to the left IMA is associated with significantly better overall and late survival compared with single IMA and saphenous vein in patients with two and three-vessel disease undergoing isolated CABG.

Introduction/Purpose: To examine trends in patient presentation, diagnosis and outcomes of acute aortic dissection over 15 years since the original report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Methods: Patient data were collected at 28 international referral centers from 1996 up to the present. Trends were analyzed among 3275 patients divided according to date of enrollment into 6 equal groups and by Type: A (n=2110) or B (n=1165). Results: There was no change over time in the presenting complaints of severe or worst ever pain for Type A and Type B (90% and 96%, respectively), or in the incidence of chest pain ( 80% in Type A and 70% in Type B, respectively), with considerable overlap in chest vs. back pain between types. The report of pulse deficits did not change over time, present in 30% of Type A patients. Normal chest X-ray on presentation increased in Type A acute aortic dissection (AoD) from 13.7% to 31.3% over time (p-value for trend <0.001). In Type B the report of normal chest X-ray increased from 19.9% to 40.9% (p-value for trend <0.001). There were significant trends in initial imaging modalities for Type A: increased use of CT (from 49.4% to 71.6%, p-value for trend <0.001) and decreased use of TEE (from 45.3% to 25.4%, p-value for trend <0.001). For Type B, use of CT increased from 77.2% to 88.4% (p-value for trend .013). A decrease in overall mortality over time was significant for both Type A and Type B patients (see graph). Surgical mortality in Type A patients fell from 25.3% to 16.5% (p-value for trend 0 .003). Conclusions: No significant difference was seen over time in pain severity, chest pain, and presence of pulse deficits. The incidences of a normal chest X-ray, originally thought to be uncommon in dissection cases, increased over time to 30% in Type A and 40% in Type B AoD. Use of CT as the initial imaging modality increased for both Type A and Type B. Lastly, a significant decrease in overall mortality was seen for both Type A and Type B patients.

Abstract OBJECTIVES Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains a highly life-threatening condition. This study investigates factors associated with fatal ATAAD prior to surgical treatment. METHODS We reviewed autopsy reports of ATAAD decedents who died before surgical intervention and underwent postmortem examination at our clinic from 1994 to 2022. RESULTS Among 94 eligible cases, 50 (53.2%) decedents had DeBakey type I dissection, and 44 (46.8%) had DeBakey type II dissection. Most were males, 63 (67%), and 72 (77%) had a history of hypertension. The median age was 70.5 years, and the type II group was a decade older than the type I group (P &lt; 0.001). Decedents in the type II group predominantly died during the first hour after symptoms onset 16 (52%), while in the type I group, fatalities occurred between 1 h and 1 day, 27 (66%). The most common site of the intimal tear was the midportion of the ascending aorta, 45 (48%). The median ascending aorta size was 5 cm for the entire cohort, 5.2 cm for type I and 4.6 cm for type II (P &lt; 0.045). CONCLUSIONS In this autopsy study of fatal acute aortic dissection, the median aortic size was below the current guideline threshold for elective repair. Type II acute aortic dissections were found more frequently than expected and were characterized by older age, advanced aortic atherosclerosis, smaller aortic size, a shorter interval from symptom onset to death and a higher frequency of syncope compared to type I dissection.

Introduction: Multiple Valvular Heart Disease (VHD), defined as at least moderate stenotic or regurgitant lesions in ≥2 valves, mixed VHD as combination of lesions in the same valve and mitral annular calcification (MAC) are common conditions. Association between multiple-mixed VHD (MMVHD), MAC and MACE in patients exposed to Radiation Therapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CT) who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has not been studied. Aim: Assess the presence of MMVHD and MAC in cancer patients with prior RT and/or CT and their correlation with MACE (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure) after TAVR. Methods: 544 patients were included and divided into 3 groups: 187 with prior chest RT and CT (RT/CT), 155 CT only, and 202 without CT/RT as controls (Table 1). Data was obtained from the pre-procedure echocardiogram and quantified in a 1-6 scale (none, mild, mild/moderate, moderate, moderate/severe and severe). Fisher’s exact test or chi-square were used to compare categorical. Multiple VHD-MACE correlation was evaluated through multivariable Cox analysis using a proportional hazards model. Results: The prevalence of Multiple VHD was 37.4% in RT/CT, 23.2% in CT, and 13.9% in controls p<0.001(Figure 1). The RT/CT group had a significantly higher prevalence of severe MAC. Multiple VHD predicted MACE at 18 months after TAVR in RT/CT (HR 3.42, CI 1.93-6.08, p<0.001) and in CT (HR 2.55, CI 1.39-4.66, p=0.002) (Table 2). In RT/CT, severe MAC also predicted MACE (HR 3.68, CI 2.13-6.37, p<0.001), while it was not a predictor in the other groups. Stenotic or regurgitant VHD was more prevalent in the RT/CT group (Figure 2). Conclusions: Multiple VHD was found higher in RT/CT and predicted MACE at 18 months post-TAVR, including CT only patients. Severe MAC was also a strong predictor of the outcome in RT/CT patients. Pre-TAVR evaluation of MMVHD lesions is crucial for optimal patient management.

Abstract Background Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) repair or replacement carries significant operative mortality risk mainly due to delayed referral. We have recently developed the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO) score to assess risk in TR based on 8 simple variables (age, sex, severe TR, creatinine&gt;2 mg/dl, history of heart failure, history of chronic lung disease, AST &gt;40 units/L, heart rate &gt;90). Whether this score can be used in assessment of TR surgical risk and long term outcome is unknown. Purpose To examine the impact of TRIO scores on the postoperative outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery. Methods Adult patients with severe functional TR who underwent isolated tricuspid valve replacement or repair between 2000-2022 were identified. Postoperative outcomes were compared across low (0-3), intermediate (4-6), and high (7-12) TRIO risk score groups. Results 177 patients were included. Mean age was 70.7 ± 12.2 years, 69 (39%) were male, 34 (19%) were low TRIO score, 111 (63%) intermediate score and 32 (18%) high score. Tricuspid repair was performed in 43 (24.3%) and valve replacement in 134 (75.7%), reflecting the advanced disease stages of this patient cohort. At short term, higher TRIO scores were associated with more frequent need for urgent surgery, prolonged ventilation (&gt;72h) and postoperative dialysis (p&lt;0.05 for all). Perioperative 30-day mortality increased with the TRIO risk score (low: 0%; intermediate: 4.5%; high: 9.4%) but differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.187). Low risk patients had a shorter hospital and ICU stay (Figure 1A-B). During a mean follow-up of 5.2 ± 3.2 years, 98 (55.4%) patients died. At long term follow-up, lower TRIO scores were associated with improved survival after tricuspid surgery (Figure 1C). Conclusions Patients with higher TRIO scores have more postoperative complications, require longer hospital stay and have higher all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up. Our findings suggest that TRIO score may also be used for risk stratification in patients considered for surgical management of isolated functional TR.