Background Recently, rare germline variants in XRCC2 were detected in non-BRCA1/2 familial breast cancer cases, and a significant association with breast cancer was reported. However, the breast cancer risk associated with these variants needs further evaluation. Methods The coding regions and exon–intron boundaries of XRCC2 were scanned for mutations in an international cohort of 3548 non-BRCA1/2 familial breast cancer cases and 1435 healthy controls using various mutation scanning methods. Predictions on functional relevance of detected missense variants were obtained from three different prediction algorithms. Results The only protein-truncating variant detected was found in a control. Rare non-protein-truncating variants were detected in 20 familial cases (0.6%) and nine healthy controls (0.6%). Although the number of variants predicted to be damaging or neutral differed between prediction algorithms, in all instances these categories were evenly represented among cases and controls. Conclusions Our data do not confirm an association between XRCC2 variants and breast cancer risk, although a relative risk smaller than two could not be excluded. Variants in XRCC2 are unlikely to explain a substantial proportion of familial breast cancer.
Abstract 1664: A functional study of missense variants localized in the DNA binding domain of BRCA2
Abstract Genetic evidence of pathogenicity is not available for most missense mutations (Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS)) detected in the DNA binding domain (DBD) of BRCA2 by clinical genetic testing. In the absence of this evidence, functional assays may be useful for classification of the clinical relevance of these VUS. We used a cell based Homology-Directed repair reporter assay to characterize 14 known pathogenic and 18 known non-pathogenic BRCA2 missense mutations and 34 VUS from the DBD of BRCA2. We transfected each full-length wildtype and mutant BRCA2 construct into V-C8 BRCA2 deficient cells along with an I-Sce1-expression plasmid, which induces a unique double strand break in an integrated DR-GFP reporter plasmid. The protein expression levels were evaluated by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. The ability of each BRCA2 mutant to repair the induced break was evaluated by fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) for GFP. The HDR assay exhibited 100% (95% CI: 75.3% - 100%) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI: 81.5% - 100%) specificity for pathogenic missense mutations. Next, we developed a statistical classifier for prediction of the pathogenicity or non-pathogenicity of BRCA2 variants based on results from the HDR assay. Using known pathogenic and non-pathogenic variants as standards we computed the probability that each variant is pathogenic or non-pathogenic based on HDR activity. A probability of 99% in favor of pathogenicity correctly classified the known pathogenic mutations and the non-pathogenic variants. The evaluation of an additional 34 variants identified 18 variants as deleterious and eight as neutral. In summary the HR assay serves as a reliable high-quality surrogate for classification of VUS located in the BRCA2 DBD. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1664. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1664
BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk
Background Clinical classification of rare sequence changes identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is essential for appropriate genetic counselling of individuals carrying these variants. We previously showed that variant BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln in the BRCA1 transcriptional transactivation domain demonstrated equivocal results from a series of functional assays, and proposed that this variant may confer low to moderate risk of cancer. Methods Measures of genetic risk (report of family history, segregation) were assessed for 68 BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) families recruited through family cancer clinics, comparing results with 34 families carrying the previously classified pathogenic BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp (R1699W) mutation at the same residue, and to 243 breast cancer families with no BRCA1 pathogenic mutation (BRCA-X). Results Comparison of BRCA1 carrier prediction scores of probands using the BOADICEA risk prediction tool revealed that BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln variant carriers had family histories that were less ‘ BRCA1 -like’ than BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp mutation carriers (p<0.00001), but more ‘ BRCA1 -like’ than BRCA-X families (p=0.0004). Further, modified segregation analysis of the subset of 30 families with additional genotyping showed that BRCA1 c.5096G >A p.Arg1699Gln had reduced penetrance compared with the average truncating BRCA1 mutation penetrance (p=0.0002), with estimated cumulative risks to age 70 of breast or ovarian cancer of 24%. Conclusions Our results provide substantial evidence that the BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) variant, demonstrating ambiguous functional deficiency across multiple assays, is associated with intermediate risk of breast and ovarian cancer, highlighting challenges for risk modelling and clinical management of patients of this and other potential moderate-risk variants.
Abstract 5591: A homologous recombination assay for classifying BRCA2 missense variants
Abstract Germline mutations in BRCA2 predispose to breast, ovarian and other cancers. Although most mutations in the gene are known to be pathogenic, there is an increasing number of missense variants for which the contribution to cancer risk is unclear. These missense substitutions are referred to as VUS (variants of uncertain significance). Because loss of BRCA2 HR function leads to defective DNA double-strand break repair and an increased risk of cancer, we evaluated the utility of a cell-based Homologous Recombination (HR) assay for determination of the cancer relevance of BRCA2 VUS. Specifically, we studied VUS localized in the BRCA2 DNA binding domain (DBD) for effects on HR. We transfected full length wild-type and mutant BRCA2 constructs into V-C8 BRCA2 deficient cells along with an I-Sce1-expressing plasmid which induces an unique double strand break in an integrated DR-GFP reporter plasmid. We evaluated the ability of each BRCA2 mutant to repair the induced break by quantifying the GFP positive cells, generated by HR repair of the DNA break, with fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS). To establish the sensitivity and specificity of the HR assay we evaluated a series of known deleterious and known neutral with the HR assay. These mutations of known effect were identified using a multifactorial likelihood approach, based on available family data, with a prior probability approach based on sequence conservation (A-GVGD) algorithm (http://agvgd.iarc.fr/agvgd_input.php). We calculated the total odds of pathogenicity for co-segregation of variants with the disease in affected carrier families, co-occurrence of VUS (in trans) with deleterious mutations and for family history of cancer of VUS and combined this odds with the A-GVGD based prior probabilities to generate the posterior probability of pathogenicity for each variant. Using this approach we successfully classified 31 VUS as either neutral or deleterious. By comparing these data with results from the HR assay we established that the assay is 100% sensitive (95% CI: 75.3% – 100%) and 100% specific (95% CI: 82.4% – 100%) for deleterious mutations in the BRCA2 DBD domain. In summary we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the HR assay for VUS in the DBD relative to a probability model based on family data and A-GVGD algorithm and we showed that the assay was highly sensitive and specific. Based on these results we propose that the HR assay can be used as a classifier of the clinical relevance of the VUS in the absence of direct genetic and family data. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5591. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5591