Richardson, Harriet

Abstract Context Prior reports of plasma estradiol concentrations and their reference ranges in postmenopausal women identified marked variation, in part due to assay method and body mass index (BMI). Objective To develop an international reference range for plasma estradiol in postmenopausal women, support accurate assessment of concentrations during systemic and local (eg, vaginal) estradiol therapy, and improve risk prediction for diseases, including osteoporosis, breast, and endometrial cancers. Methodology Estradiol concentrations were measured using primarily liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays in 5 international cohorts of community-dwelling, postmenopausal women of primarily European ancestry aged 38-100 years who were not using exogenous estrogens (n = 7206). Measurements were harmonized to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reference measurement procedure (RMP) by re-assaying a subset of samples for each cohort and generating recalibration equations. Reference intervals were determined for all women, non-obese women, and specific BMI categories. Results Estradiol concentrations from separate LC-MS/MS assays correlated closely with the CDC RMP, and harmonization minimized inter-assay variability. Estradiol concentrations correlated with BMI but not with chronological age. The reference range (2.5th-97.5th percentile) was 1.1-18.2 pg/mL (4.0-66.8 pmol/L) with median of 4.9 pg/mL (18.0 pmol/L) for all postmenopausal women and 1.1-12.5 pg/mL (4.0-45.9 pmol/L) with median of 4.1 pg/mL (15.1 pmol/L) for non-obese women (BMI < 30). Reference ranges increased progressively with higher BMI categories. Conclusion Cross-calibration of estradiol measurements with the CDC RP enabled the development of harmonized plasma estradiol reference ranges for postmenopausal women who were not using exogenous estrogens, suitable for future studies to establish clinical utility. Increasing obesity in postmenopausal women was associated with increasing estradiol concentration and BMI category-specific reference ranges.

Abstract Objective: The aim of the study was to quantify baseline estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) concentrations according to selected patient characteristics in a substudy nested within the MAP.3 chemoprevention trial. Methods: E2 and E1 levels were measured in 4,068 postmenopausal women using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Distributions were described by age, years since menopause, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and use and duration of hormone therapy using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable linear regression was also used to identify characteristics associated with estrogen levels. Results: After truncation at the 97.5th percentile, the mean (SD)/median (IQR) values for E2 and E1 were 5.41 (4.67)/4.0 (2.4-6.7) pg/mL and 24.7 (14.1)/21 (15-31) pg/mL, respectively. E2 and E1 were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation [ r ] = 0.8, P < 0.01). The largest variation in E2 and E1 levels was by BMI; mean E2 and E1 levels were 3.5 and 19.1 pg/mL, respectively for women with BMI less than 25 and 7.5 and 30.6 pg/mL, respectively, for women with BMI greater than 30. E2 and E1 varied by age, BMI, smoking status, and prior hormone therapy in multivariable models ( P < 0.01). Conclusions: There was large interindividual variability observed for E2 and E1 that varied significantly by participant characteristics, but with small absolute differences except in the case of BMI. Although the majority of participant characteristics were independently associated with E1 and E2, together, these factors only explained about 20% of the variation in E1 and E2 levels.

LBA504 Background: Limited efficacy and serious toxicities have limited uptake of tamoxifen or raloxifene as preventatives of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) prevent contralateral breast cancers more than tamoxifen in adjuvant trials and have fewer serious side effects. This is the first report of an AI used in primary prevention. Methods: NCIC CTG MAP.3 is a randomized trial designed to detect a 65% reduction in annual incidence of invasive breast cancer (IBC) on exemestane (E) versus placebo (P). Eligible postmenopausal women had ≥ one of the following risk factors: Gail score >1.66%, prior ADH, ALH, LCIS or DCIS with mastectomy, age over 60. Health-related and menopause-specific quality of life (QOL) were assessed by SF-36 and MENQOL questionnaires. Results: From 2004-2010, 4,560 women were randomized: age 62.5 yrs (37-90); Gail Score 2.3 % (0.6-21); BMI 28.0 kg/m2 (15.9-65.4). Risk factors included: age >60 yrs (49%); Gail score >1.66 (40%); and prior ADH, ALH, LCIS or DCIS with mastectomy (11%). At median follow-up of 35 months there were 11 IBCs on E and 32 on P (annual incidence 0.19% vs 0.55%; HR= 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p = 0.002); ductal (10E/27P), lobular (1E/5P). Most tumors were ER positive (7E/27P); Her2/neu negative (10E/26P); TNM stage T1 (8E/28P), N0 (7E/22P), M0 (11E/30P). E was superior in all subgroups: by Gail score, age, BMI, prior LCIS and DCIS. The annual incidence rate of IBC or DCIS was 0.35% E and 0.77% P (HR=0.47;95% CI 0.27-0.79; p = 0.004) based on 64 IBCs or DCISs (20E/44P). Clinical bone fractures, osteoporosis, hypercholesterolemia or cardiovascular events were equal in both arms. No clinically meaningful differences in QOL were detected. Conclusions: Exemestane significantly reduced invasive and pre-invasive breast cancers in postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer with no serious toxicities. Exemestane should be considered a new option for primary prevention of breast cancer. Supported by the Canadian Cancer Society; Pfizer Inc. PEG supported in part by Avon Foundation.

Abstract Background: Exemestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, reduced the incidence of invasive breast cancers by 65% among 4560 post-menopausal randomized to exemestane or placebo for 5 years on MAP.3. Differences in quality of life (QOL) were judged to be minimal, but only summary information was reported. Purpose: To provide more detailed information about effects of exemestane on menopause-specific and health-related qualities of life. Method: Participation in quality of life assessment was an eligibility criterion. Menopause-specific and health-related qualities of life were assessed using the MENQOL (4 scales; physical, vasomotor, psychosocial, sexual) and SF-36 (8 scales; physical health, role function — physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social function, role function — emotional, mental health, and 2 summary scales) instruments, respectively at baseline, 6 months and then yearly after randomization. Compliance with QOL questionnaire completion at each follow-up visit ranged from 93–98%, and did not differ by group. Change scores for each MENQOL and SF-36 scale, calculated for each assessment time relative to baseline, were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. Summary scores were used to summarize the QOL scores observed at each time point for each SF-36 dimension and overall mental (MCS) and physical component summaries (PCS) and MENQOL domains. Clinically important worsening of MENQOL change scores was defined as an increase of ≥0.5/8 points. SF-36 change scores were considered worsened if scores decreased by ≥ 5 points from baseline. Results: Both groups were balanced on scores for MENQOL and SF-36 at baseline. Median follow-up was 35 months and the proportion of women who stopped study medication early for toxicity reasons was 15% in the exemestane arm and 11% in the placebo arm. There was a statistically significant difference in change scores for vasomotor symptoms among women on exemestane during the first 4 years (p-values &lt;0.01), compared to placebo. However, no between-group differences in vasomotor change met the criterion for clinical importance. Women on exemestane had statistically poorer sexual functioning (mean change = −0.02, SD=1.37) compared to placebo (mean change = −0.12, SD=1.32) during the first 6 months on study (p-value = 0.03) but the differences were not statistically significant thereafter or clinically important at any time. Among the 8 SF-36 scales, only bodily pain was statistically different between exemestane and placebo for the first 24 months on study medication (p-value &lt;0.01), but no between-group difference in change scores exceeded 5 points. Overall SF-36 PCS and MCS assessing changes in overall physical and mental health-related QOL did not differ significantly by group at any assessment. Conclusion: Our assessment that early differences in vasomotor symptoms and pain were probably not clinically important is supported by the observation of no between-group differences when overall physical and mental health-related QOL changes were compared. Exemestane does not appear to have a major negative impact on the quality of life among these women. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-1.

Abstract Background Exemestane significantly reduced invasive and preinvasive breast cancers in postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer in the NCIC CTG MAP3 trial with no serious toxicities, including excess fractures or osteoporosis. Purpose: To provide additional information on the effect of exemestane on bone loss in women at high risk for breast cancer, within a subset of women participating on the NCIC CTG MAP.3B study. The primary hypothesis is that exemestane does not induce clinically significant bone loss in postmenopausal women at increased risk of developing breast cancer at 2 years. The primary objective of this companion study is to examine the effect of exemestane on lumbar spine and total hip BMD by DEXA at 2 years in women participating in the MAP3 trial. Methods: The MAP.3B bone sub-study registered women from the main MAP. 3 trial from May 2008 to March 2010. Eligible women had to have an acceptable quality BMD scan by DEXA taken within 12 months prior to randomization to MAP.3. A BMD T-score &gt;-2.0 SD (i.e. better than 2 standard deviations below the average peak BMD of a young adult woman) was established as the study population cutoff. A questionnaire including information on height, falls, fractures, lifestyle information including physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use was completed at baseline, 12 months, 24 months and at last visit. Fasting serum for bone biomarkers was collected at 12 months and total hip and L1-L4 (postero-anterior) spine BMD were measured 2 years after randomization on the same Lunar or Hologic scanner. The primary objective was to determine differences in hip and spine BMD at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include number of skeletal fractures and development of osteoporosis 2 years after randomization and changes in bone biomarkers at 1 year after randomization. For the analysis of the primary endpoints, the upper limit of a one sided 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean percentage changes between placebo and exemestane will be calculated for the BMD by DEXA at each site. We will conclude that exemestane does not induce significant bone loss in postmenopausal women at increased risk of developing breast cancer at 2 years when the upper limit is less than 3% for both sites. Similar confidence interval approach will be used to analyze the secondary endpoints. Results: Between May 2008 and March 2010, 238 postmenopausal women were recruited. Median age was 61.8 years, and the majority of women were Caucasian (91%), with approximately 20% of the participants reporting a recent fall (within past 12 months) and another 13% reporting a recent fracture prior to randomization. We will report results from the primary as well as the secondary endpoints at the SABCS meeting. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-13.