Back to Authors

Singh, Ravinder J

0000-0003-4538-6544

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Establishment of harmonized international reference ranges for plasma estradiol concentrations in postmenopausal women
Cui, Jinghan, Hankinson, Susan E. , Santen, Richard J. , Boutot, Maegan E., Budd, Jeffrey R. , Dowsett, Mitch, Goetz, Matthew P, Guranich, Catherine, Houghton, Serena, Ingle, J , Jones, Micheal E., Rinaldi, Sabina , Rosner, Bernard, Vesper, Hubert W. , Eliassen, A Heather, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Vachon, Celine M. , Richardson, Harriet , Qian, Jing , Jones, Michael E. , Rinaldi, Sabina , Singh, Ravinder J , Vachon, Celine M. , Qian, Jing , Hankinson, Susan E. , Jones, Michael E , Matsumoto, Alvin M. , Dowsett, Mitch , Houghton, Serena C. , Ingle, James N. , Rosner, Bernard A., Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Milne, Roger L. , Swerdlow, Anthony J

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | May 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1210/clinem/dgag188 Get It

Abstract Context Prior reports of plasma estradiol concentrations and their reference ranges in postmenopausal women identified marked variation, in part due to assay method and body mass index (BMI). Objective To develop an international reference range for plasma estradiol in postmenopausal women, support accurate assessment of concentrations during systemic and local (eg, vaginal) estradiol therapy, and improve risk prediction for diseases, including osteoporosis, breast, and endometrial cancers. Methodology Estradiol concentrations were measured using primarily liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays in 5 international cohorts of community-dwelling, postmenopausal women of primarily European ancestry aged 38-100 years who were not using exogenous estrogens (n = 7206). Measurements were harmonized to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reference measurement procedure (RMP) by re-assaying a subset of samples for each cohort and generating recalibration equations. Reference intervals were determined for all women, non-obese women, and specific BMI categories. Results Estradiol concentrations from separate LC-MS/MS assays correlated closely with the CDC RMP, and harmonization minimized inter-assay variability. Estradiol concentrations correlated with BMI but not with chronological age. The reference range (2.5th-97.5th percentile) was 1.1-18.2 pg/mL (4.0-66.8 pmol/L) with median of 4.9 pg/mL (18.0 pmol/L) for all postmenopausal women and 1.1-12.5 pg/mL (4.0-45.9 pmol/L) with median of 4.1 pg/mL (15.1 pmol/L) for non-obese women (BMI < 30). Reference ranges increased progressively with higher BMI categories. Conclusion Cross-calibration of estradiol measurements with the CDC RP enabled the development of harmonized plasma estradiol reference ranges for postmenopausal women who were not using exogenous estrogens, suitable for future studies to establish clinical utility. Increasing obesity in postmenopausal women was associated with increasing estradiol concentration and BMI category-specific reference ranges.
Anastrozole Dose Escalation for Optimal Estrogen Suppression in Postmenopausal Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Prospective Trial
Haddad, Tufia C. , Suman, Vera J. , Sideras, Kostandinos , Northfelt, Donald W. , Ernst, Brenda , O’Sullivan, Ciara C. , Singh, Ravinder J. , Desta, Zeruesenay , Peethambaram, Prema P. , Hobday, Timothy J. , Chumsri, Saranya , Leon‐Ferre, Roberto A. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Taraba, Jodi L. , Goodnature, Barbara, Wang, Liewei , Giridhar, Karthik V , Sideras, Kostandinos , Northfelt, Donald , Ernst, Brenda , O'Sullivan, Ciara Catherine , Singh, Ravinder J , Desta, Zeruesenay , Peethambaram, Prema P , Hobday, Timothy J , Chumsri, Saranya , Leon-Ferre, Roberto , Ruddy, Kathryn J , Yadav, Siddhartha , Taraba, Jodi L , Goodnature, Barbara , Goetz, Matthew P , Wang, Liewei , Ingle, J , Suman, Vera , Giridhar, Karthik V. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Goetz, Matthew P. , Ingle, James N.

Clinical Cancer Research | May 16, 2024 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 3147-3156

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-0341 Get It

Abstract Purpose: We previously reported that postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-α–positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/day (ANA1) with estrone (E1) ≥1.3 pg/mL and estradiol (E2) ≥0.5 pg/mL [inadequate estrogen suppression (IES)] had a threefold increased risk of a breast cancer event. The objective of this study was to determine if increasing anastrozole to 10 mg/day (ANA10) could result in adequate estrogen suppression (AES: E1 <1.3 pg/mL and/or E2 <0.5 pg/mL) among those with IES on ANA1. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-α–positive breast cancer planning to receive adjuvant ANA1 were eligible. E1 and E2 were assessed pre- and post-8 to 10 weeks of ANA1. Those with IES were switched to 8- to 10-week cycles of ANA10 followed by letrozole 2.5 mg/day. E1 and E2 were assessed after each cycle. Anastrozole concentrations were measured post-ANA1 and post-ANA10. Primary analyses included patients who documented taking at least 80% of the planned treatment (adherent cohort). Results: In total, 132 (84.6%) of 156 eligible patients were ANA1 adherent. IES occurred in 40 (30.3%) adherent patients. Twenty-five (78.1%) of 32 patients who began ANA10 were adherent, and AES was achieved in 19 (76.0%; 90% confidence interval, 58.1%–89.0%) patients. Anastrozole concentrations post-ANA1 and post-ANA10 did not differ by estrogen suppression status among adherent patients. AES was maintained/attained in 21 (91.3%) of 23 letrozole-adherent patients. Conclusions: Approximately 30% of ANA1-adherent patients had IES. Among those who switched to ANA10 and were adherent, 76% had AES. Further studies are required to validate emerging data that ANA1 results in IES for some patients and to determine the clinical benefit of switching to ANA10 or an alternative aromatase inhibitor.
Determinants and Measurement of Neonatal Vitamin D: Overestimation of 25(OH)D in Cord Blood Using CLIA Assay Technology
Lu, Mengdi , Hollis, Bruce W. , Carey, Vincent J. , Laranjo, Nancy , Singh, Ravinder J. , Weiss, Scott T. , Litonjua, Augusto A. , Weiss, Scott T , Singh, Ravinder J

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | December 24, 2019 | Volume: 105 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e1085-e1092

10.1210/clinem/dgz299 Get It

Abstract Context Vitamin D (VD) deficiency in pregnancy and the neonatal period has impacts on childhood outcomes. Maternal VD sufficiency is crucial for sufficiency in the neonate, though the effect of early versus late pregnancy 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels on neonatal levels is unknown. Furthermore, chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIAs) are widely used, though their validity in measuring 25(OH)D specifically in cord blood specimens has not been established. Objective To assess the validity of a CLIA in the measurement of cord blood 25(OH)D and to evaluate maternal determinants of neonatal 25(OH)D, including early versus late pregnancy 25(OH)D levels. Design This is an ancillary analysis from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART), a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Participants and Intervention A total of 881 pregnant women at high risk of having offspring asthma were randomized to receive VD supplementation or placebo. Serum samples were collected from mothers in early and late pregnancy and from offspring cord blood at birth. 25(OH)D levels were assayed by CLIA in all maternal and offspring samples and by LC-MS/MS in all offspring samples and a subset of 200 maternal third trimester samples. Results Cord blood 25(OH)D levels were higher as measured by CLIA (mean 37.13 ng/mL [SD 18.30]) than by LC-MS/MS (mean 23.54 ng/mL [SD 11.99]), with a mean positive bias of 13.54 ng/mL (SD 12.92) by Bland-Altman analysis. This positive bias in measurement by CLIA was not observed in maternal samples. Third trimester 25(OH)D was a positive determinant of neonatal 25(OH)D levels. Conclusion Chemiluminescence immunoassays overestimate 25(OH)D levels in human cord blood samples, an effect not observed in maternal blood samples. The quantification of 25(OH)D by CLIA should therefore not be considered valid when assayed in cord blood samples. Third trimester, but not first trimester, maternal 25(OH)D is one of several determinants of neonatal 25(OH)D status.