Graff‐Radford, Jonathan

AbstractBackgroundCo‐morbid Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology in the form of amyloid‐β plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles are frequently observed in people with probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) is an emerging technique to characterize white matter (WM) tissue microstructure, although NODDI alterations and associations with AD biomarkers remain undefined in DLB. The objectives of this study are to compare NODDI and DTI parameters between DLB and controls and (ii) evaluate the pattern of DTI and NODDI changes associated with amyloid and tau deposition.MethodConsecutive patients within the DLB spectrum (n = 45), including probable DLB (n = 32) and probable Mild Cognitive Impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) (n = 13) from the Mayo Clinic ADRC underwent multi‐shell diffusion MRI, [18F]‐Flortaucipir and [11C]‐PiB PET. A comparison group of 45 age‐ and gender‐matched clinically unimpaired controls (CU) was included. Voxelwise non‐parametric permutation models were used to determine pair‐wise group differences and assess the associations of AD biomarkers with fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), tissue‐weighted neurite density index (tNDI; NDI x (1 – Free water fraction)) and orientation dispersion index (ODI), controlling for age. Complementary analyses were performed using regions‐of‐interest (ROI) obtained from the JHU atlas.ResultCompared to CU, the DLB spectrum group exhibited widespread decreases in FA and tNDI and increases in MD and ODI, with the most pronounced effects in the cingulum bundles, uncinate, inferior and superior longitudinal fasciculi (Fig. 1). Greater [18F]‐Flortaucipir uptake was also associated with lower FA and tNDI, and higher MD and ODI in the DLB spectrum compared to CU, independently of age and [11C]‐PiB uptake (Fig. 2). In contrast, no associations were found between [11C]‐PiB uptake and any of the DTI or NODDI parameters. Complementary ROI analyses corroborated these findings.ConclusionWidespread loss of WM integrity was observed on DTI and NODDI in probable DLB and prodromal DLB. These findings were associated with greater cortical tau, but not with amyloid‐β deposition. Although alpha‐synuclein pathology underlies the loss of WM integrity in DLB, amyloid‐independent tau pathology may also be an important influence on white matter integrity within the DLB spectrum.

AbstractBackgroundQuantitative rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RSWA) recorded during polysomnography (PSG) represents loss of normal REM sleep atonia. RSWA is the neurophysiologic signature of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Visually scored RSWA is a candidate biomarker for synucleinopathies. However, visual RSWA scoring requires expert scoring, limiting widespread application. We comparatively analyzed RSWA in DLB and iRBD using the automated Ferri REM Atonia Index (RAI).MethodWe quantitatively analyzed the RAI in 12 DLB and 20 iRBD patients, compared to 20 controls using Hypnolab Software for Sleep Analysis (SWS Soft, Inc, Colognola ai Colli, Italy). PSG data were converted to European Data Format (.EDF), and the submentalis surface electromyogram (EMG) signal was notch‐filtered at 60 Hertz and rectified. Automatically calculated RAI scores were comparatively analyzed across groups (DLB, iRBD, controls) using Kruskal Wallis H tests for group comparisons, and regression analyses determined relationships between diagnosis, age, and sex. Logistic regression ROC determined optimal RAI for distinguishing iRBD from DLB. When interpreting RAI, lower values represent greater amounts of RSWA, and higher values represent more normal REM atonia.ResultMean age was older in DLB than in iRBD or controls (72.6 vs. 68.7 vs. 66.5 years). All 12 DLB participants were men, the iRBD group had 18 men and 2 women, and controls were comprised of 16 men and 4 women. Mean RAI was lowest in DLB (0.46), intermediate in iRBD (0.71) and highest in controls (0.96), indicating a gradient in RSWA amounts from DLB patients (highest) to controls (lowest) (Figure). Regression demonstrated diagnosis independently predicted RAI, controlling for age and sex (adjusted R2 = 0.49, p = 0.0001). The RAI that optimally distinguished iRBD from DLB was 0.46 (specificity 85%, sensitivity 58%, AUC = 0.75).ConclusionThe RAI demonstrated a clear gradient throughout the Lewy body spectrum; highest (indicating lowest RSWA amounts) in controls, intermediate in iRBD, and lowest (indicating greatest RSWA) in DLB. The RAI is a promising, time efficient and broadly applicable candidate biomarker for DLB and iRBD. Automated quantitative RSWA could be a valuable tool for deep phenotyping throughout the Lewy body disease spectrum.

AbstractBackgroundFor blood‐based biomarkers to fulfill their potential to revolutionize diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), additional research in diverse populations remains critical. Here, we analyzed a biracial sample to assess the profiles of blood‐based AD biomarkers and their relationships to cognition and medical comorbidities.MethodsSelf‐reported African‐American (AA; n = 267) and non‐Hispanic White (NHW; n = 268) participants evaluated through the Mayo Jacksonville Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center were matched on age, sex, and clinical diagnosis. Plasma AD biomarkers (Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, GFAP, NfL) were measured using the Quanterix SiMoA HD‐X analyzer. Cognition was assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess for differences in plasma biomarker levels by sex. Linear models tested for associations of race, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and vascular risk factors with plasma AD biomarker levels, covarying for age and sex. Additional models assessed for interactions between race and plasma biomarkers in predicting cognition, further covarying for education.ResultsThe sample included adults aged 43‐100 years, with 69% women. Education was higher in NHW participants (median 16 vs. 12 years, p<0.001). APOE (apolipoprotein E) ε4 positivity was higher in AA participants (43% vs. 34%; p = 0.04). There were no differences in plasma AD biomarker levels between AA and NHW participants. These findings were unchanged after stratifying by cognitive status (unimpaired versus impaired). Although the association between p‐tau181 and cognition appeared stronger in NHW participants while the association between Aβ42/40 and cognition appeared stronger in AA participants, these findings did not survive after excluding individuals with CKD. Women displayed higher GFAP (p = 0.002) and lower p‐tau181 (p = 0.001) levels than men. Diabetes was inversely associated with GFAP levels (p<0.001).ConclusionsIn a biracial, community‐based sample, we observed that sex differences, CKD, and vascular risk factors contributed to variation in plasma AD biomarkers, while self‐reported race did not. Our results reinforce the critical need to account for sex and systemic medical comorbidities in equitably deploying blood‐based AD biomarkers in the general population.

AbstractBackgroundDementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), the second most prevalent form of degenerative dementia, is characterized by pathological α‐synuclein (αSyn) protein aggregation in neurons. Pathological αSyn shows a protein‐seeding phenomenon that may result in aggregation years before clinical symptoms. Studies using Real‐time quaking‐induced conversion (RT‐QuIC) assay show αSyn seeding from peripheral tissue including skin and cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF). Identifying early biomarkers for DLB is essential for accurate diagnosis, and developing effective treatments to slow progression. Herein, we investigate αSyn seeding activities in CSF from patients with mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) phenoconverting to DLB.MethodCSF samples were obtained from 3 MCI‐LB and 2 DLB patients at baseline and two‐year follow‐up appointments. CSF samples were tested for their potential to seed α‐synuclein aggregation using an RT‐QuIC assay. CSF samples were tested by seeding 2 μl of CSF in 98 ul of RT‐QuIC reaction mixture with human recombinant αSyn protein, analyzed on a FLUOstar Omega plate reader. Results were recorded every 30 minutes over a period of 45 hours analyzed based on the reaction kinetics to determine the seeding ability of the α‐synuclein in the CSF samples.ResultWe observed seed amplification at first visit for both DLB patients and one MCI‐LB patient. The absolute quantification of aggregation increased at second visit (2 years apart) for one DLB patient and one MCI‐LB. The other two MCI‐LB patients showed no amplification at baseline visit but showed signal at two‐year visit, by which time all three had phenoconverted to DLB. Interestingly the second DLB patient showed a decline at two‐year follow‐up. The medical and neuroimaging records of that patient indicate that the patient’s cognitive decline began as early‐onset disease (first symptoms at age 50 years).ConclusionWe demonstrate that measures of seed aggregation in CSF with RT‐QuIC are informative in MCI‐LB and DLB, and may also reflect changes in disease progression and dynamics.

AbstractBackgroundPlasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) such as phosphorylated tau protein 181 (p‐tau 181), neurofilament light chain (NfL), amyloid‐β 42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have shown high performance in the discrimination of those with clinical mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia from cognitively unimpaired individuals, but few population‐based autopsy studies have evaluated the neuropathological correlates of plasma biomarkers.MethodWe utilized a population‐based prospective study of 350 participants with autopsy and antemortem plasma biomarker data. Plasma biomarkers Aβ42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL were measured using Quanterix Simoa assays. We predicted AD neuropathological change (ADNC), Braak staging, and neuritic plaque score using these plasma biomarkers and investigated the added utility of cognitive and demographic information. We utilized a variable selection procedure in cross‐validated (CV) logistic regression models by minimizing the Bayesian Information Criterion to identify the best set of predictors for a given outcome among plasma biomarkers, demographic variables, and neuropsychological tests included in the Mayo Clinic Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (Mayo‐PACC).ResultADNC was best predicted with plasma GFAP, NfL, p‐tau181 biomarkers along with APOE ε4 carrier status and Mayo‐PACC cognitive score (CV AUC = 0.821). Braak staging was best predicted using plasma GFAP, p‐tau181, and cognitive scores (CV AUC = 0.788). Neuritic plaque score was best predicted using plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL biomarkers (CV AUC = 0.778). Inclusion of plasma biomarkers demonstrated significantly better prediction of Braak staging (p<0.01) and neuritic plaque score (p<0.01), but not ADNC (p = 0.13), when compared to models that included only cognitive and demographic information. Univariate models consistently underperformed in comparison to multivariate models.ConclusionPlasma biomarkers can provide valuable predictive information about the presence of AD pathology, which can facilitate earlier recognition and diagnosis of AD. Incorporation of demographic and cognitive variables along with plasma variables in multivariable models will improve prediction accuracy of AD pathology, specifically Braak staging and ADNC.

AbstractBackgroundPlasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and neurodegeneration have demonstrated diagnostic utility and associations with AD pathology. Our objective was to map the average trajectories over age of plasma biomarkers and more established biomarkers including cognition, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume.MethodWe included 1731 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 226 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (mean age of 70.3 years; 46.3% female; 14.8 years of mean education) with one or more measurements of amyloid‐PET, MRI with hippocampal volume measurements adjusted for head size (HVa), and plasma biomarkers (Aβ42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL measured using Quanterix Simoa assays). A global cognitive z‐score was created by averaging the z‐scores of memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial domains. Smoothing spline curves were calculated for the values of each variable over age and placed on the same plot. Since each variable has a different scale, the smoothed curves were centered at the predicted value at age 50 and scaled so that a value of 1 would be one standard deviation of the fitted values from ages 50‐80.ResultAt age 50, GFAP and NfL start to increase, and Aβ42/40 was observed to decrease. At age 55, amyloid‐PET and p‐tau181 had a smooth and upward‐curving increase. After age 70, the average values of p‐tau181 increased at a higher rate. Average cognition started declining after 55 years. HVa began to decline after age 60 and then showed a steeper decline at age 72.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that predicted values of plasma GFAP, NfL, and Aβ42/40 across participants begin to change at younger ages than cognitive decline or increases observed in amyloid PET. The changes observed during middle age in GFAP and NfL likely reflect non‐AD pathologies and aging processes, while Aβ42/40 may be a leading indicator of future cerebral amyloidosis. Predicted plasma neurodegenerative biomarkers (GFAP and NfL) begin to change at younger ages than a traditional biomarker of neurodegeneration (HVa). Predicted ptau181 increases were observed in tandem with amyloid PET likely reflecting current amyloid status.

AbstractBackgroundKnowledge of the temporal evolution among plasma Alzheimer’s biomarkers and PET will inform disease pathophysiology and appropriate implementation of plasma biomarkers (Therneau, NeuroImage 2021; Betthauser, Brain 2022). This study investigates the relative timing of progression of plasma p‐tau181, p‐tau217, GFAP, and amyloid PET on individual and population levels.MethodWe included 957 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with clinical diagnoses of cognitively unimpaired (n = 732), MCI (n = 205), and Alzheimer’s clinical syndrome dementia (n = 20). An accelerated failure time (AFT) model was fit with amyloid (PiB) PET, plasma p‐tau217 (Meso Scale Discovery, Lilly), plasma p‐tau181, and GFAP (Simoa, Quanterix HD‐X) as quad‐variate endpoints, and sex, APOE genotype status, and education as covariates. The model output included a per subject adjustment or time‐shift for each biomarker indicating how much earlier or later it was estimated to progress relative to the average participant, the correlation (R) between adjustments for each pair of biomarkers, and the impact of covariates on each biomarker’s timing. Secondly, we estimated progression at a given age for selected cutpoints.ResultTemporal trajectories for each biomarker are shown in Figure 1. Individual‐level adjustments between plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET were highly correlated, R = 0.69(0.64‐0.74); how early or late an individual progressed on plasma p‐tau217 explained 48% of the variation in relative timing of amyloid PET progression. Associations of plasma p‐tau181 and GFAP with amyloid PET individual adjustments were moderate and low, respectively (Figure 2). Using the chosen cutpoints, the estimated order of biomarker progression was GFAP, amyloid PET, plasma p‐tau181, and plasma p‐tau217 (Figure 3).ConclusionOn the individual level, the strong association of the relative timing of progression of plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET supports that these processes are mechanistically related. The relatively lower associations of the timing of p‐tau181 and GFAP with amyloid PET likely reflect a lower biological association and greater measurement noise for p‐tau181. The individual adjustments, the primary output of this model, are independent of cutpoints. On the population level, relative timing of biomarker change is highly dependent on the cutpoints applied. This true for any analysis that employs cutpoints, regardless of the approach.

AbstractBackgroundPredictive models of tau‐PET accumulation have largely relied on the functional connectome to estimate its spatial patterns in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Patterns of global functional organization represent a promising avenue as they encapsulate many biological properties relevant to neurodevelopment, cognition and degeneration. We compared approaches based on local connectivity (from task‐free fMRI) and global organization (from FDG‐PET) to predict regional tau‐PET across AD phenotypes.MethodWe included 430 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals (214 A+T‐, 216 A+T+) and 62 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 64 amnestic AD, 21 dysexecutive AD (dAD), 41 logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and 49 posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) patients (all A+T+) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, and Neurodegenerative Research Groups (referred to as “Mayo cohort”). The connectivity approach consisted of assessing the relationship between a region’s tau level and its functional connectivity to the region of highest tau (epicenter). The global organization approach consisted of 1) performing a principal component analysis on 3000 FDG‐PET images that did not overlap with the Mayo cohort, 2) projecting FDG‐PET images of the Mayo cohort onto the low‐dimensional space generated in Step 1 and extracting corresponding weighted values across the first 100 components, 3) using these weighted values as predictors of regional tau‐PET in a linear model and determining optimal parameters based on predicted R 2 values, and 4) using the parameters from the model built in Step 3 to predict tau‐PET in the ADNI cohort (n = 86) (Fig.2).ResultThe connectivity‐based approach yielded adjusted R 2 values ranging from 0.19‐0.45 across diagnostic groups (Fig.1). The global organization approach yielded averaged adjusted R 2 and predicted R 2 values of 0.71 and 0.63, respectively, in the Mayo cohort. Out‐of‐sample median R 2 in the ADNI cohort was 0.41 (range 0.10‐0.60) (Fig.3).ConclusionAn unbiased approach based on the global functional organization of the brain and using an imaging modality widely used in clinical settings outperformed a connectome‐based one to predict regional tau‐PET across the AD phenotypic spectrum. Patterns of tau accumulation may better relate to the large‐scale physiology of the brain underlying specific mental functions rather than local connectivity factors.

Abstract Background Easily accessible and self‐administered cognitive assessments that can aide early identification of individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia are critical for timely intervention. Mayo Test Drive (MTD) is a remote, self‐administered, multi‐device compatible, web‐based cognitive assessment (Stricker et al., 2022). We investigated continuous associations between MTD and amyloid and tau PET biomarkers and compared the strength of association to PET biomarkers and in‐person cognitive measures. Method 556 adults from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participated (mean age = 70.6; mean education = 16.0 years; 50.7% female; 97.5% white). Participants were predominantly cognitively unimpaired (95.3%; 4.7% had a consensus diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment). Participants completed (1) brain amyloid and tau PET scans, (2) in‐person neuropsychological assessment including Mayo Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease Cognitive Composite (Mayo‐PACC) and Global‐z, and (3) remote MTD comprised of the Stricker Learning Span (SLS) and the Symbols test, which are combined into an MTD composite. Multiple regressions adjusted for age, sex, and education queried associations between imaging biomarkers [amyloid meta‐region of interest (ROI), tau meta‐ROI, and tau entorhinal cortex (EC)‐ROI)] and composite and subtest scores from remote and in‐person measures. Davidson‐Mackinnon J‐test compared R‐squared values of models with remote versus in‐person composites. Result Lower performances on MTD composite and Mayo‐PACC were associated with higher amyloid meta‐ROI (p’s<.05; Table 1). MTD composite was also negatively associated with tau meta‐ROI and EC‐ROI (p’s<.05). For memory measures, SLS sum of trials was negatively associated with tau meta‐ROI (p = .01) and EC‐ROI (p<.001) with no associations between AVLT sum of trials and PET (p’s = .06; Table 2). Among processing speed/executive function measures, worse Trails B performance was associated with higher amyloid meta‐ROI (p<.001). Symbols and Digit Symbol Coding were not associated with PET (p’s = .29). A multivariable model with MTD explained significantly less variance (p = .04) for amyloid meta‐ROI (adjusted R‐squared = 0.165) than a multivariable model with Mayo‐PACC (adjusted R‐squared = 0.176); remote and in‐person composite measures were comparable for other associations (p’s>.05). Conclusion MTD is associated with continuous measures of amyloid and tau PET biomarkers of AD, demonstrating criterion validity for MTD. Several associations were comparable to relationships between gold‐standard in‐person neuropsychological tests and imaging biomarkers.

Abstract Background Brief self‐administered cognitive assessments deployed remotely and combined with plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are well suited to assess clinical symptoms and underlying biology in large‐scale decentralized studies. We investigated whether associations of self‐administered cognitive measures and plasma biomarkers were comparable to associations of in‐person cognitive measures and plasma biomarkers. Method Participants included 327 adults from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (mean age = 70.8; 48% female; mean education = 16.0 years; 96.9% white). Most (94.5%) were cognitively unimpaired; 5.5% had consensus diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Participants completed Mayo Test Drive (MTD; Stricker et al., 2022), a remote, self‐administered, multi‐device compatible web‐based cognitive assessment comprised of the Stricker Learning Span (SLS) and Symbols test that are combined into a MTD composite. Participants also completed in‐person neuropsychological assessment (global‐z; Mayo Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease Cognitive Composite [Mayo‐PACC]) and fasting venipuncture. Plasma was assayed via HD‐X simoa platform for amyloid‐beta (Aß)‐42 and Aß‐40 to create an Aß42/40 ratio, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) using the N4PE Quanterix kit as well as phosphorylated‐tau protein 181 (p‐tau181). P‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL were log10‐transformed. Multiple regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, and education examined associations between plasma biomarkers and composite and subtest scores from remote and in‐person measures. Davidson‐Mackinnon J‐test compared R‐squared values of models with remote versus in‐person composites. Result Lower performances on MTD, global‐z, and Mayo‐PACC (Table 1) were associated with higher GFAP (p’s = .02), NfL (p’s = .003), and p‐tau181 (p’s = .04). For memory, worse SLS and AVLT sum of trials were associated with higher GFAP (p’s = .01) and NfL (p’s = .03). For processing speed/executive function, worse Symbols and Trails B were associated with higher p‐tau181 (p’s = .02). Worse Trails B and Digit Symbol Coding were associated with higher NfL (p’s = .02), and worse Digit Symbol Coding was associated with lower Aß42/40 (p = 0.03; Table 2). A multivariable model with MTD explained significantly more variance (p = .04) for NfL (adjusted R‐squared = 0.461) than a multivariable model with Mayo‐PACC (adjusted R‐squared = 0.447); remote and in‐person composite measures were comparable for other associations (p’s>.05). Conclusion Remote and in‐person composite measures showed comparable associations with AD‐related plasma biomarkers, supporting MTD’s criterion validity.