Køber, Lars

Abstract Introduction To investigate the effect of empagliflozin on right ventricular (RV) function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes and reverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling in HFrEF. The impact on RV function remains uncertain. Methods The Empire HF trial was an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 190 participants with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% or lower, with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I−III symptoms. Participants were randomized to receive either empagliflozin (at a dose of 10 mg once daily) or placebo, on top of recommended therapy for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint of this exploratory substudy was changes in RV free wall strain (RVFWS) across the whole cohort. RVFWS was also stratified into tertiles based on baseline RVFWS. Secondary endpoints included changes in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and RV S’ velocity. Results Between June 2017 and September 2019, a total of 190 patients were enrolled, of whom 160 were included in this substudy. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups (mean age of 64 ± 11 years, 86% male, mean LVEF: 29 ± 8%, 79% in NYHA Class II, 83 patients (52%) had an implanted cardiac device, and tricuspid valve regurgitation was absent/trace in 136 (85%) and mild in 24 (15%)). A high proportion of the population were on optimal medical treatment for HFrEF, and device therapy remained unchanged during follow-up. The overall mean RVFWS was −16.7 ± 6.1%, with the empagliflozin group at −16.4 ± 6.2% and the placebo group at −16.9 ± 5.9%. No differences were observed in RVFWS between the groups. When stratified by baseline RVFWS into tertiles, patients in the lowest tertile demonstrated a significant improvement with empagliflozin (treatment effect: −2.9% [95% CI: −5.0 to −0.3]; P = .027). This finding was independent of LVEF, plasma volume, and weight loss, and remained unchanged after additional adjustment for LV remodelling and the presence of resynchronization therapy. No significant treatment effect was observed in the middle or highest tertiles of RVFWS, nor in the overall or lowest tertiles of TAPSE or RV S’. Conclusion This exploratory substudy of the Empire HF, treatment with empagliflozin exerted no overall effect on RV function in stable HFrEF patients, but significantly improved RVFWS in patients in the lowest tertile of RVFWS after 12 weeks of treatment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Unique Identifier: NCT03198585

Thais Coutinho, 2011 Finalist and Presenting Author

Background: The relationship between blood volume and pressure in the vascular system can be described in terms of unstressed and stressed blood volume. Stressed blood volume determines venous pressure and provides preload back to the heart, which regulates the generation of cardiac output (CO) via the Frank-starling mechanism. Whether sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2i) favorably modifies stressed blood volume is not known. Hypothesis: To investigate the effect of SGLT2i (empagliflozin) on the hemodynamic estimated stressed blood volume (eSBV) in HFrEF patients compared to placebo. Methods: A post hoc analysis of investigator-initiated, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Seventy patients were assigned to empagliflozin of 10 mg or matching placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Patients underwent right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise at baseline and follow-up. Outcome was change in eSBV after 12 weeks of empagliflozin treatment at each level of exercise. We conducted computer-modelling simulations based on invasive hemodynamic assessment to measure eSBV. Results: HFrEF patients with mean age was 57 years, mean ejection fraction 27%, 47 (71%) on diuretics were randomized. After 12 weeks treatment exercise eSBV was significantly reduced at 0 watt, 25 watt and 25 % of maximal exercise watt, compared to placebo [(0 watt; –258 mL, 95% CI –476 to –39, p=0.021); (25 watt; –301 mL, 95% CI –561 to –40, p=0.024); and (25% of peak exercise watt; –262 mL, 95% CI –490 to –34, p=0.024)]. There was no effect on rest, or at peak exercise eSBV [(Rest; –75 ml, 95% confidence interval [CI] –279 to 130; p=0.47); and (Peak; –96 mL, 95% CI –444 to 251, p=0.59)]. This was consistent among patients with and without type 2 diabetes, etiology of HFrEF, and diuretic usage (Figure 1). Conclusion: Empagliflozin may contribute to shift blood from the effective circulatory beds to the venous reservoir in reducing filling pressure and eSBV, but maintaining CO.

Aim There is an association between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and insulin resistance, but less is known about the diabetic continuum, and in particular about pre‐diabetes, in HFpEF. We examined characteristics and outcomes of participants with diabetes or pre‐diabetes in PARAGON‐HF. Methods and results Patients aged ≥50 years with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, structural heart disease and elevated N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) were eligible. Patients were classified according to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c): (i) normal HbA1c, <6.0%; (ii) pre‐diabetes, 6.0%–6.4%; (iii) diabetes, ≥6.5% or history of diabetes. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total heart failure hospitalizations (HFH). Of 4796 patients, 50% had diabetes and 18% had pre‐diabetes. Compared to patients with normal HbA1c, patients with pre‐diabetes and diabetes more often were obese, had a history of myocardial infarction and had lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, while patients with diabetes had more clinical evidence of congestion, but similar NT‐proBNP concentrations. The risks of the primary composite outcome (rate ratio [RR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35–1.88), total HFH (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.39–2.02) and CV death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% CI 1.07–1.71) were higher among patients with diabetes, compared to those with normal HbA1c. Patients with pre‐diabetes had a higher risk (which was intermediate between that of patients with diabetes and those with normal HbA1c) of the primary outcome (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00–1.60) and HFH (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03–1.77), but not of CV death (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.75–1.40). Patients with diabetes treated with insulin had worse outcomes than those not, and those with ‘lean diabetes’ had similar mortality rates to those with a higher body mass index, but lower rates of HFH. Conclusion Pre‐diabetes is common in patients with HFpEF and is associated with worse clinical status and greater risk of HFH. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01920711.

Background: Stressed blood volume (SBV) is a major determinant of systemic and pulmonary venous pressures which, in turn, determine left and right ventricular fillings and regulates cardiac output via the Frank-Starling mechanism. It is not known whether inhibition of the SGLT2 (sodium–glucose cotransporter-2) favorably affects SBV. We investigated the effect of empagliflozin on estimated SBV in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction compared with placebo. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of an investigator-initiated, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Seventy patients were assigned to empagliflozin 10 mg or matching placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Patients underwent right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise at baseline and follow-up. The outcome was change in estimated SBV after 12 weeks of empagliflozin treatment over the full range of exercise, determined using a recently introduced analytical approach based on invasive hemodynamic assessment. Results: Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, mean age, 57 years and mean ejection fraction 27%, with 47 patients (71%) receiving diuretics were randomized. The effect of empagliflozin on estimated SBV over the full range of exercise loads showed a statistically significant reduction compared with placebo (−198.4 mL [95% CI, −317.4 to −79.3] P =0.001), a 9% decrease. The decrease in estimated SBV by empagliflozin was significantly correlated with the decrease in PCWP ( R =−0.33, P <0.0001). The effect of empagliflozin was consistent across subgroup analysis. Conclusions: Empagliflozin treatment significantly reduced SBV compared with placebo after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with stable chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction during sub maximal exercise. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03198585.

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a global public health problem with important regional differences. We investigated these differences in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in HFpEF), the largest and most inclusive global HFpEF trial. Methods: We studied differences in clinical characteristics, outcomes, and treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan in 4796 patients with HFpEF from the PARAGON-HF trial, grouped according to geographic region. Results: Regional differences in patient characteristics and comorbidities were observed: patients from Western Europe were oldest (mean 75±7 years) with the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation/flutter (36%); Central/Eastern European patients were youngest (mean 71±8 years) with the highest prevalence of coronary artery disease (50%); North American patients had the highest prevalence of obesity (65%) and diabetes (49%); Latin American patients were younger (73±9 years) and had a high prevalence of obesity (53%); and Asia-Pacific patients had a high prevalence of diabetes (44%), despite a low prevalence of obesity (26%). Rates of the primary composite end point of total hospitalizations for HF and death from cardiovascular causes were lower in patients from Central Europe (9 per 100 patient-years) and highest in patients from North America (28 per 100 patient-years), which was primarily driven by a greater number of total hospitalizations for HF. The effect of treatment with sacubitril-valsartan was not modified by region (interaction P >0.05). Conclusions: Among patients with HFpEF recruited worldwide in PARAGON-HF, there were important regional differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes, which may have implications for the design of future clinical trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.

Background: To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in HFpEF) comparing sacubitril/valsartan to valsartan in reducing morbidity and mortality. Methods and Results: We report key demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings, and baseline therapies, of 4822 patients randomized in PARAGON-HF, grouped by factors that influence criteria for study inclusion. We further compared baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in PARAGON-HF with those patients enrolled in other recent trials of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Among patients enrolled from various regions (16% Asia-Pacific, 37% Central Europe, 7% Latin America, 12% North America, 28% Western Europe), the mean age of patients enrolled in PARAGON-HF was 72.7±8.4 years, 52% of patients were female, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 57.5%, similar to other trials of HFpEF. Most patients were in New York Heart Association class II, and 38% had ≥1 hospitalizations for heart failure within the previous 9 months. Diabetes mellitus (43%) and chronic kidney disease (47%) were more prevalent than in previous trials of HFpEF. Many patients were prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (85%), β-blockers (80%), calcium channel blockers (36%), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (24%). As specified in the protocol, virtually all patients were on diuretics, had elevated plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (median, 911 pg/mL; interquartile range, 464–1610), and structural heart disease. Conclusions: PARAGON-HF represents a contemporary group of patients with HFpEF with similar age and sex distribution compared with prior HFpEF trials but higher prevalence of comorbidities. These findings provide insights into the impact of inclusion criteria on, and regional variation in, HFpEF patient characteristics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01920711.

Background: In patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction, little is known about the characteristics of, and outcomes in, those with and without diabetes mellitus. Methods: We examined clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and outcomes in the I-Preserve trial (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) according to history of diabetes mellitus. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for cardiovascular outcomes adjusted for known predictors, including age, sex, natriuretic peptides, and comorbidity. Echocardiographic data were available in 745 patients and were additionally adjusted for in supplementary analyses. Results: Overall, 1134 of 4128 patients (27%) had diabetes mellitus. Compared with those without diabetes mellitus, they were more likely to have a history of myocardial infarction (28% versus 22%), higher body mass index (31 versus 29 kg/m 2 ), worse Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score (48 versus 40), higher median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (403 versus 320 pg/mL; all P <0.01), more signs of congestion, but no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with diabetes mellitus had a greater left ventricular mass and left atrial area than patients without diabetes mellitus. Doppler E-wave velocity (86 versus 76 cm/s; P <0.0001) and the E/e’ ratio (11.7 versus 10.4; P =0.010) were higher in patients with diabetes mellitus. Over a median follow-up of 4.1 years, cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 34% of patients with diabetes mellitus versus 22% of those without diabetes mellitus (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.49–2.05), and 28% versus 19% of patients with and without diabetes mellitus died (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.59; confidence interval, 1.33–1.91). Conclusions: In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, patients with diabetes mellitus have more signs of congestion, worse quality of life, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and a poorer prognosis. They also display greater structural and functional echocardiographic abnormalities. Further investigation is needed to determine the mediators of the adverse impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and whether they are modifiable. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00095238.

Background— Diastolic dysfunction is frequently seen after myocardial infarction and is characterized by a disproportionate increase in filling pressure during exercise to maintain stroke volume. We hypothesized that sildenafil would reduce filling pressure during exercise in patients with diastolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Methods and Results— Seventy patients with diastolic dysfunction and near normal left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography were randomly assigned sildenafil 40 mg thrice daily or matching placebo for 9 weeks. Before randomization and after 9 weeks of treatment patients underwent simultaneous echocardiography and right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise. Primary end point was pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and secondary end points comprised cardiac index and pulmonary arterial pressure at rest and during exercise after 9 weeks. After 9 weeks there were no differences in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at rest (13±4 versus 13±3 mm Hg, P =0.25) or at peak exercise (35±8 mm Hg versus 31±7 mm Hg, P =0.07). However, with treatment cardiac index increased at rest ( P =0.006) and peak exercise ( P =0.02) in the sildenafil group, and systemic vascular resistance index (resting, P =0.0002; peak exercise, P =0.007) and diastolic blood pressure (resting, P =0.005; peak exercise, P =0.02) were lower in the sildenafil group. Resting left ventricular end-diastolic volume index increased ( P =0.001) within the sildenafil group but was unchanged in the placebo group. Conclusions— Sildenafil did not decrease filling pressure at rest or during exercise in post–myocardial infarction patients with diastolic dysfunction. However, there were effects on secondary end points, which require further studies. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01046838 . Unique identifier: NCT01046838.

Background— Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (DD) is common after myocardial infarction (MI) despite preservation of left ventricular ejection fraction, yet it remains unclear how or whether DD affects cardiac hemodynamics with stress. Methods and Results— Invasive hemodynamic exercise testing was performed in 46 patients with a recent MI and left ventricular ejection fraction >45% and in 10 healthy volunteers. MI patients were enrolled prospectively and divided into those with DD (MI+DD; left atrial volume index >34 mL/m 2 and diastolic E/e′ ratio>8; n=35) and those without DD (MI–DD; left atrial volume index <34 mL/m 2 and E/e′ ratio<8; n=11). All underwent a supine cycle ergometer test with simultaneous right heart catheterization and echocardiography. At rest, 10 patients in MI+DD (29%) had pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >15 (14±4 mm Hg), whereas none of the MI−DD (10±2 mm Hg) or controls (9±2 mm Hg) displayed pulmonary capillary wedge pressure elevation ( P =0.03). During exercise, an abnormal rise in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (>25 mm Hg) was observed in 94% of MI+DD (36±6 mm Hg) compared with 36% of MI−DD (24±6 mm Hg) and none of the controls (16±6 mm Hg; P <0.0001). Exercise right atrial pressure was the highest in MI+DD followed by MI−DD and control (15±5 versus 9±4 versus 7±5 mm Hg; P <0.001), whereas no difference in cardiac index was found between groups. Conclusions— In post-MI patients with preserved ejection fraction and left ventricular DD, cardiac output with exercise is maintained at the expense of substantially increased filling pressure. DD and loss of diastolic reserve may promote progression from stage B to stage C heart failure after MI. (Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:-451.)