Back to Authors

Jackson, Alice M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-1271

Mayo Clinic

University of Glasgow

Citations 3

Diabetes and pre‐diabetes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
Jackson, Alice M. , Claggett, Brian , Gong, Jianjian , Lefkowitz, Martin, Maggioni, Aldo P. , Martínez, Felipe A. , Pieske, Burkert , Redfield, Margaret M. , Rizkala, Adel R. , Rouleau, Jean L. , Seferović, Petar , Veldhuisen, Dirk J. van , Yılmaz, Mehmet Birhan , Zannad, Faı̈ez , Køber, Lars , Petrie, Mark C. , Solomon, Scott D. , McMurray, John J.V. , McMurray, John J V , Maggioni, Aldo P , Petrie, Mark C , Køber, Lars , Rørth, Rasmus , Liu, Jiankang , Kristensen, Søren Lund , Anand, Inder S. , Cleland, John G.F. , Chopra, Vijay , Desai, Akshay S , Ge, Junbo , Lam, Carolyn S.P. , Packer, Milton , Pfeffer, Marc Alan , Tromp, Jasper , Zile, Michael R. , Jhund, Pardeep S. , Solomon, Scott David

European Journal of Heart Failure | December 17, 2021 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 497-509

10.1002/ejhf.2403 Get It

Aim There is an association between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and insulin resistance, but less is known about the diabetic continuum, and in particular about pre‐diabetes, in HFpEF. We examined characteristics and outcomes of participants with diabetes or pre‐diabetes in PARAGON‐HF. Methods and results Patients aged ≥50 years with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, structural heart disease and elevated N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) were eligible. Patients were classified according to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c): (i) normal HbA1c, <6.0%; (ii) pre‐diabetes, 6.0%–6.4%; (iii) diabetes, ≥6.5% or history of diabetes. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total heart failure hospitalizations (HFH). Of 4796 patients, 50% had diabetes and 18% had pre‐diabetes. Compared to patients with normal HbA1c, patients with pre‐diabetes and diabetes more often were obese, had a history of myocardial infarction and had lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, while patients with diabetes had more clinical evidence of congestion, but similar NT‐proBNP concentrations. The risks of the primary composite outcome (rate ratio [RR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35–1.88), total HFH (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.39–2.02) and CV death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% CI 1.07–1.71) were higher among patients with diabetes, compared to those with normal HbA1c. Patients with pre‐diabetes had a higher risk (which was intermediate between that of patients with diabetes and those with normal HbA1c) of the primary outcome (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00–1.60) and HFH (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03–1.77), but not of CV death (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.75–1.40). Patients with diabetes treated with insulin had worse outcomes than those not, and those with ‘lean diabetes’ had similar mortality rates to those with a higher body mass index, but lower rates of HFH. Conclusion Pre‐diabetes is common in patients with HFpEF and is associated with worse clinical status and greater risk of HFH. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01920711.
Global Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Claggett, Brian , Jackson, Alice M. , Køber, Lars , Chopra, Vijay , Chen, Chen‐Huan , Maggioni, Aldo P. , Martínez, Felipe A. , Pieske, Burkert , Redfield, Margaret M. , Rouleau, Jean L. , Veldhuisen, Dirk J. van , Zannad, Faı̈ez , Rizkala, Adel R. , Inubushi-Molessa, Akiko, Lefkowitz, Martin, Shi, Victor , McMurray, John J.V. , Solomon, Scott D. , Investigators, on behalf of the PARAGON-HF, Maggioni, Aldo P , McMurray, John J V , Køber, Lars , Tromp, Jasper , Liu, Jiankang , Jhund, Pardeep S. , Jr., Jiri Widimsky , Boytsov, S. А. , Anand, Inder S. , Ge, Junbo , Packer, Milton , Pfeffer, Marc Alan , Zile, Michael R. , Solomon, Scott David , Lam, Carolyn S.P. , Investigators, on behalf of the PARAGON-HF

Circulation: Heart Failure | April 19, 2021 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circheartfailure.120.007901 Get It

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a global public health problem with important regional differences. We investigated these differences in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in HFpEF), the largest and most inclusive global HFpEF trial. Methods: We studied differences in clinical characteristics, outcomes, and treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan in 4796 patients with HFpEF from the PARAGON-HF trial, grouped according to geographic region. Results: Regional differences in patient characteristics and comorbidities were observed: patients from Western Europe were oldest (mean 75±7 years) with the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation/flutter (36%); Central/Eastern European patients were youngest (mean 71±8 years) with the highest prevalence of coronary artery disease (50%); North American patients had the highest prevalence of obesity (65%) and diabetes (49%); Latin American patients were younger (73±9 years) and had a high prevalence of obesity (53%); and Asia-Pacific patients had a high prevalence of diabetes (44%), despite a low prevalence of obesity (26%). Rates of the primary composite end point of total hospitalizations for HF and death from cardiovascular causes were lower in patients from Central Europe (9 per 100 patient-years) and highest in patients from North America (28 per 100 patient-years), which was primarily driven by a greater number of total hospitalizations for HF. The effect of treatment with sacubitril-valsartan was not modified by region (interaction P >0.05). Conclusions: Among patients with HFpEF recruited worldwide in PARAGON-HF, there were important regional differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes, which may have implications for the design of future clinical trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.
Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Women Compared With Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction
McMurray, John J.V. , Jackson, Alice M. , Redfield, Margaret M. , Lefkowitz, Marty , Maggioni, Aldo P. , Martínez, Felipe A. , Pieske, Burkert , Rizkala, Adel R. , Sabarwal, Shalini V., Shah, Amil M. , Shi, Victor , Veldhuisen, Dirk J. van , Zannad, Faı̈ez , Zile, Michael R. , Čikeš, Maja , Gonçalvesová, Eva , Katova, Tzvetana, Kosztin, Anamaria, Lelonek, Małgorzata , Sweitzer, Nancy K. , Claggett, Brian , Solomon, Scott D. , Felker, G. Michael , Kosztin, Annamária , Zile, Michael R , Maggioni, Aldo P , McMurray, John J V , Shah, Amil , Lam, Carolyn S.P. , Anand, Inder S. , Ge, Junbo , Packer, Milton , Pfeffer, Marc Alan , Shah, Sanjiv J , Vardeny, Orly , Jhund, Pardeep S. , Solomon, Scott David

Circulation | November 17, 2019 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 338-351

10.1161/circulationaha.119.044491 Get It

Background: Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there is no approved treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the predominant phenotype in women. Therefore, there is a greater heart failure therapeutic deficit in women compared with men. Methods: In a prespecified subgroup analysis, we examined outcomes according to sex in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), which compared sacubitril-valsartan and valsartan in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The primary outcome was a composite of first and recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. We also report secondary efficacy and safety outcomes. Results: Overall, 2479 women (51.7%) and 2317 men (48.3%) were randomized. Women were older and had more obesity, less coronary disease, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide) levels than men. For the primary outcome, the rate ratio for sacubitril-valsartan versus valsartan was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59–0.90) in women and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.84–1.25) in men ( P interaction = 0.017). The benefit from sacubitril-valsartan was attributable to reduction in heart failure hospitalization. The improvement in New York Heart Association class and renal function with sacubitril-valsartan was similar in women and men, whereas the improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score was less in women than in men. The difference in adverse events between sacubitril-valsartan and valsartan was similar in women and men. Conclusions: As compared with valsartan, sacubitril-valsartan seemed to reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization more in women than in men. Whereas the possible sex-related modification of the effect of treatment has several potential explanations, the present study does not provide a definite mechanistic basis for this finding. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01920711.