Agarwal, Shreshta

Background/Objectives: Precocious puberty (PP), defined as the onset of secondary sexual characteristics before 8 years in girls and 9 years in boys, is associated with psychosocial distress, compromised adult height, and long-term metabolic risk. Early identification remains challenging, as current diagnostic approaches are largely reactive and rely on invasive or resource-intensive testing. This narrative review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) can support earlier risk prediction and detection of PP through integration of clinical, hormonal, imaging, lifestyle, and environmental data. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published between 2005 and 2025. Eligible studies included original research and high-quality reviews that examined AI-based approaches, such as machine learning and deep learning, in pediatric endocrinology, particularly for the prediction or diagnosis of central or peripheral precocious puberty. Studies incorporating clinical, hormonal, radiological, lifestyle, environmental, or multi-omics data relevant to AI modeling were included. Results: AI models, including XGBoost, random forest, convolutional neural networks, and regression-based approaches, have demonstrated potential utility in predicting central precocious puberty using hormonal, imaging, and growth data. Reported applications include automated bone age assessment, lifestyle and dietary risk stratification, and exploratory use of wearable-derived behavioral data. However, progress is limited by small pediatric datasets, population bias, limited interpretability, and unresolved ethical challenges related to privacy, consent, and equity. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence represents a promising decision-support approach for earlier, non-invasive, and individualized risk assessment in precocious puberty. Future progress will depend on the integration of longitudinal, multimodal data, the development of ethical models, and interdisciplinary collaboration among pediatric endocrinologists, data scientists, and public health stakeholders.

Hypertension has been traditionally known to be highlighted by mean blood pressure; however, emerging evidence exhibits that blood pressure variability (BPV), including short-term, day-to-day, and visit-to-visit fluctuations can have an implication across multiple body systems. Elevated BPV reflects repetitive hemodynamic stress, affecting the physiologic hemostasis contributing to vascular injury and end organ damage. This narrative review is a compilation of recent evidence on the prognostic value of BPV, explained by pathophysiology, various devices with its measurement approaches, and, essentially, the clinical implication of BPV and the use of such devices utilizing artificial intelligence. A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were conducted, focusing on observational studies, cohorts, randomized trials, and meta-analyses. Higher BPV has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, coronary events, and heart failure, the progression of chronic kidney disease, cognitive decline, and preeclampsia, among other end organ damage, despite mean blood pressure. The various pathophysiologic mechanisms include autonomic dysregulation, arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, circadian rhythm alteration, and systemic inflammation, which result in vascular remodeling and multisystem damage. Antihypertensive medications such as calcium channel blockers and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors seem to reduce BPV; randomized trials have not specifically investigated their BPV-reducing effects. The aim of this review is to highlight that BPV is a dynamic marker of multisystem risk, and question how various AI-based devices can aid continuous BPV monitoring and patient specific risk stratification.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 10% of all cancer cases. Despite the proven effectiveness of conventional screening modalities such as colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), their invasive nature, high cost, and limited patient compliance hinder widespread adoption. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and bowel sound-based signal processing have enabled non-invasive approaches for gastrointestinal diagnostics. Among these, bowel sound analysis—historically considered subjective—has reemerged as a promising biomarker using digital auscultation and machine learning. Objective: This review explores the potential of AI-powered bowel sound analytics for early detection, screening, and characterization of colorectal cancer. It aims to assess current methodologies, summarize reported performance metrics, and highlight translational opportunities and challenges in clinical implementation. Methods: A narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the terms colorectal cancer, bowel sounds, phonoenterography, artificial intelligence, and non-invasive diagnosis. Eligible studies involving human bowel sound-based recordings, AI-based sound analysis, or machine learning applications in gastrointestinal pathology were reviewed for study design, signal acquisition methods, AI model architecture, and diagnostic accuracy. Results: Across studies using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), gradient boosting, and transformer-based models, reported diagnostic accuracies ranged from 88% to 96%. Area under the curve (AUC) values were ≥0.83, with F1 scores between 0.71 and 0.85 for bowel sound classification. In CRC-specific frameworks such as BowelRCNN, AI models successfully differentiate abnormal bowel sound intervals and spectral patterns associated with tumor-related motility disturbances and partial obstruction. Distinct bowel sound-based signatures—such as prolonged sound-to-sound intervals and high-pitched “tinkling” proximal to lesions—demonstrate the physiological basis for CRC detection through bowel sound-based biomarkers. Conclusions: AI-driven bowel sound analysis represents an emerging, exploratory research direction rather than a validated colorectal cancer screening modality. While early studies demonstrate physiological plausibility and technical feasibility, no large-scale, CRC-specific validation studies currently establish sensitivity, specificity, PPV, or NPV for cancer detection. Accordingly, bowel sound analytics should be viewed as hypothesis-generating and potentially complementary to established screening tools, rather than a near-term alternative to validated modalities such as FIT, multitarget stool DNA testing, or colonoscopy.