Back to Authors

Goyal, Bipasha

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Prospective of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Management Using Bowel Sounds Leveraging Artificial Intelligence
Sood, Divyanshi, Dadwal, Surbhi, Jain, Samiksha , Mazhar, Iqra, Goyal, Bipasha, Garapati, Chris Alex Wesley, Patel, Sagar , RIAZ, ZENAB MUHAMMAD, Buzaboon, Noor, Mendiratta, Ayushi, Kaur, Avneet , Yerrapragada, Gayathri, Elangovan, Poonguzhali, Shariff, Mohammed Naveed , Natarajan, T.K. , Janarthanan, Jayarajasekaran, Agarwal, Shreshta, Wilson, Sancia Mary Jerold, Ghosh, Atishya, Karuppiah, Shiva Sankari, Agarwal, Joshika, Gopalakrishnan, Keerthy, Rapolu, Swetha, Akshintala, Venkata S. , Arunachalam, Shivaram P. , Elangovan, Poonguzhali , Mazhar, Iqra Jabeen , Garapati, Chris, Elangovan, Poonguzhali , Shariff, Mohammad Naveed , Natarajan, Thangeswaran , Agarwal, Shreshta , Jerold Wilson, Sancia Mary, Akshintala, Venkata , Arunachalam, S P , Dadwal, Surbhi , Mendiratta, Ayushi, Mohan, Anmol , Yerrapragada, Gayathri

Cancers | January 21, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 340

10.3390/cancers18020340 Get It

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 10% of all cancer cases. Despite the proven effectiveness of conventional screening modalities such as colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), their invasive nature, high cost, and limited patient compliance hinder widespread adoption. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and bowel sound-based signal processing have enabled non-invasive approaches for gastrointestinal diagnostics. Among these, bowel sound analysis—historically considered subjective—has reemerged as a promising biomarker using digital auscultation and machine learning. Objective: This review explores the potential of AI-powered bowel sound analytics for early detection, screening, and characterization of colorectal cancer. It aims to assess current methodologies, summarize reported performance metrics, and highlight translational opportunities and challenges in clinical implementation. Methods: A narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the terms colorectal cancer, bowel sounds, phonoenterography, artificial intelligence, and non-invasive diagnosis. Eligible studies involving human bowel sound-based recordings, AI-based sound analysis, or machine learning applications in gastrointestinal pathology were reviewed for study design, signal acquisition methods, AI model architecture, and diagnostic accuracy. Results: Across studies using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), gradient boosting, and transformer-based models, reported diagnostic accuracies ranged from 88% to 96%. Area under the curve (AUC) values were ≥0.83, with F1 scores between 0.71 and 0.85 for bowel sound classification. In CRC-specific frameworks such as BowelRCNN, AI models successfully differentiate abnormal bowel sound intervals and spectral patterns associated with tumor-related motility disturbances and partial obstruction. Distinct bowel sound-based signatures—such as prolonged sound-to-sound intervals and high-pitched “tinkling” proximal to lesions—demonstrate the physiological basis for CRC detection through bowel sound-based biomarkers. Conclusions: AI-driven bowel sound analysis represents an emerging, exploratory research direction rather than a validated colorectal cancer screening modality. While early studies demonstrate physiological plausibility and technical feasibility, no large-scale, CRC-specific validation studies currently establish sensitivity, specificity, PPV, or NPV for cancer detection. Accordingly, bowel sound analytics should be viewed as hypothesis-generating and potentially complementary to established screening tools, rather than a near-term alternative to validated modalities such as FIT, multitarget stool DNA testing, or colonoscopy.
Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Liquid Biopsy and Radiomics in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Detection: A Precision Oncology Paradigm
Cherukuri, Swathi Priya , Kaur, Anmolpreet , Goyal, Bipasha, Kukunoor, Hanisha Reddy , Sahito, Areesh Fatima, Sachdeva, Pratyush , Yerrapragada, Gayathri, Poonguzhali, E. , Shariff, Mohammed Naveed , Natarajan, T.K. , Janarthanan, Jayarajasekaran, Richard, Samuel, Venkatesaprasath, Shakthidevi Pallikaranai, Karuppiah, Shiva Sankari, Iyer, Vivek , Helgeson, Scott A. , Arunachalam, Shivaram P. , Kaur, Anmolpreet , Natarajan, Thangeswaran , Pallikaranai Venkatesaprasath, Shakthidevi, Iyer, Vivek N , Arunachalam, S P , Helgeson, Scott A , Shariff, Mohammad Naveed , Sahito, Areesh Fatima , Natarajan, Thangeswaran

Cancers | September 29, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 3165

10.3390/cancers17193165 Get It

Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, largely due to delayed diagnosis in its early stages. While conventional diagnostic tools like low-dose CT and tissue biopsy are routinely used, they suffer from limitations including invasiveness, radiation exposure, cost, and limited sensitivity for early-stage detection. Liquid biopsy, a minimally invasive alternative that captures circulating tumor-derived biomarkers such as ctDNA, cfRNA, and exosomes from body fluids, offers promising diagnostic potential—yet its sensitivity in early disease remains suboptimal. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and radiomics are poised to bridge this gap. Objective: This review aims to explore how AI, in combination with radiomics, enhances the diagnostic capabilities of liquid biopsy for early detection of lung cancer and facilitates personalized monitoring strategies. Content Overview: We begin by outlining the molecular heterogeneity of lung cancer, emphasizing the need for earlier, more accurate detection strategies. The discussion then transitions into liquid biopsy and its key analytes, followed by an in-depth overview of AI techniques—including machine learning (e.g., SVMs, Random Forest) and deep learning models (e.g., CNNs, RNNs, GANs)—that enable robust pattern recognition across multi-omics datasets. The role of radiomics, which quantitatively extracts spatial and morphological features from imaging modalities such as CT and PET, is explored in conjunction with AI to provide an integrative, multimodal approach. This convergence supports the broader vision of precision medicine by integrating omics data, imaging, and electronic health records. Discussion: The synergy between AI, liquid biopsy, and radiomics signifies a shift from traditional diagnostics toward dynamic, patient-specific decision-making. Radiomics contributes spatial information, while AI improves pattern detection and predictive modeling. Despite these advancements, challenges remain—including data standardization, limited annotated datasets, the interpretability of deep learning models, and ethical considerations. A push toward rigorous validation and multimodal AI frameworks is necessary to facilitate clinical adoption. Conclusion: The integration of AI with liquid biopsy and radiomics holds transformative potential for early lung cancer detection. This non-invasive, scalable, and individualized diagnostic paradigm could significantly reduce lung cancer mortality through timely and targeted interventions. As technology and regulatory pathways mature, collaborative research is crucial to standardize methodologies and translate this innovation into routine clinical practice.