Adler, Charles H.

AbstractBackgroundYoung‐onset multiple system atrophy (YOMSA) is defined as the onset of multiple system atrophy (MSA) before the age of 40 years old. YOMSA is rare and there is much uncertainty of the phenotype and natural history in patients with YOMSA.ObjectiveThe objective is to evaluate the characteristics and disease course of patients with YOMSA.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with MSA who were evaluated at all Mayo Clinic sites from 1998 to 2021. We identified patients with YOMSA and evaluated clinical characteristics, autonomic function testing results, and disease course.ResultsOf 1496 patients with a diagnosis of clinically probable or clinically established MSA, 20 patients had YOMSA. The median age of onset was 39.1 (interquartile range [IQR] = 37.1, 40.1) years; 13 patients (65%) were male. MSA‐parkinsonism was the most common subtype (65%). The median duration of symptom onset to YOMSA diagnosis was 4.9 (IQR = 3.7, 9) years. At the time of medical record review, 17 patients were deceased with a median survival of 8.3 (IQR = 7, 10.9) years. Univariate analysis showed that initial onset of autonomic failure predicted unfavorable survival (hazard ratio = 2.89, P = 0.04) compared to those who presented with motor impairment only at onset. At the time of YOMSA diagnosis, composite autonomic severity score was available in 19 patients with a median of 5 (IQR = 4, 6.5).ConclusionsYOMSA resembles MSA in most aspects including phenotype and prognosis, although the diagnosis is usually delayed. The presence of autonomic failure at symptom onset may be a poor predictor for survival.

ImportanceNomenclature in the field of neurodegenerative diseases presents a challenging problem. Inconsistent use of terms such as Alzheimer disease and dementia has compromised progress in clinical care, research, and development of therapeutics. Dementia-associated stigma further contributes to inconsistent and imprecise language. The result is a lack of clarity that produces confusion with patients and the general public and presents communication challenges among researchers. Therefore, the Advisory Council on Research, Care, and Services of the National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease authorized a committee to make recommendations for improvement.ObjectiveTo establish a systematic neurodegenerative disease framework for information collection and communication to standardize language usage for research, clinical, and public health purposes.Evidence ReviewThe Dementia Nomenclature Initiative organized into 3 major stakeholder working groups: clinicians, researchers, and the public (including individuals living with dementia and family caregivers). To inform the work, the initiative completed a narrative literature review of dementia nomenclature evolution over the last century across the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Scopus databases (January 1, 2000, through July 31, 2020). Initiative working groups used the results as a foundation for understanding current challenges with dementia nomenclature and implications for research, clinical practice, and public understanding. The initiative obtained additional input via focus groups with individuals living with dementia and caregivers, with separate groups for race and ethnicity (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, and White) as an initial assessment of the meaning of dementia-related terms to these groups.FindingsFrom working group deliberations, the literature review, and focus group input, the initiative developed a framework clearly separating the clinical syndromic presentation experienced by affected individuals from possible underlying pathophysiologies. In the framework, domains of clinical impairment, such as cognitive, behavioral, motor, and other neurologic features, are graded by level of impairment between none and severe. Next, biomarker information describes underlying disease processes, explains the syndrome, and identifies possible disease labels: Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal degeneration, dementia with Lewy bodies, or vascular cognitive impairment dementia.Conclusions and RelevanceThe Dementia Nomenclature Initiative established a framework to guide communication about cognitive impairment among older adults. Wider testing and refinement of the framework will subsequently improve the information used in communicating about cognitive impairment and the way in which the information is used in clinical, research, and public settings.

ImportanceParkinsonism and Parkinson disease (PD) are known to result from repetitive head impacts from boxing. Repetitive head impacts from American football may also be associated with increased risk of neurodegenerative pathologies that cause parkinsonism, yet in vivo research on the association between football play and PD is scarce and limited by small samples and equivocal findings.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between football participation and self-reported parkinsonism or PD diagnosis.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study leveraged data from the online Fox Insight study. Participants completed online questionnaires and self-reported whether they currently had a diagnosis of Parkinson disease or parkinsonism by a physician or other health care professional. In November 2020, the Boston University Head Impact Exposure Assessment was launched for data collection on repetitive head impacts. Data used for this manuscript were obtained from the Fox Insight database on June 9, 2022. A total of 1875 men who endorsed playing any organized sport were included. Former athletes were divided into those who participated in football (n = 729 [38.9%]) and those who participated in other sports (reference group).ExposuresSelf-reported participation in football, duration and level of football play, age at first exposure.Main Outcomes and MeasuresLogistic regression tested associations between PD status and history of football play, duration of football play, highest level played, and age at first exposure, controlling for age, education, history of diabetes or heart disease, body mass index, history of traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, and family history of PD.ResultsIn this sample of 1875 men (mean [SD] age, 67.69 [9.84] years) enriched for parkinsonism or PD (n = 1602 [85.4%]), 729 (38.9%) played football (mean [SD] duration, 4.35 [2.91] years). History of playing football was associated with higher odds of having a parkinsonism or PD diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.19-2.17). Among the entire sample, longer duration of play was associated with higher odds of having a parkinsonism or PD diagnosis (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19). Among football players, longer duration of football play (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.23) and higher level of play (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.28-6.73) were associated with higher odds of having parkinsonism or PD.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of participants enriched for PD, participation in football was associated with higher odds of having a reported parkinsonism or PD diagnosis.

Abstract INTRODUCTION We examined the progression of extrapyramidal symptoms and signs in autopsy‐confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), and Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD). METHODS Longitudinal data were obtained from Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease, with PDD ( n = 98), AD ( n = 47) and DLB ( n = 48) further sub‐grouped as with or without parkinsonism (DLB+ and DLB−). Within‐group Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) ‐II and UPDRS‐III trajectories were analyzed using non‐linear mixed effects models. RESULTS In DLB, 65.6% had parkinsonism. Baseline UPDRS‐II and III scores (off‐stage) were highest ( P < 0.001) for PDD (mean ± SD 14.3 ± 7.8 and 27.4 ± 16.3), followed by DLB+ (6.0 ± 8.8 and 17.2 ± 17.1), DLB− (1.1 ± 1.3 and 3.3 ± 5.5) and AD (3.2 ± 6.1 and 8.2 ± 13.6). Compared to PDD, the DLB+ group had faster UPDRS‐III progression over 8‐years (Cohen's‐ d range 0.98 to 2.79, P < 0.001), driven by gait ( P < 0.001) and limb bradykinesia ( P = 0.02) subscales. DISCUSSION Motor deficits progress faster in DLB+ than PDD, providing insights about expected changes in motor function. Highlights Dementia with Lewy bodies has faster motor progression than Parkinson's disease dementia Linear and non‐linear mixed modeling analysis of longitudinal data was utilized Findings have implications for clinical prognostication and trial design

Abstract Cerebral white matter rarefaction (CWMR) was considered by Binswanger and Alzheimer to be due to cerebral arteriolosclerosis. Renewed attention came with CT and MR brain imaging, and neuropathological studies finding a high rate of CWMR in Alzheimer disease (AD). The relative contributions of cerebrovascular disease and AD to CWMR are still uncertain. In 1181 autopsies by the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND), large-format brain sections were used to grade CWMR and determine its vascular and neurodegenerative correlates. Almost all neurodegenerative diseases had more severe CWMR than the normal control group. Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that Braak neurofibrillary stage was the strongest predictor of CWMR, with additional independently significant predictors including age, cortical and diencephalic lacunar and microinfarcts, body mass index, and female sex. It appears that while AD and cerebrovascular pathology may be additive in causing CWMR, both may be solely capable of this. The typical periventricular pattern suggests that CWMR is primarily a distal axonopathy caused by dysfunction of the cell bodies of long-association corticocortical projection neurons. A consequence of these findings is that CWMR should not be viewed simply as “small vessel disease” or as a pathognomonic indicator of vascular cognitive impairment or vascular dementia.