Brady, Mark F.

Abstract Purpose: We hypothesized that mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 improve outcomes for ovarian carcinoma patients treated with platinum therapy and would impact the relative benefit of adding prolonged bevacizumab. Experimental Design: We sequenced DNA from blood and/or neoplasm from 1,195 women enrolled in GOG-0218, a randomized phase III trial in advanced ovarian carcinoma of bevacizumab added to carboplatin and paclitaxel. Defects in HRR were defined as damaging mutations in 16 genes. Proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative hazards for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 1,195 women with ovarian carcinoma, HRR mutations were identified in 307 (25.7%). Adjusted hazards for progression and death compared with those without mutations were lower for women with non-BRCA HRR mutations [HR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57–0.94; P = 0.01 for PFS; HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50–0.90; P = 0.007 for OS] and BRCA1 mutations (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66–0.97; P = 0.02 for PFS; HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.94; P = 0.01 for OS) and were lowest for BRCA2 mutations (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40–0.67; P < 0.0001 for PFS; HR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25–0.53; P < 0.0001 for OS). A test of interaction showed no difference in the effect of bevacizumab on PFS between cases with and without mutations. Conclusions: HRR mutations, including non-BRCA genes, significantly prolong PFS and OS in ovarian carcinoma and should be stratified for in clinical trials. The benefit of adding bevacizumab was not significantly modified by mutation status. Clin Cancer Res; 24(4); 777–83. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Somatic mosaic mutation in the PPM1D gene have been associated with risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Somatic mosaic mutations in blood cells may be associated with older age and chemotherapy exposure. We wanted to determine if somatic mosaic mutations in PPM1D and in other genes are associated with older age and repeated exposure to chemotherapy, rather than a contributor to risk of disease. Experimental design: We used targeted capture and massively parallel genomic sequencing to sequence DNA from PBMCs from affected patients for PPM1D as well as 60 other DNA repair genes. For a number of samples with PPM1D mutations, we re-sequenced at greater depth on patients where PBMCs that were collected at diagnosis and recurrence. Results: We identified somatic mosaic mutations in exon 6 of PPM1D in 4 out of 474 (0.8%) individuals that were newly diagnosed and had no previous chemotherapy, in 3 out of 29 (10%) individuals newly diagnosed but receiving chemotherapy and in 58 of 274 (21%) individuals with relapsed platinum resistant ovarian cancer (p<0.0001). The presence of PPM1D mutations in exon 6 was strongly associated with more advanced age (p=0.011, Wilcoxon test) and more than one chemotherapy regimen (p=0.026, Fisher's exact test). In paired blood samples from 13 patients, PPM1D mutations present at relapse were either not detected or detected at a lower percentage compared to blood obtained soon after diagnosis. Somatic mosaic mutations were also identified in TP53 in 7 of 274 (2.5%) women with relapsed platinum resistant cancer. In one of these cases, we had an earlier blood sample from diagnosis in which the mutation was not present at time near diagnosis. Conclusion: We found that somatic mosaic PPM1D mutations in PMBCs are associated with advanced age and repeated exposure to chemotherapy. Mosaic mutations in other genes were not confirmed with the exception of TP53, for which mutations are also detectable after extensive treatment. It seems likely that mosaic PPM1D mutations in blood from cancer patients may be a result of selection by chemotherapy of age-induced somatic mutations during exposure to chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these mutations. Citation Format: Maria I. Harrell, Barbara M. Norquist, Tom Walsh, Mark F. Brady, Ming K. Lee, Robert Hershberg, Kimberly R. Kalli, Heather Lankes, Eric Q. Konnick, Colin C. Pritchard, Bradley J. Monk, John K. Chan, Robert Burger, Scott H. Kaufmann, Michael J. Birrer, Elizabeth M. Swisher. Old age and chemotherapy contribute to the selection of PPM1D somatic mosaic mutations in ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B71.

Purpose: To determine if increasing the dose of paclitaxel increases the probability of clinical response, progression-free survival, or overall survival in women who have persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer, and whether doubling the dose of prophylactic filgrastim accompanying the higher paclitaxel dose decreases the frequency of neutropenic fever. Patients and Methods: Consenting patients with persistent, recurrent, or progressing ovarian cancer, despite first-line platinum therapy (but no prior taxane), were randomly assigned to paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, 175 mg/m2, or 250 mg/m2 over 24 hours every 3 weeks. Patients receiving paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 were also randomly assigned to 5 or 10 μg/kg of filgrastim per day subcutaneously. Results: Accession to the paclitaxel 135-mg/m2 arm was closed early. Among the 271 patients on the other regimens with measurable disease, partial and complete response on paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 (36%) was significantly higher than on 175 mg/m2 (27%, P = .027). This difference was more evident among patients who never responded to prior platinum. However, progression-free and overall survival results were similar. The median durations of overall survival were 13.1 and 12.3 months for paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and 250 mg/m2, respectively. Thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and myalgia were greater with paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 (P < .05). The incidence of neutropenic fever after the first cycle of paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 was 19% and 18% on the 5-μg/kg and 10-μg/kg filgrastim dose, respectively (22% for paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 without filgrastim). Conclusion: Paclitaxel exhibits a dose effect with regard to response rate, but there is more toxicity and no survival benefit to justify paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 plus filgrastim. Doubling the filgrastim dose from 5 to 10 μg/kg did not reduce the probability of neutropenic fever after high-dose paclitaxel.