Chan, John K.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Patients with ROC have limited treatment options in later lines of therapy, as many become platinum-resistant or -ineligible. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) treatment is one option, however these agents are currently not approved for BRCAwt patients in the treatment setting. Niraparib, a PARPi, has demonstrated increased progression-free survival vs placebo as maintenance therapy for platinum-responsive ROC. Niraparib was effective regardless of BRCAmut or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, although an increased treatment effect was observed in the HRDpos population. QUADRA (NCT02354586) evaluated niraparib treatment in heavily pretreated ROC patients, regardless of BRCAmut or HRD status, platinum sensitivity, or prior PARPi use. METHODS: Eligible patients had grade 2-3 serous ROC, ≥3 prior chemotherapy lines, and measurable disease. Patients were evaluated for BRCAmut and HRD status (MyChoice HRD Test). Patients received niraparib 300 mg once daily until progression; dose could be lowered to 200 mg or 100 mg due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 in patients treated in 4th or 5th line who were HRDpos, platinum sensitive, and PARPi naïve. RESULTS: 463 patients were treated. Of these, 161 were platinum refractory, 151 platinum resistant, and 120 platinum sensitive to their last line of platinum therapy. Of note, 83 patients were primary platinum resistant or refractory (42 and 41, respectively). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 2-16), and 27% of patients were treated in 6th or later line. 100% of patients received prior platinum, 99.6% received prior taxane, 81% received prior doxorubicin, 63% received prior bevacizumab, and 59% received prior gemcitabine. In the primary efficacy population (N=45), ORR was 29% (95% CI: 16-44, P=0.0003), disease control rate (DCR) was 71% (95% CI: 56-84), and duration of response (DOR) was 9.2 months (95% CI: 5.9-NE); overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI: 18.5-NE). The efficacy outcomes in all 456 patients with measurable disease at baseline treated in 4th or later line demonstrated a DCR of 49% with 2 complete responses (CR), 36 partial responses (PR), and 187 patients with stable disease (SD). The responses were durable with a median DOR of 9.4 months, a clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) at 16 weeks of 29%, and median OS of 17.2 months (95% CI: 14.9-19.8) among all patients treated in 4th or later line. 266 (57.5%) patients had grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAEs. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia event (thrombocytopenia or decreased platelet count) by dose at onset of the event was 27.5% at 300 mg, 4.7% at 200 mg, and 2.7% at 100 mg. The other most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia (26.3%) and neutropenia (8.2%). Hematologic TEAEs were most frequent in the first month and decreased in frequency and severity after dose reduction during months 2-3. CONCLUSIONS: Niraparib demonstrated durable anticancer activity in this heavily treated (≥3 lines) ROC population, including platinum-resistant or BRCAwt patients. Toxicities were consistent with previous niraparib studies. DISCLOSURE Funded by TESARO, Inc. Citation Format: Kathleen Moore, Angeles Secord, Melissa Geller, David Miller, Noelle Cloven, Gini Fleming, Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Masoud Azodi, Paul Disilvestro, Amit Oza, Mihaela Cristea, Jonathan S. Berek, John Chan, Yong Li, Kaiming Sun, Katarina Luptakova, Ursula A. Matulonis, Bradley J. Monk. QUADRA: A PHASE 2, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-ARM STUDY TO EVALUATE SINGLE-AGENT NIRAPARIB TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OVARIAN CANCER (ROC) WHO HAVE RECEIVED ≥3 PRIOR CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 13-15, 2018; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(22 Suppl):Abstract nr NT-101.

Abstract Purpose: Somatic mosaic mutation in the PPM1D gene have been associated with risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Somatic mosaic mutations in blood cells may be associated with older age and chemotherapy exposure. We wanted to determine if somatic mosaic mutations in PPM1D and in other genes are associated with older age and repeated exposure to chemotherapy, rather than a contributor to risk of disease. Experimental design: We used targeted capture and massively parallel genomic sequencing to sequence DNA from PBMCs from affected patients for PPM1D as well as 60 other DNA repair genes. For a number of samples with PPM1D mutations, we re-sequenced at greater depth on patients where PBMCs that were collected at diagnosis and recurrence. Results: We identified somatic mosaic mutations in exon 6 of PPM1D in 4 out of 474 (0.8%) individuals that were newly diagnosed and had no previous chemotherapy, in 3 out of 29 (10%) individuals newly diagnosed but receiving chemotherapy and in 58 of 274 (21%) individuals with relapsed platinum resistant ovarian cancer (p<0.0001). The presence of PPM1D mutations in exon 6 was strongly associated with more advanced age (p=0.011, Wilcoxon test) and more than one chemotherapy regimen (p=0.026, Fisher's exact test). In paired blood samples from 13 patients, PPM1D mutations present at relapse were either not detected or detected at a lower percentage compared to blood obtained soon after diagnosis. Somatic mosaic mutations were also identified in TP53 in 7 of 274 (2.5%) women with relapsed platinum resistant cancer. In one of these cases, we had an earlier blood sample from diagnosis in which the mutation was not present at time near diagnosis. Conclusion: We found that somatic mosaic PPM1D mutations in PMBCs are associated with advanced age and repeated exposure to chemotherapy. Mosaic mutations in other genes were not confirmed with the exception of TP53, for which mutations are also detectable after extensive treatment. It seems likely that mosaic PPM1D mutations in blood from cancer patients may be a result of selection by chemotherapy of age-induced somatic mutations during exposure to chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these mutations. Citation Format: Maria I. Harrell, Barbara M. Norquist, Tom Walsh, Mark F. Brady, Ming K. Lee, Robert Hershberg, Kimberly R. Kalli, Heather Lankes, Eric Q. Konnick, Colin C. Pritchard, Bradley J. Monk, John K. Chan, Robert Burger, Scott H. Kaufmann, Michael J. Birrer, Elizabeth M. Swisher. Old age and chemotherapy contribute to the selection of PPM1D somatic mosaic mutations in ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B71.