Back to Authors

King, Mary‐Claire

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-1743

Mayo Clinic

University of Washington

Citations 2

BRCA1, BRCA2 , and Associated Cancer Risks and Management for Male Patients
Shevach, Jeffrey , Castro, Elena , Couch, Fergus J. , Domchek, Susan M., Eeles, Rosalind A. , Lin, Daniel W., Morgan, Todd M. , Offit, Kenneth, Schaeffer, Edward M. , Szymaniak, Brittany M. , Eeles, Rosalind A , Morgan, Todd M , Cheng, Heather H. , Couch, Fergus J. , Giri, Veda N. , Hall, Michael J. , King, Mary‐Claire , Lin, Daniel W., Loeb, Stacy , Offit, Kenneth, Pritchard, Colin C. , Vassy, Jason L. , Katona, Bryson W , Maxwell, Kara N.

JAMA Oncology | July 25, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1272

10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2185 Get It

Importance Half of all carriers of inherited cancer-predisposing variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are male, but the implications for their health are underrecognized compared to female individuals. Germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (also known as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, referred to here as BRCA1/2 PVs) are well known to significantly increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers in female carriers, and knowledge of BRCA1/2 PVs informs established cancer screening and options for risk reduction. While risks to male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs are less characterized, there is convincing evidence of increased risk for prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer in males. There has also been a rapid expansion of US Food and Drug Administration–approved targeted cancer therapies, including poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, for breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers associated with BRCA1/2 PVs. Observations This narrative review summarized the data that inform cancer risks, targeted cancer therapy options, and guidelines for early cancer detection. It also highlighted areas of emerging research and clinical trial opportunities for male BRCA1/2 PV carriers. These developments, along with the continued relevance to family cancer risk and reproductive options, have informed changes to guideline recommendations for genetic testing and strengthened the case for increased genetic testing for males. Conclusions and Relevance Despite increasing clinical actionability for male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs, far fewer males than female individuals undergo cancer genetic testing. Oncologists, internists, and primary care clinicians should be vigilant about offering appropriate genetic testing to males. Identifying more male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs will maximize opportunities for cancer early detection, targeted risk management, and cancer treatment for males, along with facilitating opportunities for risk reduction and prevention in their family members, thereby decreasing the burden of hereditary cancer.
Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes and Outcomes in Ovarian Carcinoma Patients in GOG 218: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
Norquist, Barbara M. , Brady, Mark F. , Harrell, Maria I., Lee, Ming K. , Bernards, Sarah S., Casadei, Silvia , Burger, Robert A. , Tewari, Krishnansu S. , Mannel, Robert S., Bailey, Cheryl L., Rubin, Stephen C. , Soper, John T. , Lankes, Heather A. , Ramirez, Nilsa C. , King, Mary‐Claire , Birrer, Michael J. , Swisher, Elizabeth M. , Glaser, Gretchen , Swisher, Elizabeth M , Walsh, Tom D. , Gülsüner, Süleyman , Backes, Floor , Norquist, Barbara

Clinical Cancer Research | November 30, 2017 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 777-783

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1327 Get It

Abstract Purpose: We hypothesized that mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 improve outcomes for ovarian carcinoma patients treated with platinum therapy and would impact the relative benefit of adding prolonged bevacizumab. Experimental Design: We sequenced DNA from blood and/or neoplasm from 1,195 women enrolled in GOG-0218, a randomized phase III trial in advanced ovarian carcinoma of bevacizumab added to carboplatin and paclitaxel. Defects in HRR were defined as damaging mutations in 16 genes. Proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative hazards for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 1,195 women with ovarian carcinoma, HRR mutations were identified in 307 (25.7%). Adjusted hazards for progression and death compared with those without mutations were lower for women with non-BRCA HRR mutations [HR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57–0.94; P = 0.01 for PFS; HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50–0.90; P = 0.007 for OS] and BRCA1 mutations (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66–0.97; P = 0.02 for PFS; HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.94; P = 0.01 for OS) and were lowest for BRCA2 mutations (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40–0.67; P < 0.0001 for PFS; HR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25–0.53; P < 0.0001 for OS). A test of interaction showed no difference in the effect of bevacizumab on PFS between cases with and without mutations. Conclusions: HRR mutations, including non-BRCA genes, significantly prolong PFS and OS in ovarian carcinoma and should be stratified for in clinical trials. The benefit of adding bevacizumab was not significantly modified by mutation status. Clin Cancer Res; 24(4); 777–83. ©2017 AACR.